Maxime Tardieu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Maxime Tardieu has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
B. Bordet
Service d’imagerie médicale, clinique du Parc, 155 bis, boulevard Stalingrad, 69006 Lyon, France
2 shared publicationsJ.-B. Pialat
Pavillon B radiologie, hopital Édouard-Herriot, 5, place d’Arsonval, 69437 Lyon cedex 03, France
2 shared publicationsJ.-F. Luciani
Pavillon A, médecine du sport, hopital Édouard-Herriot, 5, place d’Arsonval, 69437 Lyon cedex 03, France
2 shared publications- Marie-Annick Le Pogam
Affiliation Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
2 shared publications - Alexandre Parpaleix
Milvue, 29, Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
1 shared publication - Aymeric Guibal
Department of Radiology, Perpignan Hospital, 20 Av. du Languedoc, 66000 Perpignan, France
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Automatic Weight-Bearing Foot Series Measurements Using Deep Learning
Background: Foot deformities, particularly hallux valgus, significantly impact patients’ quality of life. Conventional radiographs are essential for their assessment, but manual measurements are time-consuming and variable. This study assessed the reliability of a deep learning-based solution (Milvue, France) that automates podiatry angle measurements from radiographs compared to manual measurements made by radiologists. Methods: A retrospective, non-interventional study at Perpignan Hospital analyzed the weight-bearing foot radiographs of 105 adult patients (August 2017–August 2022). The deep learning (DL) model’s measurements were compared to those of two radiologists for various angles (M1-P1, M1-M2, M1-M5, and P1-P2 for Djian–Annonier, calcaneal slope, first metatarsal slope, and Meary–Tomeno angles). Statistical analyses evaluated DL performance and inter-observer variability. Results: Of the 105 patients included (29 men and 76 women; mean age 55), the DL solution showed excellent consistency with manual measurements, except for the P1-P2 angle. The mean absolute error (MAE) for the frontal view was lowest for M1-M2 (0.96°) and highest for P1-P2 (3.16°). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated excellent agreement for M1-P1, M1-M2, and M1-M5. For the lateral view, the MAE was 0.92° for calcaneal pitch and 2.83° for Meary–Tomeno, with ICCs ≥ 0.93. For hallux valgus detection, accuracy was 94%, sensitivity was 91.1%, and specificity was 97.2%. Manual measurements averaged 203 s per patient, while DL processing was nearly instantaneous. Conclusions: The DL solution reliably automates foot alignment assessments, significantly reducing time without compromising accuracy. It may improve clinical efficiency and consistency in podiatric evaluations.
Open AccessAutomatic Weight-Bearing Foot Series Measurements Using Deep Learning
Background: Foot deformities, particularly hallux valgus, significantly impact patients’ quality of life. Conventional radiographs are essential for their assessment, but manual measurements are time-consuming and variable. This study assessed the reliability of a deep learning-based solution (Milvue, France) that automates podiatry angle measurements from radiographs compared to manual measurements made by radiologists. Methods: A retrospective, non-interventional study at Perpignan Hospital analyzed the weight-bearing foot radiographs of 105 adult patients (August 2017–August 2022). The deep learning (DL) model’s measurements were compared to those of two radiologists for various angles (M1-P1, M1-M2, M1-M5, and P1-P2 for Djian–Annonier, calcaneal slope, first metatarsal slope, and Meary–Tomeno angles). Statistical analyses evaluated DL performance and inter-observer variability. Results: Of the 105 patients included (29 men and 76 women; mean age 55), the DL solution showed excellent consistency with manual measurements, except for the P1-P2 angle. The mean absolute error (MAE) for the frontal view was lowest for M1-M2 (0.96°) and highest for P1-P2 (3.16°). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated excellent agreement for M1-P1, M1-M2, and M1-M5. For the lateral view, the MAE was 0.92° for calcaneal pitch and 2.83° for Meary–Tomeno, with ICCs ≥ 0.93. For hallux valgus detection, accuracy was 94%, sensitivity was 91.1%, and specificity was 97.2%. Manual measurements averaged 203 s per patient, while DL processing was nearly instantaneous. Conclusions: The DL solution reliably automates foot alignment assessments, significantly reducing time without compromising accuracy. It may improve clinical efficiency and consistency in podiatric evaluations.
- 31 May 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Journal de Radiologie
- Vol. 92 (5) , 475
Erratum à « Évaluation de la laxité antérieure du genou en IRM : la laxi-IRM » [J Radiol 2011;92:208–25]
- 31 May 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Journal de Radiologie
- Vol. 92 (5) , 475
Erratum à « Évaluation de la laxité antérieure du genou en IRM : la laxi-IRM » [J Radiol 2011;92:208–25]
- 31 March 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Journal de Radiologie
- Vol. 92 (3) , 208-225
Évaluation de la laxité antérieure du genou en IRM : la laxi-IRM
- 31 March 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Journal de Radiologie
- Vol. 92 (3) , 208-225
Évaluation de la laxité antérieure du genou en IRM : la laxi-IRM