Kang-Seok Lee
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Kang-Seok Lee has a total of 48 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ju-Seong Jung
Hanyang Univ, Innovat Durable Bldg & Infrastruct Res Ctr, Ansan 15588, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
16 shared publications Bok-Gi Lee
7 shared publications- Bok-Gi Lee
Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Korea
6 shared publications Ju-Seong Jung
Department of Energy and Fire Protect, Chungwoon University, Incheon, South Korea
5 shared publicationsChang-Geun Cho
Chosun University
3 shared publicationsHo-Yeon Kim
Chosun University
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 4 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
- Vol. 24 (7) , 5181-5222
Seismic evaluation of existing low- to mid-rise RC buildings strengthened by a new external steel frame connected with an innovative EWSF joint device
- 4 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
- Vol. 24 (7) , 5181-5222
Seismic evaluation of existing low- to mid-rise RC buildings strengthened by a new external steel frame connected with an innovative EWSF joint device
- 24 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Structures
- Vol. 82
Proposal of design equation for bond strength for beam rebar passing through interior beam-column joint
- 24 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Structures
- Vol. 82
Proposal of design equation for bond strength for beam rebar passing through interior beam-column joint
- 6 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Building Engineering
- Vol. 115
Experimental study on hysteretic behaviors of low-yield point steel plate shear wall frames
- 6 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Building Engineering
- Vol. 115
Experimental study on hysteretic behaviors of low-yield point steel plate shear wall frames
- 1 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Structures
- Vol. 77
Seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete columns using finite element-based nonlinear dynamic analysis
- 1 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Structures
- Vol. 77
Seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete columns using finite element-based nonlinear dynamic analysis
- 30 November 2024
- Published by Wiley in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
- Vol. 54 (2) , 724-746
Seismic Safety Evaluation of a Full‐Size Reinforced Concrete Frame Infilled With Precast Modular Reinforced Blocks Using Pseudo‐Dynamic Testing and Nonlinear Dynamic Finite Element Analysis
This study proposes a novel seismic retrofitting method involving a reinforced concrete (R/C) frame infilled with precast modular reinforced blocks (PMRBs) to address the limitations of conventional infilling techniques. The retrofitting system for the R/C frame infilled with PMRB maximizes the advantages of factory‐produced modular reinforcement blocks, considerably improving the constructability and joint integrity between the existing frame and the reinforcement, without substantially increasing the structural weight. Moreover, this approach uses a typical frame‐infilling method to enhance lateral load capacity, simplifying the calculation of the required amount of seismic reinforcement; thus, it is ideal for R/C buildings with non‐seismic detailing dominated by shear failure because it helps secure the necessary strength. A pseudo‐dynamic test was conducted using a full‐scale two‐story frame test specimen, based on an existing R/C building with non‐seismic detailing, to verify the restoring force characteristics, strength‐increasing effects, reinforcement strain and seismic response control capabilities of the PMRB frame‐infilling system. Nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to compare and estimate the results of the pseudo‐dynamic test. The study results showed that the average deviation ratio for the seismic response load and displacement between the nonlinear dynamic FEA and the pseudo‐dynamic test was approximately 10%, indicating similar outcomes. Under a design basis earthquake of 200 cm/s2 in seismic intensity, the unreinforced R/C frame experienced shear failure, whereas the PMRB‐reinforced frame sustained only minor earthquake damage, even under seismic accelerations of a maximum considered earthquake of 300 cm/s2 and a large‐scale earthquake of 400 cm/s2. Thus, the newly developed PMRB frame‐infilling system shows great promise for seismic reinforcement.
- 30 November 2024
- Published by Wiley in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
- Vol. 54 (2) , 724-746
Seismic Safety Evaluation of a Full‐Size Reinforced Concrete Frame Infilled With Precast Modular Reinforced Blocks Using Pseudo‐Dynamic Testing and Nonlinear Dynamic Finite Element Analysis
This study proposes a novel seismic retrofitting method involving a reinforced concrete (R/C) frame infilled with precast modular reinforced blocks (PMRBs) to address the limitations of conventional infilling techniques. The retrofitting system for the R/C frame infilled with PMRB maximizes the advantages of factory‐produced modular reinforcement blocks, considerably improving the constructability and joint integrity between the existing frame and the reinforcement, without substantially increasing the structural weight. Moreover, this approach uses a typical frame‐infilling method to enhance lateral load capacity, simplifying the calculation of the required amount of seismic reinforcement; thus, it is ideal for R/C buildings with non‐seismic detailing dominated by shear failure because it helps secure the necessary strength. A pseudo‐dynamic test was conducted using a full‐scale two‐story frame test specimen, based on an existing R/C building with non‐seismic detailing, to verify the restoring force characteristics, strength‐increasing effects, reinforcement strain and seismic response control capabilities of the PMRB frame‐infilling system. Nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to compare and estimate the results of the pseudo‐dynamic test. The study results showed that the average deviation ratio for the seismic response load and displacement between the nonlinear dynamic FEA and the pseudo‐dynamic test was approximately 10%, indicating similar outcomes. Under a design basis earthquake of 200 cm/s2 in seismic intensity, the unreinforced R/C frame experienced shear failure, whereas the PMRB‐reinforced frame sustained only minor earthquake damage, even under seismic accelerations of a maximum considered earthquake of 300 cm/s2 and a large‐scale earthquake of 400 cm/s2. Thus, the newly developed PMRB frame‐infilling system shows great promise for seismic reinforcement.
- 29 September 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 587-594
Seismic Response Analysis of Seismic Isolated Building and Production Test Results of Isolation Devices
- 29 September 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 587-594
Seismic Response Analysis of Seismic Isolated Building and Production Test Results of Isolation Devices