Jasmine Soriano

Background: Understanding and addressing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy is crucial to informing vaccination outreach strategies and achieving high vaccination coverage. Marin County, California, United States, has a history of vaccine hesitancy regarding childhood vaccinations required for school entry. Objectives: We aimed to describe and address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Marin County to inform outreach and messaging. Our objectives were to identify subgroups with high COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy early in distribution, better understand local concerns and feedback about the COVID-19 vaccine distribution process, and inform tailored vaccine messaging to increase vaccination confidence and coverage. Methods: The survey, which was administered from January 3 to May 10, 2021, queried demographics, vaccine acceptance, reasons for hesitancy, and reasons for acceptance. Open-ended questions were used for respondents to report additional reasons for hesitancy and for general feedback about the vaccine distribution process. We conducted quantitative and qualitative analyses stratified by COVID-19 vaccine acceptance to identify subgroups with high hesitancy. Results were shared weekly in real-time with leadership and key community partners working on vaccine outreach. Results: Among the 5,618 survey responses, there were differences in vaccine hesitancy by sociodemographic characteristics with the highest hesitancy reported among subgroups identifying as Black/African American and young adult, and within the lowest family income grouping. The most common reason for vaccine hesitancy was “uncertain about the side effects of the vaccine” (67.3% endorsement) and responses varied by race and ethnicity. Qualitative data revealed equity-related, vaccine distribution, and vaccine access themes that were not present in structured responses. Vaccine hesitancy survey results were paired with vaccination coverage and COVID-19 case data to inform tailored outreach strategies and priorities week-to-week. Conclusions: Marin County had some of the highest COVID-19 vaccination rates in the United States during the pandemic and met equity goals aimed at ensuring vulnerable populations received vaccinations. Presenting real-time survey findings with leadership and key community partners informed a timely and tailored COVID-19 vaccine outreach and delivery strategy.

Earlier uncertain implications of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the pediatric population prompted the authorities to close schools worldwide under the premise that school settings would serve as drivers of an increase in the cases of COVID-19. Safe and equitable full-in-person school instruction is a critical factor in the continued educational gains of children and for their general well-being. The objective of this study was to report epidemiological trends related to the increasing percentage of students returning to in-person instruction, the suspected in-school transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), the virus that causes COVID-19, and countywide COVID-19 case rates during the first 21 weeks of school reopening in Marin County, CA, in the fall of 2020. The institutional review board (IRB) approval was waived for this study as it did not involve any identifiable human subjects data. Retrospective electronic reviews of countywide COVID-19 daily case count and COVID-19-related reports associated with in-person school participants from 77 schools in Marin County, CA, from September 8, 2020, to January 29, 2021, were conducted. The data were made available in collaboration with the Marin County Office of Education (MCOE) and Marin County Department of Health and Human Services (Marin HHS). Descriptive trends analyses were performed to determine whether the phased increase of students attending in-person learning was a significant contributor to countywide COVID-19 incidence rate, crude rate, and in-school COVID-19 viral transmission. This is the first long retrospective study of COVID-19 data among the reopened school population during the second half of the first pandemic year. It was conducted in a 21-week surveillance period involving an immense collaboration between Marin County’s public health officials and school administrators. Over the 21-week observational period involving 17,639 students, 4,938 school staff, and 899,175 student days, the countywide COVID-19 crude rate decreased (from 89.9 to 35.89 per 10,000) as more students returned to in-person learning. The schools’ strict adherence to public health guidance and site-specific safety plans against COVID-19 yielded a significantly reduced incidence rate of 0.84% among in-person learning participants; only nine cases were traced to suspected in-school SARS-CoV-2 transmission by way of rigorous contact tracing. The countywide COVID-19 incidence rate was 2.09%. It is possible to minimize COVID-19 transmissions in in-person learning settings with cohesive mitigation strategies, specifically strict adherence to proper masking by students and staff while on school grounds. There is no clear correlation that the increasing phased return of students to in-person school drove an increase in countywide COVID-19 cases in Marin County, CA. Our findings revealed that schools were capable of safely resuming operations by following public health orders and recommendations. The increasing percentage of students returning to in-person school did not drive an increased COVID-19 case rate in the community. On the contrary, this analysis revealed that there was a drop in countywide COVID-19 cases as the phased student return percentage increased.

Childhood environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure is a risk factor for adverse health outcomes and may disproportionately burden lower socioeconomic status groups, exacerbating health disparities. We explored associations of demographic factors, stressful life events, and chemical co-exposures, with cotinine levels, among girls in the CYGNET Study. Data were collected from families of girls aged 6–8 years old in Northern California, through clinic exams, questionnaires and biospecimens (n = 421). Linear regression and factor analysis were conducted to explore predictors of urinary cotinine and co-exposure body burdens, respectively. In unadjusted models, geometric mean cotinine concentrations were higher among Black (0.59 ug/g creatinine) than non-Hispanic white (0.27), Asian (0.32), or Hispanic (0.34) participants. Following adjustment, living in a rented home, lower primary caregiver education, and lack of two biologic parents in the home were associated with higher cotinine concentrations. Girls who experienced parental separation or unemployment in the family had higher unadjusted cotinine concentrations. Higher cotinine was also associated with higher polybrominated diphenyl ether and metals concentrations. Our findings have environmental justice implications as Black and socio-economically disadvantaged young girls experienced higher ETS exposure, also associated with higher exposure to other chemicals. Efforts to reduce ETS and co-exposures should account for other disparity-related factors.