Kim S. Mews
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Kim S. Mews has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Reza Barati
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
2 shared publications - Anil Misra
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, USA
1 shared publication - Frank Wuttke
Geomechanics and Geotechnics, Kiel University, Ludewig-Meyn-Straße 10, 24118 Kiel, Germany
1 shared publication - Hem Bahadur Motra
Institute of Geosciences, Marine and Land Geomechanics and Geotechnics, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany
1 shared publication - Luka Hansen
Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
1 shared publication Mustafa M. Alhubail
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66046, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 16 July 2021
- Published by ASME International
From Peak Force Quantitative Nanomechanical Mapping Measurements to Triaxial Testing - a Comparative Study of Geomechanical Properties of Clay-Rich Carbonates
*The assessment of geomechanical properties of unconventional reservoirs is significant as they assist in placing horizontal wells in optimum locations for multi-stage hydraulic fracturing treatments. However, the mineralogical variability of shale, the deviation in mechanical properties, the scope of testing and the available sample size vary from formation to formation. This
- 16 July 2021
- Published by ASME International
Open AccessFrom Peak Force Quantitative Nanomechanical Mapping Measurements to Triaxial Testing - a Comparative Study of Geomechanical Properties of Clay-Rich Carbonates
*The assessment of geomechanical properties of unconventional reservoirs is significant as they assist in placing horizontal wells in optimum locations for multi-stage hydraulic fracturing treatments. However, the mineralogical variability of shale, the deviation in mechanical properties, the scope of testing and the available sample size vary from formation to formation. This
- Open Access
- 19 July 2019
- Published by MDPI AG in Geosciences
- Vol. 9 (7) , 319
A Review of Brittleness Index Correlations for Unconventional Tight and Ultra-Tight Reservoirs
Rock brittleness is pivotal in the development of the unconventional reservoirs. However, the existence of various methods of calculating the brittleness index (BI) such as the mineral-based brittleness index (MBI), the log-based brittleness index (LBI), and the elastic-based brittleness index (EBI) lead to inconclusive estimations of the brittleness index. Hence, in this work, the existing correlations are applied on prolific unconventional plays in the U.S. such as the Marcellus, Bakken, Niobrara, and Chattanooga Formation to examine the various BI methods. A detailed comparison between the MBI, LBI, and EBI has also been conducted. The results show that a universal correlation cannot be derived in order to define brittleness since it is a function of lithology. Correlation parameters vary significantly from one shale play to another. Nevertheless, an overall trend shows that abundant quartz and carbonates content yield high brittleness values, while the high clay content and porosity lower the rock brittleness.
- 19 July 2019
- Published by MDPI AG in Geosciences
- Vol. 9 (7) , 319
Open AccessA Review of Brittleness Index Correlations for Unconventional Tight and Ultra-Tight Reservoirs
Rock brittleness is pivotal in the development of the unconventional reservoirs. However, the existence of various methods of calculating the brittleness index (BI) such as the mineral-based brittleness index (MBI), the log-based brittleness index (LBI), and the elastic-based brittleness index (EBI) lead to inconclusive estimations of the brittleness index. Hence, in this work, the existing correlations are applied on prolific unconventional plays in the U.S. such as the Marcellus, Bakken, Niobrara, and Chattanooga Formation to examine the various BI methods. A detailed comparison between the MBI, LBI, and EBI has also been conducted. The results show that a universal correlation cannot be derived in order to define brittleness since it is a function of lithology. Correlation parameters vary significantly from one shale play to another. Nevertheless, an overall trend shows that abundant quartz and carbonates content yield high brittleness values, while the high clay content and porosity lower the rock brittleness.