Kim S. Mews

Kim S. Mews

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Kim S. Mews has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    From Peak Force Quantitative Nanomechanical Mapping Measurements to Triaxial Testing - a Comparative Study of Geomechanical Properties of Clay-Rich Carbonates

    by Kim Mews, Mustafa Alhubail, Luka Hansen, Hem B. Motra, Frank Wuttke, Qiang Ye, Anil Misra, Reza Barati Ghahfarokhi

    *The assessment of geomechanical properties of unconventional reservoirs is significant as they assist in placing horizontal wells in optimum locations for multi-stage hydraulic fracturing treatments. However, the mineralogical variability of shale, the deviation in mechanical properties, the scope of testing and the available sample size vary from formation to formation. This

  • Open Access

    A Review of Brittleness Index Correlations for Unconventional Tight and Ultra-Tight Reservoirs

    by Kim S. Mews, Mustafa M. Alhubail, Reza Gh. Barati

    Rock brittleness is pivotal in the development of the unconventional reservoirs. However, the existence of various methods of calculating the brittleness index (BI) such as the mineral-based brittleness index (MBI), the log-based brittleness index (LBI), and the elastic-based brittleness index (EBI) lead to inconclusive estimations of the brittleness index. Hence, in this work, the existing correlations are applied on prolific unconventional plays in the U.S. such as the Marcellus, Bakken, Niobrara, and Chattanooga Formation to examine the various BI methods. A detailed comparison between the MBI, LBI, and EBI has also been conducted. The results show that a universal correlation cannot be derived in order to define brittleness since it is a function of lithology. Correlation parameters vary significantly from one shale play to another. Nevertheless, an overall trend shows that abundant quartz and carbonates content yield high brittleness values, while the high clay content and porosity lower the rock brittleness.