Edward C. Stone
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Edward C. Stone has a total of 173 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alan C. Cummings
California Institute of Technology
18 shared publications - Mark E. Wiedenbeck
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
15 shared publications - Eric Richard Christian
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
14 shared publications - Richard Alvin Mewaldt
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
13 shared publications A. C. Cummings
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
12 shared publications- Richard A. Leske
California Institute of Technology
12 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 October 2025
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 992 (2) , 218
Erratum: “Galactic Cosmic Rays in the Local Interstellar Medium: Voyager 1 Observations and Model Results” (2016, ApJ, 831, 18)
- 17 October 2025
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 992 (2) , 218
Open AccessErratum: “Galactic Cosmic Rays in the Local Interstellar Medium: Voyager 1 Observations and Model Results” (2016, ApJ, 831, 18)
- Open Access
- 1 September 2023
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 954 (2) , 220
Erratum: “The Isotopic Abundances of Galactic Cosmic Rays with Atomic Number 29 ≤ Z ≤ 38” (2022, ApJ, 936, 13)
- 1 September 2023
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 954 (2) , 220
Open AccessErratum: “The Isotopic Abundances of Galactic Cosmic Rays with Atomic Number 29 ≤ Z ≤ 38” (2022, ApJ, 936, 13)
- Open Access
- 25 August 2022
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 936 (1) , 13
The Isotopic Abundances of Galactic Cosmic Rays with Atomic Number 29 ≤ Z ≤ 38
The Cosmic Ray Isotope Spectrometer (CRIS) on the Advanced Composition Explorer spacecraft has been operating successfully in a halo orbit about the L1 Lagrange point since late 1997. We report here the isotopic composition of the Galactic cosmic ray (GCR) elements with 29 ≤ Z ≤ 38 derived from more than 20 years of CRIS data. Using a model of cosmic-ray transport in the Galaxy and the solar system (SS), we have derived from these observations the isotopic composition of the accelerated material at the GCR source (GCRS). Comparison of the isotopic fractions of these elements in the GCRS with corresponding fractions in the solar system gives no indication of GCRS enrichment in r-process isotopes. Since a large fraction of core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) occur in OB associations, the fact that GCRs do not contain enhanced abundances of r-process nuclides indicates that CCSNe are not the principal source of lighter (Z ≤ 38) r-process nuclides in the solar system. This conclusion supports recent work that points to binary neutron-star mergers, rather than supernovae, as the principal source of galactic r-process isotopes.
- 25 August 2022
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 936 (1) , 13
Open AccessThe Isotopic Abundances of Galactic Cosmic Rays with Atomic Number 29 ≤ Z ≤ 38
The Cosmic Ray Isotope Spectrometer (CRIS) on the Advanced Composition Explorer spacecraft has been operating successfully in a halo orbit about the L1 Lagrange point since late 1997. We report here the isotopic composition of the Galactic cosmic ray (GCR) elements with 29 ≤ Z ≤ 38 derived from more than 20 years of CRIS data. Using a model of cosmic-ray transport in the Galaxy and the solar system (SS), we have derived from these observations the isotopic composition of the accelerated material at the GCR source (GCRS). Comparison of the isotopic fractions of these elements in the GCRS with corresponding fractions in the solar system gives no indication of GCRS enrichment in r-process isotopes. Since a large fraction of core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) occur in OB associations, the fact that GCRs do not contain enhanced abundances of r-process nuclides indicates that CCSNe are not the principal source of lighter (Z ≤ 38) r-process nuclides in the solar system. This conclusion supports recent work that points to binary neutron-star mergers, rather than supernovae, as the principal source of galactic r-process isotopes.
- Open Access
- 15 July 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Space Science Reviews
- Vol. 218 (5) , 1-58
Galactic Cosmic Rays Throughout the Heliosphere and in the Very Local Interstellar Medium
We review recent observations and modeling developments on the subject of galactic cosmic rays through the heliosphere and in the Very Local Interstellar Medium, emphasizing knowledge that has accumulated over the past decade. We begin by highlighting key measurements of cosmic-ray spectra by Voyager, PAMELA, and AMS and discuss advances in global models of solar modulation. Next, we survey recent works related to large-scale, long-term spatial and temporal variations of cosmic rays in different regimes of the solar wind. Then we highlight new discoveries from beyond the heliopause and link these to the short-term evolution of transients caused by solar activity. Lastly, we visit new results that yield interesting insights from a broader astrophysical perspective.
- 15 July 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Space Science Reviews
- Vol. 218 (5) , 1-58
Open AccessGalactic Cosmic Rays Throughout the Heliosphere and in the Very Local Interstellar Medium
We review recent observations and modeling developments on the subject of galactic cosmic rays through the heliosphere and in the Very Local Interstellar Medium, emphasizing knowledge that has accumulated over the past decade. We begin by highlighting key measurements of cosmic-ray spectra by Voyager, PAMELA, and AMS and discuss advances in global models of solar modulation. Next, we survey recent works related to large-scale, long-term spatial and temporal variations of cosmic rays in different regimes of the solar wind. Then we highlight new discoveries from beyond the heliopause and link these to the short-term evolution of transients caused by solar activity. Lastly, we visit new results that yield interesting insights from a broader astrophysical perspective.
- 1 October 2021
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Vol. 919 (2) , L28
Using Magnetic Flux Conservation to Determine Heliosheath Speeds
The heliosheath (HSH) radial speeds at Voyager 2 (V2) derived from the plasma instrument (PLS) and from particle instruments using the Compton–Getting (CG) effect are different. At V2 the CG speeds are more variable than the plasma speeds and decrease about 2 yr before the heliopause. We use magnetic flux conservation to differentiate between these two speed profiles at V2, comparing the magnetic flux observed at 1 au and in the HSH. For V2 the PLS speed profile is significantly more consistent with magnetic flux conservation than the CG speeds. For Voyager 1 (V1), we present new V R derivations from the Cosmic Ray Subsystem (CRS) using the CG method that agree reasonably well with those previously obtained from the low energy charged particle (LECP) instrument. If we use the V2 PLS speed profile to calculate the magnetic flux at V1, we again find much better agreement than if we use the V1 CG speeds. These results suggest that the radial speeds derived from particle anisotropy observations in the HSH are not reliable.
- 1 October 2021
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Vol. 919 (2) , L28
Using Magnetic Flux Conservation to Determine Heliosheath Speeds
The heliosheath (HSH) radial speeds at Voyager 2 (V2) derived from the plasma instrument (PLS) and from particle instruments using the Compton–Getting (CG) effect are different. At V2 the CG speeds are more variable than the plasma speeds and decrease about 2 yr before the heliopause. We use magnetic flux conservation to differentiate between these two speed profiles at V2, comparing the magnetic flux observed at 1 au and in the HSH. For V2 the PLS speed profile is significantly more consistent with magnetic flux conservation than the CG speeds. For Voyager 1 (V1), we present new V R derivations from the Cosmic Ray Subsystem (CRS) using the CG method that agree reasonably well with those previously obtained from the low energy charged particle (LECP) instrument. If we use the V2 PLS speed profile to calculate the magnetic flux at V1, we again find much better agreement than if we use the V1 CG speeds. These results suggest that the radial speeds derived from particle anisotropy observations in the HSH are not reliable.
- Open Access
- 2 June 2021
- Published by EDP Sciences in Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Vol. 650, L5
Time evolution of stream interaction region energetic particle spectra in the inner heliosphere
We analyze an energetic proton event associated with a stream interaction region (SIR) that was observed at Parker Solar Probe on day 320 of 2018 when the spacecraft was just 0.34 AU from the Sun. Using the Integrated Science Investigation of the Sun instrument suite, we perform a spectral analysis of the event and show how the observed spectra evolve over the course of the event. We find that the spectra from the first day of the event are much more consistent with local acceleration at a weak compression, while spectra from later on are more typical of SIR-related events in which particles accelerated at distant shocks dominate. After the first day, the spectra remain approximately constant, which indicates that the modulation of energetic particles during transit from the presumed source region is weaker than previously thought. We argue that these observations can be explained by a sub-Parker spiral magnetic field structure connecting the spacecraft to a source region in the SIR that is relatively close to the Sun. We further propose that acceleration at weak, pre-shock compressions likely plays an important role in observations of SIR-related events in the inner heliosphere and that future modelling of such events should consider acceleration all along the compression region, not just at the distant shock region.
- 2 June 2021
- Published by EDP Sciences in Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Vol. 650, L5
Open AccessTime evolution of stream interaction region energetic particle spectra in the inner heliosphere
We analyze an energetic proton event associated with a stream interaction region (SIR) that was observed at Parker Solar Probe on day 320 of 2018 when the spacecraft was just 0.34 AU from the Sun. Using the Integrated Science Investigation of the Sun instrument suite, we perform a spectral analysis of the event and show how the observed spectra evolve over the course of the event. We find that the spectra from the first day of the event are much more consistent with local acceleration at a weak compression, while spectra from later on are more typical of SIR-related events in which particles accelerated at distant shocks dominate. After the first day, the spectra remain approximately constant, which indicates that the modulation of energetic particles during transit from the presumed source region is weaker than previously thought. We argue that these observations can be explained by a sub-Parker spiral magnetic field structure connecting the spacecraft to a source region in the SIR that is relatively close to the Sun. We further propose that acceleration at weak, pre-shock compressions likely plays an important role in observations of SIR-related events in the inner heliosphere and that future modelling of such events should consider acceleration all along the compression region, not just at the distant shock region.
- 1 January 2021
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 906 (2) , 126
No Stagnation Region before the Heliopause at Voyager 1? Inferences from New Voyager 2 Results
We present anisotropy results for anomalous cosmic-ray protons in the energy range ∼0.5–35 MeV from Cosmic Ray Subsystem (CRS) data collected during calibration roll maneuvers for the magnetometer instrument when Voyager 2 (V2) was in the inner heliosheath. We use a new technique to derive for the first time the radial component of the anisotropy vector from CRS data. We find that the CRS-derived radial solar wind speeds, when converted from the radial components of the anisotropy vectors via the Compton–Getting (C–G) effect, generally agree with those similarly derived speeds from the Low Energy Charged Particle experiment using 28–43 keV data. However, they often differ significantly from the radial solar wind speeds measured directly by the Plasma Science (PLS) instrument. There are both periods when the C–G-derived radial solar wind speeds are significantly higher than those measured by PLS and times when they are significantly lower. The differences are not expected nor explained, but it appears that after a few years in the heliosheath the V2 radial solar wind speeds derived from the C–G method underestimate the true speeds as the spacecraft approaches the heliopause. We discuss the implications of this observation for the stagnation region reported along the Voyager 1 trajectory as it approached the heliopause inferred using the C–G method.
- 1 January 2021
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 906 (2) , 126
No Stagnation Region before the Heliopause at Voyager 1? Inferences from New Voyager 2 Results
We present anisotropy results for anomalous cosmic-ray protons in the energy range ∼0.5–35 MeV from Cosmic Ray Subsystem (CRS) data collected during calibration roll maneuvers for the magnetometer instrument when Voyager 2 (V2) was in the inner heliosheath. We use a new technique to derive for the first time the radial component of the anisotropy vector from CRS data. We find that the CRS-derived radial solar wind speeds, when converted from the radial components of the anisotropy vectors via the Compton–Getting (C–G) effect, generally agree with those similarly derived speeds from the Low Energy Charged Particle experiment using 28–43 keV data. However, they often differ significantly from the radial solar wind speeds measured directly by the Plasma Science (PLS) instrument. There are both periods when the C–G-derived radial solar wind speeds are significantly higher than those measured by PLS and times when they are significantly lower. The differences are not expected nor explained, but it appears that after a few years in the heliosheath the V2 radial solar wind speeds derived from the C–G method underestimate the true speeds as the spacecraft approaches the heliopause. We discuss the implications of this observation for the stagnation region reported along the Voyager 1 trajectory as it approached the heliopause inferred using the C–G method.
- 3 December 2020
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astronomical Journal
- Vol. 161 (1) , 11
A Foreshock Model for Interstellar Shocks of Solar Origin: Voyager 1 and 2 Observations
The Voyager 1 (V1) and Voyager 2 (V2) spacecraft were launched in 1977 on a mission to explore the outer planets and reach the heliopause, the boundary between the hot solar plasma and the relatively cool interstellar plasma. V1 reached the heliopause on 2012 August 25, at 121.6 au, and V2 reached the heliopause on 2018 November 5, at 119.0 au. One of their remarkable discoveries was the detection of shocks propagating into the interstellar plasma from energetic solar events. These shocks are typically preceded by electron plasma oscillations excited by electron beams streaming along interstellar magnetic field lines ahead of the shocks. The frequencies of the plasma oscillations have now provided radial electron density profiles in the outer heliosphere and in the interstellar medium to radial distances of more than 145 au. The oscillations are typically preceded by bursts of high-energy ∼5–100 MeV electrons. These electron bursts are interpreted as being due to the reflection (and acceleration) of cosmic-ray electrons by the shock at the time the shock first contacts the magnetic field line that passes through the spacecraft. Relative timing between the cosmic rays reflected by the shock and the onset of the plasma oscillations allow us, for the first time, to estimate the energy, ∼20–100 eV, of the electron beams responsible for the plasma oscillations. These observations are combined into a self-consistent model called the foreshock model that describes the interaction of shocks of solar origin with the interstellar plasma.
- 3 December 2020
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astronomical Journal
- Vol. 161 (1) , 11
A Foreshock Model for Interstellar Shocks of Solar Origin: Voyager 1 and 2 Observations
The Voyager 1 (V1) and Voyager 2 (V2) spacecraft were launched in 1977 on a mission to explore the outer planets and reach the heliopause, the boundary between the hot solar plasma and the relatively cool interstellar plasma. V1 reached the heliopause on 2012 August 25, at 121.6 au, and V2 reached the heliopause on 2018 November 5, at 119.0 au. One of their remarkable discoveries was the detection of shocks propagating into the interstellar plasma from energetic solar events. These shocks are typically preceded by electron plasma oscillations excited by electron beams streaming along interstellar magnetic field lines ahead of the shocks. The frequencies of the plasma oscillations have now provided radial electron density profiles in the outer heliosphere and in the interstellar medium to radial distances of more than 145 au. The oscillations are typically preceded by bursts of high-energy ∼5–100 MeV electrons. These electron bursts are interpreted as being due to the reflection (and acceleration) of cosmic-ray electrons by the shock at the time the shock first contacts the magnetic field line that passes through the spacecraft. Relative timing between the cosmic rays reflected by the shock and the onset of the plasma oscillations allow us, for the first time, to estimate the energy, ∼20–100 eV, of the electron beams responsible for the plasma oscillations. These observations are combined into a self-consistent model called the foreshock model that describes the interaction of shocks of solar origin with the interstellar plasma.
- 1 February 2020
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Vol. 246 (2) , 35
Observations of the 2019 April 4 Solar Energetic Particle Event at the Parker Solar Probe
A solar energetic particle event was detected by the Integrated Science Investigation of the Sun (IS⊙IS) instrument suite on Parker Solar Probe (PSP) on 2019 April 4 when the spacecraft was inside of 0.17 au and less than 1 day before its second perihelion, providing an opportunity to study solar particle acceleration and transport unprecedentedly close to the source. The event was very small, with peak 1 MeV proton intensities of ∼0.3 particles (cm2 sr s MeV)−1, and was undetectable above background levels at energies above 10 MeV or in particle detectors at 1 au. It was strongly anisotropic, with intensities flowing outward from the Sun up to 30 times greater than those flowing inward persisting throughout the event. Temporal association between particle increases and small brightness surges in the extreme-ultraviolet observed by the Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory, which were also accompanied by type III radio emission seen by the Electromagnetic Fields Investigation on PSP, indicates that the source of this event was an active region nearly 80° east of the nominal PSP magnetic footpoint. This suggests that the field lines expanded over a wide longitudinal range between the active region in the photosphere and the corona.
- 1 February 2020
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Vol. 246 (2) , 35
Observations of the 2019 April 4 Solar Energetic Particle Event at the Parker Solar Probe
A solar energetic particle event was detected by the Integrated Science Investigation of the Sun (IS⊙IS) instrument suite on Parker Solar Probe (PSP) on 2019 April 4 when the spacecraft was inside of 0.17 au and less than 1 day before its second perihelion, providing an opportunity to study solar particle acceleration and transport unprecedentedly close to the source. The event was very small, with peak 1 MeV proton intensities of ∼0.3 particles (cm2 sr s MeV)−1, and was undetectable above background levels at energies above 10 MeV or in particle detectors at 1 au. It was strongly anisotropic, with intensities flowing outward from the Sun up to 30 times greater than those flowing inward persisting throughout the event. Temporal association between particle increases and small brightness surges in the extreme-ultraviolet observed by the Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory, which were also accompanied by type III radio emission seen by the Electromagnetic Fields Investigation on PSP, indicates that the source of this event was an active region nearly 80° east of the nominal PSP magnetic footpoint. This suggests that the field lines expanded over a wide longitudinal range between the active region in the photosphere and the corona.
- 1 February 2020
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Vol. 246 (2) , 42
3He-rich Solar Energetic Particle Observations at the Parker Solar Probe and near Earth
The Integrated Science Investigation of the Sun (IS⊙IS) instrument suite on the Parker Solar Probe (PSP) spacecraft is making in situ observations of energetic ions and electrons closer to the Sun than any previous mission. Using data collected during its first two orbits, which reached perihelion distances of 0.17 au, we have searched for -rich solar energetic particle (SEP) events under very quiet solar minimum conditions. On 2019-110–111 (April 20–21), -rich SEPs were observed at energies near 1 MeV nucleon–1 in association with energetic protons, heavy ions, and electrons. This activity was also detected by the Ultra-Low-Energy Isotope Spectrometer and the Electron, Proton, and Alpha Monitor instruments on the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft located near Earth, 0.99 au from the Sun. At that time, PSP and ACE were both magnetically connected to locations near the west limb of the Sun. Remote sensing measurements showed the presence of type III radio bursts and also helical jets from this region of the Sun. This combination of observations is commonly associated with -rich SEP acceleration on the Sun. AR 12738, which was located at Carrington coordinates from which numerous X-ray flares were observed over a period of more than 6 months, was identified as the source of the -rich events. This region was also the source of several other SEP events detected at PSP or ACE. Aside from the period in 2019 April, IS⊙IS did not observe any other -rich SEPs during orbits 1 and 2.
- 1 February 2020
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Vol. 246 (2) , 42
3He-rich Solar Energetic Particle Observations at the Parker Solar Probe and near Earth
The Integrated Science Investigation of the Sun (IS⊙IS) instrument suite on the Parker Solar Probe (PSP) spacecraft is making in situ observations of energetic ions and electrons closer to the Sun than any previous mission. Using data collected during its first two orbits, which reached perihelion distances of 0.17 au, we have searched for -rich solar energetic particle (SEP) events under very quiet solar minimum conditions. On 2019-110–111 (April 20–21), -rich SEPs were observed at energies near 1 MeV nucleon–1 in association with energetic protons, heavy ions, and electrons. This activity was also detected by the Ultra-Low-Energy Isotope Spectrometer and the Electron, Proton, and Alpha Monitor instruments on the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft located near Earth, 0.99 au from the Sun. At that time, PSP and ACE were both magnetically connected to locations near the west limb of the Sun. Remote sensing measurements showed the presence of type III radio bursts and also helical jets from this region of the Sun. This combination of observations is commonly associated with -rich SEP acceleration on the Sun. AR 12738, which was located at Carrington coordinates from which numerous X-ray flares were observed over a period of more than 6 months, was identified as the source of the -rich events. This region was also the source of several other SEP events detected at PSP or ACE. Aside from the period in 2019 April, IS⊙IS did not observe any other -rich SEPs during orbits 1 and 2.