XYXiling Yin

Xiling Yin

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Xiling Yin has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Meta‐analysis of NIH Alzheimer’s Disease‐Related Dementias (ADRD) programs responsive to the National Plan to Address Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)

    by Amber J McCartney, Arvind Shukla, Xiling Yin, Sara Dodson, Erin Bryant, Roderick A Corriveau

    Background: AD/ADRD diseases currently impact more than 6 million people in the US. Rare forms of AD/ADRD are caused directly and unambiguously by genetic mutations. However, most AD/ADRD burden is complex in etiology and thought to result from an interplay among multiple incompletely understood genetic, biochemical, lifestyle, environmental and psychosocial risk factors. Moreover, risk factors interact with other health factors to impact AD/ADRD outcomes. For example, while the most common dementia diagnosis is AD, research over the past decade revealed most people with a diagnosis of AD have multiple brain pathologies, other comorbidities, and many people diagnosed with clinical AD do not have AD pathology at all. This new knowledge highlights the importance of better understanding dementia syndromes, and the relationships among them, to increase chances of developing effective interventions. The NINDS partners with the NIA, the NIH lead for AD/ADRD, in the NIH response to the National Plan. NINDS leads ADRD including frontotemporal dementia (FTD), Lewy body dementias (LBD), vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) and multiple etiology dementias (MED). This project aims to evaluate NIH and the ADRD field’s responsiveness to ADRD research milestones from triennial NINDS ADRD Summits by mapping NIH‐funded research activities to ADRD milestones.Method: The approach used text‐based analysis/mining of grant titles, abstracts, and specific aims to map awards and activities to ADRD milestones. Mappings were vetted by expert concurrence. The ongoing study includes new or competitively renewed NIH ADRD awards starting from fiscal year 2017. Findings help NIH to better understand the state of the field, identify research gaps and opportunities for future efforts, and enable public communication of research activities with an accurate, accessible, compact, and updatable data visualizations.Result: Results indicate the approach is feasible, and importantly the field and NIH have largely been responsive to the ADRD milestones in the National Plan to Address AD.Conclusion: The analysis points to several cross‐cutting ADRD research areas that may benefit from increased attention going forward, including health equity, the multiple etiology hypothesis of common dementias, emerging risk factors for common dementias (e.g. COVID‐19, TBI, and TDP‐43 proteinopathy), and clinical trials.

  • Open Access

    Comparison of Intentional and Unintentional Injuries Among Chinese Children and Adolescents

    by Xiling Yin, Deyun Li, Kejing Zhu, Xiaodong Liang, Songxu Peng, Aijun Tan, Yukai Du

    Background The patterns and risk factors of intentional injuries compared to unintentional injuries among Chinese children and adolescents have not been examined in depth. This work comprehensively describes patterns of intentional injuries in China, for which little information has been previously published.Methods All cases involving individuals 0-17 years old registered at emergency rooms and outpatient clinics were examined using data submitted to the National Injury Surveillance System from 2006 to 2017. A logistic regression model was performed to explore the risk factors related to intentional injuries compared to unintentional injuries.Results A total of 81459(95.1%) unintentional injuries, 4218 (4.9%) intentional injuries (4013 violent attacks and 205 self-mutilation/suicide) cases were identified. Blunt injuries accounted for 59.4% of violent attacks, while cuts and poisoning accounted for 37.1% and 23.4% of injuries involving self-mutilation/suicide, respectively. For unintentional injuries, falls (50.4%) ranked first. Additional risk factors for intentional injuries included being male [odds ratio (OR) =1.6], coming from rural areas (OR=1.9), being staff or workers (OR=2.2) and being a student (OR=1.8). As the age of the patients increased, so did the risk of intentional injuries (OR=5.0 in the 15-17 age group). Intentional injuries were more likely to occur at 00:00 - 03:00 am (OR=2.0).Conclusions Intentional injuries affected more males, rural and older children, school students and staff or workers. The mechanisms and occurrence times differed according to different age groups. Preventive measures should be taken to reduce the dropout of rural students, strengthen the school's violence prevention plan and reduce self-harm.