Daniel Altman
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Daniel Altman has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anita Liebenau
School of Mathematics and Statistics UNSW Sydney 2052 NSW Australia
1 shared publication - Catherine Greenhill
UNSW Sydney
1 shared publication - Mehtaab Sawhney
Department of Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, USA
1 shared publication - Mikhail Isaev
School of Mathematics and Statistics , UNSW Sydney , Sydney , NSW , Australia
1 shared publication - Reshma Ramadurai
School of Mathematics School of Mathematics & Statistics School of Mathematics School of Mathematics Monash University Victoria University of Wellington Monash University Monash University
1 shared publication Zachary Chase
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 23 October 2025
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Forum of Mathematics, Sigma
- Vol. 13, e177
Local aspects of the Sidorenko property for linear equations
A system of linear equations in $\mathbb {F}_p^n$ is Sidorenko if any subset of $\mathbb {F}_p^n$ contains at least as many solutions to the system as a random set of the same density, asymptotically as $n\to \infty $ . A system of linear equations is common if any two-colouring of $\mathbb {F}_p^n$ yields at least as many monochromatic solutions to the system of equations as a random 2-colouring, asymptotically as $n\to \infty $ . Both classification problems remain wide open despite recent attention. We show that a certain generic family of systems of two linear equations is not Sidorenko. In fact, we show that systems in this family are not locally Sidorenko, and that systems in this family which do not contain additive tuples are not weakly locally Sidorenko. This endeavour answers a conjecture and question of Kamčev–Liebenau–Morrison. Insofar as methods, we observe that the true complexity of a linear system is not maintained under Fourier inversion; our main novelty is the use of higher-order methods in the frequency space of systems which have complexity one. We also give a shorter proof of the recent result of Kamčev–Liebenau–Morrison and independently Versteegen that any linear system containing a four-term arithmetic progression is uncommon.- 23 October 2025
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Forum of Mathematics, Sigma
- Vol. 13, e177
Open AccessLocal aspects of the Sidorenko property for linear equations
A system of linear equations in $\mathbb {F}_p^n$ is Sidorenko if any subset of $\mathbb {F}_p^n$ contains at least as many solutions to the system as a random set of the same density, asymptotically as $n\to \infty $ . A system of linear equations is common if any two-colouring of $\mathbb {F}_p^n$ yields at least as many monochromatic solutions to the system of equations as a random 2-colouring, asymptotically as $n\to \infty $ . Both classification problems remain wide open despite recent attention. We show that a certain generic family of systems of two linear equations is not Sidorenko. In fact, we show that systems in this family are not locally Sidorenko, and that systems in this family which do not contain additive tuples are not weakly locally Sidorenko. This endeavour answers a conjecture and question of Kamčev–Liebenau–Morrison. Insofar as methods, we observe that the true complexity of a linear system is not maintained under Fourier inversion; our main novelty is the use of higher-order methods in the frequency space of systems which have complexity one. We also give a shorter proof of the recent result of Kamčev–Liebenau–Morrison and independently Versteegen that any linear system containing a four-term arithmetic progression is uncommon. - Open Access
Deterministic polynomial factorisation modulo many primes
Designing a deterministic polynomial time algorithm for factoring univariate polynomials over finite fields remains a notorious open problem. In this paper, we present an unconditional deterministic algorithm that takes as input an irreducible polynomial $f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$, and computes the factorisation of its reductions modulo $p$ for all primes $p$ up to a prescribed bound $N$. The \emph{average running time per prime} is polynomial in the size of the input and the degree of the splitting field of $f$ over $\mathbb{Q}$. In particular, if $f$ is Galois, we succeed in factoring in (amortised) deterministic polynomial time.Open AccessDeterministic polynomial factorisation modulo many primes
Designing a deterministic polynomial time algorithm for factoring univariate polynomials over finite fields remains a notorious open problem. In this paper, we present an unconditional deterministic algorithm that takes as input an irreducible polynomial $f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$, and computes the factorisation of its reductions modulo $p$ for all primes $p$ up to a prescribed bound $N$. The \emph{average running time per prime} is polynomial in the size of the input and the degree of the splitting field of $f$ over $\mathbb{Q}$. In particular, if $f$ is Galois, we succeed in factoring in (amortised) deterministic polynomial time. - Open Access
On polynomial progressions via transference
We prove new cases of reasonable bounds for the polynomial Szemerédi theorem both over $\mathbb{Z}/N\mathbb{Z}$ with $N$ prime and over the integers. In particular, we prove reasonable bounds for Szemerédi's theorem in the integers with fixed polynomial common difference. That is, we prove for any polynomial $P(y)\in \mathbb{Z}[y]$ with $P(0) = 0$, that the largest subset $A\subseteq [N]$ avoiding the pattern \[x, x+P(y),\ldots, x+ kP(y)\] has size bounded by $\ll_{P,k}N(\log\log\log N)^{-Ω_{P,k}(1)}.$Open AccessOn polynomial progressions via transference
We prove new cases of reasonable bounds for the polynomial Szemerédi theorem both over $\mathbb{Z}/N\mathbb{Z}$ with $N$ prime and over the integers. In particular, we prove reasonable bounds for Szemerédi's theorem in the integers with fixed polynomial common difference. That is, we prove for any polynomial $P(y)\in \mathbb{Z}[y]$ with $P(0) = 0$, that the largest subset $A\subseteq [N]$ avoiding the pattern \[x, x+P(y),\ldots, x+ kP(y)\] has size bounded by $\ll_{P,k}N(\log\log\log N)^{-Ω_{P,k}(1)}.$ - 1 March 2025
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Compositio Mathematica
- Vol. 161 (3) , 635-679
A non-flag arithmetic regularity lemma and counting lemma
Green and Tao’s arithmetic regularity lemma and counting lemma together apply to systems of linear forms which satisfy a particular algebraic criterion known as the ‘flag condition’. We give an arithmetic regularity lemma and counting lemma which apply to all systems of linear forms.
- 1 March 2025
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Compositio Mathematica
- Vol. 161 (3) , 635-679
A non-flag arithmetic regularity lemma and counting lemma
Green and Tao’s arithmetic regularity lemma and counting lemma together apply to systems of linear forms which satisfy a particular algebraic criterion known as the ‘flag condition’. We give an arithmetic regularity lemma and counting lemma which apply to all systems of linear forms.
- Open Access
- 21 November 2024
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Combinatorics, Probability and Computing
- Vol. 34 (2) , 283-297
On the smallest gap in a sequence with Poisson pair correlations
We prove that any increasing sequence of real numbers with average gap $1$ and Poisson pair correlations has some gap that is at least $3/2+10^{-9}$ . This improves upon a result of Aistleitner, Blomer, and Radziwiłł.- 21 November 2024
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Combinatorics, Probability and Computing
- Vol. 34 (2) , 283-297
Open AccessOn the smallest gap in a sequence with Poisson pair correlations
We prove that any increasing sequence of real numbers with average gap $1$ and Poisson pair correlations has some gap that is at least $3/2+10^{-9}$ . This improves upon a result of Aistleitner, Blomer, and Radziwiłł. - Open Access
On the uncommonness of minimal rank-2 systems of linear equations
We prove that suitably generic pairs of linear equations on an even number of variables are uncommon. This verifies a conjecture of Kamčev, Morrison and the second author. Moreover, we prove that any large system containing such a $(2\times k)$-system as a minimal subsystem is uncommon.
Open AccessOn the uncommonness of minimal rank-2 systems of linear equations
We prove that suitably generic pairs of linear equations on an even number of variables are uncommon. This verifies a conjecture of Kamčev, Morrison and the second author. Moreover, we prove that any large system containing such a $(2\times k)$-system as a minimal subsystem is uncommon.
- Open Access
- 22 December 2023
- Published by California Digital Library (CDL) in Combinatorial Theory
- Vol. 3 (3)
On a common-extendable, non-Sidorenko linear system
A system of linear equations in \(\mathbb{F}_p^n\) is common if every two-colouring of \(\mathbb{F}_p^n\) yields at least as many monochromatic solutions as a random two-colouring, asymptotically as \(n \to \infty\). By analogy to the graph-theoretic setting, Alon has asked whether any (non-Sidorenko) system of linear equations can be made uncommon by adding sufficiently many free variables. Fox, Pham and Zhao answered this question in the affirmative among systems which consist of a single equation. We answer Alon's question in the negative.We also observe that the property of remaining common despite that addition of arbitrarily many free variables is closely related to a notion of commonness in which one replaces the arithmetic mean of the number of monochromatic solutions with the geometric mean, and furthermore resolve questions of Kamčev-Liebenau-Morrison.Mathematics Subject Classifications: 05D10, 11B30Keywords: Sidorenko's conjecture, Sidorenko and common linear patterns- 22 December 2023
- Published by California Digital Library (CDL) in Combinatorial Theory
- Vol. 3 (3)
Open AccessOn a common-extendable, non-Sidorenko linear system
A system of linear equations in \(\mathbb{F}_p^n\) is common if every two-colouring of \(\mathbb{F}_p^n\) yields at least as many monochromatic solutions as a random two-colouring, asymptotically as \(n \to \infty\). By analogy to the graph-theoretic setting, Alon has asked whether any (non-Sidorenko) system of linear equations can be made uncommon by adding sufficiently many free variables. Fox, Pham and Zhao answered this question in the affirmative among systems which consist of a single equation. We answer Alon's question in the negative.We also observe that the property of remaining common despite that addition of arbitrarily many free variables is closely related to a notion of commonness in which one replaces the arithmetic mean of the number of monochromatic solutions with the geometric mean, and furthermore resolve questions of Kamčev-Liebenau-Morrison.Mathematics Subject Classifications: 05D10, 11B30Keywords: Sidorenko's conjecture, Sidorenko and common linear patterns - 1 January 2020
- Published by Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences in Acta Arithmetica
- Vol. 195 (1) , 97-108
On Szemerédi’s theorem with differences from a random set
We consider, over both the integers and finite fields, Szemerédi’s theorem on $k$-term arithmetic progressions where the set $S$ of allowed common differences in those progressions is restricted and random. Fleshing out a line of enquiry suggested by Fran- 1 January 2020
- Published by Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences in Acta Arithmetica
- Vol. 195 (1) , 97-108
On Szemerédi’s theorem with differences from a random set
We consider, over both the integers and finite fields, Szemerédi’s theorem on $k$-term arithmetic progressions where the set $S$ of allowed common differences in those progressions is restricted and random. Fleshing out a line of enquiry suggested by Fran- Open Access
A threshold result for loose Hamiltonicity in random regular uniform hypergraphs
Let $\mathcal{G}(n,r,s)$ denote a uniformly random $r$-regular $s$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices, where $s$ is a fixed constant and $r=r(n)$ may grow with $n$. An $\ell$-overlapping Hamilton cycle is a Hamilton cycle in which successive edges overlap in precisely $\ell$ vertices, and 1-overlapping Hamilton cycles are called loose Hamilton cycles. When $r,s\geq 3$ are fixed integers, we establish a threshold result for the property of containing a loose Hamilton cycle. This partially verifies a conjecture of Dudek, Frieze, Rucinski and Sileikis (2015). In this setting, we also find the asymptotic distribution of the number of loose Hamilton cycles in $\mathcal{G}(n,r,s)$. Finally we prove that for $\ell = 2,\ldots, s-1$ and for $r$ growing moderately as $n\to\infty$, the probability that $\mathcal{G}(n,r,s)$ has a $\ell$-overlapping Hamilton cycle tends to zero.Open AccessA threshold result for loose Hamiltonicity in random regular uniform hypergraphs
Let $\mathcal{G}(n,r,s)$ denote a uniformly random $r$-regular $s$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices, where $s$ is a fixed constant and $r=r(n)$ may grow with $n$. An $\ell$-overlapping Hamilton cycle is a Hamilton cycle in which successive edges overlap in precisely $\ell$ vertices, and 1-overlapping Hamilton cycles are called loose Hamilton cycles. When $r,s\geq 3$ are fixed integers, we establish a threshold result for the property of containing a loose Hamilton cycle. This partially verifies a conjecture of Dudek, Frieze, Rucinski and Sileikis (2015). In this setting, we also find the asymptotic distribution of the number of loose Hamilton cycles in $\mathcal{G}(n,r,s)$. Finally we prove that for $\ell = 2,\ldots, s-1$ and for $r$ growing moderately as $n\to\infty$, the probability that $\mathcal{G}(n,r,s)$ has a $\ell$-overlapping Hamilton cycle tends to zero. - Open Access
On Szemerédi's theorem with differences from a random set
We consider, over both the integers and finite fields, Szemer\'{e}di's theorem on $k$-term arithmetic progressions where the set $S$ of allowed common differences in those progressions is restricted and random. Fleshing out a line of enquiry suggested by Frantzikinakis et al, we show that over the integers, the conjectured threshold for $\mathbb{P}(d \in S)$ for Szemer\'{e}di's theorem to hold a.a.s follows from a conjecture about how so-called dual functions are approximated by nilsequences. We also show that the threshold over finite fields is different to this threshold over the integers.Open AccessOn Szemerédi's theorem with differences from a random set
We consider, over both the integers and finite fields, Szemer\'{e}di's theorem on $k$-term arithmetic progressions where the set $S$ of allowed common differences in those progressions is restricted and random. Fleshing out a line of enquiry suggested by Frantzikinakis et al, we show that over the integers, the conjectured threshold for $\mathbb{P}(d \in S)$ for Szemer\'{e}di's theorem to hold a.a.s follows from a conjecture about how so-called dual functions are approximated by nilsequences. We also show that the threshold over finite fields is different to this threshold over the integers.