RGRosemarie E. Gough

Rosemarie E. Gough

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Rosemarie E. Gough has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Use of Online Health Forums by People Living With Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Thematic Analysis

    by Sally Sanger, Suzanne Duffin, Rosemarie E Gough, Peter A Bath

    Background: At the time of the UK COVID-19 lockdowns, online health forums (OHFs) were one of the relatively few remaining accessible sources of peer support for people living with breast cancer. Cancer services were heavily affected by the pandemic in many ways, including the closure of many of the customary support services. Previous studies indicate that loneliness, anxiety, distress, and depression caused by COVID-19 were common among people living with breast cancer, and this suggests that the role of OHFs in providing users with support, information, and empathy could have been of increased importance at that time. Objective: This study aimed to examine how people living with breast cancer shared information, experiences, and emotions in an OHF during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This qualitative study thematically analyzed posts from the discussion forums of an OHF provided by the UK charity, Breast Cancer Now. We selected 1053 posts from the time of 2 UK lockdowns: March 16, 2020, to June 15, 2020 (lockdown 1), and January 6, 2021, to March 8, 2021 (lockdown 3), for analysis, from 2 of the forum’s boards (for recently diagnosed people and for those undergoing chemotherapy). We analyzed the data using the original 6 steps for thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke but by following a codebook approach. Descriptive statistics for posts were also derived. Results: We found that COVID-19 amplified the forum’s value to its users. As patients with cancer, participants were in a situation that was “bad enough already,” and the COVID-19 pandemic heightened this difficult situation. The forum’s value, which was already high for the information and peer support it provided, increased because COVID-19 caused some special information needs that forum users were uniquely well placed to fulfill as people experiencing the combined effects of having breast cancer during the pandemic. The forum also met the emotional needs generated by the COVID-19 pandemic and was valued as a place where loneliness during the pandemic may be relieved and users’ spirits lifted in a variety of ways specific to this period. We found some differences in use between the 2 periods and the 2 boards—most noticeable was the great fear and anxiety expressed at the beginning of lockdown 1. Both the beginning and end of lockdown periods were particularly difficult for participants, with the ends seen as potentially increasing isolation. Conclusions: The forums were an important source of support and information to their users, with their value increasing during the lockdowns for a variety of reasons. Our findings will be helpful to organizations offering OHFs and to health care workers advising people living with breast cancer about sources of support.


  • Open Access

    Use of online health forums by people living with breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative analysis (Preprint)

    by Sally Sanger, Suzanne Duffin, Rosemarie E Gough, Peter A Bath

    BACKGROUND At the time of the UK COVID-19 lockdowns, online health forums (OHFs) were one of the relatively few remaining accessible sources of peer support for people living with breast cancer. Cancer services were heavily affected by the pandemic in many ways including the closure of many of the customary support services. Previous research indicates that loneliness, anxiety, distress and depression caused by COVID-19 were common amongst people living with breast cancer, and this suggests that the role of the OHF in providing users with support, information and empathy could have been of increased importance at that time. OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper is to examine how people living with breast cancer used an online health forum during COVID-19. METHODS This qualitative study thematically analysed posts from the discussion forums of an OHF provided by the UK charity, Breast Cancer Now. We selected 1,053 posts from the time of two UK lockdowns: 16 March - 15 June 2020 (Lockdown 1), and 6 January – 8 March 2021 (Lockdown 3) for analysis from two of the forum’s boards (for recently diagnosed people and for those undergoing chemotherapy). We analysed the data using Braun & Clarke’s original six steps for thematic analysis, but following a ‘codebook’ approach. Some descriptive statistics were also obtained. RESULTS We found that COVID-19 amplified the forum’s value to its users. As cancer patients, participants were in a situation that was ‘bad enough already’ and COVID-19 amplified this. The forum, already highly regarded, became even more valued for the information and peer support it continued to provide. It also increased in value because COVID-19 caused some special information needs that the forum users were uniquely well-placed to fulfil, as people experiencing the ‘double whammy’ of cancer-during-covid. The forum also met emotional needs generated by the pandemic, and was valued as a place where loneliness during COVID-19 might be relieved and users’ spirits lifted in a variety of ways specific to the time. We found some differences in usage between the two periods and the two boards: most noticeable was the greater fear and anxiety expressed at the start of Lockdown 1. Both the start and end of the lockdown periods were particularly difficult for participants. The end of lockdowns were seen as potentially increasing isolation, as patients saw everyone else resuming normal life, whilst they had to remain cautious. CONCLUSIONS The forums were an important source of support and information to their users, with their value increasing during the lockdowns for a variety of reasons. Our findings will be helpful to organizations offering OHFs, and to healthcare workers advising people living with breast cancer on sources of support.

  • Open Access

    Talin mechanosensitivity is modulated by a direct interaction with cyclin-dependent kinase-1

    by Rosemarie E. Gough, Matthew C. Jones, Thomas Zacharchenko, Shimin Le, Miao Yu, Guillaume Jacquemet, Ste P. Muench, Jie Yan, Jonathan D. Humphries, Claus Jørgensen, et al.


  • Open Access

    Competition between two high- and low-affinity protein-binding sites in myosin VI controls its cellular function

    by Natalia Fili, Yukti Hari-Gupta, Bjork Aston, Ália dos Santos, Rosemarie E. Gough, Bana Alamad, Lin Wang, Marisa L. Martin-Fernandez, Christopher P. Toseland