Amy Logan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Amy Logan has a total of 97 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Charlotte E. Conn
School of Science, RMIT University City Campus, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
4 shared publications - Jared K. Raynes
CSIRO Agr & Food, 671 Sneydes Rd, Werribee, Vic, Australia
4 shared publications - Jitendra P. Mata
University of New South Wales
4 shared publications - Juliane Floury
STLO, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35042 Rennes, France
4 shared publications Amirtha Puvanenthiran
3 shared publications- Li Day
AgResearch Ltd., Te Ohu Rangahau Kai, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 29 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Applied Food Research
- Vol. 6 (2)
Application of machine learning to identify key physicochemical predictors for mimicking UHT cow milk
- 29 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Applied Food Research
- Vol. 6 (2)
Open AccessApplication of machine learning to identify key physicochemical predictors for mimicking UHT cow milk
- Open Access
- 25 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Food Hydrocolloids
- Vol. 185
Protein-fibre-water interactions in thermally-treated Lupin fractions
- 25 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Food Hydrocolloids
- Vol. 185
Open AccessProtein-fibre-water interactions in thermally-treated Lupin fractions
- Open Access
- 24 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
Exploring the function of toggle genes in cheese microbial consortium
- 24 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
Open AccessExploring the function of toggle genes in cheese microbial consortium
- Open Access
- 16 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Food Hydrocolloids
- Vol. 182
Combined effects of κ-casein and β-casein genetic variants on yoghurt microstructure and texture
- 16 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Food Hydrocolloids
- Vol. 182
Open AccessCombined effects of κ-casein and β-casein genetic variants on yoghurt microstructure and texture
- Open Access
- 10 May 2026
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Food Science
- Vol. 91 (5) , e71104
Sensory and Physicochemical Evaluation of Dairy‐Like Plant‐Based Milk Formulations Predicted by Machine Learning
Plant‐based milk alternatives (PBMAs) are now increasingly used by some consumers in similar ways to cow milk. However, they differ in their physicochemical and sensory properties. Improving PBMAs to better mimic dairy is limited by the time and cost of development trials. Machine learning offers a promising approach to predict optimal formulations without the need for extensive trial and error. In this study, Random Forest regression (RFR) and gradient boosting regression (GBR) models were used to formulate PBMAs (Formulation 1 and 2, respectively) that mimic cow milk. Sensory analysis, viscosity, stability, color, particle size, and headspace volatiles were compared to cow milk to assess model accuracy. Both formulations were sensorially distinct from coconut, oat, soy, almond, pasteurized, and ultra‐high temperature (UHT) cow milk, associated with vanilla, caramel, astringent, bitter, metallic, and nutty notes, compared to the sweet, dairy, and coconut notes of dairy. The formulations contained aldehydes, including hexanal and pentanal from soy, although compounds including vanillin, octanal, and 1‐pentanol were shared with cow milk. UHT cow (0.68 µm) had the smallest average particle size ( D 50 ), followed by Formulation 2 and pasteurized cow (1.04 µm), with Formulation 1 (1.62 µm) as the largest. The UHT and pasteurized cow milk had higher whiteness indices compared with Formulation 1 and Formulation 2. Formulations exhibited faster sedimentation compared to cow milk. The models correctly predicted viscosity and some volatiles. However, predictive performance was limited by the small dataset and restricted access to commercial formulations. A larger dataset and access to formulations would improve model accuracy. Practical Applications: This research demonstrates the potential of predictive modelling for the development of plant‐based alternatives to animal‐derived ingredients. Such an approach would reduce reliance on trial and error in product development, saving time and development costs while meeting consumer needs.
- 10 May 2026
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Food Science
- Vol. 91 (5) , e71104
Open AccessSensory and Physicochemical Evaluation of Dairy‐Like Plant‐Based Milk Formulations Predicted by Machine Learning
Plant‐based milk alternatives (PBMAs) are now increasingly used by some consumers in similar ways to cow milk. However, they differ in their physicochemical and sensory properties. Improving PBMAs to better mimic dairy is limited by the time and cost of development trials. Machine learning offers a promising approach to predict optimal formulations without the need for extensive trial and error. In this study, Random Forest regression (RFR) and gradient boosting regression (GBR) models were used to formulate PBMAs (Formulation 1 and 2, respectively) that mimic cow milk. Sensory analysis, viscosity, stability, color, particle size, and headspace volatiles were compared to cow milk to assess model accuracy. Both formulations were sensorially distinct from coconut, oat, soy, almond, pasteurized, and ultra‐high temperature (UHT) cow milk, associated with vanilla, caramel, astringent, bitter, metallic, and nutty notes, compared to the sweet, dairy, and coconut notes of dairy. The formulations contained aldehydes, including hexanal and pentanal from soy, although compounds including vanillin, octanal, and 1‐pentanol were shared with cow milk. UHT cow (0.68 µm) had the smallest average particle size ( D 50 ), followed by Formulation 2 and pasteurized cow (1.04 µm), with Formulation 1 (1.62 µm) as the largest. The UHT and pasteurized cow milk had higher whiteness indices compared with Formulation 1 and Formulation 2. Formulations exhibited faster sedimentation compared to cow milk. The models correctly predicted viscosity and some volatiles. However, predictive performance was limited by the small dataset and restricted access to commercial formulations. A larger dataset and access to formulations would improve model accuracy. Practical Applications: This research demonstrates the potential of predictive modelling for the development of plant‐based alternatives to animal‐derived ingredients. Such an approach would reduce reliance on trial and error in product development, saving time and development costs while meeting consumer needs.
- Open Access
- 9 May 2026
- Published by Elsevier in International Dairy Journal
- Vol. 180
Linking glycosylation to the functional and health-promoting properties of dairy proteins
- 9 May 2026
- Published by Elsevier in International Dairy Journal
- Vol. 180
Open AccessLinking glycosylation to the functional and health-promoting properties of dairy proteins
- Open Access
Can Plant-Based Milk Alternatives Fully Replicate UHT Cow Milk? A Review of Sensory and Physicochemical Attributes
Plant-based milk alternatives (PBMA) have emerged as popular substitutes for cow milk, driven by health, environmental, and ethical considerations. However, their ability to replicate the sensory and physicochemical properties of dairy remains a critical challenge for industry. This review critically examines the extent to which almond, soy, and oat PBMA replicate key sensory attributes of ultra-high temperature (UHT) full cream cow milk, focusing on appearance, texture, and flavour. Furthermore, it explores the relationship between these sensory attributes and the physicochemical properties of PBMA to elucidate the underlying reasons for the observed differences. A comparative analysis of compositional differences reveals fundamental limitations linked to plant protein functionality, carbohydrate structure, fat composition, and mineral fortification, all of which contribute to disparities in creaminess, mouthfeel, colour, and flavour. Technological strategies such as particle size reduction, enzymatic hydrolysis, and flavour masking have improved specific attributes, yet no PBMA fully replicates the holistic sensory experience of dairy. Emerging approaches, including blended formulations, precision fermentation, and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven optimisation, show promise in narrowing these gaps. Nonetheless, a complete replication of UHT cow milk remains elusive, highlighting the need for continued research and innovation to either approximate dairy properties more closely or enhance PBMA’s unique qualities to drive consumer acceptance.
Open AccessCan Plant-Based Milk Alternatives Fully Replicate UHT Cow Milk? A Review of Sensory and Physicochemical Attributes
Plant-based milk alternatives (PBMA) have emerged as popular substitutes for cow milk, driven by health, environmental, and ethical considerations. However, their ability to replicate the sensory and physicochemical properties of dairy remains a critical challenge for industry. This review critically examines the extent to which almond, soy, and oat PBMA replicate key sensory attributes of ultra-high temperature (UHT) full cream cow milk, focusing on appearance, texture, and flavour. Furthermore, it explores the relationship between these sensory attributes and the physicochemical properties of PBMA to elucidate the underlying reasons for the observed differences. A comparative analysis of compositional differences reveals fundamental limitations linked to plant protein functionality, carbohydrate structure, fat composition, and mineral fortification, all of which contribute to disparities in creaminess, mouthfeel, colour, and flavour. Technological strategies such as particle size reduction, enzymatic hydrolysis, and flavour masking have improved specific attributes, yet no PBMA fully replicates the holistic sensory experience of dairy. Emerging approaches, including blended formulations, precision fermentation, and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven optimisation, show promise in narrowing these gaps. Nonetheless, a complete replication of UHT cow milk remains elusive, highlighting the need for continued research and innovation to either approximate dairy properties more closely or enhance PBMA’s unique qualities to drive consumer acceptance.
- Open Access
- 14 June 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Applied Food Research
- Vol. 5 (2)
Physicochemical and perceived textural attributes of pea and skim milk protein hybrid yoghurts compared to commercial thickened fluids
- 14 June 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Applied Food Research
- Vol. 5 (2)
Open AccessPhysicochemical and perceived textural attributes of pea and skim milk protein hybrid yoghurts compared to commercial thickened fluids
- Open Access
- 11 June 2024
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Dairy Technology
- Vol. 78 (1)
Effect of casein genetic variants and glycosylation on bovine milk foaming properties
The effects of κ‐casein (κ‐CN) and β‐casein (β‐CN) genetic variant and κ‐CN glycosylation degree (GD, low or high) on interfacial and foaming properties of bovine skim milk were investigated. No significant effect was measured for milks with different ĸ‐CN and β‐CN genetic variants. However, milks of higher GD exhibited lower surface tension, enhanced foamability and differences in secondary protein structure compared to lower GD skim milks. Glycan attachment is believed to affect surface activity and the spread and packing of protein at the foam bubble liquid–air interface, leading to differences in foaming performance.
- 11 June 2024
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Dairy Technology
- Vol. 78 (1)
Open AccessEffect of casein genetic variants and glycosylation on bovine milk foaming properties
The effects of κ‐casein (κ‐CN) and β‐casein (β‐CN) genetic variant and κ‐CN glycosylation degree (GD, low or high) on interfacial and foaming properties of bovine skim milk were investigated. No significant effect was measured for milks with different ĸ‐CN and β‐CN genetic variants. However, milks of higher GD exhibited lower surface tension, enhanced foamability and differences in secondary protein structure compared to lower GD skim milks. Glycan attachment is believed to affect surface activity and the spread and packing of protein at the foam bubble liquid–air interface, leading to differences in foaming performance.
- Open Access
- 19 March 2024
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society
- Vol. 101 (9) , 861-878
Microfiltration of milk fat globules for particle size affects key sensory parameters of Cheddar cheese
Descriptive sensory analysis discriminated between the appearance, aroma, flavor, taste and texture of Cheddar cheese samples prepared from milk varying in fat globule size; small milk fat globule milk (SMM, d4,3 = 2.76 ± 0.07 μm), large milk fat globule milk (LMM, d4,3 = 5.07 ± 0.06 μm) and Control (d4,3 = 3.91 ± 0.09 μm), over a six‐month maturation period. Significant differences were measured between SMM, LMM and the Control as each cheese matured, where SMM was the most different across all parameters examined. SMM was lowest in color intensity (34.6 < 38.8–47.0), firmness (29.4 < 36.1–47.7), and fracturability (24.5 < 28.8–30.7), and highest in cohesiveness (57.0 > 39.8–45.8), adhesiveness (52.9 > 39.0–45.4), and smoothness (50.4 > 37.9–44.0). Moreover, SMM was more intense than the Control in cultured odor (34.9 > 29.6–30.6) and flavor (45.5 > 34.9–36.2), rancid (23.3 > 16.0–18.6) and metallic (17.7 > 14.3) flavor, salty taste (45.7 > 40.3–40.5) and aftertaste (38.5 > 34.9–35.8), sour (36.3 > 28.9) and umami taste (19.6 > 16.4); attributes that align with the degree of maturation. LMM showed similar differences to the Control, but was firmer (36.1 > 29.4), less cohesive (45.8 < 57.0), adhesive (45.4 < 52.9) and smooth (44.0 < 50.4) and had a less intense cultured odor (31.5 < 34.9) than SMM. An increase in salty taste was associated with a decrease in cheese firmness (−0.91, p < 0.0001). These results could provide process‐driven solutions that allow the dairy industry to decrease maturation time or create differentiated cheese products to meet specific consumer tastes or function.
- 19 March 2024
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society
- Vol. 101 (9) , 861-878
Open AccessMicrofiltration of milk fat globules for particle size affects key sensory parameters of Cheddar cheese
Descriptive sensory analysis discriminated between the appearance, aroma, flavor, taste and texture of Cheddar cheese samples prepared from milk varying in fat globule size; small milk fat globule milk (SMM, d4,3 = 2.76 ± 0.07 μm), large milk fat globule milk (LMM, d4,3 = 5.07 ± 0.06 μm) and Control (d4,3 = 3.91 ± 0.09 μm), over a six‐month maturation period. Significant differences were measured between SMM, LMM and the Control as each cheese matured, where SMM was the most different across all parameters examined. SMM was lowest in color intensity (34.6 < 38.8–47.0), firmness (29.4 < 36.1–47.7), and fracturability (24.5 < 28.8–30.7), and highest in cohesiveness (57.0 > 39.8–45.8), adhesiveness (52.9 > 39.0–45.4), and smoothness (50.4 > 37.9–44.0). Moreover, SMM was more intense than the Control in cultured odor (34.9 > 29.6–30.6) and flavor (45.5 > 34.9–36.2), rancid (23.3 > 16.0–18.6) and metallic (17.7 > 14.3) flavor, salty taste (45.7 > 40.3–40.5) and aftertaste (38.5 > 34.9–35.8), sour (36.3 > 28.9) and umami taste (19.6 > 16.4); attributes that align with the degree of maturation. LMM showed similar differences to the Control, but was firmer (36.1 > 29.4), less cohesive (45.8 < 57.0), adhesive (45.4 < 52.9) and smooth (44.0 < 50.4) and had a less intense cultured odor (31.5 < 34.9) than SMM. An increase in salty taste was associated with a decrease in cheese firmness (−0.91, p < 0.0001). These results could provide process‐driven solutions that allow the dairy industry to decrease maturation time or create differentiated cheese products to meet specific consumer tastes or function.