Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Ana Blanca has a total of 76 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Molecular pathology of bladder cancer

    by Antonio Lopez‐Beltran, Ana Blanca, Michelle R. Downes, Alessia Cimadamore, Rodolfo Montironi, Liang Cheng

    Significant progress has been achieved in elucidating the molecular underpinnings of bladder cancer initiation and progression. Translational research has identified mutations in chromatin‐modifying genes such as KMT2D and KDM6A, which facilitate colonization of larger regions of the urothelium. Subsequent mutations in TP53, PIK3CA, FGFR3 or RB1 drive malignant transformation. Advances in personalized oncology now integrate clinical, pathological and molecular classifications in bladder cancer, representing a paradigm shift in the management of locally advanced and metastatic disease. Alterations in FGFR3, commonly found in the luminal‐papillary molecular subtype associated with low response to immunotherapy, are the target of erdafitinib. Enfortumab vedotin, which targets Nectin‐4 (expressed in >95% of urothelial carcinomas), is approved for patients who progress after chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Evidence suggests that Nectin‐4 gene amplification may further refine patient stratification. Sacituzumab govitecan, an antibody–drug conjugate directed against Trop‐2, is effective in basal, luminal and stroma‐rich subtypes but not in neuroendocrine carcinomas. In addition, therapies developed for HER2‐positive breast cancer have shown efficacy in urothelial carcinoma, with recent data from the DESTINY pan‐tumour phase II trial leading to FDA approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2‐overexpressing metastatic urothelial carcinoma. This paper is a comprehensive review of the molecular pathology of bladder cancer, highlighting advances in molecular classification, biomarkers and personalized therapies. The transition from morphology‐based classifications to combined morphological and molecular approaches, with therapeutic implications, is also addressed.


  • Prognostic Significance of Programmed Cell Death-1, Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1, Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 2, and Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 mRNA Expression in Bladder Cancer

    by Ana Blanca, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Enrique Gomez-Gomez, Pablo Campos-Hernández, Alessia Cimadamore, Rodolfo Montironi, Liang Cheng

    Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of programmed cell death (PD)-1/PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1), PD-ligand 2 (PD-L2), and fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) expression in bladder cancer (BC). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on BC patients who underwent transurethral resection between 2005 and 2014. Of the initial 136 patients, 31 were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria, leaving 105 cases for the final analysis. The mRNA levels of PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2 and FGFR3 were assessed using quantitative reverse transcription PCR and NanoString technology. Results: High expression of PD-1 and its ligands (PD-L1/PD-L2) showed a strong correlation with each other and was associated with poor clinical outcomes, including higher tumor stage, grade, and cancer-specific mortality (p < 0.001). Conversely, high FGFR3 expression was associated with improved survival and more favorable clinicopathological features. Interestingly, an inverse relationship was observed between FGFR3 and PD-1 (p = 0.032) and PD-L1 (p = 0.016) expression. High mRNA expression profiles of PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, and low FGFR3 expression were associated with worse cancer-specific survival (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that advanced stage, low FGFR3 expression, and high PD-L2 expression are independent predictors of poor prognosis in BC patients. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that elevated levels of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2, combined with reduced FGFR3 expression, may assist in identifying patients with poor outcomes and highlight their potential as prognostic biomarkers in BC.


  • Open Access

    Multi-Centre Study of Progression Factors and Intravesical Recurrence in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract

    by Lucía García-Morales, Francisco Javier Contreras-Matos, Ana Blanca-Pedregosa, Alejandro Mellado-Castillero, Juan Pablo Campos-Hernández, María Fernanda Lara, Ignacio Puche-Sanz, Enrique Gómez-Gómez

    Background/Objectives: A retrospective analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with disease progression and intravesical recurrence (IVR) in a multi-centre cohort of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated surgically between 2015 and 2021. Methods: Progression-free survival (PFS) and IVR-free survival were evaluated using a Kaplan–Meier survival curve and a Log-Rank test. Prognostic factors for progression and IVR were analysed using Cox logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 170 patients were analysed. Up to 32.9% developed progression within 65.64 ± 3.44 months. Multivariate analysis showed that pT (HR 2.9, 95%CI 1.54–5.48, p = 0.01), margin status (HR 2.89, 95%CI 2.88–57.68, p = 0.01), and lymphovascular involvement (HR 7.97, 95% CI 1.43–44.42, p = 0.02) were independent risk factors for PFS. Up to 25.9% of patients presented with IVR at a mean time of 68.33 ± 3.59 months. A previous diagnosis of bladder cancer (BC) (HR 3.73, 95% CI 1.24–11.22, p = 0.02) and the non-invasive appearance of the tumour on computed tomography were significant risk factors for IVR (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05–0.95, p = 0.03). Conclusions: pT stage, margin involvement, and lymphovascular involvement were independent risk factors for UTUC progression. The main risk factor for presenting with IVR after UTUC was a previous diagnosis of BC.


  • Open Access

    Risk Classification of Bladder Cancer by Gene Expression and Molecular Subtype

    by Ana Blanca, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Kevin Lopez-Porcheron, Enrique Gomez-Gomez, Alessia Cimadamore, Andreia Bilé-Silva, Rajan Gogna, Rodolfo Montironi, Liang Cheng

    This study evaluated a panel including the molecular taxonomy subtype and the expression of 27 genes as a diagnostic tool to stratify bladder cancer patients at risk of aggressive behavior, using a well-characterized series of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) as well as muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The study was conducted using the novel NanoString nCounter gene expression analysis. This technology allowed us to identify the molecular subtype and to analyze the gene expression of 27 bladder-cancer-related genes selected through a recent literature search. The differential gene expression was correlated with clinicopathological variables, such as the molecular subtypes (luminal, basal, null/double negative), histological subtype (conventional urothelial carcinoma, or carcinoma with variant histology), clinical subtype (NMIBC and MIBC), tumor stage category (Ta, T1, and T2–4), tumor grade, PD-L1 expression (high vs. low expression), and clinical risk categories (low, intermediate, high and very high). The multivariate analysis of the 19 genes significant for cancer-specific survival in our cohort study series identified TP53 (p = 0.0001), CCND1 (p = 0.0001), MKI67 (p < 0.0001), and molecular subtype (p = 0.005) as independent predictors. A scoring system based on the molecular subtype and the gene expression signature of TP53, CCND1, or MKI67 was used for risk assessment. A score ranging from 0 (best prognosis) to 7 (worst prognosis) was obtained and used to stratify our patients into two (low [score 0–2] vs. high [score 3–7], model A) or three (low [score 0–2] vs. intermediate [score 3–4] vs. high [score 5–7], model B) risk categories with different survival characteristics. Mean cancer-specific survival was longer (122 + 2.7 months) in low-risk than intermediate-risk (79.4 + 9.4 months) or high-risk (6.2 + 0.9 months) categories (p < 0.0001; model A); and was longer (122 + 2.7 months) in low-risk than high-risk (58 + 8.3 months) (p < 0.0001; model B). In conclusion, the molecular risk assessment model, as reported here, might be used better to select the appropriate management for patients with bladder cancer.


  • Open Access

    Mass Spectrometry-Based Biomarkers to Detect Prostate Cancer: A Multicentric Study Based on Non-Invasive Urine Collection without Prior Digital Rectal Examination

    by Maria Frantzi, Zoran Culig, Isabel Heidegger, Marika Mokou, Agnieszka Latosinska, Marie C. Roesch, Axel S. Merseburger, Manousos Makridakis, Antonia Vlahou, Ana Blanca-Pedregosa, et al.

    (1) Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men. Wide application of prostate specific antigen test has historically led to over-treatment, starting from excessive biopsies. Risk calculators based on molecular and clinical variables can be of value to determine the risk of PCa and as such, reduce unnecessary and invasive biopsies. Urinary molecular studies have been mostly focusing on sampling after initial intervention (digital rectal examination and/or prostate massage). (2) Methods: Building on previous proteomics studies, in this manuscript, we aimed at developing a biomarker model for PCa detection based on urine sampling without prior intervention. Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry was applied to acquire proteomics profiles from 970 patients from two different clinical centers. (3) Results: A case-control comparison was performed in a training set of 413 patients and 181 significant peptides were subsequently combined by a support vector machine algorithm. Independent validation was initially performed in 272 negative for PCa and 138 biopsy-confirmed PCa, resulting in an AUC of 0.81, outperforming current standards, while a second validation phase included 147 PCa patients. (4) Conclusions: This multi-dimensional biomarker model holds promise to improve the current diagnosis of PCa, by guiding invasive biopsies.


  • Open Access

    Molecular Classification of Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma Using NanoString-Based Gene Expression Analysis

    by Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Ana Blanca, Alessia Cimadamore, Rajan Gogna, Rodolfo Montironi, Liang Cheng

    Molecular classification of bladder carcinoma is a relevant topic in modern bladder cancer oncology due to its potential to improve oncological outcomes. The available molecular classifications are generally based on transcriptomic profiles, generating highly diverse categories with limited correlation. Implementation of molecular classification in practice is typically limited due to the high complexity of the required technology, the elevated costs, and the limited availability of this technology worldwide. We have conducted a gene expression analysis using a four-gene panel related to luminal and basal subtypes in a series of 91 bladder cancer cases. NanoString-based gene expression analysis using typically luminal (GATA3+/KRT20+) and basal markers (KRT14+/KRT5+/GATA3low/-/KRT20low/-) classified urothelial bladder carcinoma samples as luminal, basal, and a third category (KRT14-/KRT5-/GATA3-/KRT20-), null/double negative (non-luminal/non-basal). These three categories were meaningful in terms of overall cancer-specific survival (p < 0.0001) or when classified as conventional urothelial carcinoma and variant histology urothelial carcinoma (p < 0.0001), NMIBC vs. MIBC (p < 0.001), or by AJCC stage category Ta (p = 0.0012) and T1 (p < 0.0001) but did not reach significance in T2-T4 (p = 0.563). PD-L1 expression (low vs. high) was also different according to molecular subtype, with high PD-L1 expression mostly seen in basal and null subtypes and carcinomas with variant histology (p = 0.002). Additionally, the luminal subtype was enriched in NMIBC with favorable cancer-specific survival (p < 0.0001). In contrast, basal and null subtypes resulted in aggressive MIBC tumors with shorter cancer-specific survival (p < 0.0001), some of which presented variant histology. In conclusion, a comprehensive evaluation of a gene classifier related to molecular taxonomy using NanoString technology is feasible. Therefore, it might represent an accessible and affordable tool in this rapidly expanding area of precision genomics.


  • Open Access

    Does Adding Standard Systematic Biopsy to Targeted Prostate Biopsy in PI-RADS 3 to 5 Lesions Enhance the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? Should All Patients with PI-RADS 3 Undergo Targeted Biopsy?

    by Enrique Gomez-Gomez, Sara Moreno Sorribas, Jose Valero-Rosa, Ana Blanca, Juan Mesa, Joseba Salguero, Julia Carrasco-Valiente, Daniel López-Ruiz, Francisco José Anglada-Curado

    Introduction. Our aim was to assess the value of adding standard biopsy to targeted biopsy in cases of suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and also to evaluate when a biopsy of a PI-RADS 3 lesion could be avoided. Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent targeted biopsy plus standard systematic biopsy between 2016–2019 was performed. All the 1.5 T magnetic resonance images were evaluated according to PI-RADSv.2. An analysis focusing on the clinical scenario, lesion location, and PI-RADS score was performed. Results. A total of 483 biopsies were evaluated. The mean age was 65 years, with a PSA density of 0.12 ng/mL/cc. One-hundred and two mp-MRIs were categorized as PI-RADS-3. Standard biopsy was most helpful in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients in the active surveillance (AS) cohort (increasing the detection rate 12.2%), and in peripheral lesions (6.5%). Adding standard biopsy showed no increase in the detection rate for csPCa in patients with PI-RADS-5 lesions. Considering targeted biopsy in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions, a higher detection rate was shown in biopsy-naïve patients versus AS and in patients with a previous negative biopsy (p = 0.002). Furthermore, in these patients, the highest rate of csPCa detection was in anterior lesions [42.9% (p = 0.067)]. Conclusions. Our results suggest that standard biopsy could be safely omitted in patients with anterior lesions and in those with PI-RADS-5 lesions. Targeted biopsy for PI-RADS-3 lesions would be less effective in peripheral lesions with a previous negative biopsy.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer

    by Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Alessia Cimadamore, Ana Blanca, Francesco Massari, Nuno Vau, Marina Scarpelli, Liang Cheng, Rodolfo Montironi

    A number of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved as first-line therapy in case of cisplatin-ineligible patients or as second-line therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) of the bladder. About 30% of patients with mUC will respond to ICIs immunotherapy. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression detected by immunohistochemistry seems to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mUC as supported by the objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) associated with the response observed in most clinical trials. Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, demonstrated better OS respective to chemotherapy in a randomized phase 3 study for second-line treatment of mUC. Nivolumab, a PD-1 antibody, also demonstrated an OS benefit when compared to controls. Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, and Avelumab antibodies targeting PD-L1 have also received approval as second-line treatments for mUC with durable response for more than 1 year in selected patients. Atezolizumab and Pembrolizumab also received approval for first-line treatment of patients that are ineligible for cisplatin. A focus on the utility of ICIs in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, or as combination with chemotherapy, is the basis of some ongoing trials. The identification of a clinically useful biomarker, single or in association, to determine the optimal ICIs treatment for patients with mUC is very much needed as emphasized by the current literature. In this review, we examined relevant clinical trial results with ICIs in patients with mUC alone or as part of drug combinations; emphasis is also placed on the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. The current landscape of selected biomarkers of response to ICIs including anti-PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is also briefly reviewed.


  • Open Access

    A Multiplex Test Assessing MiR663ame and VIMme in Urine Accurately Discriminates Bladder Cancer from Inflammatory Conditions

    by Sara Monteiro-Reis, Ana Blanca, Joana Tedim-Moreira, Isa Carneiro, Diana Montezuma, Paula Monteiro, Jorge Oliveira, Luís Antunes, Rui Henrique, António Lopez-Beltran, et al.

    Bladder cancer (BlCa) is a common malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality. Current diagnostic methods are invasive and costly, showing the need for newer biomarkers. Although several epigenetic-based biomarkers have been proposed, their ability to discriminate BlCa from common benign conditions of the urinary tract, especially inflammatory diseases, has not been adequately explored. Herein, we sought to determine whether VIMme and miR663ame might accurately discriminate those two conditions, using a multiplex test. Performance of VIMme and miR663ame in tissue samples and urines in testing set confirmed previous results (96.3% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity, area under de curve (AUC) 0.98 and 92.6% sensitivity, 75% specificity, AUC 0.83, respectively). In the validation sets, VIMme-miR663ame multiplex test in urine discriminated BlCa patients from healthy donors or patients with inflammatory conditions, with 87% sensitivity, 86% specificity and 80% sensitivity, 75% specificity, respectively. Furthermore, positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 2.41 and negative LR of 0.21 were also disclosed. Compared to urinary cytology, VIMme-miR663ame multiplex panel correctly detected 87% of the analysed cases, whereas cytology only forecasted 41%. Furthermore, high miR663ame independently predicted worse clinical outcome, especially in patients with invasive BlCa. We concluded that the implementation of this panel might better stratify patients for confirmatory, invasive examinations, ultimately improving the cost-effectiveness of BlCa diagnosis and management. Moreover, miR663ame analysis might provide relevant information for patient monitoring, identifying patients at higher risk for cancer progression.


  • Open Access

    Clinical Utility of Ghrelin-O-Acyltransferase (GOAT) Enzyme as a Diagnostic Tool and Potential Therapeutic Target in Prostate Cancer

    by Juan M. Jiménez-Vacas, Enrique Gómez-Gómez, Antonio J. Montero-Hidalgo, Vicente Herrero-Aguayo, Fernando L-López, Rafael Sánchez-Sánchez, Ipek Guler, Ana Blanca, María José Méndez-Vidal, Julia Carrasco, et al.

    Recent data suggested that plasma Ghrelin O-Acyl Transferase enzyme (GOAT) levels could represent a new diagnostic biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we aimed to explore the diagnostic and prognostic/aggressiveness capacity of GOAT in urine, as well as to interrogate its putative pathophysiological role in PCa. We analysed urine/plasma levels of GOAT in a cohort of 993 patients. In vitro (i.e., cell-proliferation) and in vivo (tumor-growth in a xenograft-model) approaches were performed in response to the modulation of GOAT expression/activity in PCa cells. Our results demonstrate that plasma and urine GOAT levels were significantly elevated in PCa patients compared to controls. Remarkably, GOAT significantly outperformed PSA in the diagnosis of PCa and significant PCa in patients with PSA levels ranging from 3 to 10 ng/mL (the so-called PSA grey-zone). Additionally, urine GOAT levels were associated to clinical (e.g., Gleason-score, PSA levels) and molecular (e.g., CDK2/CDK6/CDKN2A expression) aggressiveness parameters. Indeed, GOAT overexpression increased, while its silencing/blockade decreased cell-proliferation in PCa cells. Moreover, xenograft tumors derived from GOAT-overexpressing PCa (DU145) cells were significantly higher than those derived from the mock-overexpressing cells. Altogether, our results demonstrate that GOAT could be used as a diagnostic and aggressiveness marker in urine and a therapeutic target in PCa.