Cevriye Mülkoğlu

Investigation of the efficacy of dry needling added to physical therapy in supraspinatus tendinopathy - Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

To identify clinical and demographic predictors associated with the timing of transition from psoriasis (PsO) to psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and to compare the characteristics of patients with concurrent PsO-PsA onset versus those with prolonged transition. A multi-center, observational study was conducted using data from the Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) network including PsA patients fulfilling CASPAR criteria. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group 1 (concurrent PsO and PsA onset within ± 1 year) and Group 2 (prolonged transition to PsA, > 1 year after PsO). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics, disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes were compared between groups. Logistic regression was employed to determine independent predictors of prolonged transition. Among 799 patients (mean age 46.8 ± 12.3 years), 237 (29.7%) had concurrent onset and 562 (70.3%) had a prolonged transition, with a mean PsO-to-PsA interval of 12.9 ± 9.6 years. Depression (p = 0.005) and fatigue levels (p = 0.011) were significantly higher in patients with prolonged transition to PsA. Multivariate analysis revealed that scalp psoriasis (OR = 7.162), nail psoriasis (OR = 3.270), family history of PsO (OR = 1.813), and enthesitis ever (OR = 2.187) were associated with prolonged transition. Conversely, family history of PsA (OR = 0.421) and older age at PsO onset (OR = 0.957) predicted shorter transition. Prolonged transition from PsO to PsA is influenced by distinct clinical and demographic factors. Scalp/nail psoriasis, family history of PsO, and enthesitis ever may signal higher risk for prolonged PsA onset. Recognizing these markers can support timely referral and intervention, minimizing diagnostic delay and improving long-term patient outcomes.

We aimed to investigate the efficacy of shoulder hydrodilatation (HD) applied in addition to suprascapular nerve blockage (SSNB) on severity of pain, shoulder joint range of motion (ROM), functional status, handgrip (HG) strength in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC). Forty-eight patients who were diagnosed with AC based on physical examination findings included in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups as combination of SSNB + HD and SSNB alone. Injections were performed under ultrasonography guidance. Shoulder ROM angles were measured with a goniometer. Pain intensity was evaluated with visual analog scale. Functional status was evaluated with Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH). HG strength was measured by a Jamar dynometer. After the injection, a home-based exercise program was given to all patients. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 1st and 3rd month. Abduction and external rotation ROM angles were statistically significantly limited in SSNB group, at baseline (p = 0.020, p = 0.018, respectively). In terms of other parameters, both groups were similar at baseline (p > 0.05). At comparison of baseline-1st month, a significant improvement was observed in VAS score, abduction and flexion ROM and QDASH score, in both groups (p < 0.05), however, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. There is a statistically significant decrease in VAS score in both groups, at all times, but, no significant difference between the groups. At the comparison of baseline-3rd month measurements, it was observed that all of the parameters significantly improved in both groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups except for abduction and external rotation ROM (p > 0.05). Abduction ROM and external rotation ROM were significantly higher in the SSNB group than SSNB + HD group at 3rd month. Both SSNB + HD and SSNB alone provide significant improvement clinically especially in shoulder pain. HD added to SSNB does not seem to provide any additional benefit. SSNB is an effective treatment option for up to 3 months in patients with AC, mainly in abduction and external rotation limitation.

Objectives: The study aimed to investigate and compare clinical features, disease activity, and the overall disease burden among psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients across seven distinct geographic regions in Türkiye. Patients and methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study involving 1,134 PsA patients from 25 referral centers across seven regions was conducted. Demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, joint involvement, extra-articular manifestations, and disease activity measures were evaluated across regions. Results: A total of 1134 PsA patients from seven different geographic regions in Türkiye participated in this study. The highest number of participants was from the Marmara region (n=409), with subsequent representation from Central Anatolia (n=370), Aegean (n=139), Mediterranean (n=60), Black Sea (n=60), Eastern Anatolia (n=60), and Southeastern Anatolia (n=36) regions. There were significant variations in demographic profile, including age, body mass index, age of disease onset, educational status, comorbidities, and family history of both psoriasis and PsA. Clinical features, such as enthesitis, dactylitis, uveitis, and joint involvement, demonstrated significant variation across regions. Additionally, disease activity measures, including pain, patient and physician global assessments, acute phase reactants, disease activity indices, quality of life, and functional status, displayed considerable regional differences. Conclusion: This nationwide study revealed substantial regional diversity in demographic data, clinical characteristics, disease activity, and quality of life among PsA patients in Türkiye. These findings stress the need to customize treatment approaches to address regional needs and to conduct further research to uncover reasons for disparities. It is crucial to enhance region-specific approaches to improve patient care and outcomes for PsA.

Pruritus is a common complaint in dermatology outpatient clinics. It is defined as chronic pruritus if the symptoms last 6 weeks or longer. Fibromyalgia is a chronic, extensive pain syndrome that is well-known for its clinical signs, such as exhaustion, sleeping disorders, and some other pain symptoms. In the present study, it was investigated whether chronic pruritus patients were accompanied by fibromyalgia. The study included 100 patients with chronic pruritus and 100 controls without dermatological disease. All of the individuals were first evaluated in the dermatology clinic, and the patients having any musculoskeletal symptoms were then referred to a physiatrist in terms of accompanying fibromyalgia syndrome. Fibromyalgia was detected in 29 (29%) of 100 chronic pruritus patients and 6 (6%) of 100 patients in the control group. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding accompanying FM (p < 0.001). In the chronic pruritus group, pruritus severity, according to VAS and the four-item itch questionnaire score, was statistically significantly higher in patients with fibromyalgia than in patients without fibromyalgia (p = 0.027, p = 0.002, respectively). In addition, the number of patients with severe/very severe chronic pruritus was statistically significantly higher in the group accompanied by fibromyalgia (p = 0.023). It may be suggested that fibromyalgia is a frequent disease that can accompany chronic pruritus. Clinicians should keep in mind that there is a possibility of the coexistence of both diseases. This study calls attention to the complex relationship between chronic itch and pain.

AMAÇ: Amacımız, sık görülen ve zamanında tedavi edilmezse morbidite ve iş gücü kaybına sebep olan el yaralanmalarının restrospektif olarak analizinin yapılmasıdır. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Ocak-Aralık 2022 arasında SBÜ Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi El Rehabilitasyonu polikliniğine başvurmuş hastaların verileri retrospektif olarak tarandı ve analiz edildi. BULGULAR: El rehabilitasyonu polikliniğimize başvuran toplam 127 hastanın 46’sı (%36,2) kadın, 81’i (%63,8) erkekti. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 41,515,3 yıl idi. Kırık tanılı 45 (%35,4), ekstansör tendon yaralanmalı 33 (%26,0), kombine yaralanması olan 28 (%22,1), fleksör tendon yaralanmalı 7 (%5,5), diğer nedenlerle (karpal tünel sendromu (KTS), dupuytren kontraktürü, tetik parmak, sinir yaralanması, ampütasyon) başvuran 14 (%11) hasta mevcuttu. 13 (%10,2) hastada iş kazası sonucu yaralanma oluşmuştu. Yaralanma tipi 52 (%40,9) hastada kesici alet yaralanması, 46 (%36,2) hastada crush travma, 18 (%14,2) hastada künt travma, 1 (%0,8) hastada yanık, 10 (%7,9) hastada ise overuse yaralanması idi. 78 (%61,4) hasta opere edilmişti. SONUÇ: El rehabilitasyonu polikliniğimize başvuran hastaların çoğu erkekti. En sık görülen yaralanma tipi kesici alet yaralanmasıydı ve en sık kırık tanılı hastaların başvurduğu belirlendi.

Objectives: This study aimed to increase the awareness of clinicians about shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) by analyzing 21 patients with adhesive capsulitis that developed after COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) vaccination. Patients and methods: In this observational study, 21 patients (11 males, 10 females; mean age: 60.7±7.3 years; range, 45 to 70 years) with incipient shoulder pain and limitation diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis due to SIRVA were evaluated between June 2021 and December 2022. Demographic and clinical data of the patients were recorded. Pain was evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The passive range of motion (ROM) of the affected shoulder was measured by a goniometer. The applied treatment methods (medical treatment, physical therapy, intraarticular steroid injection, hydrodilatation, and suprascapular nerve block) were recorded. The patients were called in for control two months later. Visual Analog Scale scores and passive shoulder ROMs were reevaluated. Results: Symptoms started after the second dose in nine (42.9%) patients. The mean time between vaccination and onset of complaints was 8.0±6.4 days. Sinovac vaccine was administered to eight patients, BioNTech vaccine was administered to five patients, and Sinovac+BioNTech vaccine was administered to eight patients. Baseline to control ROM angle changes were 128.8±30.4º to 155.0±20.6° for flexion, 117.1±37.8° to 147.1±26.4° for abduction, 45.9±17.8° to 61.9±12.6° for internal rotation, and 43.4±21.9° to 56.3±18.3° for external rotation, respectively. The mean VAS scores were 7.0±1.2 (5-9) at baseline and 2.7±1.0 (1-5) at the control. There was a statistically significant difference between the baseline and control (two months after treatment) in terms of VAS scores and ROM angles (p<0.001). Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of adhesive capsulitis following vaccine administration since a significant improvement can be obtained by proper treatment for SIRVA.

Background: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) are effective in alleviating pain and improving functionality in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC); however, no study has compared the efficacy of these two laser treatments. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of LLLT and HILT in improving the shoulder joint range of motion and functional status and in reducing pain level in patients with AC. Trial Design: Prospective, randomized, parallel group, patient- and assessor-blinded. Methods: A total of 45 patients (aged: 18–65 years) with complaint of shoulder pain were evaluated for inclusion criteria, which included being aged 18–65 years and a diagnosis of AC based on physical examinations. Using computer-generated random numbers, eligible patients were randomized into two groups: HILT + stretching exercise and LLLT + stretching exercise groups. Both HILT and LLLT were performed three times/week for 3 weeks. Functional status and pain of the patients were evaluated with Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while shoulder joint range of motion was measured with goniometry. All assessments were done before and 3 weeks after treatment. Results: A total of 40 patients (20 in each group) completed the study. At baseline, there was no statistically significant difference in the demographic and clinical characteristics between both groups. Both the LLLT and HILT groups showed significant improvement in the VAS and SPADI scores 3 weeks after treatment; however, the improvement was significantly higher in the HILT group than the LLLT group. There was no significant improvement in goniometric scores in both groups compared with baseline. No injury or other musculoskeletal complications were recorded during or after the treatments. Conclusion: HILT + stretching exercise treatment was more effective than LLLT + stretching exercise for improving functional parameters and pain in patients with AC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05469672. Funding: None