David J. Campbell
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
David J. Campbell has a total of 1000 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
P.R. Thomas
Fusion for Energy
14 shared publicationsG. Saibene
Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking, c/Josep Pla, n° 2, 08019 Barcelona, Spain
12 shared publicationsG Saibene
11 shared publicationsK Thomsen
10 shared publicationsJ.A. Snipes
9 shared publicationsK. Behringer
9 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 12 August 2025
- Published by IOP Publishing in Nuclear Fusion
- Vol. 65 (9) , 093002
Introduction and overview: Chapter 1 of the special issue: on the path to tokamak burning plasma operation
The International Tokamak Physics Activity (ITPA) has developed a comprehensive overview of the results of its coordinated R&D activities in fusion physics and diagnostics implemented during the past two decades with the aim of developing an improved physics basis for the operation of tokamak burning plasma experiments. Here, an introduction is presented to key concepts in the physics of burning plasmas in tokamaks, together with an overview of the scope of the principal areas of physics R&D pursued by the ITPA Topical Physics Groups in which the critical issues, major areas of progress and most significant recent results are highlighted. This paper introduces the following collection of articles, which encompass detailed presentations of the progress achieved by the Topical Groups in preparing the physics basis for the operation of tokamak burning plasma experiments expected to come into operation in the 2030s.
- 12 August 2025
- Published by IOP Publishing in Nuclear Fusion
- Vol. 65 (9) , 093002
Open AccessIntroduction and overview: Chapter 1 of the special issue: on the path to tokamak burning plasma operation
The International Tokamak Physics Activity (ITPA) has developed a comprehensive overview of the results of its coordinated R&D activities in fusion physics and diagnostics implemented during the past two decades with the aim of developing an improved physics basis for the operation of tokamak burning plasma experiments. Here, an introduction is presented to key concepts in the physics of burning plasmas in tokamaks, together with an overview of the scope of the principal areas of physics R&D pursued by the ITPA Topical Physics Groups in which the critical issues, major areas of progress and most significant recent results are highlighted. This paper introduces the following collection of articles, which encompass detailed presentations of the progress achieved by the Topical Groups in preparing the physics basis for the operation of tokamak burning plasma experiments expected to come into operation in the 2030s.
- 16 January 2020
- Published by IOP Publishing in Nuclear Fusion
- Vol. 60 (2) , 027001
27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference: summary of sessions EX/C, EX/S and PPC
- 16 January 2020
- Published by IOP Publishing in Nuclear Fusion
- Vol. 60 (2) , 027001
27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference: summary of sessions EX/C, EX/S and PPC
- 27 September 2019
- Published by IOP Publishing in Nuclear Fusion
- Vol. 59 (12) , 126014
Modelling one-third field operation in the ITER pre-fusion power operation phase
- 27 September 2019
- Published by IOP Publishing in Nuclear Fusion
- Vol. 59 (12) , 126014
Modelling one-third field operation in the ITER pre-fusion power operation phase
- 4 January 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Fusion Energy
- Vol. 38 (1) , 11-71
Innovations in Technology and Science R&D for ITER
- 4 January 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Fusion Energy
- Vol. 38 (1) , 11-71
Innovations in Technology and Science R&D for ITER
- 1 November 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Fusion Engineering and Design
- Vol. 109-111, 1491-1497
Progress and challenges of the ITER TBM Program from the IO perspective
- 1 November 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Fusion Engineering and Design
- Vol. 109-111, 1491-1497
Progress and challenges of the ITER TBM Program from the IO perspective
- Open Access
- 1 September 2016
- Published by EDP Sciences in Europhysics News
- Vol. 47 (5-6) , 28-31
The first fusion reactor: ITER
Europhysics News is the magazine of the European physics community
- 1 September 2016
- Published by EDP Sciences in Europhysics News
- Vol. 47 (5-6) , 28-31
Open AccessThe first fusion reactor: ITER
Europhysics News is the magazine of the European physics community
- 31 August 2016
- Published by IOP Publishing in Nuclear Fusion
- Vol. 56 (12) , 126002
CORSICA modelling of ITER hybrid operation scenarios
- 31 August 2016
- Published by IOP Publishing in Nuclear Fusion
- Vol. 56 (12) , 126002
CORSICA modelling of ITER hybrid operation scenarios
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Nuclear Materials
- Vol. 463, 39-48
Disruptions in ITER and strategies for their control and mitigation
- 1 August 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Nuclear Materials
- Vol. 463, 39-48
Top Cited PapersDisruptions in ITER and strategies for their control and mitigation
- 1 May 2015
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- p. 1-8
Control, detection and mitigation of disruptions on ITER
The fast loss of thermal and magnetic energy during an unmitigated disruption in ITER can lead to heat fluxes exceeding melt thresholds for plasma facing components, can generate high electromagnetic loads in some cases close to the design limits, and can potentially cause the generation of high energy runaway electrons. Therefore, the operation strategy in ITER will have a strong focus on limiting the number of disruptions and especially of those that are unmitigated. This will be achieved by a multi-layer strategy including disruption prevention and avoidance, disruption prediction and disruption mitigation. The plasma control system (PCS) will be in charge to react to any deviation from the predicted behavior by applying appropriate correction measures for which an extensive suite of actuators is available including those for active disruption prevention like electron cyclotron heating. It is also the PCS that optimizes triggering of the disruption mitigation system (DMS), should a disruption be imminent despite all control efforts. This paper will give an overview on all aspects of disruption control with a more detailed discussion of the requirements for the DMS.
- 1 May 2015
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- p. 1-8
Control, detection and mitigation of disruptions on ITER
The fast loss of thermal and magnetic energy during an unmitigated disruption in ITER can lead to heat fluxes exceeding melt thresholds for plasma facing components, can generate high electromagnetic loads in some cases close to the design limits, and can potentially cause the generation of high energy runaway electrons. Therefore, the operation strategy in ITER will have a strong focus on limiting the number of disruptions and especially of those that are unmitigated. This will be achieved by a multi-layer strategy including disruption prevention and avoidance, disruption prediction and disruption mitigation. The plasma control system (PCS) will be in charge to react to any deviation from the predicted behavior by applying appropriate correction measures for which an extensive suite of actuators is available including those for active disruption prevention like electron cyclotron heating. It is also the PCS that optimizes triggering of the disruption mitigation system (DMS), should a disruption be imminent despite all control efforts. This paper will give an overview on all aspects of disruption control with a more detailed discussion of the requirements for the DMS.
- 1 February 2015
- Published by AIP Publishing in Physics of Plasmas
- Vol. 22 (2) , 021701
Preface to Special Topic: ITER
- 1 February 2015
- Published by AIP Publishing in Physics of Plasmas
- Vol. 22 (2) , 021701
Preface to Special Topic: ITER