Xiao Wei

Soil stabilizers using conventional cement and lime binders incur high environmental costs owing to CO₂ emissions associated with their excavation, production, and processing. This has motivated research on low-carbon, waste-derived alternatives. The review shows that: biochar increases unconfined compressive strength (UCS) by 15–40% with a 2–5% dosage through pore filling and particle binding; nanocellulose promotes soil cohesion by 25–60% through fibrous network development and tensile bridging; recycled PET powder at 5–10% increases shear strength by 20–35% promoting mechanical interlocking, increasing stiffness, crack resistance and durability. Biochar provides direct carbon sequestration with a carbon transfer capacity of up to 2.5 tons CO₂-eq/ton. Recycled PET introduces waste valorization, with the potential to divert millions of tons of annual PET waste, while nanocellulose provides indirect carbon savings by avoiding emissions from cement and lime replacement. This review’s objectives are as follows: providing a comprehensive comparison of biochar, nanocellulose, and PET powder as promising non-cement composite stabilizers; identifying optimal dosage ranges and stabilization mechanisms for each material across different soil types; and outlining knowledge gaps and future research directions in sustainable geotechnical practices. The review assessed the individual and synergistic effects of the additives on critical geotechnical properties, including unconfined compressive strength (UCS), California bearing ratio (CBR), resilient resistance, swelling resistance, and the durability of the treated soil. Findings provide actionable guidance for practitioners seeking to reduce construction carbon footprints while maintaining geotechnical performance standards. Research gaps were identified, and future directions for integrating high-performance, low-carbon soil composites into sustainable construction solutions are proposed.

Inconsistent experimental findings in the literature regarding the influence of particle size on small-strain shear modulus (Gmax) highlight the need for deeper mechanical insights. A series of resonant column tests was conducted on glass beads and silica sands to investigate the effects of particle size on Gmax considering various particle surface roughness. Results indicate that Gmax decreases with increasing particle surface roughness (Sq) and decreasing mean particle size (d50) under otherwise similar conditions. There is a unified correlation between Gmax and Sq/d50 when the effects of gradation and particle shape are properly considered, showing that Gmax initially decreases with increasing Sq/d50, but then stabilises for a given confining pressure and void ratio. This study further confirmed the combined effects of particle size and surface roughness on Gmax through a semi-analytical analysis. These results suggest that the inconsistent findings regarding the effects of particle size on Gmax may be related to the neglect of particle surface roughness.

Cement-stabilization of weak and soft soils is an efficient way for ground improvement. Traditional Portland cement remains the most popular cementitious material in practice, and thus, a proper dosage design of cement-stabilized soil is of practical interest to meet the sustainable engineering requirements and to remedy environmental concerns. Based on the unconfined compression test of cement-stabilized Qiantang River silty clay, the effects of cement content, mixing moisture content, mixing-water-to-cement ratio, and curing time on the unconfined compressive strength were investigated. The results show that the mixing-water-to-cement ratio can comprehensively characterize the effects of cement content and water content on the unconfined compressive strength of the cement-stabilized clay. A prediction method for the unconfined compressive strength of cement-stabilized Qiantang River silty clay has been proposed with considerations for mixing-water-to-cement ratio and curing time. By comparing the experimental data of the present study with the existing literature data, it is found that there is a unified relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the mixing-water-to-cement ratio of cement-stabilized Qiantang River silty clay, kaolin, Singapore marine clay, and Bangkok clay under the same curing time. The prediction method recommended by the standard may overestimate the unconfined compressive strength of cement-stabilized Qiantang River silty clay cured for 90 days.