CMConstantin Mork

Constantin Mork

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Constantin Mork has a total of 60 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Automated echocardiographic measurements for longitudinal monitoring of ATTR cardiomyopathy: agreement and repeatability analysis

    by Amely Walser, Olivier F. Clerc, Constantin Mork, Andreas J. Flammer, Peder L. Myhre, Rahel Schwotzer, Christoph Gräni, Frank Ruschitzka, Felix C. Tanner, Dominik C. Benz

  • Open Access

    Automated echocardiographic measurements for longitudinal monitoring of ATTR cardiomyopathy: agreement and repeatability analysis

    by Amely Walser, Olivier Florian Clerc, Constantin Mork, Andreas J. Flammer, Peder L. Myhre, Rahel Schwotzer, Christoph Graeni, Frank Ruschitzka, Felix C. Tanner, Dominik C. Benz

    Background: Detection of disease progression is key to personalize treatment strategies in transthyretin cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), particularly with emerging therapies. Echocardiography can detect subtle longitudinal changes but is limited by operator dependence. This study evaluates agreement and reproducibility of fully automated, AI-assisted echocardiographic measurements under real-world conditions. Methods: This retrospective study included 62 patients with ATTR-CM undergoing 178 serial annual echocardiograms assessed by a reference cardiologist, a second cardiologist, a novice reader, and a fully automated AI algorithm (Us2.ai). Interrater agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Intrarater variability for human readers was derived from repeated blinded measurements, with limits of agreement (LoA = mean difference +/- 1.96 x SD) defining the smallest detectable change. AI repeatability was assessed using within-study pairwise differences. Results: AI showed moderate agreement with the reference cardiologist for IVSd and LVEDV (ICC 0.65 and 0.51), with biases of -1.9 mm and -39 mL, respectively. Interrater agreement between cardiologists was good (ICC 0.79 and 0.84) with minimal bias (-0.2 mm and +3 mL). Intrarater variability was moderate to excellent for both cardiologists (LoA 3.0 mm and 43 mL for the reference cardiologist; 2.7 mm and 31 mL for the second cardiologist). AI demonstrated comparable repeatability (LoA 3.6 mm and 37 mL), while the novice showed higher variability (5.1 mm and 61 mL). Conclusion: AI-based measurements demonstrated repeatability comparable to experienced cardiologists. Despite moderate agreement and systematic differences in volumetric assessments, their reproducibility supports automated analysis for longitudinal echocardiographic monitoring.

  • Open Access

    Prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time as predictive factor for bloodstream infection

    by Constantin Mork, Brigita Gahl, Friedrich Eckstein, Denis A. Berdajs


  • Open Access

    Prognostic Value of Self-Reported Subjective Exercise Capacity in Patients With Acute Dyspnea

    by Maria Belkin, Desiree Wussler, Eleni Michou, Ivo Strebel, Nikola Kozhuharov, Zaid Sabti, Albina Nowak, Samyut Shrestha, Pedro Lopez-Ayala, Alexandra Prepoudis, et al.


  • Open Access

    Similar 5-Year Survival in Transfemoral and Transapical TAVI Patients: A Single-Center Experience

    by Constantin Mork, Raphael Twerenbold, Brigitta Gahl, Friedrich Eckstein, Raban Jeger, Christoph Kaiser, Oliver Reuthebuch

    Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) is generally considered to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation TAVI (TF-TAVI). We aimed to compare different patient risk profiles, access-related complications, and long-term survival using inverse probability treatment weighting. This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of 925 consecutive patients with aortic valve stenosis undergoing TF-TAVI (n = 802) or TA-TAVI (n = 123) at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, as a single procedure between September 2011 and August 2020. Baseline characteristics revealed a higher perioperative risk as reflected in the EuroSCORE II (geometric mean 2.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 2.4) vs. 3.7 (CI 3.1 to 4.5); before inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) p < 0.001) in the transfemoral than in the transapical group, respectively. After 30 days, TF-TAVI patients had a higher incidence of any bleeding than TA-TAVI patients (TF-TAVI n = 146 vs. TA-TAVI n = 15; weighted hazard ratio (HR) 0.52 (0.29 to 0.95); p = 0.032). After 5 years, all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups (TF-TAVI n = 162 vs. TA-TAVI n = 45; weighted HR 1.31, (0.92 to 1.88); p = 0.138). With regard to our data, we could demonstrate, despite a higher perioperative risk, the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of the transapical approach for TAVI therapies. Though at higher perioperative risk, transapically treated patients suffered from less bleeding or vascular complications than transfemorally treated patients. It is of utmost interest that 5-year mortality did not differ between the groups.


  • Open Access

    Aortic Root Thrombus Directly After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

    by Constantin Mork, Otmar Pfister, Luca Koechlin, Simon Scheifele, Anne Morgen, Lukas Altwegg, David Heppel, Denis Berdajs, Ayham Darwisch, Michael Kuehne, et al.


  • Open Access

    Simple endovascular thoracic aortic stenting rescues a wrongly deployed frozen elephant trunk during a modified procedure

    by Gregory Reid, Constantin Mork, Edin Mujagic, Denis Berdajs

    We report a bail out approach of endovascular thoracic aorta repair following incorrect deployment of a modified frozen elephant trunk stent graft into the false lumen. A 76-year-old patient was admitted to our Emergency Department. A computed tomography angiography scan showed type I DeBakey aortic dissection. An emergency modified frozen elephant trunk procedure was performed. Immediate postoperative computed tomography angiography showed that the distal segment of the stent was deployed in the false lumen, probably through a re-entry tear at the descending thoracic aorta. Emergency endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta, as well as angioplasty of the superior mesenteric artery and left iliac artery, were performed.


  • Open Access

    Bretschneider (Custodiol®) and St. Thomas 2 Cardioplegia Solution in Mitral Valve Repair via Anterolateral Right Thoracotomy: A Propensity-Modelled Comparison

    by Constantin Mork, Luca Koechlin, Thibault Schaeffer, Lena Schoemig, Urs Zenklusen, Brigitta Gahl, Oliver Reuthebuch, Friedrich S. Eckstein, Martin T. R. Grapow

    Background. Single-dose cardioplegia is preferred in minimal invasive mitral valve surgery to maintain the adjustment of the operative site without change of preset visualization. The aim of our study was to compare two widely used crystalloid cardioplegias Bretschneider (Custodiol®) versus St. Thomas 2 in patients who underwent mitral valve repair via small anterolateral right thoracotomy. Material and Methods. From May 2012 until February 2019, 184 isolated mitral valve procedures for mitral valve repair via anterolateral right thoracotomy were performed using Bretschneider (Custodiol®) cardioplegia (n=123) or St. Thomas (n=61). Primary efficacy endpoint was peak postoperative high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnT) during hospitalization. Secondary endpoints were peak creatine kinase-muscle brain type (CK-MB) and creatine kinase (CK) as well as safety outcomes. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) in order to adjust for confounding by indication. Results. Peak hs-cTnT was higher after use of Bretschneider (Custodiol®) (geometric mean 716 mg/L, 95% confidence interval (CI) 605-847 mg/L) vs. St. Thomas 2 (561 mg/L, CI 467-674 mg/L, p=0.047). Peak CK-MB (geometric mean after Bretschneider (Custodiol®): 40 μg/L, CI 35-46, St. Thomas 2: 33 μg/L, CI 27-41, p=0.295) and CK (geometric mean after Bretschneider (Custodiol®): 1370 U/L, CI 1222-1536, St. Thomas 2: 1152 U/L, CI 972-1366, p=0.037) showed the same pattern. We did not see any difference with respect to postoperative complications between treatment groups after IPTW. Conclusion. Use of St. Thomas 2 cardioplegia was associated with lower postoperative peak levels of all cardiac markers that reflect cardiac ischemia such as hs-cTnT, CK, and CK-MB as compared to Bretschneider (Custodiol®) in propensity-weighted treatment groups.