John G. Hanly

Objective: A data-driven and expert/patient consensus-based project to develop a revised Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index (SDI) is under way supported by SLICC, ACR, and the Lupus Foundation of America. Our objective is to report the item generation and reduction phase results for a revised SDI. Methods: Item generation included a literature review by literature review groups and a Delphi exercise of international systemic lupus erythematosus experts and patients. Item reduction involved Delphi rounds in which items with a median appropriateness score of ≤ 4 of 9 were excluded. A 14-member item reduction committee assessed remaining items and removed those that did not reflect the damage construct, were rare, or were not feasible to assess. The clinical domain groups then refined the remaining items and their definitions. Results: The Delphi panel included 146 individuals from 35 countries. The Delphi exercise nominated 2256 items, and the literature review identified 117 items. After removing redundancies, 226 candidate items remained. Subsequent Delphi rounds, followed by review by the item reduction committee and clinical domain groups, resulted in 39 items across 13 domains. Eleven items from the original SDI, including proteinuria and cranial neuropathy, were removed and several new items were proposed, including growth failure/reduced final height and adrenal insufficiency. Severity-based subitems are proposed for 17 items (43.6%). Conclusion: This data-driven and expert/patient consensus-based process has proposed 39 candidate items, some with subitems, and definitions for a revised SDI. Weighting of items and subitems is underway to develop a clinical scoring system.

Objective: A data‐driven and expert/patient consensus‐based project to develop a revised Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index (SDI) is under way supported by SLICC, ACR, and the Lupus Foundation of America. Our objective is to report the item generation and reduction phase results for a revised SDI. Methods: Item generation included a literature review by literature review groups and a Delphi exercise of international systemic lupus erythematosus experts and patients. Item reduction involved Delphi rounds in which items with a median appropriateness score of ≤4 of 9 were excluded. A 14‐member item reduction committee assessed remaining items and removed those that did not reflect the damage construct, were rare, or were not feasible to assess. The clinical domain groups then refined the remaining items and their definitions. Results: The Delphi panel included 146 individuals from 35 countries. The Delphi exercise nominated 2,256 items, and the literature review identified 117 items. After removing redundancies, 226 candidate items remained. Subsequent Delphi rounds, followed by review by the item reduction committee and clinical domain groups, resulted in 39 items across 13 domains. Eleven items from the original SDI, including proteinuria and cranial neuropathy, were removed and several new items were proposed, including growth failure/reduced final height and adrenal insufficiency. Severity‐based subitems are proposed for 17 items (43.6%). Conclusion: This data‐driven and expert/patient consensus‐based process has proposed 39 candidate items, some with subitems, and definitions for a revised SDI. Weighting of items and subitems is underway to develop a clinical scoring system.

Objective: Using a hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dose of 5 mg/kg/day in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with a higher risk of flares; HCQ blood level monitoring could be a better way to adjust the HCQ dose. We studied the upper threshold for a reference range of HCQ levels to inform routine monitoring. Methods: This observational study included patients (N = 2,010) across the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics, Wisconsin, international, and French studies who underwent HCQ blood level measurements. Using adjusted spline and logistic regression analyses on the cross‐sectional data, we first identified an HCQ blood level associated with higher HCQ toxicity. Next, we tested if this upper threshold level was supratherapeutic (no further risk reduction for the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 [score ≥6]). Finally, we examined associations between chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage and supratherapeutic (toxic) HCQ blood levels. Results: Among 1,842 patients (excluding 168 patients with very low HCQ blood levels), 4.9% had HCQ‐related toxicity. Odds of toxicity were 2.1‐fold higher with blood levels ≥1,150 ng/mL and 1.7‐fold higher with the cumulative HCQ dose per 1,000‐g increase. Blood levels ≥1,150 ng/mL were associated with a saturation in therapeutic effect, indicating supratherapeutic levels. Patients with CKD stage ≥3 had 2.3‐fold higher odds of having supratherapeutic levels (≥1,150 ng/mL). Conclusion: The therapeutic reference range for HCQ blood level monitoring is 750 to <1,150 ng/mL. HCQ level monitoring could optimize HCQ use, particularly in patients with CKD stage ≥3. Future longitudinal studies are needed to validate the use of HCQ blood level monitoring in optimizing dosing. image

Objectives: To assess indirect costs (IDC) due to lost productivity in paid/unpaid labour, stratified by sex, in a national prospective observational multicentre Canadian SLE cohort. Methods: Patients from six centres reported on lost productivity in paid/unpaid labour. IDC included: absenteeism (time lost from paid labour because of illness), presenteeism (degree of productivity impairment in paid/unpaid labour) and opportunity costs (additional time patients would be working in paid/unpaid labour if not ill). Opportunity costs were the difference between the time patients reported working and the time worked by an age, sex and geography-matched general population. IDC were valued using Statistics Canada wages (2024 Canadian dollars) with unpaid labour calculated using the opportunity cost method (OCM) and replacement cost method (RCM). The association of sex with IDC components was assessed (adjusted for race/ethnicity, age, disease duration, education and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index) using regression modelling. Results: Of the 2180 patients who participated, 90.5% were female and 67.1% were white; the mean age at diagnosis was 33.2 years and mean SLE duration was 14.7 years. Patients completed an average of 3.4 questionnaires with 51.2% of women and 47.1% of men employed at baseline. Total annual IDC were significantly higher among women using the OCM (women $35 330; men $32 016) and did not differ using the RCM (women $26 114; men $26 136). Regressions showed total IDC did not differ using either method. Unpaid labour costs were significantly higher among women (OCM: women $22 680; men $11 591 and RCM: women $13 465; men $5711) and paid labour costs were significantly higher among men (women $12 651; men $20 425). Regressions showed similar results. Conclusion: IDC in SLE, particularly resulting from unpaid labour, are substantial, especially in women, where they represent up to 64.2% of total IDC versus 36.2% in men. Hence, economic analyses of novel/emerging therapies should incorporate lost productivity, including unpaid labour costs, which are of particular importance in diseases disproportionately affecting women.

Objective: SLE is a complex, heterogenous autoimmune disease. SLE researchers do not always collect the same data, making comparative studies difficult. We aimed to ascertain what variables SLE clinical researchers commonly collect for SLE research. Our ultimate goal is to generate a minimal core dataset for future SLE studies. Methods: In 2020, we designed and distributed a questionnaire to members of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) as well as additional active research centres in China. Our survey included 26 questions about the types of data that are routinely collected for research. Variables collected by ≥75% of participating respondents were used as a threshold for inclusion. Results: 18 of 36 invited respondents replied (8 from USA/Canada, 5 from China and 5 from Europe). Many key variables in the domains of sociodemographics, SLE specific, comorbidities, baseline haematology/biochemistry/immunology and treatment data were collected by ≥75% respondents including the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Classification Criteria (83%), SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (82%), current treatment (100%), drug name, dose, frequency and start date (75–100%) and complement C3/4 (94%). A range of other items was collected by 50–<75% of respondents including SLICC 2012 Criteria (67%), SLICC/ACR Damage Index (68%) and Short Form Health Survey-36 (53%). Less than 50% of respondents collect certain items including European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/ACR 2019 criteria (33%), British Isles Lupus Assessment Group scores (12%) and pneumococcal vaccine status (39%). Conclusions: The frequency with which an initial set of variables is collected in SLE cohorts globally was identified and can form the basis from which to develop a core minimum dataset for SLE. Further refinement and common definitions will be needed to finalise a minimal core dataset suitable for widespread use.

Neuropsychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are common and frequently associated with a substantial negative impact on health outcomes. The pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) remains largely unknown, but a single pathogenic mechanism is unlikely to be responsible for the heterogeneous array of clinical manifestations, and a combination of inflammatory and ischaemic mechanistic pathways have been implicated. Currently, valid and reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis of NPSLE are lacking, and differentiating NPSLE from nervous system dysfunction not caused by SLE remains a major challenge for clinicians. However, correct attribution is essential to ensure timely institution of appropriate treatment. In the absence of randomized clinical trials on NPSLE, current treatment strategies are derived from clinical experience with different therapeutic modalities and their efficacy in the management of other manifestations of SLE or of neuropsychiatric disease in non-SLE populations. This Review describes recent advances in the understanding of NPSLE that can inform diagnosis and management, as well as unanswered questions that necessitate further research.

Background Cranial neuropathies (CN) are a rare neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) manifestation. Previous studies reported that antibodies to the kinesin family member 20B (KIF20B) (anti-KIF20B) protein were associated with idiopathic ataxia and CN. We assessed anti-KIF20B as a potential biomarker for NPSLE in an international SLE inception cohort. Methods Individuals fulfilling the revised 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE classification criteria were enrolled from 31 centres from 1999 to 2011 and followed annually in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics inception cohort. Anti-KIF20B testing was performed on baseline (within 15 months of diagnosis or first annual visit) samples using an addressable laser bead immunoassay. Logistic regression (penalised maximum likelihood and adjusting for confounding variables) examined the association between anti-KIF20B and NPSLE manifestations (1999 ACR case definitions), including CN, occurring over the first 5 years of follow-up. Results Of the 1827 enrolled cohort members, baseline serum and 5 years of follow-up data were available on 795 patients who were included in this study: 29.8% were anti-KIF20B-positive, 88.7% female, and 52.1% White. The frequency of anti-KIF20B positivity differed only for those with CN (n=10) versus without CN (n=785) (70.0% vs 29.3%; OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.4, 18.5). Compared with patients without CN, patients with CN were more likely to fulfil the ACR haematological (90.0% vs 66.1%; difference 23.9%, 95% CI 5.0%, 42.8%) and ANA (100% vs 95.7%; difference 4.3%, 95% CI 2.9%, 5.8%) criteria. In the multivariate analysis adjusting for age at baseline, female, White race and ethnicity, and ACR haematological and ANA criteria, anti-KIF20B positivity remained associated with CN (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.4, 19.1). Conclusion Anti-KIF20B is a potential biomarker for SLE-related CN. Further studies are needed to examine how autoantibodies against KIF20B, which is variably expressed in a variety of neurological cells, contribute to disease pathogenesis.

Objective: The goals of this study were to assess the associations of severe nonadherence to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), objectively assessed by HCQ serum levels, and risks of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares, damage, and mortality rates over five years of follow‐up.Methods: The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort is an international multicenter initiative (33 centers throughout 11 countries). The serum of patients prescribed HCQ for at least three months at enrollment were analyzed. Severe nonadherence was defined by a serum HCQ level <106 ng/mL or <53 ng/mL for HCQ doses of 400 or 200 mg/day, respectively. Associations with the risk of a flare (defined as a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 increase ≥4 points, initiation of prednisone or immunosuppressive drugs, or new renal involvement) were studied with logistic regression, and associations with damage (first SLICC/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index [SDI] increase ≥1 point) and mortality with separate Cox proportional hazard models.Results: Of the 1,849 cohort participants, 660 patients (88% women) were included. Median (interquartile range) serum HCQ was 388 ng/mL (244–566); 48 patients (7.3%) had severe HCQ nonadherence. No covariates were clearly associated with severe nonadherence, which was, however, independently associated with both flare (odds ratio 3.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80–6.42) and an increase in the SDI within each of the first three years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92 at three years; 95% CI 1.05–3.50). Eleven patients died within five years, including 3 with severe nonadherence (crude HR 5.41; 95% CI 1.43–20.39).Conclusion: Severe nonadherence was independently associated with the risks of an SLE flare in the following year, early damage, and five‐year mortality. image