Jill B. Jensen

Phosphoinositide membrane lipids are ubiquitous low-abundance signaling molecules. They direct many physiological processes that involve ion channels, membrane identification, fusion of membrane vesicles, and vesicular endocytosis. Pools of these lipids are continually broken down and refilled in living cells, and the rates of some of these reactions are strongly accelerated by physiological stimuli. Recent biophysical experiments described here measure and model the kinetics and regulation of these lipid signals in intact cells. Rapid on-line monitoring of phosphoinositide metabolism is made possible by optical tools and electrophysiology. The experiments reviewed here reveal that as for other cellular second messengers, the dynamic turnover and lifetimes of membrane phosphoinositides are measured in seconds, controlling and timing rapid physiological responses, and the signaling is under strong metabolic regulation. The underlying mechanisms of this metabolic regulation remain questions for the future.

Phosphatidylinositol(4,5)-bisphosphate (PtdInsP2) is an important modulator of many cellular processes, and its abundance in the plasma membrane is closely regulated. We examined the hypothesis that members of the Dishevelled scaffolding protein family can bind the lipid kinases phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (PI4K) and phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase (PIP5K), facilitating synthesis of PtdInsP2 directly from phosphatidylinositol. We used several assays for PtdInsP2 to examine the cooperative function of phosphoinositide kinases and the Dishevelled protein Dvl3 in the context of two receptor signaling cascades. Simultaneous overexpression of PI4KIIIα (also known as PI4KA) and PIP5KIγ (also known as PIP5K1C) had a synergistic effect on PtdInsP2 synthesis that was recapitulated by overexpression of Dvl3. Increasing the activity of Dvl3 by overexpression increased resting plasma membrane PtdInsP2. Knockdown of Dvl3 reduced resting plasma membrane PtdInsP2 and slowed PtdInsP2 resynthesis following receptor activation. We confirm that Dvl3 promotes coupling of PI4KIIIα and PIP5KIγ and show that this interaction is essential for efficient resynthesis of PtdInsP2 following receptor activation.

Phosphoinositide lipids regulate many cellular processes and are synthesized by lipid kinases. Type I phosphatidylinositol phosphate 5-kinases (PIP5KIs) generate phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PtdIns(4,5)P₂]. Several phosphoinositide-sensitive readouts revealed the nonequivalence of overexpressing PIP5KIβ, PIP5KIγ or Ras association domain family 4 (RASSF4), believed to activate PIP5KIs. Mass spectrometry showed that each of these three proteins increased total cellular phosphatidylinositol bisphosphates (PtdInsP₂) and trisphosphates (PtdInsP₃) at the expense of phosphatidylinositol phosphate (PtdInsP) without changing lipid acyl chains. Analysis of KCNQ2/3 channels and PH domains confirmed an increase in plasma membrane PtdIns(4,5)P₂ in response to PIP5KIβ or PIP5KIγ overexpression, but RASSF4 required coexpression with PIP5KIγ to increase plasma membrane PtdIns(4,5)P₂. Effects on the several steps of store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) were not explained by plasma membrane phosphoinositide increases alone. PIP5KIβ and RASSF4 increased STIM1 proximity to the plasma membrane, accelerated STIM1 mobilization and speeded onset of SOCE; however, PIP5KIγ reduced STIM1 recruitment but did not change induced Ca²⁺ entry. These differences imply actions through different segregated pools of phosphoinositides and specific protein–protein interactions and targeting. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Effective cellular function requires both compartmentalization of tasks in space and time, and coordination of those efforts. The endoplasmic reticulum's (ER) expansive and ramifying structure makes it ideally suited to serve as a regulatory platform for organelle–organelle communication through membrane contacts. These contact sites consist of two membranes juxtaposed at a distance less than 30 nm that mediate the exchange of lipids and ions without the need for membrane fission or fusion, a process distinct from classical vesicular transport. Membrane contact sites are positioned by organelle-specific membrane–membrane tethering proteins and contain a growing number of additional proteins that organize information transfer to shape membrane identity. Here we briefly review the role of ER-containing membrane junctions in two important cellular functions: calcium signalling and phosphoinositide processing.

Endoplasmic reticulum–plasma membrane (ER–PM) contact sites play an integral role in cellular processes such as excitation–contraction coupling and store-operated calcium entry (SOCE). Another ER–PM assembly is one tethered by the extended synaptotagmins (E-Syt). We have discovered that at steady state, E-Syt2 positions the ER and Sac1, an integral ER membrane lipid phosphatase, in discrete ER–PM junctions. Here, Sac1 participates in phosphoinositide homeostasis by limiting PM phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI(4)P), the precursor of PI(4,5)P2. Activation of G protein–coupled receptors that deplete PM PI(4,5)P2 disrupts E-Syt2–mediated ER–PM junctions, reducing Sac1’s access to the PM and permitting PM PI(4)P and PI(4,5)P2 to recover. Conversely, depletion of ER luminal calcium and subsequent activation of SOCE increases the amount of Sac1 in contact with the PM, depleting PM PI(4)P. Thus, the dynamic presence of Sac1 at ER–PM contact sites allows it to act as a cellular sensor and controller of PM phosphoinositides, thereby influencing many PM processes.

Significance: Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P ₂ ] is a key informational phospholipid, localized to and defining the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane (PM). How PM PI(4,5)P ₂ is sourced and regulated is critically important to the understanding of cellular trafficking, cell motility, membrane identity, and ion channel activity. The immediate precursor of PI(4,5)P ₂ is PI(4)P. Direct evidence detailing the location and contribution of PI(4)P pool(s) maintaining steady-state PM PI(4,5)P ₂ is lacking. We find that PM PI(4,5)P ₂ levels are supported by at least two continuously supplying precursor pools of PI(4)P, one in the PM and the other in the Golgi. The contribution of the Golgi pool of PI(4)P highlights the possibility that PM PI(4,5)P ₂ production is coupled to important cell biological processes.

Phosphoinositides are a family of minority acidic phospholipids in cell membranes. Their principal role is instructional: they interact with proteins. Each cellular membrane compartment uses a characteristic species of phosphoinositide. This signature phosphoinositide attracts a specific complement of functionally important, loosely attached peripheral proteins to that membrane. For example, the phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP(2)) of the plasma membrane attracts phospholipase C, protein kinase C, proteins involved in membrane budding and fusion, proteins regulating the actin cytoskeleton, and others. Phosphoinositides also regulate the activity level of the integral membrane proteins. Many ion channels of the plasma membrane need the plasma-membrane-specific PIP(2) to function. Their activity decreases when the abundance of this lipid falls, as for example after activation of phospholipase C. This behaviour is illustrated by the suppression of KCNQ K(+) channel current by activation of M(1) muscarinic receptors; KCNQ channels require PIP(2) for their activity. In summary, phosphoinositides contribute to the selection of peripheral proteins for each membrane and regulate the activity of the integral proteins.

The signaling phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) is synthesized in two steps from phosphatidylinositol by lipid kinases. It then interacts with KCNQ channels and with pleckstrin homology (PH) domains among many other physiological protein targets. We measured and developed a quantitative description of these metabolic and protein interaction steps by perturbing the PIP2 pool with a voltage-sensitive phosphatase (VSP). VSP can remove the 5-phosphate of PIP2 with a time constant of τ <300 ms and fully inhibits KCNQ currents in a similar time. PIP2 was then resynthesized from phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PIP) quickly, τ = 11 s. In contrast, resynthesis of PIP2 after activation of phospholipase C by muscarinic receptors took ∼130 s. These kinetic experiments showed that (1) PIP2 activation of KCNQ channels obeys a cooperative square law, (2) the PIP2 residence time on channels is <10 ms and the exchange time on PH domains is similarly fast, and (3) the step synthesizing PIP2 by PIP 5-kinase is fast and limited primarily by a step(s) that replenishes the pool of plasma membrane PI(4)P. We extend the kinetic model for signaling from M1 muscarinic receptors, presented in our companion paper in this issue (Falkenburger et al. 2010. J. Gen. Physiol. doi:10.1085/jgp.200910344), with this new information on PIP2 synthesis and KCNQ interaction.

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate responses to external stimuli in various cell types. Early events, such as the binding of ligand and G proteins to the receptor, nucleotide exchange (NX), and GTPase activity at the Gα subunit, are common for many different GPCRs. For Gq-coupled M1 muscarinic (acetylcholine) receptors (M1Rs), we recently measured time courses of intermediate steps in the signaling cascade using Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). The expression of FRET probes changes the density of signaling molecules. To provide a full quantitative description of M1R signaling that includes a simulation of kinetics in native (tsA201) cells, we now determine the density of FRET probes and construct a kinetic model of M1R signaling through Gq to activation of phospholipase C (PLC). Downstream effects on the trace membrane lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and PIP2-dependent KCNQ2/3 current are considered in our companion paper in this issue (Falkenburger et al. 2010. J. Gen. Physiol. doi:10.1085/jgp.200910345). By calibrating their fluorescence intensity, we found that we selected transfected cells for our experiments with ∼3,000 fluorescently labeled receptors, G proteins, or PLC molecules per µm2 of plasma membrane. Endogenous levels are much lower, 1–40 per µm2. Our kinetic model reproduces the time courses and concentration–response relationships measured by FRET and explains observed delays. It predicts affinities and rate constants that align well with literature values. In native tsA201 cells, much of the delay between ligand binding and PLC activation reflects slow binding of G proteins to receptors. With M1R and Gβ FRET probes overexpressed, 10% of receptors have G proteins bound at rest, rising to 73% in the presence of agonist. In agreement with previous work, the model suggests that binding of PLC to Gαq greatly speeds up NX and GTPase activity, and that PLC is maintained in the active state by cycles of rapid GTP hydrolysis and NX on Gαq subunits bound to PLC.

G protein–coupled receptors initiate signaling cascades. M1 muscarinic receptor (M1R) activation couples through Gαq to stimulate phospholipase C (PLC), which cleaves phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). Depletion of PIP2 closes PIP2-requiring Kv7.2/7.3 potassium channels (M current), thereby increasing neuronal excitability. This modulation of M current is relatively slow (6.4 s to reach within 1/e of the steady-state value). To identify the rate-limiting steps, we investigated the kinetics of each step using pairwise optical interactions likely to represent fluorescence resonance energy transfer for M1R activation, M1R/Gβ interaction, Gαq/Gβ separation, Gαq/PLC interaction, and PIP2 hydrolysis. Electrophysiology was used to monitor channel closure. Time constants for M1R activation (<100 ms) and M1R/Gβ interaction (200 ms) are both fast, suggesting that neither of them is rate limiting during muscarinic suppression of M current. Gαq/Gβ separation and Gαq/PLC interaction have intermediate 1/e times (2.9 and 1.7 s, respectively), and PIP2 hydrolysis (6.7 s) occurs on the timescale of M current suppression. Overexpression of PLC accelerates the rate of M current suppression threefold (to 2.0 s) to become nearly contemporaneous with Gαq/PLC interaction. Evidently, channel release of PIP2 and closure are rapid, and the availability of active PLC limits the rate of M current suppression.