Chon Phin Ong
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Chon Phin Ong has a total of 99 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Dong-Yan Jin
School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, China
9 shared publications Kaiming Tang
State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Department of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China
6 shared publications- Shuofeng Yuan
State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Department of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
6 shared publications - Kelvin Kai-Wang To
The University of Hong Kong
4 shared publications Zi-Wei Ye
School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
4 shared publicationsCuiting Luo
State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Department of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
CRISPR/Cas13-Mediated Inhibition of EBNA1 for Suppression of Epstein–Barr Virus Transcripts and DNA Load in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), a double-stranded DNA virus, is implicated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), with particularly high incidence in regions such as southern China and Hong Kong. Although NPC is typically treated with radio- and chemotherapy, outcomes remain poor for advanced-stage diagnoses, highlighting the need for targeted therapies. This study explores the potential of CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein 13 (Cas13) technology to target essential EBV RNA in NPC cells. Previous research demonstrated that CRISPR/Cas9 could partially reduce EBV load, but suppression was incomplete. Here, the combination of CRISPR/Cas13 with CRISPR/Cas9 shows enhanced viral clearance. Long-term EBNA1 suppression via CRISPR/Cas13 reduced the EBV genome, improved CRISPR/Cas9 effectiveness, and identified suitable AAV serotypes for delivery. Furthermore, cotreatment increased NPC cell sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. These findings underscore the potential of CRISPR/Cas13 as an anti-EBV therapeutic approach, effectively targeting latent EBV transcripts and complementing existing treatments. The study suggests a promising new direction for developing anti-EBV strategies, potentially benefiting therapies for NPC and other EBV-associated malignancies.
Open AccessCRISPR/Cas13-Mediated Inhibition of EBNA1 for Suppression of Epstein–Barr Virus Transcripts and DNA Load in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), a double-stranded DNA virus, is implicated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), with particularly high incidence in regions such as southern China and Hong Kong. Although NPC is typically treated with radio- and chemotherapy, outcomes remain poor for advanced-stage diagnoses, highlighting the need for targeted therapies. This study explores the potential of CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein 13 (Cas13) technology to target essential EBV RNA in NPC cells. Previous research demonstrated that CRISPR/Cas9 could partially reduce EBV load, but suppression was incomplete. Here, the combination of CRISPR/Cas13 with CRISPR/Cas9 shows enhanced viral clearance. Long-term EBNA1 suppression via CRISPR/Cas13 reduced the EBV genome, improved CRISPR/Cas9 effectiveness, and identified suitable AAV serotypes for delivery. Furthermore, cotreatment increased NPC cell sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. These findings underscore the potential of CRISPR/Cas13 as an anti-EBV therapeutic approach, effectively targeting latent EBV transcripts and complementing existing treatments. The study suggests a promising new direction for developing anti-EBV strategies, potentially benefiting therapies for NPC and other EBV-associated malignancies.
- Open Access
- 25 March 2025
- Published by Elsevier in EBioMedicine
- Vol. 114, 105662
A live attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine constructed by dual inactivation of NSP16 and ORF3a
- 25 March 2025
- Published by Elsevier in EBioMedicine
- Vol. 114, 105662
Open AccessA live attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine constructed by dual inactivation of NSP16 and ORF3a
- Open Access
- 31 May 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
- Vol. 14 (9) , 4028-4044
Identification of novel small-molecule inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 by chemical genetics
- 31 May 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
- Vol. 14 (9) , 4028-4044
Open AccessIdentification of novel small-molecule inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 by chemical genetics
- Open Access
- 20 November 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in npj Vaccines
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-5
Monovalent vaccination with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 protects hamsters against Omicron but not non-Omicron variants
We compared the protective effects of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines derived from the ancestral and the currently circulating BA.5.2 strains against infection with multiple variants in Syrian golden hamsters. Vaccination with BA.5.2 effectively protected against infection with the Omicron subvariants including XBB.1, but not the Alpha or Delta variant. In contrast, hamsters vaccinated with the ancestral strain demonstrated decent neutralization activity against both the Omicron and non-Omicron variants. Our findings might instruct future design and formulation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
- 20 November 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in npj Vaccines
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-5
Open AccessMonovalent vaccination with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 protects hamsters against Omicron but not non-Omicron variants
We compared the protective effects of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines derived from the ancestral and the currently circulating BA.5.2 strains against infection with multiple variants in Syrian golden hamsters. Vaccination with BA.5.2 effectively protected against infection with the Omicron subvariants including XBB.1, but not the Alpha or Delta variant. In contrast, hamsters vaccinated with the ancestral strain demonstrated decent neutralization activity against both the Omicron and non-Omicron variants. Our findings might instruct future design and formulation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
- 28 November 2022
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 95 (1) , e28326
Comparative analysis of SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants
The initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) Omicron subvariants, BA.1 and BA.2, are being progressively displaced by BA.5 in many countries. To provide insight on the replacement of BA.2 by BA.5 as the dominant SARS‐CoV‐2 variant, we performed a comparative analysis of Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants in cell culture and hamster models. We found that BA.5.2 exhibited enhanced replicative kinetics over BA.2.12.1 in vitro and in vivo, which is evidenced by the dominant BA.5.2 viral genome detected at different time points, regardless of immune selection pressure with vaccine‐induced serum antibodies. Utilizing reverse genetics, we constructed a mutant SARS‐CoV‐2 carrying spike F486V substitution, which is an uncharacterized mutation that concurrently discriminates Omicron BA.5.2 from BA.2.12.1 variant. We noticed that the 486th residue does not confer viral replication advantage to the virus. We also found that 486V displayed generally reduced immune evasion capacity when compared with its predecessor, 486F. However, the surge of fitness in BA.5.2 over BA.2.12.1 was not due to stand‐alone F486V substitution but as a result of the combination of multiple mutations. Our study upholds the urgency for continuous monitoring of SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron variants with enhanced replication fitness.
- 28 November 2022
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 95 (1) , e28326
Comparative analysis of SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants
The initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) Omicron subvariants, BA.1 and BA.2, are being progressively displaced by BA.5 in many countries. To provide insight on the replacement of BA.2 by BA.5 as the dominant SARS‐CoV‐2 variant, we performed a comparative analysis of Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants in cell culture and hamster models. We found that BA.5.2 exhibited enhanced replicative kinetics over BA.2.12.1 in vitro and in vivo, which is evidenced by the dominant BA.5.2 viral genome detected at different time points, regardless of immune selection pressure with vaccine‐induced serum antibodies. Utilizing reverse genetics, we constructed a mutant SARS‐CoV‐2 carrying spike F486V substitution, which is an uncharacterized mutation that concurrently discriminates Omicron BA.5.2 from BA.2.12.1 variant. We noticed that the 486th residue does not confer viral replication advantage to the virus. We also found that 486V displayed generally reduced immune evasion capacity when compared with its predecessor, 486F. However, the surge of fitness in BA.5.2 over BA.2.12.1 was not due to stand‐alone F486V substitution but as a result of the combination of multiple mutations. Our study upholds the urgency for continuous monitoring of SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron variants with enhanced replication fitness.
- Top Cited Papers
- 22 July 2022
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 377 (6604) , 428-433
Pathogenicity, transmissibility, and fitness of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in Syrian hamsters
The in vivo pathogenicity, transmissibility, and fitness of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant are not well understood. We compared these virological attributes of this new variant of concern (VOC) with those of the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant in a Syrian hamster model of COVID-19. Omicron-infected hamsters lost significantly less body weight and exhibited reduced clinical scores, respiratory tract viral burdens, cytokine and chemokine dysregulation, and lung damage than Delta-infected hamsters. Both variants were highly transmissible through contact transmission. In noncontact transmission studies Omicron demonstrated similar or higher transmissibility than Delta. Delta outcompeted Omicron without selection pressure, but this scenario changed once immune selection pressure with neutralizing antibodies—active against Delta but poorly active against Omicron—was introduced. Next-generation vaccines and antivirals effective against this new VOC are therefore urgently needed.
- 22 July 2022
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 377 (6604) , 428-433
Top Cited PapersPathogenicity, transmissibility, and fitness of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in Syrian hamsters
The in vivo pathogenicity, transmissibility, and fitness of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant are not well understood. We compared these virological attributes of this new variant of concern (VOC) with those of the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant in a Syrian hamster model of COVID-19. Omicron-infected hamsters lost significantly less body weight and exhibited reduced clinical scores, respiratory tract viral burdens, cytokine and chemokine dysregulation, and lung damage than Delta-infected hamsters. Both variants were highly transmissible through contact transmission. In noncontact transmission studies Omicron demonstrated similar or higher transmissibility than Delta. Delta outcompeted Omicron without selection pressure, but this scenario changed once immune selection pressure with neutralizing antibodies—active against Delta but poorly active against Omicron—was introduced. Next-generation vaccines and antivirals effective against this new VOC are therefore urgently needed.
- 29 March 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Cellular & Molecular Immunology
- Vol. 19 (5) , 588-601
Intranasal administration of a single dose of a candidate live attenuated vaccine derived from an NSP16-deficient SARS-CoV-2 strain confers sterilizing immunity in animals
Live attenuated vaccines might elicit mucosal and sterilizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 that the existing mRNA, adenoviral vector and inactivated vaccines fail to induce. Here, we describe a candidate live attenuated vaccine strain of SARS-CoV-2 in which the NSP16 gene, which encodes 2′-O-methyltransferase, is catalytically disrupted by a point mutation. This virus, designated d16, was severely attenuated in hamsters and transgenic mice, causing only asymptomatic and nonpathogenic infection. A single dose of d16 administered intranasally resulted in sterilizing immunity in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts of hamsters, thus preventing viral spread in a contact-based transmission model. It also robustly stimulated humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, thus conferring full protection against lethal challenge with SARS-CoV-2 in a transgenic mouse model. The neutralizing antibodies elicited by d16 effectively cross-reacted with several SARS-CoV-2 variants. Secretory immunoglobulin A was detected in the blood and nasal wash of vaccinated mice. Our work provides proof-of-principle evidence for harnessing NSP16-deficient SARS-CoV-2 for the development of live attenuated vaccines and paves the way for further preclinical studies of d16 as a prototypic vaccine strain, to which new features might be introduced to improve safety, transmissibility, immunogenicity and efficacy.
- 29 March 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Cellular & Molecular Immunology
- Vol. 19 (5) , 588-601
Intranasal administration of a single dose of a candidate live attenuated vaccine derived from an NSP16-deficient SARS-CoV-2 strain confers sterilizing immunity in animals
Live attenuated vaccines might elicit mucosal and sterilizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 that the existing mRNA, adenoviral vector and inactivated vaccines fail to induce. Here, we describe a candidate live attenuated vaccine strain of SARS-CoV-2 in which the NSP16 gene, which encodes 2′-O-methyltransferase, is catalytically disrupted by a point mutation. This virus, designated d16, was severely attenuated in hamsters and transgenic mice, causing only asymptomatic and nonpathogenic infection. A single dose of d16 administered intranasally resulted in sterilizing immunity in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts of hamsters, thus preventing viral spread in a contact-based transmission model. It also robustly stimulated humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, thus conferring full protection against lethal challenge with SARS-CoV-2 in a transgenic mouse model. The neutralizing antibodies elicited by d16 effectively cross-reacted with several SARS-CoV-2 variants. Secretory immunoglobulin A was detected in the blood and nasal wash of vaccinated mice. Our work provides proof-of-principle evidence for harnessing NSP16-deficient SARS-CoV-2 for the development of live attenuated vaccines and paves the way for further preclinical studies of d16 as a prototypic vaccine strain, to which new features might be introduced to improve safety, transmissibility, immunogenicity and efficacy.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Ivyspring International Publisher in International Journal of Biological Sciences
- Vol. 18 (12) , 4781-4791
Cross-variant protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in hamsters immunized with monovalent and bivalent inactivated vaccines
Rapid development and successful use of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 might hold the key to curb the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19. Emergence of vaccine-evasive SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) has posed a new challenge to vaccine design and development. One urgent need is to determine what types of variant-specific and bivalent vaccines should be developed. Here, we compared homotypic and heterotypic protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection of hamsters with monovalent and bivalent whole-virion inactivated vaccines derived from representative VOCs. In addition to the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain, Delta (B.1.617.2; δ) and Theta (P.3; θ) variants were used in vaccine preparation. Additional VOCs including Omicron (B.1.1.529) and Alpha (B.1.1.7) variants were employed in the challenge experiment. Consistent with previous findings, Omicron variant exhibited the highest degree of immune evasion, rendering all different forms of inactivated vaccines substantially less efficacious. Notably, monovalent and bivalent Delta variant-specific inactivated vaccines provided optimal protection against challenge with Delta variant. Yet, some cross-variant protection against Omicron and Alpha variants was seen with all monovalent and bivalent inactivated vaccines tested. Taken together, our findings support the notion that an optimal next-generation inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 should contain the predominant VOC in circulation. Further investigations are underway to test whether a bivalent vaccine for Delta and Omicron variants can serve this purpose.
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Ivyspring International Publisher in International Journal of Biological Sciences
- Vol. 18 (12) , 4781-4791
Open AccessCross-variant protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in hamsters immunized with monovalent and bivalent inactivated vaccines
Rapid development and successful use of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 might hold the key to curb the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19. Emergence of vaccine-evasive SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) has posed a new challenge to vaccine design and development. One urgent need is to determine what types of variant-specific and bivalent vaccines should be developed. Here, we compared homotypic and heterotypic protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection of hamsters with monovalent and bivalent whole-virion inactivated vaccines derived from representative VOCs. In addition to the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain, Delta (B.1.617.2; δ) and Theta (P.3; θ) variants were used in vaccine preparation. Additional VOCs including Omicron (B.1.1.529) and Alpha (B.1.1.7) variants were employed in the challenge experiment. Consistent with previous findings, Omicron variant exhibited the highest degree of immune evasion, rendering all different forms of inactivated vaccines substantially less efficacious. Notably, monovalent and bivalent Delta variant-specific inactivated vaccines provided optimal protection against challenge with Delta variant. Yet, some cross-variant protection against Omicron and Alpha variants was seen with all monovalent and bivalent inactivated vaccines tested. Taken together, our findings support the notion that an optimal next-generation inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 should contain the predominant VOC in circulation. Further investigations are underway to test whether a bivalent vaccine for Delta and Omicron variants can serve this purpose.
- 29 March 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 30 (7) , 1733-1743
Breast cancer awareness and knowledge assessment among men and women in Malaysia
- 29 March 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 30 (7) , 1733-1743
Breast cancer awareness and knowledge assessment among men and women in Malaysia
- Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Emerging Microbes & Infections
- Vol. 10 (1) , 291-304
Beneficial effect of combinational methylprednisolone and remdesivir in hamster model of SARS-CoV-2 infection
Effective treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are urgently needed. Dexamethasone has been shown to confer survival benefits to certain groups of hospitalized patients, but whether glucocorticoids such as dexamethasone and methylprednisolone should be used together with antivirals to prevent a boost of SARS-CoV-2 replication remains to be determined. Here, we show the beneficial effect of methylprednisolone alone and in combination with remdesivir in the hamster model of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Treatment with methylprednisolone boosted RNA replication of SARS-CoV-2 but suppressed viral induction of proinflammatory cytokines in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Although methylprednisolone monotherapy alleviated body weight loss as well as nasal and pulmonary inflammation, viral loads increased and antibody response against the receptor-binding domain of spike protein attenuated. In contrast, a combination of methylprednisolone with remdesivir not only prevented body weight loss and inflammation, but also dampened viral protein expression and viral loads. In addition, the suppressive effect of methylprednisolone on antibody response was alleviated in the presence of remdesivir. Thus, combinational anti-inflammatory and antiviral therapy might be an effective, safer and more versatile treatment option for COVID-19. These data support testing of the efficacy of a combination of methylprednisolone and remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 in randomized controlled clinical trials.
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Emerging Microbes & Infections
- Vol. 10 (1) , 291-304
Open AccessBeneficial effect of combinational methylprednisolone and remdesivir in hamster model of SARS-CoV-2 infection
Effective treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are urgently needed. Dexamethasone has been shown to confer survival benefits to certain groups of hospitalized patients, but whether glucocorticoids such as dexamethasone and methylprednisolone should be used together with antivirals to prevent a boost of SARS-CoV-2 replication remains to be determined. Here, we show the beneficial effect of methylprednisolone alone and in combination with remdesivir in the hamster model of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Treatment with methylprednisolone boosted RNA replication of SARS-CoV-2 but suppressed viral induction of proinflammatory cytokines in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Although methylprednisolone monotherapy alleviated body weight loss as well as nasal and pulmonary inflammation, viral loads increased and antibody response against the receptor-binding domain of spike protein attenuated. In contrast, a combination of methylprednisolone with remdesivir not only prevented body weight loss and inflammation, but also dampened viral protein expression and viral loads. In addition, the suppressive effect of methylprednisolone on antibody response was alleviated in the presence of remdesivir. Thus, combinational anti-inflammatory and antiviral therapy might be an effective, safer and more versatile treatment option for COVID-19. These data support testing of the efficacy of a combination of methylprednisolone and remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 in randomized controlled clinical trials.