Ross Street
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Ross Street has a total of 61 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Stephen Lack
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
17 shared publications Brian Day
8 shared publicationsAurelio Carboni
5 shared publicationsAndré Joyal
Département de Mathématiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3P8, Canada
4 shared publicationsBranko Nikolić
4 shared publications- Richard Garner
Macquarie University, Australia
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 27 November 2025
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Mathematical Structures in Computer Science
- Vol. 35, e31
Objective Mackey and Tambara functors via parametrized categories
The first word in the title is intended in a sense suggested by Lawvere and Schanuel whereby finite sets are objective natural numbers. At the objective level, the axioms defining abstract Mackey and Tambara functors are categorically familiar. The first step was taken by Harald Lindner in 1976 when he recognized that Mackey functors, defined as pairs of functors, were equivalently single functors with domain a category of spans. In 1993, Tambara recognized that TNR-functors (that is, functors designed to have abstract trace, norm and restriction operations, and now called Tambara functors) were equivalently certain functors out of a category of polynomials. We define objective Mackey and objective Tambara functors as parametrized categories that have local finite products and satisfy some parametrized completeness and cocompleteness restriction. However, we can replace the original parametrizing base for objective Mackey functors by a bicategory of spans while the replacement for objective Tambara functors is a bicategory obtained by iterating the span construction; these iterated spans are polynomials. There is an objective Mackey functor of ordinary Mackey functors. We show that there is a distributive law relating objective Mackey functors to objective Tambara functors analogous to the distributive law relating abelian groups to commutative rings. We remark on hom enrichment matters involving the 2-category $\textrm{Cat}_{+}$ of categories admitting finite coproducts and functors preserving them, both as a closed base and as a skew-closed base.- 27 November 2025
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Mathematical Structures in Computer Science
- Vol. 35, e31
Open AccessObjective Mackey and Tambara functors via parametrized categories
The first word in the title is intended in a sense suggested by Lawvere and Schanuel whereby finite sets are objective natural numbers. At the objective level, the axioms defining abstract Mackey and Tambara functors are categorically familiar. The first step was taken by Harald Lindner in 1976 when he recognized that Mackey functors, defined as pairs of functors, were equivalently single functors with domain a category of spans. In 1993, Tambara recognized that TNR-functors (that is, functors designed to have abstract trace, norm and restriction operations, and now called Tambara functors) were equivalently certain functors out of a category of polynomials. We define objective Mackey and objective Tambara functors as parametrized categories that have local finite products and satisfy some parametrized completeness and cocompleteness restriction. However, we can replace the original parametrizing base for objective Mackey functors by a bicategory of spans while the replacement for objective Tambara functors is a bicategory obtained by iterating the span construction; these iterated spans are polynomials. There is an objective Mackey functor of ordinary Mackey functors. We show that there is a distributive law relating objective Mackey functors to objective Tambara functors analogous to the distributive law relating abelian groups to commutative rings. We remark on hom enrichment matters involving the 2-category $\textrm{Cat}_{+}$ of categories admitting finite coproducts and functors preserving them, both as a closed base and as a skew-closed base. - Open Access
- 1 January 2025
- Published by Mount Allison University in Theory and Applications of Categories
- Vol. 43 (4) , 68-92
Wood fusion and Thiébaud algebraicity
The goal is to show how a 1978 paper of Richard Wood on monoidal comonads and exponentiation relates to more recent publications such as Pastro et alia [30] and Bruguiéres et alia [7]. In the process, we mildly extend the ideas to procomonads in a magmal setting and suggest it also works for algebras for any club in the sense of Max Kelly [18, 19].
- 1 January 2025
- Published by Mount Allison University in Theory and Applications of Categories
- Vol. 43 (4) , 68-92
Open AccessWood fusion and Thiébaud algebraicity
The goal is to show how a 1978 paper of Richard Wood on monoidal comonads and exponentiation relates to more recent publications such as Pastro et alia [30] and Bruguiéres et alia [7]. In the process, we mildly extend the ideas to procomonads in a magmal setting and suggest it also works for algebras for any club in the sense of Max Kelly [18, 19].
- Open Access
- 1 January 2024
- Published by Mount Allison University in Theory and Applications of Categories
- Vol. 41 (21) , 686-706
The core groupoid can suffice
This work results from a study of Nicholas Kuhn's paper entitled "Generic representation theory of finite fields in nondescribing characteristic". Our goal is to abstract the categorical structure required to obtain an equivalence between functor categories rF , V s and rG , V s where G is the core groupoid of the category F and V is a category of modules over a commutative ring. Examples other than Kuhn's are covered by this general setting.
- 1 January 2024
- Published by Mount Allison University in Theory and Applications of Categories
- Vol. 41 (21) , 686-706
Open AccessThe core groupoid can suffice
This work results from a study of Nicholas Kuhn's paper entitled "Generic representation theory of finite fields in nondescribing characteristic". Our goal is to abstract the categorical structure required to obtain an equivalence between functor categories rF , V s and rG , V s where G is the core groupoid of the category F and V is a category of modules over a commutative ring. Examples other than Kuhn's are covered by this general setting.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2024
- Published by Mount Allison University in Theory and Applications of Categories
- Vol. 40 (1) , 3-31
Monoidal centres and groupoid-graded categories
We denote the monoidal bicategory of two-sided modules (also called profunctors, bimodules and distributors) between categories by Mod; the tensor product is cartesian product of categories. For a groupoid G , we study the monoidal centre ZPspG , Mod op q of the monoidal bicategory PspG , Mod op q of pseudofunctors and pseudonatural transformations; the tensor product is pointwise. Alexei Davydov defined the full centre of a monoid in a monoidal category. We define a higher dimensional version: the full monoidal centre of a monoidale (= pseudomonoid) in a monoidal bicategory M , and it is a braided monoidale in the monoidal centre ZM of M. Each fibration π : H Ñ G between groupoids provides an example of a full monoidal centre of a monoidale in PspG , Mod op q. For a group G, we explain how the G-graded categorical structures, as considered by Turaev and Virelizier in order to construct topological invariants, fit into this monoidal bicategory context. We see that their structures are monoidales in the monoidal centre of the monoidal bicategory of k-linear categories on which G acts. Contents 1 The bicategory of categories and two-sided modules 5 2 Review of centres 8 3 Review of internal centres 12 4 Centre pieces in Mod op 15 5 The groupoid of automorphisms in a groupoid 17 6 Monoidales in convolution bicategories 20 7 The Turaev-Virelizier structures 22 8 Internal homs, biduals and braidings 23 9 A full centre from a groupoid fibration 25
- 1 January 2024
- Published by Mount Allison University in Theory and Applications of Categories
- Vol. 40 (1) , 3-31
Open AccessMonoidal centres and groupoid-graded categories
We denote the monoidal bicategory of two-sided modules (also called profunctors, bimodules and distributors) between categories by Mod; the tensor product is cartesian product of categories. For a groupoid G , we study the monoidal centre ZPspG , Mod op q of the monoidal bicategory PspG , Mod op q of pseudofunctors and pseudonatural transformations; the tensor product is pointwise. Alexei Davydov defined the full centre of a monoid in a monoidal category. We define a higher dimensional version: the full monoidal centre of a monoidale (= pseudomonoid) in a monoidal bicategory M , and it is a braided monoidale in the monoidal centre ZM of M. Each fibration π : H Ñ G between groupoids provides an example of a full monoidal centre of a monoidale in PspG , Mod op q. For a group G, we explain how the G-graded categorical structures, as considered by Turaev and Virelizier in order to construct topological invariants, fit into this monoidal bicategory context. We see that their structures are monoidales in the monoidal centre of the monoidal bicategory of k-linear categories on which G acts. Contents 1 The bicategory of categories and two-sided modules 5 2 Review of centres 8 3 Review of internal centres 12 4 Centre pieces in Mod op 15 5 The groupoid of automorphisms in a groupoid 17 6 Monoidales in convolution bicategories 20 7 The Turaev-Virelizier structures 22 8 Internal homs, biduals and braidings 23 9 A full centre from a groupoid fibration 25
- Open Access
Wood fusion for magmal comonads
The goal is to show how a 1978 paper of Richard Wood on monoidal comonads and exponentiation relates to more recent publications such as Pastro-Street (2009) and Bruguiéres-Lack-Virelizier (2011). In the process, we mildly extend the ideas to procomonads in a magmal setting and suggest it also works for algebras for any club in the sense of Max Kelly (1972).
Open AccessWood fusion for magmal comonads
The goal is to show how a 1978 paper of Richard Wood on monoidal comonads and exponentiation relates to more recent publications such as Pastro-Street (2009) and Bruguiéres-Lack-Virelizier (2011). In the process, we mildly extend the ideas to procomonads in a magmal setting and suggest it also works for algebras for any club in the sense of Max Kelly (1972).
- 9 February 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra
- Vol. 227 (8)
Comonadic base change for enriched categories
- 9 February 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra
- Vol. 227 (8)
Comonadic base change for enriched categories
- Open Access
The core groupoid can suffice
This work results from a study of Nicholas Kuhn's paper entitled "Generic representation theory of finite fields in nondescribing characteristic". Our goal is to abstract the categorical structure required to obtain an equivalence between functor categories $[\mathscr{F},\mathscr{V}]$ and $[\mathscr{G},\mathscr{V}]$ where $\mathscr{G}$ is the core groupoid of the category $\mathscr{F}$ and $\mathscr{V}$ is a category of modules over a commutative ring.Open AccessThe core groupoid can suffice
This work results from a study of Nicholas Kuhn's paper entitled "Generic representation theory of finite fields in nondescribing characteristic". Our goal is to abstract the categorical structure required to obtain an equivalence between functor categories $[\mathscr{F},\mathscr{V}]$ and $[\mathscr{G},\mathscr{V}]$ where $\mathscr{G}$ is the core groupoid of the category $\mathscr{F}$ and $\mathscr{V}$ is a category of modules over a commutative ring. - Open Access
Monoidal centres and groupoid-graded categories
We denote the monoidal bicategory of two-sided modules (also called profunctors, bimodules and distributors) between categories by $\mathrm{Mod}$; the tensor product is cartesian product of categories. For a groupoid $\scr{G}$, we study the monoidal centre $\mathrm{ZPs}(\scr{G},\mathrm{Mod}^{\mathrm{op}})$ of the monoidal bicategory $\mathrm{Ps}(\scr{G},\mathrm{Mod}^{\mathrm{op}})$ of pseudofunctors and pseudonatural transformations; the tensor product is pointwise. Alexei Davydov defined the full centre of a monoid in a monoidal category. We define a higher dimensional version: the full monoidal centre of a monoidale (= pseudomonoid) in a monoidal bicategory $\scr{M}$, and it is a braided monoidale in the monoidal centre $\mathrm{Z}\scr{M}$ of $\scr{M}$. Each fibration $\pi : \scr{H} \to \scr{G}$ between groupoids provides an example of a full monoidal centre of a monoidale in $\mathrm{Ps}(\scr{G},\mathrm{Mod}^{\mathrm{op}})$. For a group $G$, we explain how the $G$-graded categorical structures, as considered by Turaev and Virelizier in order to construct topological invariants, fit into this monoidal bicategory context. We see that their structures are monoidales in the monoidal centre of the monoidal bicategory of $k$-linear categories on which $G$ acts.Open AccessMonoidal centres and groupoid-graded categories
We denote the monoidal bicategory of two-sided modules (also called profunctors, bimodules and distributors) between categories by $\mathrm{Mod}$; the tensor product is cartesian product of categories. For a groupoid $\scr{G}$, we study the monoidal centre $\mathrm{ZPs}(\scr{G},\mathrm{Mod}^{\mathrm{op}})$ of the monoidal bicategory $\mathrm{Ps}(\scr{G},\mathrm{Mod}^{\mathrm{op}})$ of pseudofunctors and pseudonatural transformations; the tensor product is pointwise. Alexei Davydov defined the full centre of a monoid in a monoidal category. We define a higher dimensional version: the full monoidal centre of a monoidale (= pseudomonoid) in a monoidal bicategory $\scr{M}$, and it is a braided monoidale in the monoidal centre $\mathrm{Z}\scr{M}$ of $\scr{M}$. Each fibration $\pi : \scr{H} \to \scr{G}$ between groupoids provides an example of a full monoidal centre of a monoidale in $\mathrm{Ps}(\scr{G},\mathrm{Mod}^{\mathrm{op}})$. For a group $G$, we explain how the $G$-graded categorical structures, as considered by Turaev and Virelizier in order to construct topological invariants, fit into this monoidal bicategory context. We see that their structures are monoidales in the monoidal centre of the monoidal bicategory of $k$-linear categories on which $G$ acts. - Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Mount Allison University in Theory and Applications of Categories
- Vol. 36 (4) , 102-117
Span composition using fake pullbacks
The construction of a category of spans can be made in some categories A which do not have pullbacks in the traditional sense. The PROP for monoids is a good example of such an A. The 2012 book concerning homological algebra by Marco Grandis gives the proof of associativity of relations in a Puppe-exact category based on a 1967 paper of M.. Calenko. The proof here is a restructuring of that proof in the spirit of the rst sentence of this We observe that these relations are spans of EM-spans and that EM-spans admit fake pullbacks so that spans of EM-spans compose. Our setting is more general than Puppe-exact categories. We mention the formalism of distributive laws which, in a generalized form, would cover our setting. Contents 1 Suitable factorization systems 103 2 The bicategory of EM-spans 105 3 Relations as spans of spans 107 4 A fake pullback construction 107 5 An abstraction 108 6 A distributive law formalism and the PROP example 112 C are zigzag diagrams of monomorphisms and epimorphisms, rather than the jointly monomorphic spans as for a regular category (see [7] for example). Associativity of these
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Mount Allison University in Theory and Applications of Categories
- Vol. 36 (4) , 102-117
Open AccessSpan composition using fake pullbacks
The construction of a category of spans can be made in some categories A which do not have pullbacks in the traditional sense. The PROP for monoids is a good example of such an A. The 2012 book concerning homological algebra by Marco Grandis gives the proof of associativity of relations in a Puppe-exact category based on a 1967 paper of M.. Calenko. The proof here is a restructuring of that proof in the spirit of the rst sentence of this We observe that these relations are spans of EM-spans and that EM-spans admit fake pullbacks so that spans of EM-spans compose. Our setting is more general than Puppe-exact categories. We mention the formalism of distributive laws which, in a generalized form, would cover our setting. Contents 1 Suitable factorization systems 103 2 The bicategory of EM-spans 105 3 Relations as spans of spans 107 4 A fake pullback construction 107 5 An abstraction 108 6 A distributive law formalism and the PROP example 112 C are zigzag diagrams of monomorphisms and epimorphisms, rather than the jointly monomorphic spans as for a regular category (see [7] for example). Associativity of these
- Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Mount Allison University in Theory and Applications of Categories
- Vol. 37 (28) , 940-963
Cauchy completeness for DG-categories
We go back to the roots of enriched category theory and study categories enriched in chain complexes; that is, we deal with differential graded categories (DGcategories for short). In particular, we recall weighted colimits and provide examples. We solve the 50 year old question of how to characterize Cauchy complete DG-categories in terms of existence of some specific finite absolute colimits. As well as the interactions between absolute weighted colimits, we also examine the total complex of a chain complex in a DG-category as a non-absolute weighted colimit. Contents 1 Introduction 940 2 Chain complexes 941 3 Constructions on chain complexes 944 4 DG-Categories 948 5 Module-weighted colimits 950 6 Cauchy G-modules 955 7 Cauchy DG-modules 956 8 Complexes in DG-categories 959
- 1 January 2021
- Published by Mount Allison University in Theory and Applications of Categories
- Vol. 37 (28) , 940-963
Open AccessCauchy completeness for DG-categories
We go back to the roots of enriched category theory and study categories enriched in chain complexes; that is, we deal with differential graded categories (DGcategories for short). In particular, we recall weighted colimits and provide examples. We solve the 50 year old question of how to characterize Cauchy complete DG-categories in terms of existence of some specific finite absolute colimits. As well as the interactions between absolute weighted colimits, we also examine the total complex of a chain complex in a DG-category as a non-absolute weighted colimit. Contents 1 Introduction 940 2 Chain complexes 941 3 Constructions on chain complexes 944 4 DG-Categories 948 5 Module-weighted colimits 950 6 Cauchy G-modules 955 7 Cauchy DG-modules 956 8 Complexes in DG-categories 959