JBJudith R. Baker

Judith R. Baker

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Judith R. Baker has a total of 147 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Association of Patient-Reported Outcomes with Hemophilia A Inhibitor Status and Treatment Product Type

    by Megan M. Ullman, Marilyn J. Manco-Johnson, Jonathan C. Roberts, Nicole Crook, Randall Curtis, Judith R. Baker, Joanne Wu, Michael B. Nichol

    Objectives: We compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in persons with hemophilia A (PwHA) by inhibitor status and prescribed treatment products. Methods: Hematology Utilization Group VIII study enrolled PwHA aged ≥ 2 years to collect PRO data via surveys. A clinical chart review documented the hemophilic severity, inhibitor level and treatment regimen. PROs were compared across inhibitor status and prescribed treatment products. Results: Among 85 enrolled PwHA, 9 (10.6%) had active inhibitors, 22 (25.9%) had tolerized inhibitors, and 54 (63.5%) had no inhibitors. The no-inhibitor group was significantly older (mean: 29.3 ± 13.5 years) than the tolerized (16.3 ± 9.5 years) and active inhibitor (21.9 ± 19.1 years; p = 0.001) groups. A larger proportion of participants with active inhibitors (66.7%) and no inhibitors (53.7%) reported having bleeds in the previous month compared to those with tolerized inhibitors (22.7%, p = 0.02). After covariate adjustment for age and hemophilia severity, the tolerized inhibitor group showed the lowest estimated number of joint bleeds compared to those of the no inhibitor and active inhibitor groups (p = 0.08), and the highest EQ-5D index score (p = 0.09). Emicizumab users reported significantly fewer bleeds in the previous months than those who were prescribed standard or extended half-life factor VIII (33.3% vs. 58.6%, 64.3%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Participants with active inhibitors experienced joint bleeding rates similar to those of participants without inhibitors, likely attributable to emicizumab use. Tolerized participants reported the fewest joint bleeds and highest quality-of-life scores, potentially reflecting younger age and possible greater prophylaxis adherence. Emicizumab was associated with lower bleed rates compared to standard or extended half-life factor VIII products.

  • Open Access

    Costs and impact of disease in adults with sickle cell disease: a pilot study

    by Sophie Lanzkron, Nicole Crook, Joanne Wu, Sarah Hussain, Randall G. Curtis, Derek Robertson, Judith R. Baker, Diane Nugent, Amit Soni, Jonathan C. Roberts, et al.

    We assessed the feasibility to estimate illness burden in adults with SCD, investigated factors associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and estimated societal burden. We recruited 32 participants and collected data on fatigue, HRQoL, and work productivity and activity impairment via patient survey. Health care utilization was abstracted for the 12 months before enrollment using medical chart review. Mean age was 36.7 years; 84.4% of participants had hemoglobin SS or Sβthal0 disease, and 81.3% reported chronic pain (experiencing pain on ≥3 days per week in the past 6 months). Mean EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale score was 63.4 and the index score was 0.79. The mean fatigue score was 57.9. Higher fatigue score was correlated with lower EQ-5D index score (correlation coefficient r = −0.35; P = .049) and Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-Me) scores, including pain (r = −0.47; P = .006), sleep (r = −0.38; P = .03), and emotion scores (r = −0.79; P < .0001). The number of hospitalizations was negatively correlated with HRQoL (all P < .05). Patients who reported chronic pain had significantly lower mean ASCQ-Me sleep scores (48.3 vs 57.1; P = .04) and EQ-5D index scores (0.72 vs 0.89; P = .002) than those without chronic pain. Mean estimated annual per person costs were $51 779 (median, $36 366) for total costs, $7619 ($0) for indirect costs (estimated from lost earnings of participants), and $44 160 ($31 873) for medical costs. Fatigue, SCD complications, hospitalization, and chronic pain negatively affected HRQoL. This sample experienced a high economic burden, largely from outpatient doctor visits.


  • Open Access

    Trends in prescribing practices for management of haemophilia: 1999–2021

    by Randall Curtis, Jonathan C. Roberts, Nicole Crook, Marquita Decker‐Palmer, Rahul Khainar, Judith R. Baker, Megan Ullman, Marion A. Koerper, Joanne Wu, Michael B. Nichol

    Introduction: People with haemophilia rely on specialists for their care, yet the specific dosing regimens of treatments prescribed by these specialists have not been widely studied.Aim: The objective of this study is to describe trends in clinician prescribing practices for the management of haemophilia in the United States (US).Methods: We administered surveys to members of the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society via paper surveys at its in‐person annual symposia in 1999 and 2015, and an online survey in 2021. The surveys collected information on haemophilia treatments including factor dosing, inhibitor therapy and gene therapy.Results: Clinicians treating haemophilia for more than 50% of their practice time have increased from 37.5% of respondents in 1999 to 46.3% in 2021. Clinicians prescribing factor concentrates at >40 units/kg for routine bleeding events increased from 0% in 1999 to 29.3% in 2021 in haemophilia A (HA) and from 22.5% to 87.8% in haemophilia B (HB). In 2021, the clinicians reported prescribing emicizumab to treat HA patients (>89.5% paediatric, >85.7% adult) with or without inhibitors at least some of the time. Approximately 78.0% of respondents reported that they expected to recommend gene therapy at least some of time.Conclusion: These data indicate changing trends in prescribing practices among US haemophilia specialists during the past 22 years. Preference for high doses of factor (>40 units/kg) has increased during this period. Emicizumab prophylaxis has been prescribed for patients with and without HA inhibitors. Clinicians expect gene therapy to have value for some haemophilia patients.


  • Open Access

    Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities in health services; diversity, equity, and inclusion; and implementation science

    by Vanessa R. Byams, Judith R. Baker, Cindy Bailey, Nathan T. Connell, Melissa S. Creary, Randall G. Curtis, Alexis Dinno, Christine J. Guelcher, Michelle Kim, Roshni Kulkarni, et al.

    Research into how people get their health care, called health services research, is important to understand if care is being delivered equitably and efficiently. This research figures out how to provide the best care at the lowest cost and finds out if everyone gets equally good care. Diversity and inclusion research focuses on whether all marginalized and minoritized populations (such as a given social standing, race, ethnicity, sex, gender identity, sexuality, age, income, disability status, language, culture, faith, geographic location, or country of birth) receive equitable care. This includes checking whether different populations are all getting the care they need and looking for ways to improve the care. Implementation science studies how to make a potential improvement work in the real world. The improvement could be a new way to diagnose or treat a health condition, a better way to deliver health care or do research, or a strategy to remove barriers preventing specific populations from getting the best available care. The National Hemophilia Foundation focuses on improving the lives of all people with bleeding disorders (BD). They brought BDs doctors, nurses, physical therapists, social workers, professors, and government and industry partners together with people and families living with BDs to discuss research in the areas described above. The group came up with important future research questions to address racism and other biases, and other changes to policies, procedures, and practices to make BD care equitable, efficient, and effective.


  • Open Access

    Depression and anxiety in persons with Von Willebrand disease

    by Jonathan C. Roberts, Roshni Kulkarni, Peter A. Kouides, Robert F. Sidonio, Shannon L. Carpenter, Barbara A. Konkle, Joanne Wu, Megan M. Ullman, Randall Curtis, Judith R. Baker, et al.

    Objective: We assessed sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with depression and anxiety in individuals with Von Willebrand disease (VWD) aged ≥12 years.Methods: The study collected data on patients’ sociodemographic, joint problems and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) using EQ‐5D‐3L, 8‐item patient health questionnaire for depression and 7‐item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire from participants in seven geographically diverse US haemophilia treatment centres.Results: Analyses included 77 participants. The rates of depression and anxiety were 63.6% and 58.3%, respectively. Persons with low VWF displayed higher rates of depression (86.7%) or anxiety (69.2%) compared to those with VWD (58.1%, p = .04 for depression, and 55.9%, p = .38 for anxiety). Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that having joint problems (odds ratio [OR] = 6.3, confidence interval [CI] = 2.0–20.1) was the most important variable associated with depression, followed by being single, divorced, widowed, or separated in adult participants or parents of participants age < 18 years (OR = 7.0, CI = 1.7–29.0. The most important variable associated with anxiety was being single or lacking a partner (OR = 10.8, CI = 2.5–47.5), followed by age 12–17 years old (OR = 6.7, CI = 1.6–26.9), or having worse health compared to 3‐months ago (OR = 12.3, CI = 1.3‐116.2). Mean covariates adjusted EQ visual analogue scale score was significantly lower among persons with depression (68.77 ± 3.15 vs. 77.58 ± 4.24, p = .03) than those without depression.Conclusions: Our study revealed concerning levels of depression and anxiety in this VWD sample. Lack of social support was determined an important factor associated with depression and anxiety in this sample. Mental health screening is critical in VWD clinical evaluation and care.


  • Open Access

    Sickle cell disease among Latinx in California

    by Jhaqueline Valle, Judith R. Baker, Daniel Madrigal, Juana Ferrerosa, Susan Paulukonis

    Introduction: After African Americans, Latinx are the second largest population affected by Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) in the U.S. However, research has largely ignored how this devastating rare blood disorder specifically affects Latinx nationwide.Methods: This study compared demographics, genotypes, primary insurance, and health care utilization among Latinx and non-Latinx Californians living with SCD, using data from the California SCD Data Collection Program (2016–2018) and newborn screening cases 2000–2017.Results: Stemming from 6,837 SCD patients, 501(7%) were Latinx. Latinx with SCD (Lx-SCD) were statistically significantly younger than non-Latinx (NLx-SCD) counterparts. Within both groups, females predominated, with 70% being insured by Medicaid. Mean Emergency Department encounters were statistically significantly lower among Lx-SCD adults.Discussion: Lx-SCD differ in age, genotype, and Emergency Department utilization, when compared to NLx-SCD counterparts in California. Latinx are now the largest racial and/or ethnic group in the US, and their presence in SCD population is expected to grow. Therefore, their specific demographic, genotypic, and health care utilization characteristics merit attention to inform policies and programs that will improve their health.


  • Open Access

    Comorbidities, Health-Related Quality of Life, Health-care Utilization in Older Persons with Hemophilia—Hematology Utilization Group Study Part VII (HUGS VII)

    by Randall Curtis, Marilyn Manco-Johnson, Barbara A Konkle, Roshni Kulkarni, Joanne Wu, Judith R Baker, Megan Ullman, Duc Quang Tran Jr, Michael B Nichol

    Purpose: We compare the impact of hemophilia on comorbidities, joint problems, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health-care utilization between two age groups: 40– 49 years and ≥ 50 years. Patients and Methods: The HUGS VII study recruited persons with hemophilia A or B age ≥ 40 years. Participants completed surveys to collect data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, hemophilia treatment regimen, pain, joint problems, comorbidities, HRQoL, depression and anxiety, at baseline and 6-months later. Clinical chart reviews documented hemophilic severity and treatment. Results: The sample includes 69 males, 65.2% aged ≥ 50 years, 75.4% with hemophilia A. Individuals ≥ 50 years were more likely to have mild or moderate hemophilia (68.9% vs 41.7%, P = 0.03) than those 40– 49 years old. Among persons with mild/moderate hemophilia, those ≥ 50 years old reported a higher rate of joint pain (83.9% vs 70.0%, P = 0.34 at baseline, 91.3% vs 57.1%, P = 0.06 at follow up) or range of motion limitation (73.3% vs 60.0%, P = 0.43 at baseline, 73.9% vs 28.6%, P = 0.04 at follow up) than the younger group. Compared to the younger group, the older group reported fewer emergency room visits (4.5% vs 21.7%, P = 0.03), and physical therapy visits (15.9% vs 43.5%, P = 0.01) at baseline. The sample depression rate was 85.7%, but the differences among the age groups were not significant. The mean covariate-adjusted EQ-5D index score was lower in older persons (0.77 vs 0.89, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Older persons with hemophilia in this sample are over-represented by individuals with mild/moderate disease, potentially due to premature death among those with severe disease. Although this group included a larger proportion of individuals with mild disease than the younger group, they experienced lower quality of life, more comorbidities both of aging and of hemophilic arthropathy, and lower rates of health-care utilization.


  • Open Access

    Integrated Hemophilia Patient Care via a National Network of Care Centers in the United States: A Model for Rare Coagulation Disorders

    by Leonard A Valentino, Judith R Baker, Regina Butler, Miguel Escobar, Neil Frick, Susan Karp, Kollet Koulianos, Susan Lattimore, Diane Nugent, Joseph N Pugliese, et al.

    Rare, chronic diseases such as hemophilia and other congenital coagulation disorders require coordinated delivery of services for optimal outcomes. Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs) are specialized, multidisciplinary health-care centers providing team-based care to meet the physical, psychosocial, and emotional needs of people with hemophilia (PWH) and may serve as a model for other rare coagulation disorders. Health-care purchasers, as well as the general medical community, may not appreciate the breadth and quality of services provided by HTCs. They exemplify the acculturalization and actualization of integrated care by providing comprehensive diagnostic and treatment services that reduce morbidity, mortality, avoidable emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and overall costs, while promoting a longer lifespan and improved patient functioning and outcomes. This is accomplished by a team-based approach relying upon a shared decision-making model to effectively prevent complications and manage symptoms in PWH, who are dependent on high-cost treatments. This article provides a concise yet comprehensive description of the core components of an HTC and the regional and national networks in the United States, which together achieve their incomparable value for all stakeholders.


  • Patient satisfaction with US Hemophilia Treatment Center Care, Teams and Services: The First National Survey

    by Brenda Riske, Rick Shearer, Judith R. Baker

    Introduction: Patient satisfaction with health care is a key quality metric, associated with adherence and better outcomes. However, satisfaction with US Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTC) is unknown.Aim: To assess patient satisfaction with US Hemophilia Treatment Centers.Methods: A nationally uniform survey was conducted using the US HTC Network's regional infrastructure. Satisfaction with multidisciplinary team members, services and care processes was assessed. The anonymous survey, in English and Spanish, was disseminated to 28 289 households. Data were aggregated using 4 standard US Census regions.Results: 5006 individuals (17.7%) who obtained care from 133 (96.4%) of 138 HTCs in 2014 responded. Satisfaction with overall HTC care at ‘always’ or ‘usually’ (A/U) levels ranged 94.2%‐97.9% regardless of patient gender, age, race, ethnicity, language, diagnosis, severity, region or frequency of HTC contact. A/U satisfaction with HTC haematologist, nurse, social worker or physical therapist, individually, ranged 95.1%‐97.3% nationally. A/U satisfaction with three HTC services was 89.5%‐96.9% and 94.9%‐98.0% for five HTC care processes nationally. Regional satisfaction at A/U levels was at least 87.0%. Nationally, 26.4% and 21.2% rated insurance and language, respectively, as A/U problems in getting needed HTC services.Conclusion: Patient satisfaction with US Hemophilia Treatment Center care, multi‐disciplinary teams, services and processes was consistently high, documenting the value patients place on HTCs. The successful survey administration demonstrates the capability of the Network's regional infrastructure. Access to the US HTC Network is particularly critical to ongoing health in this new era of novel and gene therapies.


  • Open Access

    Building access to care in adult sickle cell disease: defining models of care, essential components, and economic aspects

    by Julie Kanter, Wally R. Smith, Payal C. Desai, Marsha Treadwell, Biree Andemariam, Jane Little, Diane Nugent, Susan Claster, Deepa G. Manwani, Judith Baker, et al.

    Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited blood disorder in the United States. It is a medically and socially complex, multisystem illness that affects individuals throughout the lifespan. Given improvements in care, most children with SCD survive into adulthood. However, access to adult sickle cell care is poor in many parts of the United States, resulting in increased acute care utilization, disjointed care delivery, and early mortality for patients. A dearth of nonmalignant hematology providers, the lack of a national SCD registry, and the absence of a centralized infrastructure to facilitate comparative quality assessment compounds these issues. As part of a workshop designed to train health care professionals in the skills necessary to establish clinical centers focused on the management of adults living with SCD, we defined an SCD center, elucidated required elements of a comprehensive adult SCD center, and discussed different models of care. There are also important economic impacts of these centers at an institutional and health system level. As more clinicians are trained in providing adult-focused SCD care, center designation will enhance the ability to undertake quality improvement and compare outcomes between SCD centers. Activities will include an assessment of the clinical effectiveness of expanded access to care, the implementation of SCD guidelines, and the efficacy of newly approved targeted medications. Details of this effort are provided.