Joseph D. Schonhoft
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Joseph D. Schonhoft has a total of 178 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Elizabeth K. Lee
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
31 shared publications - Ian M. Silverman
Repare Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts
31 shared publications - Timothy Anthony Yap
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
31 shared publications - Benedito Arruda Carneiro
Legorreta Cancer Center, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
30 shared publications - Danielle Ulanet
Repare Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts
30 shared publications - Ezra Rosen
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 5 Evelyn H. Lauder Breast Center New York, New York
30 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S4 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Kaplan-meier estimate for A, DOT and B, PFS in patients with and without reversions enrolled on LoF in BRCA1/2, RAD51p, or PALB2 in HRD associated tumor types (breast, prostate, pancreatic, ovarian) C) On-treatment BRCA1 reversion detected (RECIST and ctDNA cTF in Fig. 3D)
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S4 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Kaplan-meier estimate for A, DOT and B, PFS in patients with and without reversions enrolled on LoF in BRCA1/2, RAD51p, or PALB2 in HRD associated tumor types (breast, prostate, pancreatic, ovarian) C) On-treatment BRCA1 reversion detected (RECIST and ctDNA cTF in Fig. 3D)
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S3 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Camonsertib concentration levels at 80 and 120 mg – cycle 1 day 1
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S3 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Camonsertib concentration levels at 80 and 120 mg – cycle 1 day 1
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Study schematic for TRESR, Module 4.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Study schematic for TRESR, Module 4.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S1 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Institutional Review Boards of participating institutions
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S1 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Institutional Review Boards of participating institutions
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S5 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Drug combination pharmacokinetic parameters
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S5 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Drug combination pharmacokinetic parameters
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table 2 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
TRAEs by schedule and grade in >5% of the total study population.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable 2 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
TRAEs by schedule and grade in >5% of the total study population.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S1 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Mice bearing SUM149PT (A and C) or Granta-519 (B) tumors were treated with camonsertib (3/4d, weekly) or gemcitabine (QW) as single agents and in combination at the doses indicated. A) Tumor growth is represented as mean ± SEM; n = 7 mice/group; TGI = tumor growth inhibition (%). B, C) Body weights are represented as mean change relative to Day 0 ± SEM. Statistical differences between groups were determined using an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. *P < .05; **P < .01 (GraphPad Prism v10.4).
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S1 from Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results
Mice bearing SUM149PT (A and C) or Granta-519 (B) tumors were treated with camonsertib (3/4d, weekly) or gemcitabine (QW) as single agents and in combination at the doses indicated. A) Tumor growth is represented as mean ± SEM; n = 7 mice/group; TGI = tumor growth inhibition (%). B, C) Body weights are represented as mean change relative to Day 0 ± SEM. Statistical differences between groups were determined using an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. *P < .05; **P < .01 (GraphPad Prism v10.4).
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Correlative Biomarker Analysis of PSMA Expression on CTCs and PSMA Imaging in a Phase I Study of PSMA-Targeted Tubulysin Conjugate EC1169
Purpose:Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–directed therapies provide meaningful clinical benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), yet responses remain limited, underscoring the need for additional biomarkers of PSMA expression heterogeneity. In this study, we explored the relationship between PSMA imaging and PSMA expression on circulating tumor cells (CTC) in our early-phase trial using a PSMA-targeted small molecule.Experimental Design:This phase I study investigated EC1169, a small molecule conjugated to a tubulysin analog warhead, and 99mTc–EC0652, a PSMA imaging agent. Part A (dose escalation) identified the recommended phase II dose. Part B (dose expansion) assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) as its primary endpoint. We enrolled and treated 103 patients with mCRPC. Most part B patients underwent 99mTc–EC0652 PSMA imaging. A CTC assay assessed PSMA-positive CTCs and their association with response and PSMA imaging.Results:99mTc–EC0652 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging demonstrated increased sensitivity for detecting bone lesions compared with standard scans (computed tomography/bone scans). Using an optimized CTC assay, we observed that patients with a decrease in PSMA+ CTCs at baseline versus C3D1 displayed a longer rPFS (8 vs. 2.9 months; P = 0.04). Importantly, patients with predominantly PSMA-positive disease on 99mTc–EC0652 imaging also harbored PSMA-negative CTCs, with a subset displaying neuroendocrine prostate cancer–like morphology.Conclusions:Although EC1169 showed limited activity, CTC and imaging analyses showed significant heterogeneity in PSMA expression on CTCs in patients with predominantly PSMA-positive lesions on SPECT. Our study highlights the importance of assessing both PSMA-based CTC and imaging assays in future validation trials.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Correlative Biomarker Analysis of PSMA Expression on CTCs and PSMA Imaging in a Phase I Study of PSMA-Targeted Tubulysin Conjugate EC1169
Purpose:Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–directed therapies provide meaningful clinical benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), yet responses remain limited, underscoring the need for additional biomarkers of PSMA expression heterogeneity. In this study, we explored the relationship between PSMA imaging and PSMA expression on circulating tumor cells (CTC) in our early-phase trial using a PSMA-targeted small molecule.Experimental Design:This phase I study investigated EC1169, a small molecule conjugated to a tubulysin analog warhead, and 99mTc–EC0652, a PSMA imaging agent. Part A (dose escalation) identified the recommended phase II dose. Part B (dose expansion) assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) as its primary endpoint. We enrolled and treated 103 patients with mCRPC. Most part B patients underwent 99mTc–EC0652 PSMA imaging. A CTC assay assessed PSMA-positive CTCs and their association with response and PSMA imaging.Results:99mTc–EC0652 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging demonstrated increased sensitivity for detecting bone lesions compared with standard scans (computed tomography/bone scans). Using an optimized CTC assay, we observed that patients with a decrease in PSMA+ CTCs at baseline versus C3D1 displayed a longer rPFS (8 vs. 2.9 months; P = 0.04). Importantly, patients with predominantly PSMA-positive disease on 99mTc–EC0652 imaging also harbored PSMA-negative CTCs, with a subset displaying neuroendocrine prostate cancer–like morphology.Conclusions:Although EC1169 showed limited activity, CTC and imaging analyses showed significant heterogeneity in PSMA expression on CTCs in patients with predominantly PSMA-positive lesions on SPECT. Our study highlights the importance of assessing both PSMA-based CTC and imaging assays in future validation trials.