Madison Butler
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Madison Butler has a total of 26 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Abigail K Shelton
Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
1 shared publicationAsra Askari
University of Michigan, Neurosurgery, Ann Arbor, USA
1 shared publicationBrandon Zhu
Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
1 shared publication- Christopher Ryan Miller
University of Alabama at Birmingham
1 shared publication Daniel Leventhal
University of Michigan, Neurology, Ann Arbor, USA
1 shared publicationDemitra A Canoutas
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 April 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Neural Transmission
- Vol. 132 (7) , 1031-1040
Ventral STN stimulation is associated with improved axial motor outcomes in Parkinson’s disease
Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is well-established for improving appendicular motor signs but its effect on axial motor signs is less clear. Additionally, the location of active electrode contact within the STN has been shown to differentially affect motor outcomes. We investigate the effect of STN DBS and the role of active electrode contact location on axial motor outcomes. Axial scores were assessed in 70 patients with advanced PD between 6 and 12 months after bilateral STN DBS. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the mean axial motor scores between different medication and stimulation treatment conditions. Multiple linear regression was performed to determine the association between electrode contact location and axial motor score. The mean duration of follow-up was 7.37 ± 2.49 months. The mean total axial score was improved with STN DBS compared to the OFF MED-OFF STIM condition (6.36 ± 4.50 vs. 8.91 ± 5.49, p < 0.0001). A more dorsal electrode contact location on the right was associated with increased (worsened) total axial score (slope = 0.407, p = 0.0047). Total axial score was also lower (improved) in the anterior ventral STN region but not the posterior ventral STN region on the right. STN DBS improves total axial score and several axial subscores in patients with PD 6–12 months postoperatively. A more ventral electrode contact location on the right was associated with improved axial score. Additional research is warranted to determine if this is the optimal stimulation location to improve axial signs in other DBS cohorts.
- 24 April 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Neural Transmission
- Vol. 132 (7) , 1031-1040
Open AccessVentral STN stimulation is associated with improved axial motor outcomes in Parkinson’s disease
Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is well-established for improving appendicular motor signs but its effect on axial motor signs is less clear. Additionally, the location of active electrode contact within the STN has been shown to differentially affect motor outcomes. We investigate the effect of STN DBS and the role of active electrode contact location on axial motor outcomes. Axial scores were assessed in 70 patients with advanced PD between 6 and 12 months after bilateral STN DBS. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the mean axial motor scores between different medication and stimulation treatment conditions. Multiple linear regression was performed to determine the association between electrode contact location and axial motor score. The mean duration of follow-up was 7.37 ± 2.49 months. The mean total axial score was improved with STN DBS compared to the OFF MED-OFF STIM condition (6.36 ± 4.50 vs. 8.91 ± 5.49, p < 0.0001). A more dorsal electrode contact location on the right was associated with increased (worsened) total axial score (slope = 0.407, p = 0.0047). Total axial score was also lower (improved) in the anterior ventral STN region but not the posterior ventral STN region on the right. STN DBS improves total axial score and several axial subscores in patients with PD 6–12 months postoperatively. A more ventral electrode contact location on the right was associated with improved axial score. Additional research is warranted to determine if this is the optimal stimulation location to improve axial signs in other DBS cohorts.
- Top Cited Papers
- 27 March 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Cancer
- Vol. 6 (5) , 380-391
MGMT Status as a Clinical Biomarker in Glioblastoma
- 27 March 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Cancer
- Vol. 6 (5) , 380-391
Top Cited PapersMGMT Status as a Clinical Biomarker in Glioblastoma
- Open Access
- 5 July 2018
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 13 (7) , e0200014
PIK3CA missense mutations promote glioblastoma pathogenesis, but do not enhance targeted PI3K inhibition
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common adult primary brain tumor. Multimodal treatment is empiric and prognosis remains poor. Recurrent PIK3CA missense mutations (PIK3CAmut) in GBM are restricted to three functional domains: adaptor binding (ABD), helical, and kinase. Defining how these mutations influence gliomagenesis and response to kinase inhibitors may aid in the clinical development of novel targeted therapies in biomarker-stratified patients. We used normal human astrocytes immortalized via expression of hTERT, E6, and E7 (NHA). We selected two PIK3CAmut from each of 3 mutated domains and induced their expression in NHA with (NHARAS) and without mutant RAS using lentiviral vectors. We then examined the role of PIK3CAmut in gliomagenesis in vitro and in mice, as well as response to targeted PI3K (PI3Ki) and MEK (MEKi) inhibitors in vitro. PIK3CAmut, particularly helical and kinase domain mutations, potentiated proximal PI3K signaling and migration of NHA and NHARAS in vitro. Only kinase domain mutations promoted NHA colony formation, but both helical and kinase domain mutations promoted NHARAS tumorigenesis in vivo. PIK3CAmut status had minimal effects on PI3Ki and MEKi efficacy. However, PI3Ki/MEKi synergism was pronounced in NHA and NHARAS harboring ABD or helical mutations. PIK3CAmut promoted differential gliomagenesis based on the mutated domain. While PIK3CAmut did not influence sensitivity to single agent PI3Ki, they did alter PI3Ki/MEKi synergism. Taken together, our results demonstrate that a subset of PIK3CAmut promote tumorigenesis and suggest that patients with helical domain mutations may be most sensitive to dual PI3Ki/MEKi treatment.
- 5 July 2018
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 13 (7) , e0200014
Open AccessPIK3CA missense mutations promote glioblastoma pathogenesis, but do not enhance targeted PI3K inhibition
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common adult primary brain tumor. Multimodal treatment is empiric and prognosis remains poor. Recurrent PIK3CA missense mutations (PIK3CAmut) in GBM are restricted to three functional domains: adaptor binding (ABD), helical, and kinase. Defining how these mutations influence gliomagenesis and response to kinase inhibitors may aid in the clinical development of novel targeted therapies in biomarker-stratified patients. We used normal human astrocytes immortalized via expression of hTERT, E6, and E7 (NHA). We selected two PIK3CAmut from each of 3 mutated domains and induced their expression in NHA with (NHARAS) and without mutant RAS using lentiviral vectors. We then examined the role of PIK3CAmut in gliomagenesis in vitro and in mice, as well as response to targeted PI3K (PI3Ki) and MEK (MEKi) inhibitors in vitro. PIK3CAmut, particularly helical and kinase domain mutations, potentiated proximal PI3K signaling and migration of NHA and NHARAS in vitro. Only kinase domain mutations promoted NHA colony formation, but both helical and kinase domain mutations promoted NHARAS tumorigenesis in vivo. PIK3CAmut status had minimal effects on PI3Ki and MEKi efficacy. However, PI3Ki/MEKi synergism was pronounced in NHA and NHARAS harboring ABD or helical mutations. PIK3CAmut promoted differential gliomagenesis based on the mutated domain. While PIK3CAmut did not influence sensitivity to single agent PI3Ki, they did alter PI3Ki/MEKi synergism. Taken together, our results demonstrate that a subset of PIK3CAmut promote tumorigenesis and suggest that patients with helical domain mutations may be most sensitive to dual PI3Ki/MEKi treatment.