Rajesh Kuppusamy

Background/Objectives: There is a growing demand for the development of novel antimicrobial agents due to their efficacy being eroded by increasing antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial hydrogels have been reported as a method to treat bacterial infections. Methods: This study explores how different structural features are important for the hydrogelation properties of amphiphilic antimicrobial peptide-mimics through rheology and AFM, as well as properties important for antimicrobial activity measured through MIC. Results: Eleven novel peptide-mimicking anthranilamides containing various structural features were synthesised in 4–7 steps. Of these peptide-mimics, three novel compounds formed hydrogels, and it was identified that their mechanical strength, secondary structure, and fibre morphology could be tuned by altering the aromatic cap or the amino acid side chain. In conjunction, several structural features were identified that reduce hydrogelation strength and stiffness. Conclusions: This work provides an insight into how the structural features of low-molecular-weight self-assembling hydrogels can translate to differing physical and potent antimicrobial properties. This work provides a rational guide to optimising physical hydrogel properties, as well as highlighting features that may reduce hydrogelation.

Tertiary amides such as peptoids are a novel class of peptidomimetics that offer enhanced structure, activity, and stability compared to many naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides.

With rising multidrug-resistant yeast pathogens, conventional antifungals are becoming less effective, urging the need for adjuvants that enhance their activity at lower doses. This study evaluated the synergistic activity of antimicrobial peptidomimetics (TM8 and RK758) or colistin sulphate in combination with conventional antifungals against Candida albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Nakaseomyces glabratus, Pichia kudriavzevii and Kluyveromyces marxianus, and Candidozyma auris using the checkerboard microdilution test. RK758 was synergistic with fluconazole in 78% of isolates, with the remaining 22% of isolates still showing partial synergy; it showed synergy with amphotericin B in 56% of isolates, and with caspofungin, 78% of isolates exhibited either synergy or partial synergy. TM8 showed synergy with fluconazole in 44% (with partial synergy in another 44%) of isolates, with amphotericin B in 67% of isolates, and with caspofungin in 44% (with partial synergy in another 44%) of isolates. Colistin with fluconazole or caspofungin exhibited synergy or partial synergy in 56% of the isolates. No antagonism was observed in any of the combinations. Additionally, a time-kill assay further demonstrated synergistic activity between fluconazole and TM8 or RK758. The effects of these peptidomimetics on cell membrane integrity were demonstrated in an ergosterol binding assay, supported by SYTOX Green and cellular leakage assays, both indicating a lytic effect. These results suggest that peptidomimetics can synergise with conventional antifungals, offering a potential strategy for combination therapy against yeast infections. The membrane lytic activity of the peptidomimetics likely plays a role in their synergistic interaction with antifungals, thereby enhancing the antimicrobial activities of both compounds at sub-MIC levels.

The ongoing battle against viral pandemics continues, with the possibility of future outbreaks. The search for effective antiviral compounds that can combat a diverse range of viruses continues to be a focal point of research. This study investigated the efficacy of two natural antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (lactoferricin and LL-37), two synthetic AMPs (melimine and Mel4), and nine AMP mimics (758, 1091, 1096, 1083, 610, NAPL, 3-BIPL, 4-BIPL, and Sau-22) against influenza A virus strains H1N1 and H3N2, human adenovirus 5 (HAdV-5), and murine norovirus 1 (MNV-1). These compounds were tested using virus pre-treatment, cell pre-treatment, or post-cell entry treatment assays, electron microscopy, and circular dichroism (CD), alongside evaluations of cytotoxicity against the host cells. After virus pre-treatment, the AMP mimics 610 and Sau-22 had relatively low IC₅₀ values for influenza strains H1N1 (2.35 and 6.93 µM, respectively) and H3N2 (3.7 and 5.34 µM, respectively). Conversely, natural and synthetic AMPs were not active against these strains. For the non-enveloped viruses, the AMP Mel4 and mimic 1083 had moderate activity against HAdV-5 (Mel4 IC₅₀ = 47.4 µM; 1083 IC₅₀ = 47.2 µM), whereas all AMPs, but none of the mimics, were active against norovirus (LL-37 IC₅₀ = 4.2 µM; lactoferricin IC₅₀ = 23.18 µM; melimine IC₅₀ = 4.8 µM; Mel4 IC₅₀ = 8.6 µM). Transmission electron microscopy demonstrated that the mimics targeted the outer envelope of influenza viruses, while the AMPs targeted the capsid of non-enveloped viruses. CD showed that Mel4 adopted an α-helical structure in a membrane mimetic environment, but mimic 758 remained unstructured. The diverse activity against different virus groups is probably influenced by charge, hydrophobicity, size, and, in the case of natural and synthetic AMPs, their secondary structure. These findings underscore the potential of peptides and mimics as promising candidates for antiviral therapeutics against both enveloped and non-enveloped viruses.

Bacteria readily acquire resistance to traditional antibiotics, resulting in pan-resistant strains with no available treatment. Antimicrobial resistance is a global challenge and without the development of effective antimicrobials, the foundation of modern medicine is at risk. Combination therapies such as antibiotic–antibiotic and antibiotic–adjuvant combinations are strategies used to combat antibiotic resistance. Current research focuses on antimicrobial peptidomimetics as adjuvant compounds, due to their promising activity against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Here, for the first time we demonstrate that antibiotic–peptidomimetic combinations mitigate the development of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. When ciprofloxacin and gentamicin were passaged individually at sub-inhibitory concentrations for 10 days, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) increased up to 32-fold and 128-fold for S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, respectively. In contrast, when antibiotics were passaged in combination with peptidomimetics (Melimine, Mel4, RK758), the MICs of both antibiotics and peptidomimetics remained constant, indicating these combinations were able to mitigate the development of antibiotic-resistance. Furthermore, antibiotic–peptidomimetic combinations demonstrated synergistic activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, reducing the concentration needed for bactericidal activity. This has significant potential clinical applications—including preventing the spread of antibiotic-resistant strains in hospitals and communities, reviving ineffective antibiotics, and lowering the toxicity of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

The development of potent antiviral agents is of utmost importance to combat the global burden of viral infections. Traditional antiviral drug development involves targeting specific viral proteins, which may lead to the emergence of resistant strains. To explore alternative strategies, we investigated the antiviral potential of antimicrobial peptidomimetic compounds. In this study, we evaluated the antiviral potential of 17 short anthranilamide-based peptidomimetic compounds against two viruses: Murine hepatitis virus 1 (MHV-1) which is a surrogate of human coronaviruses and herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values of these compounds were determined in vitro to assess their potency as antiviral agents. Compounds 11 and 14 displayed the most potent inhibitory effects with IC₅₀ values of 2.38 μM, and 6.3 μM against MHV-1 while compounds 9 and 14 showed IC₅₀ values of 14.8 μM and 13 μM against HSV-1. Multiple antiviral assessments and microscopic images obtained through transmission electron microscopy (TEM) collectively demonstrated that these compounds exert a direct influence on the viral envelope. Based on this outcome, it can be concluded that peptidomimetic compounds could offer a new approach for the development of potent antiviral agents.

The development of potent antiviral agents is of utmost importance to combat the global burden of viral infections. Traditional antiviral drug development involves targeting specific viral proteins, which may lead to the emergence of resistant strains. To explore alternative strategies, we investigated the antiviral potential of antimicrobial peptidomimetic compounds. In this study, we evaluated the antiviral potential of short anthranilamide-based peptidomimetic compounds 1-17 against two viruses: Murine Hepatitis Virus 1 (MHV-1-single stranded RNA virus) which is a surrogate of human coronaviruses and Herpes Simplex Virus 1 (HSV-1-double stranded DNA virus). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of these compounds were determined in vitro to assess their potency as antiviral agents. Compounds 11 and 14 displayed the most potent inhibitory effect with IC50 values of 2.38μM, and 6.3μM against MHV-1 while compounds 9 and 14 showed IC50 values of 14.8μM and 13μM, against HSV-1. Multiple antiviral assessments and microscopic images obtained through transmission electron microscopy (TEM) collectively demonstrated that these compounds exert a direct influence on the viral envelope. Based on this outcome, it can be concluded that peptidomimetic compounds could offer a new approach for the development of potent antiviral agents.