Cinthya Ruiz-Tagle
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Cinthya Ruiz-Tagle has a total of 76 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- María Elvira Balcells
Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
6 shared publications - Manuel Antonio Espinoza
School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 shared publications Patricia García
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
2 shared publications- Aldo Barrera
Departamento de Enfermedades Infecciosas e Inmunología Pediátrica, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320165, Chile
1 shared publication - Alejandra Pizarro
Departamento de Enfermedades Infecciosas del Adulto, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile , Santiago
1 shared publication - Alejandro Afani
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Dr. Carlos Lorca Tobar 999 (ex Santos Dumont), Independencia, Región Metropolitana, Chile
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 25 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Virology
- Vol. 182, 105890
High levels of transmitted drug resistance to INSTIs and NNRTIs in Chile: A nationwide prevalence study
- 25 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Virology
- Vol. 182, 105890
High levels of transmitted drug resistance to INSTIs and NNRTIs in Chile: A nationwide prevalence study
- Open Access
- 22 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Research Square
Window Prophylaxis for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection Prevention in Child and Adolescent Household Contacts: Study Protocol for a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial (the TB-WIN trial)
Trials guidance: The Abstract should not exceed 350 words. Please minimize the use of abbreviations and do not cite references in the The abstract must include the following separate sections: Background : Mycobacterium tuberculosis acquisition after exposure is common but difficult to diagnose and frequently requires serial testing given that immunological evidence of infection can take several weeks to develop. Even though tuberculosis infection (TBI) is asymptomatic, its long-term effects remain unclear due to poorly understood host-pathogen interactions and delayed disease development, and research has shown that active mycobacterial replication and inflammation occur during TBI. Although the main purpose of antituberculosis prophylaxis has been to prevent people with established TBI from progressing to active tuberculosis disease, a few studies have suggested that this prophylaxis, when administered during the window period after exposure, can prevent the acquisition of TBI in very young children. Considering that newer preventive regimens are shorter and safer, this study aims to assess whether tuberculosis prophylaxis —when given in the window period after exposure— can prevent new infections in older children and adolescents who have been recently exposed. Methods : A multicentre cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial will be performed in Chile. A total of 360 households (clusters) with children aged ≥5 to <18 years, who have been recently exposed to a new case of pulmonary tuberculosis will be randomized to intervention or control arm. In the intervention arm, contacts will receive immediate tuberculosis prophylaxis, regardless of the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) result. In the control arm, participants will receive tuberculosis prophylaxis only if the IGRA test results positive, as per standard of care. In both arms, the prophylaxis scheme will be the usual weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine for 12 weeks regimen. The primary outcome will be assessed at the individual level by IGRA conversions from negative at baseline to positive at the 12-week follow-up. Discussion : This trial will establish the effectiveness of a window prophylaxis strategy in reducing the risk of TBI acquisition after exposure in a community setting, a strategy that can potentially contribute to global tuberculosis elimination by reducing M. tuberculosis reservoirs. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07086820. Registered 17 July 2025, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07086820.
- 22 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Research Square
Open AccessWindow Prophylaxis for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection Prevention in Child and Adolescent Household Contacts: Study Protocol for a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial (the TB-WIN trial)
Trials guidance: The Abstract should not exceed 350 words. Please minimize the use of abbreviations and do not cite references in the The abstract must include the following separate sections: Background : Mycobacterium tuberculosis acquisition after exposure is common but difficult to diagnose and frequently requires serial testing given that immunological evidence of infection can take several weeks to develop. Even though tuberculosis infection (TBI) is asymptomatic, its long-term effects remain unclear due to poorly understood host-pathogen interactions and delayed disease development, and research has shown that active mycobacterial replication and inflammation occur during TBI. Although the main purpose of antituberculosis prophylaxis has been to prevent people with established TBI from progressing to active tuberculosis disease, a few studies have suggested that this prophylaxis, when administered during the window period after exposure, can prevent the acquisition of TBI in very young children. Considering that newer preventive regimens are shorter and safer, this study aims to assess whether tuberculosis prophylaxis —when given in the window period after exposure— can prevent new infections in older children and adolescents who have been recently exposed. Methods : A multicentre cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial will be performed in Chile. A total of 360 households (clusters) with children aged ≥5 to <18 years, who have been recently exposed to a new case of pulmonary tuberculosis will be randomized to intervention or control arm. In the intervention arm, contacts will receive immediate tuberculosis prophylaxis, regardless of the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) result. In the control arm, participants will receive tuberculosis prophylaxis only if the IGRA test results positive, as per standard of care. In both arms, the prophylaxis scheme will be the usual weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine for 12 weeks regimen. The primary outcome will be assessed at the individual level by IGRA conversions from negative at baseline to positive at the 12-week follow-up. Discussion : This trial will establish the effectiveness of a window prophylaxis strategy in reducing the risk of TBI acquisition after exposure in a community setting, a strategy that can potentially contribute to global tuberculosis elimination by reducing M. tuberculosis reservoirs. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07086820. Registered 17 July 2025, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07086820.
- 26 September 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 82 (2) , 291-298
Reducing Household Tuberculosis Transmission: A Pilot Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: The duration of infectiousness following pulmonary tuberculosis treatment initiation remains uncertain. We aimed to assess whether a bundled intervention designed to decrease respiratory exposure was feasible and would reduce new tuberculosis infections in household contacts (HHCs). Methods: We conducted a pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial with a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design in Santiago, Chile. Random allocation was performed, and 2 healthcare districts were assigned to the intervention (n = 180 HHCs) and 1 to standard of care (n = 149 HHCs). Eligible participants were people newly diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis and their HHCs. The intervention included education, mask use, household ventilation, and nightly separation of tuberculosis patients, for 2 weeks. Intervention adherence was evaluated weekly. Effectiveness was assessed at the individual level with QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus (QFT) test conversions in HHCs at 12-week follow-up. Results: Between October 2021 and December 2023, 384 HHCs and 157 people with tuberculosis were enrolled. Overall, 56.3% of contacts were women, with a mean age of 34.6 years and a baseline QFT positivity of 32.3%. A total of 216 contacts had negative QFT result at baseline, with 179 (82.9%) completing follow-up. QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus conversions occurred in 11 (12.8%) and 10 (10.8%) HHCs from the intervention and control arms, respectively (incidence risk ratio 1.10, 95% CI .71–1.71, P = .849). Good adherence to the respiratory bundle was reported by 53% of participants on day 7 and 54% on day 14. Conclusions: Isolation and restrictive measures after tuberculosis treatment initiation proved challenging and did not reduce tuberculosis infections in HHCs, suggesting limited benefit for transmission control.
- 26 September 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 82 (2) , 291-298
Reducing Household Tuberculosis Transmission: A Pilot Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: The duration of infectiousness following pulmonary tuberculosis treatment initiation remains uncertain. We aimed to assess whether a bundled intervention designed to decrease respiratory exposure was feasible and would reduce new tuberculosis infections in household contacts (HHCs). Methods: We conducted a pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial with a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design in Santiago, Chile. Random allocation was performed, and 2 healthcare districts were assigned to the intervention (n = 180 HHCs) and 1 to standard of care (n = 149 HHCs). Eligible participants were people newly diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis and their HHCs. The intervention included education, mask use, household ventilation, and nightly separation of tuberculosis patients, for 2 weeks. Intervention adherence was evaluated weekly. Effectiveness was assessed at the individual level with QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus (QFT) test conversions in HHCs at 12-week follow-up. Results: Between October 2021 and December 2023, 384 HHCs and 157 people with tuberculosis were enrolled. Overall, 56.3% of contacts were women, with a mean age of 34.6 years and a baseline QFT positivity of 32.3%. A total of 216 contacts had negative QFT result at baseline, with 179 (82.9%) completing follow-up. QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus conversions occurred in 11 (12.8%) and 10 (10.8%) HHCs from the intervention and control arms, respectively (incidence risk ratio 1.10, 95% CI .71–1.71, P = .849). Good adherence to the respiratory bundle was reported by 53% of participants on day 7 and 54% on day 14. Conclusions: Isolation and restrictive measures after tuberculosis treatment initiation proved challenging and did not reduce tuberculosis infections in HHCs, suggesting limited benefit for transmission control.
- Open Access
- 6 August 2024
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Microbiology Spectrum
- Vol. 12 (8) , e0046924
Evaluation of concordance of new QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus platforms for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection diagnosis in a prospective cohort of household contacts
Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays play a pivotal role in tuberculosis infection (TBI) diagnosis, with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus—an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)—among the most widely utilized. Newer QuantiFERON-TB platforms with shorter turnaround times were recently released. We aimed to evaluate these platforms’ agreement in the diagnosis of TBI. Blood samples from a prospective cohort of tuberculosis household contacts were collected at baseline and after 12 weeks of follow-up, and tested with LIAISON, an automated chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) system, QIAreach, a lateral flow (QFT-LF) semi-automated immunoassay, and the ELISA QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus platform. Test concordances were analyzed. ELISA vs CLIA overall agreement was 83.3% for all tested samples (120/144) [Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ): 0.66 (95% CI: 0.54–0.77)]. Samples positive with CLIA provided consistently higher IFN-γ levels than with ELISA ( P < 0.001). Twenty-four (16.7%) discordant pairs were obtained, all CLIA-positive/ELISA-negative: 15 (62.5%) had CLIA IFN-γ levels within borderline values (0.35–0.99 IU/mL) and 9 (37.5%) >0.99 IU/mL. QFT-LF showed only 76.4% (68/89) overall agreement with ELISA [κ: 0.53 (95% CI: 0.37–0.68)] with 21 (23.6%) discordant results obtained, all QFT-LF-positive/ELISA-negative. Overall concordance between ELISA and CLIA platforms was substantial, and only moderate between ELISA and QFT-LF. The CLIA platform yielded higher IFN-γ levels than ELISA, leading to an almost 17% higher positivity rate. The techniques do not seem interchangeable, and validation against other gold standards, such as microbiologically-confirmed tuberculosis disease, is required to determine whether these cases represent true new infections or whether CLIA necessitates a higher cutoff. IMPORTANCE: Tuberculosis is an airborne infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis that affects over 10 million people annually, with over 2 billion people carrying an asymptomatic tuberculosis infection (TBI) worldwide. Currently, TBI diagnosis includes tuberculin skin test and the blood-based interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays, with Qiagen QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT) being among those most widely utilized. We evaluated Qiagen's newer QFT platforms commercially available in a prospective cohort of tuberculosis contacts. A substantial agreement was obtained between the current QFT-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the new QFT-chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) platform, although QFT-CLIA provided higher concentrations of IFN-γ, leading to a 16.6% higher positivity rate. We highlight that both platforms may not be directly interchangeable and that further validation is required.
- 6 August 2024
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Microbiology Spectrum
- Vol. 12 (8) , e0046924
Open AccessEvaluation of concordance of new QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus platforms for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection diagnosis in a prospective cohort of household contacts
Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays play a pivotal role in tuberculosis infection (TBI) diagnosis, with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus—an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)—among the most widely utilized. Newer QuantiFERON-TB platforms with shorter turnaround times were recently released. We aimed to evaluate these platforms’ agreement in the diagnosis of TBI. Blood samples from a prospective cohort of tuberculosis household contacts were collected at baseline and after 12 weeks of follow-up, and tested with LIAISON, an automated chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) system, QIAreach, a lateral flow (QFT-LF) semi-automated immunoassay, and the ELISA QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus platform. Test concordances were analyzed. ELISA vs CLIA overall agreement was 83.3% for all tested samples (120/144) [Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ): 0.66 (95% CI: 0.54–0.77)]. Samples positive with CLIA provided consistently higher IFN-γ levels than with ELISA ( P < 0.001). Twenty-four (16.7%) discordant pairs were obtained, all CLIA-positive/ELISA-negative: 15 (62.5%) had CLIA IFN-γ levels within borderline values (0.35–0.99 IU/mL) and 9 (37.5%) >0.99 IU/mL. QFT-LF showed only 76.4% (68/89) overall agreement with ELISA [κ: 0.53 (95% CI: 0.37–0.68)] with 21 (23.6%) discordant results obtained, all QFT-LF-positive/ELISA-negative. Overall concordance between ELISA and CLIA platforms was substantial, and only moderate between ELISA and QFT-LF. The CLIA platform yielded higher IFN-γ levels than ELISA, leading to an almost 17% higher positivity rate. The techniques do not seem interchangeable, and validation against other gold standards, such as microbiologically-confirmed tuberculosis disease, is required to determine whether these cases represent true new infections or whether CLIA necessitates a higher cutoff. IMPORTANCE: Tuberculosis is an airborne infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis that affects over 10 million people annually, with over 2 billion people carrying an asymptomatic tuberculosis infection (TBI) worldwide. Currently, TBI diagnosis includes tuberculin skin test and the blood-based interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays, with Qiagen QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT) being among those most widely utilized. We evaluated Qiagen's newer QFT platforms commercially available in a prospective cohort of tuberculosis contacts. A substantial agreement was obtained between the current QFT-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the new QFT-chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) platform, although QFT-CLIA provided higher concentrations of IFN-γ, leading to a 16.6% higher positivity rate. We highlight that both platforms may not be directly interchangeable and that further validation is required.
- Open Access
Influence of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Booster among Cancer Patients on Active Treatment Previously Immunized with Inactivated versus mRNA Vaccines: A Prospective Cohort Study
Cancer patients on chemotherapy have a lower immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Therefore, through a prospective cohort study of patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy, we aimed to determine the immunogenicity of an mRNA vaccine booster (BNT162b2) among patients previously immunized with an inactivated (CoronaVac) or homologous (BNT162b2) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody (NAb) seropositivity at 8–12 weeks post-booster. The secondary end points included IgG antibody (TAb) seropositivity and specific T-cell responses. A total of 109 patients were included. Eighty-four (77%) had heterologous vaccine schedules (two doses of CoronaVac followed by the BNT162b2 booster) and twenty-five had (23%) homologous vaccine schedules (three doses of BNT162b2). IgG antibody positivity for the homologous and heterologous regimen were 100% and 96% (p = 0.338), whereas NAb positivity reached 100% and 92% (p = 0.13), respectively. Absolute NAb positivity and Tab levels were associated with the homologous schedule (with a beta coefficient of 0.26 with p = 0.027 and a geometric mean ratio 1.41 with p = 0.044, respectively). Both the homologous and heterologous vaccine regimens elicited a strong humoral and cellular response after the BNT162b2 booster. The homologous regimen was associated with higher NAb positivity and Tab levels after adjusting for relevant covariates.
Open AccessInfluence of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Booster among Cancer Patients on Active Treatment Previously Immunized with Inactivated versus mRNA Vaccines: A Prospective Cohort Study
Cancer patients on chemotherapy have a lower immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Therefore, through a prospective cohort study of patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy, we aimed to determine the immunogenicity of an mRNA vaccine booster (BNT162b2) among patients previously immunized with an inactivated (CoronaVac) or homologous (BNT162b2) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody (NAb) seropositivity at 8–12 weeks post-booster. The secondary end points included IgG antibody (TAb) seropositivity and specific T-cell responses. A total of 109 patients were included. Eighty-four (77%) had heterologous vaccine schedules (two doses of CoronaVac followed by the BNT162b2 booster) and twenty-five had (23%) homologous vaccine schedules (three doses of BNT162b2). IgG antibody positivity for the homologous and heterologous regimen were 100% and 96% (p = 0.338), whereas NAb positivity reached 100% and 92% (p = 0.13), respectively. Absolute NAb positivity and Tab levels were associated with the homologous schedule (with a beta coefficient of 0.26 with p = 0.027 and a geometric mean ratio 1.41 with p = 0.044, respectively). Both the homologous and heterologous vaccine regimens elicited a strong humoral and cellular response after the BNT162b2 booster. The homologous regimen was associated with higher NAb positivity and Tab levels after adjusting for relevant covariates.
- 20 February 2020
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Infection and Immunity
- Vol. 88 (3)
Unraveling the Role of MicroRNAs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Disease: Advances and Pitfalls
Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease of extremely high epidemiological burden worldwide that is easily acquired through the inhalation of infected respiratory droplets. The complex pathogenesis of this infection spans from subjects never developing this disease despite intense exposure, to others in which immune containment fails catastrophically and severe or disseminated forms of disease ensue.
- 20 February 2020
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Infection and Immunity
- Vol. 88 (3)
Unraveling the Role of MicroRNAs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Disease: Advances and Pitfalls
Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease of extremely high epidemiological burden worldwide that is easily acquired through the inhalation of infected respiratory droplets. The complex pathogenesis of this infection spans from subjects never developing this disease despite intense exposure, to others in which immune containment fails catastrophically and severe or disseminated forms of disease ensue.