Duncan Smith

It is anticipated that by 2028 there will be a significant increase in the use of HWHP systems in Great Britain (GB). Such systems are considered a better, energy-efficient alternative to fossil fuel-based burners and furnaces, as they use electricity. There are concerns that these systems are susceptible to microbial contamination because they hold water at lower temperatures. In particular, the concern is regarding Legionella contamination, as it can potentially cause disease in the general public and those who are maintaining and replacing these systems. Therefore, this review was focused on understanding the potential risk posed by their increased use and maintenance requirements. This review was approached systematically but was not a full systematic review. There were 61 papers that were considered potentially relevant to the research questions. Of these, 40 papers were considered relevant to the topic of Legionella in HWHP and underwent full article assessment and data extraction. The remaining papers were considered useful for background information. The scope of this review established that Legionella are a known risk in hot water systems that can be carried over to HWHP systems, yet there is minimal evidence to suggest that the current control measures are being appropriately applied to reduce the risk of exposure. When considering countrywide legislation and guidance, it appears that the risk is considered lower in single- or multi-family homes that do not require a centralised system. This review included the assessment of information regarding the safety of working with HWHP systems with regards to maintenance and replacement. The authors found a lack of information regarding these safety concerns. This review is among the first to systematically evaluate the risks of Legionella contamination in HWHP systems.

Legionella bacteria can proliferate in poorly maintained water systems, posing risks to users. All Legionella species are potentially pathogenic, but Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) is usually the primary focus of testing. However, Legionella anisa (L. anisa) also colonizes water distribution systems, is frequently found with L. pneumophila, and could be a good indicator for increased risk of nosocomial infection. Anonymized data from three commercial Legionella testing laboratories afforded an analysis of 565,750 water samples. The data covered July 2019 to August 2021, including the COVID-19 pandemic. The results confirmed that L. anisa commonly colonizes water distribution systems, being the most frequently identified non-L. pneumophila species. The proportions of L. anisa and L. pneumophila generally remained similar, but increases in L. pneumophila during COVID-19 lockdown suggest static water supplies might favor its growth. Disinfection of hospital water systems was effective, but re-colonization did occur, appearing to favor L. pneumophila; however, L. anisa colony numbers also increased as a proportion of the total. While L. pneumophila remains the main species of concern as a risk to human health, L. anisa’s role should not be underestimated, either as a potential infection risk or as an indicator of the need to intervene to control Legionella’s colonization of water supplies.

Legionella bacteria can proliferate in poorly maintained water systems, posing risks to users. All Legionella species are potentially pathogenic but Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) is usually the primary focus of testing. However, Legionella anisa (L. anisa) also colonises water distribution systems, is frequently found with L. pneumophila and could be a good indicator for increased risk of nosocomial infection. Anonymized data from three commercial Legionella testing laboratories afforded analysis of 565,750 water samples. Data covered July 2019 to August 2021, including the COVID-19 pandemic. Results confirmed L. anisa commonly colonises water distribution systems, being the most frequently identified non-L. pneumophila species. Proportions of L. anisa and L. pneumophila generally remained similar but increases in L. pneumophila during COVID-19 lockdown suggests static water supplies might favour its growth. Disinfection of hospital water systems was effective but re-colonization did occur, appearing to favour L. pneumophila, although L. anisa colony numbers also increased as a proportion of the total. While L. pneumophila remains the main species of concern as a risk to human health, L. anisa’s role should not be under-estimated, either as a potential infection risk or as an indicator of the need to intervene to control Legionella colonization of water supplies.

Most literature to date on the use of rapid Legionella tests have compared different sampling and analytical techniques, with few studies on real-world experiences using such methods. Rapid tests offer a significantly shorter feedback loop on the effectiveness of the controls. This study involved a complex of five factories, three of which had a history of Legionella contamination in their cooling water distribution system. Multiple sampling locations were utilised to take monthly water samples over 39 months to analyse for Legionella by both culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Routine monitoring gave no positive Legionella results by culture (n = 330); however, samples were frequently (68%) positive by qPCR for Legionella spp. (n = 1564). Legionella spp. qPCR assay was thus found to be a good indicator of cooling tower system health and suitable as a routine monitoring tool. An in-house qPCR limit of 5000 genomic units (GU)/L Legionella spp. was established to trigger investigation and remedial action. This approach facilitated swift remedial action to prevent Legionella proliferation to levels that may represent a public health risk. Cooling tower operators may have to set their own action levels for their own systems; however, in this study, 5000 GU/L was deemed appropriate and pragmatic.