D.L. Morris

Some forages require significant amounts of water to grow, causing the dairy industry to be dependent on a limited resource. Feeding crop residues and feed coproducts in dairy rations may represent opportunities when alfalfa is not readily available, and may reduce the industry's use of water. A study using indirect calorimetry and 12 multiparous lactating Jersey cows (BW = 447.5 ± 43.7 kg; DIM = 71 ± 11 d, mean ± SD) was conducted to determine the effect of feeding dried distillers grains and solubles (DDGS) and straw in replacement of alfalfa hay on milk production and energy utilization. A triplicated 4 × 4 Latin square design was used to evaluate the replacement of alfalfa hay with a coproduct mixture (COP) of wheat straw and DDGS. Animals were blocked by milk yield and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental treatments as follows (proportions on a DM basis): a control diet (CON) containing 18.2% of alfalfa hay, a low-coproduct diet (LCOP) that contained 8.1% COP, a medium-coproduct diet (MCOP) that contained 16.3% COP, and a high-coproduct diet (HCOP) that contained 24.3% COP. No differences were observed for daily DMI or milk yield (mean ± SEM), 19.5 kg ± 0.60 and 29.6 kg ± 0.91, respectively. A quadratic tendency was observed, where increasing inclusion of COP up to 16.3% maintained ECM and milk fat yield but decreased these when animals were fed 24.3% COP. Total methane production decreased linearly from 429.4 to 345.0 ± 22.8 L/d from CON to HCOP diets, respectively. The digestibility of CP increased linearly from 64.0% to 70.4% ± 0.95%, and N balance increased linearly from 43.3 to 90.7 ± 15.0 g/d in animals consuming CON to HCOP diets. Total time spent ruminating was lowest in animals consuming the HCOP diet. A linear increasing tendency in digestible and metabolizable energy of 2.92 to 3.02 ± 0.041 Mcal/kg and 2.58 to 2.70 ± 0.047 Mcal/kg was observed in animals consuming CON to HCOP. The proportion of metabolizable energy from digestible energy tended to linearly increase from 88.3 to 89.4 ± 0.454 when COP was added to the diet. Results of this study indicate that alfalfa hay with a mixture of straw and DDGS can maintain milk production and DMI, but the partial or full replacement of alfalfa with the COP mixture may result in differences in energy utilization, in part driven by effects on CH₄ reduction.

A simulation study was conducted to examine accuracy of estimating daily O₂ consumption, CO₂ and CH₄ emissions, and heat production (HP) using a spot sampling technique and to determine optimal spot sampling frequency (FQ). Data were obtained from 3 experiments where daily O₂ consumption, emissions of CO₂ and CH₄, and HP were measured using indirect calorimetry (respiration chamber or headbox system). Experiment 1 used 8 beef heifers (ad libitum feeding; gaseous exchanges measured every 30 min over 3 d in respiration chambers); Experiment 2 used 56 lactating Holstein-Friesian cows (restricted feeding; gaseous exchanges measured every 12 min over 3 d in respiration chambers); Experiment 3 used 12 lactating Jersey cows (ad libitum feeding; gaseous exchanges measured every hour for 1 d using headbox style chambers). Within experiment, averages of all measurements (FQALL) and averages of measurements selected at time points with 12, 8, 6, or 4 spot sampling FQ (i.e., sampling every 2, 3, 4, and 6 h in a 24-h cycle, respectively; FQ12, FQ8, FQ6, and FQ4, respectively) were compared. Within study a mixed model was used to compare gaseous exchanges and HP among FQALL, FQ12, FQ8, FQ6, and FQ4, and an interaction of dietary treatment by FQ was examined. A regression model was used to evaluate accuracy of spot sampling within study [i.e., FQALL (observed) vs. FQ12, FQ8, FQ6, or FQ4 (estimated)]. No interaction of diet by FQ was observed for any variables except for CH₄ production in experiment 1. No FQ effect was observed for gaseous exchanges and HP except in experiment 2 where CO₂ production was less (5,411 vs. 5,563 L/d) for FQ4 compared with FQALL, FQ12, and FQ8. A regression analysis between FQALL and each FQ within study showed that slopes and intercepts became farther from 1 and 0, respectively, for almost all variables as FQ decreased. Most variables for FQ12 and FQ8 had root mean square prediction error (RMSPE) less than 10% of the mean and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) greater than 0.80, and RMSPE increased and CCC decreased as FQ decreased. When a regression analysis was conducted with combined data from the 3 experiments (mixed model with study as a random effect), results agreed with those from the analysis for the individual studies. Prediction errors increased and CCC decreased as FQ decreased. Generally, all the estimates from FQ12, FQ8, FQ6, and FQ4 had RMSPE less than 10% of the means and CCC greater than 0.90 except for FQ6 and FQ4 for O₂ consumption and CH₄ production. In conclusion, the spot sampling simulation with 3 indirect calorimetry experiments indicated that FQ of at least 8 samples (every 3 h in a 24-h cycle) was required to estimate daily O₂ consumption, CO₂ and CH₄ production, and HP and to detect changes in those in response to dietary treatments. This sampling FQ may be considered when using techniques that measure spot gas exchanges such as the GreenFeed and face mask systems.

Summary: Using 3 different assays, this study evaluated the degradability and digestibility of protein in hydrolyzed feather meal. Traditionally, when hydrolyzed feather meal was produced, coagulated poultry blood was added before the drying phase; however, now some renderers separate the feathers and blood and sell them separately. These 2 types of commercially available hydrolyzed feather meal were evaluated. Although the assays differed in the estimates of rumen degradability of protein, intestinal digestibility of rumen undegraded protein (RUP) estimates were not different. We observed little difference in digestibility with the inclusion of blood, but rumen degradability was greater for feather meal not containing blood. No difference was observed in the digestibility of RUP between feather meal with and without blood. These results suggest that estimation of the intestinal digestibility of RUP is similar across assays and the inclusion of blood does not alter digestibility. However, due to differences in rumen degradability, the amount of RUP digested was significantly different across assays.

The effects of dietary fatty acid (FA) and starch content as well as supplemental digestible Lys (sdLys) on production, energy utilization, and N utilization were evaluated. Each factor was fed at 5 different amounts, and factor limits were as follows: 3.0 to 6.2% of dry matter (DM) for FA; 20.2 to 31.3% of DM for starch, and 0 to 17.8 g/d of sdLys. Dietary FA and starch were increased by replacing soyhulls with supplemental fat and corn grain, respectively, and sdLys increased with rumen-protected Lys. Fifteen unique treatments were fed to 25 Jersey cows (mean ± SD; 80 ± 14 d in milk) across 3 blocks in a partially balanced incomplete block design. Each block consisted of 4 periods of 28 d, where the final 4 d were used to determine milk production and composition, feed intake, energy utilization (via total collection and headbox-style indirect calorimetry), and N utilization (via total collection). Response surface models were used to evaluate treatment responses. Increasing dietary FA decreased DM intake and milk protein yield. When dietary starch was less than 24%, milk protein concentration increased with increasing sdLys, but when dietary starch was greater than 26% milk protein concentration decreased with increasing sdLys. Digestibility of FA increased when dietary FA increased from 3.0 to 4.2% and decreased as FA increased beyond 4.2%. Although neutral detergent fiber digestibility decreased as dietary starch increased, energy digestibility increased. As dietary FA increased, metabolizable energy (ME) content quadratically increased. Supply of ME increased as dietary FA increased from 3.0 to 4.2% and decreased as FA increased beyond 4.2%. Increasing dietary FA and starch decreased CH₄ production and urinary energy. Increasing dietary starch increased the efficiency of utilizing dietary N for milk N. Increasing sdLys quadratically decreased N balance as sdLys increased from 0 to 8 g/d and increased N balance as sdLys increased from 8 to 18 g/d. Increasing dietary FA can increase ME content, however, at high dietary FA, decreased DM intake and FA digestibility resulted in a plateau in ME content and a decrease in ME supply. Our results demonstrate that sdLys supply is important for milk protein when dietary starch is low, and some Lys may be preferentially used for muscle protein synthesis at the expense of milk protein when sdLys is high.

Maintenance energy is the energy required to conserve the state of an animal when no work is completed. Dietary energy must be supplied to meet maintenance requirements before milk can be produced. The objectives of the current experiment were to quantify the maintenance energy requirement of Jersey cows when lactating or dry. Energetic measures were collected on 8 Jersey cows and evaluated across 3 physiological phases and nutritional planes: lactation, dry cows fed at maintenance, and fasted dry cows. Through total collection of feces and urine as well as using headbox-style indirect calorimeters, energy balance and heat production data were measured across all phases. Lactation data were collected across four 28-d periods. Data for cows fed at maintenance were collected after 14 d and fasting heat production was measured during the last 24 h of a 96-h fast. Net energy for maintenance (NE_M) requirements, and the efficiency of converting metabolizable energy (ME) into net energy were compared between lactating and dry (maintenance or fasting phase) cows. Heat production of dry cows fed at maintenance, which represents ME for maintenance, was 0.146 ± 0.0087 Mcal per unit of metabolic body weight (BW^0.75, MBW). Fasting heat production, which represents NE_M, was 0.102 ± 0.0071 Mcal/MBW. Energy balance was calculated as tissue energy plus milk energy. When estimated via regressing energy balance on ME intake, NE_M was not different between dry and lactating cows (0.120 ± 0.32 vs. 0.103 ± 0.0052 Mcal/MBW). However, the slope of the regression of energy balance on ME intake was greater for dry compared with lactating cows (0.714 ± 0.046 vs. 0.685 ± 0.010) when evaluated with a fixed intercept. This suggests that dry cows were more efficient at converting ME into net energy and that the efficiency of utilizing ME for maintenance may be greater than for lactation. Our measurements of NE_M and the slope of ME on energy balance were greater than the value used by the National Research Council (2001), which are 0.080 Mcal/MBW for NE_M and approximately 0.64 for the slope. Results of this study suggest that NE_M and the efficiency of converting ME into NE_M of modern lactating Jersey cows are similar to recent measurements on modern Holstein cows and greater than previous measurements.

Hydrolyzed feather meal (HFM) is a feed that is high in rumen undegradable protein; however, it is low in Lys compared with other high rumen undegradable protein sources. Additionally, processing methods differ by facility, which affects AA composition and protein digestibility. The objective of this study was to use lactating dairy cows to determine the effects of feeding 2 sources of HFM that differed by the amount of blood they contained and also to study the effects of supplementing rumen-protected (RP) Lys when these sources of HFM are fed. In this study, 12 multiparous Jersey cows were enrolled in a triplicated 4 × 4 Latin square with 4 periods 28 d in length. Cows were fed 2 total mixed rations that differed by source of HFM. The HFM was included at 4.5% of the diet dry matter, and one source was produced with the addition of poultry blood. Cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment sequences. Treatments were as follows: HFM without added blood and no RP-Lys, HFM with added blood and no RP-Lys, HFM without blood and with RP-Lys (22 g of digestible Lys), and HFM with added blood and RP-Lys. The source of HFM containing blood tended to increase dry matter intake (18.3 vs. 17.3 ± 0.72 kg/d), and increased milk yield (20.5 vs. 18.4 ± 1.31 kg/d) and protein yield (0.788 vs. 0.694 ± 0.040 kg/d). The inclusion of RP-Lys did not affect milk or protein yield. In cows fed HFM containing blood, plasma concentration of Lys (82.1 vs. 70.8 ± 4.06 μM) and His (27.8 vs. 17.9 ± 3.15 μM) was higher. The addition of RP-Lys had no effect on the concentration of either plasma Lys or His. Gross energy intake tended to increase for HFM containing more blood (81.4 vs. 77.3 ± 3.29 Mcal/d); however, no difference was observed for intake of digestible energy (52.0 ± 2.20 Mcal/d) or metabolizable energy (46.4 ± 2.02 Mcal/d). Similar to dry matter intake, N intake increased with the inclusion of HFM containing blood, but crude protein digestibility decreased (61.6 vs. 66.0%). Results of this study highlight that source of HFM can be a factor that affects milk production and that this in part is due to differences in the profile of AA. Additionally, the observation that plasma His and milk protein increased with the consumption of HFM containing more blood suggests that His may have played a role in increasing milk and milk protein yield.

Measurement of urinary energy (UE) excretion is essential to determine metabolizable energy (ME) supply. Our objectives were to evaluate the accuracy of using urinary N (UN) or C (UC) to estimate UE and ultimately improve the accuracy of estimating ME. Individual animal data (n = 433) were used from 11 studies with Jersey cows at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, where samples were analyzed after drying (n = 299) or on an as-is basis (n = 134). Dried samples resulted in greater estimated error variance compared with as-is samples, and thus only as-is samples were used for final models. The as-is data set included a range (min to max) in dry matter intake (11.6-24.6 kg/d), N intake (282-642 g/d), UE excretion (1,390-3,160 kcal/d), UN excretion (85-220 g/d or 20.6-59.5% of N intake), and UC excretion (130-273 g/d). As indicated by a bias in residuals between observed and predicted ME as dietary crude protein (CP; range of 14.9-19.1%) increased, the National Research Council dairy model did not accurately predict ME of diets, as dietary CP varied. The relationship between UE (kcal/d) and UN (g/d) excretion was linear and had an intercept of 880 ± 140 kcal. Because an intercept of 880 is biologically unlikely, the intercept was forced through 0, resulting in linear and quadratic relationships. The regressions of UE (kcal/d) on UN (g/d) excretion were UE = 14.6 ± 0.32 × UN, and UE = 20.9 ± 1.0 × UN - 0.0357 ± 0.0056 × UN². In the quadratic regression, UE increased, but at a diminishing rate as UN excretion increased. As UC increased, UE linearly and quadratically increased. However, error variance was greater for regression with UC compared with UN as explanatory variables (8.42 vs. 7.42% of mean UE). The use of the quadratic regression between UN and UE excretion to predict ME resulted in a slope bias in ME predictions as dietary CP increased. The linear regression between UE and UN excretion removed slope bias between predicted ME and CP, and thus may be more appropriate for predicting UE across a wider range of dietary CP. Using equations to predict UE from UN should improve our ability to predict diet ME in Jersey cows compared with calculating ME directly from digestible energy.

The physical form of feeds can influence dairy cow chewing behavior, rumen characteristics, and ruminal passage rate. Changing particle size of feeds is usually done through grinding or chopping forages, but pelleting feed ingredients also changes particle size. Our objective was to determine if pelleted dried distillers grains and solubles (DDGS) affected the feeding value for lactating dairy cattle. Seven lactating Jersey cows that were each fitted with a ruminal cannula averaging (± standard deviation) 56 ± 10.3 d in milk and 462 ± 75.3 kg were used in a crossover design. The treatments contained 15% DDGS in either meal or pelleted form with 45% or 55% forage on a dry matter basis. The forages were alfalfa hay, corn silage, and wheat straw. The factorial treatment arrangement was meal DDGS and low forage (mDDGS-LF), pelleted DDGS and low forage (pDDGS-LF), meal DDGS and high forage (mDDGS-HF), and pelleted DDGS and high forage (pDDGS-HF). Dry matter intake and energy-corrected milk were both unaffected by treatment averaging 19.8 ± 2.10 kg/d and 33.9 ± 1.02 kg/d, respectively. Fat yield was unaffected averaging 1.7 ± 0.13 kg/d, but protein yield was affected by the interaction of forage and DDGS. Protein yield was similar for both low forage treatments but was increased by when pDDGS was fed in the high forage treatment (1.05 vs. 0.99 ± 0.035 kg/d). When forage concentration was increased, starch digestibility increased by 1.9 percentage units, crude protein digestibility tended to increase 1.1 percentage units, and residual organic matter digestibility decreased 3.4 percentage units. Pelleting DDGS increased digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility (49.2 vs. 47.5 ± 1.85%) and gross energy (68.2 vs. 67.1 ± 1.18%). Increasing forage increased ruminal pH (5.85 to 5.94 ± 0.052). Passage rate slowed from 2.84 to 2.65 ± 0.205 %/h when feeding HF compared with LF. Rumination time increased from 417 to 454 ± 49.4 min with increasing forage concentration but was unaffected by the form of DDGS or the interaction of forage and DDGS. Eating time increased with pDDGS (235 vs. 209 ± 19.8 min), which may be a result of increased feed sorting behavior. Pelleting DDGS increased preference for particles retained on the 8-mm sieve and decreased preference for particles on the 1.18-mm sieve and in the pan (<1.18 mm). Results confirm that increasing forage concentration increases ruminal pH, rumination time, and slows passage rate, but contrary to our hypothesis increasing forage concentration did not increase NDF digestibility. Results also suggest that pelleted DDGS do not appear to affect milk production, ruminal characteristics, or passage rate, but pelleted DDGS may increase sorting behavior of lactating Jersey cows and increase NDF and gross energy digestibility.

Heat production (HP) represents a major energy cost in lactating dairy cows. Better understanding of factors that affect HP will improve our understanding of energy metabolism. Our objective was to derive models to explain variation in HP of lactating Jersey cows. Individual animal-period data from 9 studies (n = 293) were used. The data set included cows with a wide range (min to max) in days in milk (44-410) and milk yield (7.8-43.0 kg/d). Diets included corn silage as the predominate forage source, but diets varied (min to max on DM basis) in crude protein (CP; 15.2-19.5%), neutral detergent fiber (NDF; 35.5-43.0%), starch (16.2-31.1%), and crude fat (2.2 to 6.4%) contents. Average HP was (mean ± standard deviation) 22.1 ± 2.86 Mcal/d, or 28.1 ± 3.70% of gross energy intake. Eight models were fit to explain variation in HP: (1) dry matter intake (DMI; INT); (2) milk fat, protein, and lactose yield (MILKCOMP); (3) INT and milk yield (INT+MY); (4) INT and MILKCOMP/DMI (INT+MILKCOMP); (5) mass of digested NDF, CP, and starch (DIG); (6) INT and digested energy (INT+DE); (7) INT and NDF, CP, and starch digestibility (INT+DIG); or (8) INT+MILKCOMP model plus urinary N excretion (INT+MILKCOMP+UN). For all HP models, metabolic body weight was included. All models were derived via a backward elimination approach and included the random effects of study, cow, and period within block within study. The INT models adequately explained variation in HP with a nonrandom effect-adjusted concordance correlation coefficient of 0.84. Similar adjusted concordance correlation coefficients (0.79-0.85) were observed for other HP models. The HP associated with milk protein yield and supply of digestible protein was greater than other milk production and nutrient digestibility variables. The HP associated with urinary N excretion was 5.32. Overall, HP can be adequately predicted from metabolic body weight and DMI. Milk component yield, nutrient digestibility, or urinary N excretion explained similar variation as DMI. Coefficients for milk protein and protein digestion suggest that digestion and metabolism of protein and synthesis of milk protein contribute substantially to HP of a dairy cow.