AGAllen L. Gifford

Allen L. Gifford

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Allen L. Gifford has a total of 493 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Complexity of Adherence Challenges: Understanding Syndemic Factors Affecting HIV Treatment Adherence During Treatment Initiation in Cape Town, South Africa

    by Jeanette L. Kaiser, Erin Trowbridge, Taryn Vian, Jessica E. Haberer, Rashmi Paudel, Jillian DeMaria, Catherine Orrell, Lauren Jennings, Allen L. Gifford, Nafisa Halim, et al.

    People living with HIV and beginning antiretroviral therapy (ART) often struggle with medication adherence and attending appointments due to multi-level challenges such as depression symptoms, substance use, stigma and disclosure, food insecurity, health system challenges, transportation challenges, and gender inequity. The SUSTAIN trial seeks to improve initiation adherence through multiple monitoring and support interventions in three clinics in Mitchells Plain township, Cape Town, South Africa. We qualitatively explored the multi-level challenges impacting adherence at the individual, interpersonal, and structural levels among 60 study participants within the first six months after initiation on ART. The in-depth interview sample was selected purposively based on participant experiences with at least one of these factors reported through a baseline survey, gender, and age. We conducted a content analysis and utilized syndemic theory to understand the synergistic effects of multiple adherence challenges. To manage their HIV diagnosis, participants described positive and negative coping mechanisms, including how substance use affected adherence particularly on big event days (e.g., birthdays, holidays, or funerals). Participants described fears of stigma motivat decisions on disclosure of their HIV status and decreased potential social support, possibly reducing motivation to adhere to ART. Gender inequity reinforced experiences with and perceptions of stigma and disclosure. Participants indicated that food insecurity resulted in feelings of shame when associated with perceived larger appetites due to ART use and with lack of employment. Participants described both positive and negative ways the health system impacted their adherence and retention in care, citing information provided by clinic staff, clinician attitudes, and clinic operations. Misunderstandings regarding the strict timing of ART dose-taking (often from lack of clear information or counselling by clinicians) meant participants often had limited competence to make decisions about their dosing schedule and how to best integrate treatment into their daily lives. Participants described a notable fear of commuting to and from clinics due to dangerous and difficult paths on which muggings occurred frequently; women were at particular risk of violence. Often, participants mentioned multiple factors simultaneously affecting adherence, with additive or synergistic effects. Syndemic factors affecting ART adherence exist across multiple levels. Enhanced adherence counseling, designed as a behavior change intervention, might help PLWH cope with individual adherence barriers and support strategizing about ways to mitigate or overcome structural barriers. Continued efforts by government and implementers to address health system, gender inequity, and security challenges could further support ART adherence.


  • Open Access

    Exploring HIV provider framings of living and aging with HIV

    by Madeline Villalba, Gemmae M. Fix, Rachel Schenkel, Mary Ann Chiasson, Allen L. Gifford, Peter Gordon, Helen-Maria Lekas, Michael T. Yin, Abigail Baim-Lance


  • Open Access

    Six Moments of Infection Prevention in Injection Drug Use: An Educational Toolkit for Clinicians

    by Leah Harvey, Jacqueline Boudreau, Samantha K Sliwinski, Judith Strymish, Allen L Gifford, Justeen Hyde, Katherine Linsenmeyer, Westyn Branch-Elliman

    Injection drug use–associated bacterial and viral infections are increasing. Expanding access to harm reduction services, such as safe injection education, are effective prevention strategies. However, these strategies have had limited uptake. New tools are needed to improve provider capacity to facilitate dissemination of these evidence-based interventions. The “Six Moments of Infection Prevention in Injection Drug Use” provider educational tool was developed using a global, rather than pathogen-specific, infection prevention framework, highlighting the prevention of invasive bacterial and fungal infections in additional to viral pathogens. The tool’s effectiveness was tested using a short, paired pre/post survey that assessed provider knowledge and attitudes about harm reduction. Seventy-five respondents completed the paired surveys. At baseline, 17 respondents (22.6%) indicated that they had received no prior training in harm reduction and 28 (37.3%) reported discomfort counseling people who inject drugs (PWID). Sixty respondents (80.0%) reported they had never referred a patient to a syringe service program (SSP); of those, 73.3% cited lack of knowledge regarding locations of SSPs and 40.0% reported not knowing where to access information regarding SSPs. After the training, 66 (88.0%) reported that they felt more comfortable educating PWID (P < .0001), 65 respondents (86.6%) reported they planned to use the Six Moments model in their own practice, and 100% said they would consider referring patients to an SSP in the future. The Six Moments model emphasizes the importance of a global approach to infection prevention and harm reduction. This educational intervention can be used as part of a bundle of implementation strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality in PWID.


  • Open Access

    Vaccine hesitancy as an opportunity for engagement: A rapid qualitative study of patients and employees in the U.S. Veterans Affairs healthcare system

    by A. Rani Elwy, Marla L. Clayman, Lara LoBrutto, Danielle Miano, Beth Ann Petrakis, Sarah Javier, Taryn Erhardt, Amanda M. Midboe, Richard Carbonaro, Guneet K. Jasuja, et al.


  • Open Access

    The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Innovators Network: Evaluation design, methods and lessons learned through an embedded research approach

    by Anita A. Vashi, Elizabeth A. Orvek, Anaïs Tuepker, George L. Jackson, Allison Amrhein, Brynn Cole, Steven M. Asch, Allen L. Gifford, Jennifer Lindquist, Nell J. Marshall, et al.


  • Provider Perceptions of Virtual Care During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

    by Samantha L. Connolly, Allen L. Gifford, Christopher J. Miller, Mark S. Bauer, Lisa S. Lehmann, Michael E. Charness

    Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a dramatic increase in virtual care (VC) across outpatient specialties, but little is known regarding provider acceptance of VC. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess provider perceptions of the quality, efficiency, and challenges of VC versus in-person care with masks. Design: This was a voluntary survey. Participants: Mental health (MH), primary care, medical specialty, and surgical specialty providers across the 8 VA New England Healthcare System medical centers. Measures: Provider ratings of: (1) quality and efficiency of VC (phone and video telehealth) compared with in-person care with masks; (2) challenges of VC; and (3) percentage of patients that providers are comfortable seeing via VC in the future. Results: The sample included 998 respondents (49.8% MH, 20.6% primary care, 20.4% medical specialty, 9.1% surgical specialty; 61% response rate). Most providers rated VC as equivalent to or higher in quality and efficiency compared with in-person care with masks. Quality ratings were significantly higher for video versus phone (χ2=61.4, P24.1, Ps12.2, Ps<0.01). Conclusions: Broad provider support for VC was stratified across specialties, with the highest ratings in MH and lowest ratings in SS. Findings will inform the improvement of VC processes and the planning of health care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.


  • Open Access

    Challenges to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence and Coping Strategies to Overcome Them: Qualitative Investigations of Adolescents Living with HIV, their Caregivers, and Clinicians in Vietnam

    by Lora L. Sabin, Vu Cong Nguyen, Kelsee Harvey, Rachael Bonawitz, Le Thanh Hai, Nguyen Van Lam, Le Thi Yen, Allen L. Gifford, Jessica E. Haberer, Dang Thuy Linh, et al.

    Background: Adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) in Vietnam are known to struggle with adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy (ART). Objective: To examine treatment challenges and facilitators experienced by ALHIV from the perspective of adolescents, their caregivers, and providers, and to inform an adherence intervention. Methods: In-depth Interviews (IDIs) of adolescent/caregiver dyads and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with adolescents, caregivers, and clinicians were conducted in Hanoi, Vietnam. We used semi-structured guides to encourage open-ended responses. We queried the challenges adolescents experience taking ART medications and being adherent, their awareness of disease status, and facilitators to support high adherence. Audio-recorded IDIs were translated into English, and coded and analyzed in NVivo using a thematic approach. Results: A total of 78 individuals participated in the study. Forty individuals participated in IDIs (20 adolescents and 20 caregivers). All adolescents had acquired HIV perinatally. We conducted six FGDs: four with adolescents, and one each with caregivers and clinicians. We identified major themes regarding awareness of HIV status (most caregivers reported they had disclosed to their child, while few adolescents revealed the knowledge of their status); perceived barriers to adherence (medication-related challenges, stigma, school-associated issues, financial obstacles, system challenges, awareness of HIV status); and adherence facilitators (development of dose-taking habits, reminder systems, social support). Differences between adolescents and caregivers related to key issues were evident. Conclusion: Further research is needed to elucidate discrepancies in adolescent-caregiver viewpoints and develop interventions tailored to both ALHIV and their caregivers.


  • Open Access

    Identifying, Replicating, and Spreading Health care Innovations across a Nation‐Wide Health care System: VHA Diffusion of Excellence

    by G. Jackson, S. Cutrona, B. White, C. Reardon, E. Orvek, A. Nevedal, J. Lindquist, A. Gifford, H. King, K. DeLaughter, et al.

    Click on the article title to read more.


  • Open Access

    The Supporting Adolescent Adherence in Vietnam (SAAV) study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial assessing an mHealth approach to improving adherence for adolescents living with HIV in Vietnam

    by Mary DeSilva, Cong Nguyen Vu, Rachael Bonawitz, Le Thanh Hai, Nguyen Van Lam, Le Thi Yen, Allen L. Gifford, Jessica Haberer, Dang Thuy Linh, Lora Sabin

    The overall goal of the Supporting Adolescent Adherence in Vietnam (SAAV) study is to improve understanding of an adherence feedback mHealth intervention designed to help adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) maintain high adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART), critical to effective treatment. Specifically, we aim to: (1) conduct formative research with Vietnamese ALHIV and their caregivers to better understand adherence challenges and refine the personalized mHealth intervention package; and (2) assess the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of the intervention to improve ART adherence by implementing a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The study will utilize mixed methods. The formative phase will include 40 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 20 adolescent (12–17 years)/caregiver dyads and eight focus group discussions with adolescents, caregivers, and clinicians at the National Hospital for Pediatrics (NHP) in Hanoi, Vietnam. We will also conduct 20 IDIs with older adolescents (18–21 years) who have transitioned to adult care at outpatient clinics in Hanoi. We will then implement a seven-month RCT at NHP. We will recruit 80 adolescents on ART, monitor their adherence for one month to establish baseline adherence using a wireless pill container (WPC), and then randomize participants to intervention versus control within optimal (≥ 95% on-time doses) versus suboptimal (< 95% on-time doses) baseline adherence strata. Intervention participants will receive a reminder of their choice (cellphone text message/call or bottle-based flash/alarm), triggered when they miss a dose, and engage in monthly counseling informed by their adherence data. Comparison participants will receive usual care and offer of counseling at routine monthly clinic visits. After six months, we will compare ART adherence, CD4 count, and HIV viral suppression between arms, in addition to acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. Findings will contribute valuable information on perceived barriers and facilitators affecting adolescents’ ART adherence, mHealth approaches as adherence support tools for ALHIV, and factors affecting adolescents’ ART adherence. This information will be useful to researchers, medical personnel, and policy-makers as they develop and implement adherence programs for ALHIV, with potential relevance to other chronic diseases during transition from adolescent to adult care. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03031197 . Registered on 21 January 2017.