Heather S. Healy
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Heather S. Healy has a total of 101 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Lauren Lavin
University of Iowa (United States, Iowa City) - UI
16 shared publications- Nicholas Matthew Mohr
Department of Emergency Medicine University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Iowa City Iowa USA
16 shared publications Sara Ternes
University of Iowa (United States, Iowa City) - UI
16 shared publications- Jayamalathi Priyanka Vakkalanka
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
11 shared publications Kimberly A. S. Merchant
University of Iowa USA
8 shared publicationsMarcia M. Ward
University of Iowa USA
8 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 12 February 2026
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 33 (2) , e70230
A Systematic Review Evaluating Pain Assessment Strategies for Patients With Dementia in the Emergency Department: The Geriatric ED Guidelines 2.0
Objectives: Pain is common among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) but is frequently underdetected and undertreated in older people living with dementia (PLWD). This systematic review examined whether dementia‐specific pain assessment tools improve pain management compared with usual care in the ED. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and have reported the methods and results following PRISMA (PROSPERO: CRD420251044828). Eligible studies included randomized, quasi‐experimental, and observational designs enrolling ED patients aged ≥ 65 years with dementia or cognitive impairment. Interventions were pain assessment tools developed for PLWD, and comparisons were with standard pain scales. Primary outcomes were patient‐reported outcome measures and analgesia administration; secondary outcomes included repeated pain scores, ED revisits, functional decline, mortality, and adverse events. Five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycInfo) and two clinical trial registries were searched without language or date restrictions on April 22, 2025, and December 16, 2025, respectively. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane RoB‐2. Results: Of 987 records identified, 18 underwent full‐text review, and one study met eligibility criteria. Fry et al. (2017) conducted a multicenter, cluster‐randomized controlled trial of 602 older adults with suspected long bone fractures, comparing the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) tool with standard pain scales. No significant differences were observed in median time to first analgesia (83 vs. 82 min, p = 0.42) or proportion receiving analgesia within 60 min (28% vs. 32%, p = 0.19). Evidence certainty was rated very low. Conclusions: Evidence on dementia‐specific pain assessment tools in the ED is extremely limited. Available data suggest PAINAD does not improve timeliness of analgesia, underscoring the urgent need for rigorous studies to guide pain management for PLWD in the ED.
- 12 February 2026
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 33 (2) , e70230
Open AccessA Systematic Review Evaluating Pain Assessment Strategies for Patients With Dementia in the Emergency Department: The Geriatric ED Guidelines 2.0
Objectives: Pain is common among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) but is frequently underdetected and undertreated in older people living with dementia (PLWD). This systematic review examined whether dementia‐specific pain assessment tools improve pain management compared with usual care in the ED. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and have reported the methods and results following PRISMA (PROSPERO: CRD420251044828). Eligible studies included randomized, quasi‐experimental, and observational designs enrolling ED patients aged ≥ 65 years with dementia or cognitive impairment. Interventions were pain assessment tools developed for PLWD, and comparisons were with standard pain scales. Primary outcomes were patient‐reported outcome measures and analgesia administration; secondary outcomes included repeated pain scores, ED revisits, functional decline, mortality, and adverse events. Five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycInfo) and two clinical trial registries were searched without language or date restrictions on April 22, 2025, and December 16, 2025, respectively. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane RoB‐2. Results: Of 987 records identified, 18 underwent full‐text review, and one study met eligibility criteria. Fry et al. (2017) conducted a multicenter, cluster‐randomized controlled trial of 602 older adults with suspected long bone fractures, comparing the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) tool with standard pain scales. No significant differences were observed in median time to first analgesia (83 vs. 82 min, p = 0.42) or proportion receiving analgesia within 60 min (28% vs. 32%, p = 0.19). Evidence certainty was rated very low. Conclusions: Evidence on dementia‐specific pain assessment tools in the ED is extremely limited. Available data suggest PAINAD does not improve timeliness of analgesia, underscoring the urgent need for rigorous studies to guide pain management for PLWD in the ED.
- 1 November 2024
- Published by The University of Iowa
The Effect of Telehealth on Cost of Health Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- 1 November 2024
- Published by The University of Iowa
The Effect of Telehealth on Cost of Health Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- 27 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Women's Health Issues
- Vol. 34 (5) , 455-464
Health and Health Care Use of American Indian/Alaska Native Women Veterans: A Scoping Review
- 27 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Women's Health Issues
- Vol. 34 (5) , 455-464
Health and Health Care Use of American Indian/Alaska Native Women Veterans: A Scoping Review
- Open Access
- 22 December 2023
- Published by CABI Publishing
The effect of telehealth on cost of healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review (Embase).
- 22 December 2023
- Published by CABI Publishing
Open AccessThe effect of telehealth on cost of healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review (Embase).
- Open Access
- 22 December 2023
- Published by CABI Publishing
Telehealth use and health equity for mental health and substance use disorder during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A systematic review (Embase).
- 22 December 2023
- Published by CABI Publishing
Open AccessTelehealth use and health equity for mental health and substance use disorder during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A systematic review (Embase).
- Open Access
- 22 December 2023
- Published by CABI Publishing
Telehealth use and health equity for mental health and substance use disorder during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A systematic review (Cochrane CENTRAL).
- 22 December 2023
- Published by CABI Publishing
Open AccessTelehealth use and health equity for mental health and substance use disorder during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A systematic review (Cochrane CENTRAL).
- Open Access
- 22 December 2023
- Published by CABI Publishing
Telehealth use and health equity for mental health and substance use disorder during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A systematic review (CINAHL Plus).
- 22 December 2023
- Published by CABI Publishing
Open AccessTelehealth use and health equity for mental health and substance use disorder during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A systematic review (CINAHL Plus).