Olivia Bailey
Research Subjects
Olivia Bailey has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Annette Miller
1 shared publicationDavid S. Howes
1 shared publication- Hans R. House
University of Iowa, Department of Emergency Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
1 shared publication James Walter
1 shared publication- Karin V. Rhodes
Health Services Research Group, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
1 shared publication - Mark Alan Graber
University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 August 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-5
The wizard behind the curtain: programmers as providers
It is almost universally accepted that traditional provider-patient relationships should be governed, at least in part, by the ethical principles set forth by Beauchamp and Childress (Beauchamp and Childress, Principles of biomedical ethics, 1979). These principles include autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice (Beauchamp and Childress, Principles of biomedical ethics, 1979). Recently, however, the nature of medial practice has changed. The pervasive presence of computer technology in medicine raises interesting ethical questions. In this paper we argue that some software designers should be considered health care providers and thus be subject the ethical principles incumbent upon “traditional” providers. We argue that these ethical responsibilities should be applied explicitly rather than as a passive, implicit, set of guidelines.
- 4 August 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-5
Open AccessThe wizard behind the curtain: programmers as providers
It is almost universally accepted that traditional provider-patient relationships should be governed, at least in part, by the ethical principles set forth by Beauchamp and Childress (Beauchamp and Childress, Principles of biomedical ethics, 1979). These principles include autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice (Beauchamp and Childress, Principles of biomedical ethics, 1979). Recently, however, the nature of medial practice has changed. The pervasive presence of computer technology in medicine raises interesting ethical questions. In this paper we argue that some software designers should be considered health care providers and thus be subject the ethical principles incumbent upon “traditional” providers. We argue that these ethical responsibilities should be applied explicitly rather than as a passive, implicit, set of guidelines.
- 1 January 2016
- Published by Elsevier
- p. 743-745
Chlamydophila psittaci (Psittacosis) Attack
- 1 September 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 44 (3) , 262-267
Resuscitating the physician-patient relationship: emergency department communication in an academic medical center
- 1 September 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 44 (3) , 262-267
Resuscitating the physician-patient relationship: emergency department communication in an academic medical center