John Maciejowski
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
John Maciejowski has a total of 302 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Abraham Shim
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
35 shared publications - Yanyang Chen
Molecular Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
35 shared publications - Eléonore Toufektchan
Molecular Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
34 shared publications - Samuel F. Bakhoum
Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
34 shared publications - Alexandra Dananberg
Molecular Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
33 shared publications - Ashley Nichols
Molecular Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
33 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 26 October 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Cell Reports
- Vol. 45 (11)
Heterogeneous contributions of APOBEC3 deaminases to substitution and indel mutagenesis in lung adenocarcinoma
- 26 October 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Cell Reports
- Vol. 45 (11)
Open AccessHeterogeneous contributions of APOBEC3 deaminases to substitution and indel mutagenesis in lung adenocarcinoma
- Open Access
- 23 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 658 (8135) , 525-535
MMEJ repair of breaks at TA repeats maintains ecDNA and cancer fitness
Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) comprises megabase-sized circular DNA elements that frequently carry oncogene amplifications, driving aggressive tumour phenotypes, therapeutic resistance and poor clinical outcomes across many cancers1,2,3,4. Although ecDNA is thought to arise from canonical double-strand break repair, the pathways that maintain it remain unclear. Here we show that inhibition of microhomology-mediated end joining, but not non-homologous end joining or homologous recombination, selectively depletes ecDNA, induces ecDNA-specific damage and promotes its sequestration into micronuclei, compromising the fitness of cancer cells that depend on ecDNA-driven oncogene amplification. Mechanistically, TA-rich loci on ecDNA are hotspots for DNA damage and breakage5,6. The DNA translocase FANCM suppresses break formation at these sites, while breaks that escape FANCM surveillance are cleaved by ERCC1–ERCC4 and channelled into microhomology-mediated end joining for repair. Single-cell whole-genome sequencing shows that disrupting FANCM or polymerase θ (Polθ) in COLO320DM cells causes structural instability characterized by deletions and small duplications, with breakpoints enriched at TA-rich regions. This fragility is recapitulated in human tumours, in which ecDNA rearrangements are enriched at TA repeats. Collectively, our findings reveal TA repeat fragility as an intrinsic vulnerability of circular DNA and identify Polθ inhibition as a promising strategy to potentially destabilize ecDNA and sensitize ecDNA-driven tumours to therapeutic intervention.
- 23 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 658 (8135) , 525-535
Open AccessMMEJ repair of breaks at TA repeats maintains ecDNA and cancer fitness
Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) comprises megabase-sized circular DNA elements that frequently carry oncogene amplifications, driving aggressive tumour phenotypes, therapeutic resistance and poor clinical outcomes across many cancers1,2,3,4. Although ecDNA is thought to arise from canonical double-strand break repair, the pathways that maintain it remain unclear. Here we show that inhibition of microhomology-mediated end joining, but not non-homologous end joining or homologous recombination, selectively depletes ecDNA, induces ecDNA-specific damage and promotes its sequestration into micronuclei, compromising the fitness of cancer cells that depend on ecDNA-driven oncogene amplification. Mechanistically, TA-rich loci on ecDNA are hotspots for DNA damage and breakage5,6. The DNA translocase FANCM suppresses break formation at these sites, while breaks that escape FANCM surveillance are cleaved by ERCC1–ERCC4 and channelled into microhomology-mediated end joining for repair. Single-cell whole-genome sequencing shows that disrupting FANCM or polymerase θ (Polθ) in COLO320DM cells causes structural instability characterized by deletions and small duplications, with breakpoints enriched at TA-rich regions. This fragility is recapitulated in human tumours, in which ecDNA rearrangements are enriched at TA repeats. Collectively, our findings reveal TA repeat fragility as an intrinsic vulnerability of circular DNA and identify Polθ inhibition as a promising strategy to potentially destabilize ecDNA and sensitize ecDNA-driven tumours to therapeutic intervention.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 5 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
TREX1 promotes tumor growth, but not in vitro cell proliferation.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 5 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
TREX1 promotes tumor growth, but not in vitro cell proliferation.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 7 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Individual growth curves of tumors transplanted in Rag1 KO and NU/J hosts.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 7 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Individual growth curves of tumors transplanted in Rag1 KO and NU/J hosts.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 2 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
CGAS-STING-dependent TREX1 upregulation.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 2 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
CGAS-STING-dependent TREX1 upregulation.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 1 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Generation of KO cell lines and extracellular cGAMP measurements.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 1 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Generation of KO cell lines and extracellular cGAMP measurements.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 8 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Individual growth curves of tumors treated with anti-PD-1 and isotype controls.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 8 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Individual growth curves of tumors treated with anti-PD-1 and isotype controls.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 3 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Frequency of micronucleation and micronuclear envelope rupture are similar across KO models.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 3 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Frequency of micronucleation and micronuclear envelope rupture are similar across KO models.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 6 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Characterization of intratumoral immune cell infiltration.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 6 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Characterization of intratumoral immune cell infiltration.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 4 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Paclitaxel treatment increases micronucleation, cGAS activity, and TREX1 expression.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 4 from Intratumoral TREX1 Induction Promotes Immune Evasion by Limiting Type I IFN
Paclitaxel treatment increases micronucleation, cGAS activity, and TREX1 expression.