Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna has a total of 116 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ben E. Black
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
9 shared publications - Michael A. Lampson
Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
4 shared publications - Tim M. Curtis
Wellcome–Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
4 shared publications - Benjamin L. Prosser
Department of Physiology, Pennsylvania Muscle Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (B.L.P.).
3 shared publications - Cn Scholfield
Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland
3 shared publications - Glennis A. Logsdon
Department of Genetics, Epigenetics Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Functional profiling of STXBP1 missense variants using a novel dual‐readout fluorometric assay
Objective: STXBP1 ‐related disorders ( STXBP1 ‐RD) are among the most common genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, marked by early onset epilepsy, global developmental delay, and motor impairments. Many missense variants remain uncharacterized, limiting accurate variant interpretation and hindering development of precision therapies. Current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) variant curation frameworks provide limited discriminatory power for STXBP1 missense variants due to limited functional data and frequently incomplete parental testing, leaving a substantial proportion of variants classified as variants of uncertain significance. Methods: We developed a fluorometric assay that leverages split fluorescence complementation to simultaneously measure STXBP1 protein stability and its binding affinity to a primary interaction partner, syntaxin‐1A (STX1A), including genetically engineered closed and open STX1A conformations, which are essential for SNARE complex function. Using this platform, we evaluated five benign variants, six pathogenic variants, and four variants that result in an atypically mild clinical presentation. Results: Benign population variants showed minimal effects on stability or binding, whereas known pathogenic variants consistently demonstrated reduced protein stability and diminished binding to STX1A, with some exhibiting STX1A conformation‐specific binding deficits. Variants associated with atypically mild phenotypes displayed intermediate, variant‐specific profiles. To quantify discriminatory performance, we developed and trained an exploratory support vector machine classifier using stability and binding metrics. With the exception of a single STXBP1 variant in an individual with a mild clinical presentation, the model correctly classified benign and pathogenic variants using leave‐one‐out cross‐validation. For variants with available clinical data, classifier scores showed a statistically significant correlation with clinical severity. Significance: Together, these findings demonstrate that a scalable, quantitative assay capturing STXBP1 stability and syntaxin‐binding behavior can differentiate benign from pathogenic variants and provide functional insights into mechanisms of pathogenicity. This platform offers a path toward improved variant interpretation, supports refinement of ACMG/AMP criteria for synaptic disorders, and may inform future therapeutic targeting strategies for STXBP1 ‐RD.
Open AccessFunctional profiling of STXBP1 missense variants using a novel dual‐readout fluorometric assay
Objective: STXBP1 ‐related disorders ( STXBP1 ‐RD) are among the most common genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, marked by early onset epilepsy, global developmental delay, and motor impairments. Many missense variants remain uncharacterized, limiting accurate variant interpretation and hindering development of precision therapies. Current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) variant curation frameworks provide limited discriminatory power for STXBP1 missense variants due to limited functional data and frequently incomplete parental testing, leaving a substantial proportion of variants classified as variants of uncertain significance. Methods: We developed a fluorometric assay that leverages split fluorescence complementation to simultaneously measure STXBP1 protein stability and its binding affinity to a primary interaction partner, syntaxin‐1A (STX1A), including genetically engineered closed and open STX1A conformations, which are essential for SNARE complex function. Using this platform, we evaluated five benign variants, six pathogenic variants, and four variants that result in an atypically mild clinical presentation. Results: Benign population variants showed minimal effects on stability or binding, whereas known pathogenic variants consistently demonstrated reduced protein stability and diminished binding to STX1A, with some exhibiting STX1A conformation‐specific binding deficits. Variants associated with atypically mild phenotypes displayed intermediate, variant‐specific profiles. To quantify discriminatory performance, we developed and trained an exploratory support vector machine classifier using stability and binding metrics. With the exception of a single STXBP1 variant in an individual with a mild clinical presentation, the model correctly classified benign and pathogenic variants using leave‐one‐out cross‐validation. For variants with available clinical data, classifier scores showed a statistically significant correlation with clinical severity. Significance: Together, these findings demonstrate that a scalable, quantitative assay capturing STXBP1 stability and syntaxin‐binding behavior can differentiate benign from pathogenic variants and provide functional insights into mechanisms of pathogenicity. This platform offers a path toward improved variant interpretation, supports refinement of ACMG/AMP criteria for synaptic disorders, and may inform future therapeutic targeting strategies for STXBP1 ‐RD.
- Top Cited Papers
- 8 January 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 638 (8051) , 814-822
Satellite DNA shapes dictate pericentromere packaging in female meiosis
The abundance and sequence of satellite DNA at and around centromeres is evolving rapidly despite the highly conserved and essential process through which the centromere directs chromosome inheritance1,2,3. The impact of such rapid evolution is unclear. Here we find that sequence-dependent DNA shape dictates packaging of pericentromeric satellites in female meiosis through a conserved DNA-shape-recognizing chromatin architectural protein, high mobility group AT-hook 1 (HMGA1)4,5. Pericentromeric heterochromatin in two closely related mouse species, M. musculus and M. spretus, forms on divergent satellites that differ by both density of narrow DNA minor grooves and HMGA1 recruitment. HMGA1 binds preferentially to M. musculus satellites, and depletion in M. musculus oocytes causes massive stretching of pericentromeric satellites, disruption of kinetochore organization and delays in bipolar spindle assembly. In M. musculus × spretus hybrid oocytes, HMGA1 depletion disproportionately impairs M. musculus pericentromeres and microtubule attachment to their kinetochores. Thus, DNA shape affects both pericentromere packaging and the segregation machinery. We propose that rapid evolution of centromere and pericentromere DNA does not disrupt these essential processes when the satellites adopt DNA shapes recognized by conserved architectural proteins (such as HMGA1). By packaging these satellites, architectural proteins become part of the centromeric and pericentromeric chromatin, suggesting an evolutionary strategy that lowers the cost of megabase-scale satellite expansion.
- 8 January 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 638 (8051) , 814-822
Top Cited PapersSatellite DNA shapes dictate pericentromere packaging in female meiosis
The abundance and sequence of satellite DNA at and around centromeres is evolving rapidly despite the highly conserved and essential process through which the centromere directs chromosome inheritance1,2,3. The impact of such rapid evolution is unclear. Here we find that sequence-dependent DNA shape dictates packaging of pericentromeric satellites in female meiosis through a conserved DNA-shape-recognizing chromatin architectural protein, high mobility group AT-hook 1 (HMGA1)4,5. Pericentromeric heterochromatin in two closely related mouse species, M. musculus and M. spretus, forms on divergent satellites that differ by both density of narrow DNA minor grooves and HMGA1 recruitment. HMGA1 binds preferentially to M. musculus satellites, and depletion in M. musculus oocytes causes massive stretching of pericentromeric satellites, disruption of kinetochore organization and delays in bipolar spindle assembly. In M. musculus × spretus hybrid oocytes, HMGA1 depletion disproportionately impairs M. musculus pericentromeres and microtubule attachment to their kinetochores. Thus, DNA shape affects both pericentromere packaging and the segregation machinery. We propose that rapid evolution of centromere and pericentromere DNA does not disrupt these essential processes when the satellites adopt DNA shapes recognized by conserved architectural proteins (such as HMGA1). By packaging these satellites, architectural proteins become part of the centromeric and pericentromeric chromatin, suggesting an evolutionary strategy that lowers the cost of megabase-scale satellite expansion.
- Open Access
- 17 November 2023
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science Advances
- Vol. 9 (46) , eadi5764
Centromere innovations within a mouse species
Mammalian centromeres direct faithful genetic inheritance and are typically characterized by regions of highly repetitive and rapidly evolving DNA. We focused on a mouse species, Mus pahari, that we found has evolved to house centromere-specifying centromere protein-A (CENP-A) nucleosomes at the nexus of a satellite repeat that we identified and termed π-satellite (π-sat), a small number of recruitment sites for CENP-B, and short stretches of perfect telomere repeats. One M. pahari chromosome, however, houses a radically divergent centromere harboring ~6 mega–base pairs of a homogenized π-sat–related repeat, π-sat B , that contains >20,000 functional CENP-B boxes. There, CENP-B abundance promotes accumulation of microtubule-binding components of the kinetochore and a microtubule-destabilizing kinesin of the inner centromere. We propose that the balance of pro- and anti-microtubule binding by the new centromere is what permits it to segregate during cell division with high fidelity alongside the older ones whose sequence creates a markedly different molecular composition.
- 17 November 2023
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science Advances
- Vol. 9 (46) , eadi5764
Open AccessCentromere innovations within a mouse species
Mammalian centromeres direct faithful genetic inheritance and are typically characterized by regions of highly repetitive and rapidly evolving DNA. We focused on a mouse species, Mus pahari, that we found has evolved to house centromere-specifying centromere protein-A (CENP-A) nucleosomes at the nexus of a satellite repeat that we identified and termed π-satellite (π-sat), a small number of recruitment sites for CENP-B, and short stretches of perfect telomere repeats. One M. pahari chromosome, however, houses a radically divergent centromere harboring ~6 mega–base pairs of a homogenized π-sat–related repeat, π-sat B , that contains >20,000 functional CENP-B boxes. There, CENP-B abundance promotes accumulation of microtubule-binding components of the kinetochore and a microtubule-destabilizing kinesin of the inner centromere. We propose that the balance of pro- and anti-microtubule binding by the new centromere is what permits it to segregate during cell division with high fidelity alongside the older ones whose sequence creates a markedly different molecular composition.
- Open Access
- 6 May 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 14 (1) , 1-20
Mapping PTBP2 binding in human brain identifies SYNGAP1 as a target for therapeutic splice switching
Alternative splicing of neuronal genes is controlled partly by the coordinated action of polypyrimidine tract binding proteins (PTBPs). While PTBP1 is ubiquitously expressed, PTBP2 is predominantly neuronal. Here, we define the PTBP2 footprint in the human transcriptome using brain tissue and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons (iPSC-neurons). We map PTBP2 binding sites, characterize PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing events, and identify novel PTBP2 targets including SYNGAP1, a synaptic gene whose loss-of-function leads to a complex neurodevelopmental disorder. We find that PTBP2 binding to SYNGAP1 mRNA promotes alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated decay, and that antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) that disrupt PTBP binding redirect splicing and increase SYNGAP1 mRNA and protein expression. In SYNGAP1 haploinsufficient iPSC-neurons generated from two patients, we show that PTBP2-targeting ASOs partially restore SYNGAP1 expression. Our data comprehensively map PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing in human neurons and cerebral cortex, guiding development of novel therapeutic tools to benefit neurodevelopmental disorders.
- 6 May 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 14 (1) , 1-20
Open AccessMapping PTBP2 binding in human brain identifies SYNGAP1 as a target for therapeutic splice switching
Alternative splicing of neuronal genes is controlled partly by the coordinated action of polypyrimidine tract binding proteins (PTBPs). While PTBP1 is ubiquitously expressed, PTBP2 is predominantly neuronal. Here, we define the PTBP2 footprint in the human transcriptome using brain tissue and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons (iPSC-neurons). We map PTBP2 binding sites, characterize PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing events, and identify novel PTBP2 targets including SYNGAP1, a synaptic gene whose loss-of-function leads to a complex neurodevelopmental disorder. We find that PTBP2 binding to SYNGAP1 mRNA promotes alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated decay, and that antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) that disrupt PTBP binding redirect splicing and increase SYNGAP1 mRNA and protein expression. In SYNGAP1 haploinsufficient iPSC-neurons generated from two patients, we show that PTBP2-targeting ASOs partially restore SYNGAP1 expression. Our data comprehensively map PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing in human neurons and cerebral cortex, guiding development of novel therapeutic tools to benefit neurodevelopmental disorders.
- Open Access
Mapping PTBP splicing in human brain identifies targets for therapeutic splice switching including SYNGAP1
Alternative splicing of neuronal genes is controlled in part by the coordinated action of the polypyrimidine tract binding proteins (PTBP1 and PTBP2). While PTBP1 is ubiquitously expressed, PTBP2 is predominantly neuronal, controlling the expression of such targets as DLG4 , which encodes PSD95, a protein important in synaptic function whose deficiency causes neurodevelopmental disorders. Here, we fully define the PTBP2 footprint in the human transcriptome using both human brain tissue and neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-neurons). We identify direct PTBP2 binding sites and define PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing events, finding novel targets such as STXBP1 and SYNGAP1 , which are synaptic genes also associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. The resultant PTBP2 binding and splicing maps were used to test if PTBP2 binding could be manipulated to increase gene expression in PTBP-targeted genes that cause disease when haploinsufficient. We find that PTBP2 binding to SYNGAP1 mRNA promotes alternative splicing and non-sense mediated decay. Antisense oligonucleotides that disrupt PTBP binding sites on SYNGAP1 redirect splicing and increase gene and protein expression. Collectively, our data provide a comprehensive view of PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing in human neurons and human cerebral cortex, guiding the development of novel therapeutic tools that may benefit a range of neurodevelopmental disorders.
Open AccessMapping PTBP splicing in human brain identifies targets for therapeutic splice switching including SYNGAP1
Alternative splicing of neuronal genes is controlled in part by the coordinated action of the polypyrimidine tract binding proteins (PTBP1 and PTBP2). While PTBP1 is ubiquitously expressed, PTBP2 is predominantly neuronal, controlling the expression of such targets as DLG4 , which encodes PSD95, a protein important in synaptic function whose deficiency causes neurodevelopmental disorders. Here, we fully define the PTBP2 footprint in the human transcriptome using both human brain tissue and neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-neurons). We identify direct PTBP2 binding sites and define PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing events, finding novel targets such as STXBP1 and SYNGAP1 , which are synaptic genes also associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. The resultant PTBP2 binding and splicing maps were used to test if PTBP2 binding could be manipulated to increase gene expression in PTBP-targeted genes that cause disease when haploinsufficient. We find that PTBP2 binding to SYNGAP1 mRNA promotes alternative splicing and non-sense mediated decay. Antisense oligonucleotides that disrupt PTBP binding sites on SYNGAP1 redirect splicing and increase gene and protein expression. Collectively, our data provide a comprehensive view of PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing in human neurons and human cerebral cortex, guiding the development of novel therapeutic tools that may benefit a range of neurodevelopmental disorders.
- 9 May 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Cell Biology
- Vol. 24 (5) , 748-756
Epigenetic, genetic and maternal effects enable stable centromere inheritance
Centromeres are defined epigenetically by the histone H3 variant CENP-A. The propagation cycle by which pre-existing CENP-A nucleosomes serve as templates for nascent assembly predicts the epigenetic memory of weakened centromeres. Using a mouse model with reduced levels of CENP-A nucleosomes, we find that an embryonic plastic phase precedes epigenetic memory through development. During this phase, nascent CENP-A nucleosome assembly depends on the maternal Cenpa genotype rather than the pre-existing template. Weakened centromeres are thus limited to a single generation, and parental epigenetic differences are eliminated by equal assembly on maternal and paternal centromeres. These differences persist, however, when the underlying DNA of parental centromeres differs in repeat abundance, as assembly during the plastic phase also depends on sufficient repetitive centromere DNA. With contributions of centromere DNA and the Cenpa maternal effect, we propose that centromere inheritance naturally minimizes fitness costs associated with weakened centromeres or epigenetic differences between parents.
- 9 May 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Cell Biology
- Vol. 24 (5) , 748-756
Epigenetic, genetic and maternal effects enable stable centromere inheritance
Centromeres are defined epigenetically by the histone H3 variant CENP-A. The propagation cycle by which pre-existing CENP-A nucleosomes serve as templates for nascent assembly predicts the epigenetic memory of weakened centromeres. Using a mouse model with reduced levels of CENP-A nucleosomes, we find that an embryonic plastic phase precedes epigenetic memory through development. During this phase, nascent CENP-A nucleosome assembly depends on the maternal Cenpa genotype rather than the pre-existing template. Weakened centromeres are thus limited to a single generation, and parental epigenetic differences are eliminated by equal assembly on maternal and paternal centromeres. These differences persist, however, when the underlying DNA of parental centromeres differs in repeat abundance, as assembly during the plastic phase also depends on sufficient repetitive centromere DNA. With contributions of centromere DNA and the Cenpa maternal effect, we propose that centromere inheritance naturally minimizes fitness costs associated with weakened centromeres or epigenetic differences between parents.
- 1 August 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Current Biology
- Vol. 29 (16) , 2625-2639.e5
Structure of the Human Core Centromeric Nucleosome Complex
- 1 August 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Current Biology
- Vol. 29 (16) , 2625-2639.e5
Structure of the Human Core Centromeric Nucleosome Complex
- 1 January 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Current Biology
- Vol. 29 (1) , R35-R37
Chromosomes: Keeping Centromeric Chromatin Tidy through S Phase
- 1 January 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Current Biology
- Vol. 29 (1) , R35-R37
Chromosomes: Keeping Centromeric Chromatin Tidy through S Phase
- 1 August 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Current Biology
- Vol. 27 (15) , 2365-2373.e8
Expanded Satellite Repeats Amplify a Discrete CENP-A Nucleosome Assembly Site on Chromosomes that Drive in Female Meiosis
- 1 August 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Current Biology
- Vol. 27 (15) , 2365-2373.e8
Expanded Satellite Repeats Amplify a Discrete CENP-A Nucleosome Assembly Site on Chromosomes that Drive in Female Meiosis
- Open Access
- 9 June 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 8 (1) , 15775
Centromeres are maintained by fastening CENP-A to DNA and directing an arginine anchor-dependent nucleosome transition
Maintaining centromere identity relies upon the persistence of the epigenetic mark provided by the histone H3 variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A), but the molecular mechanisms that underlie its remarkable stability remain unclear. Here, we define the contributions of each of the three candidate CENP-A nucleosome-binding domains (two on CENP-C and one on CENP-N) to CENP-A stability using gene replacement and rapid protein degradation. Surprisingly, the most conserved domain, the CENP-C motif, is dispensable. Instead, the stability is conferred by the unfolded central domain of CENP-C and the folded N-terminal domain of CENP-N that becomes rigidified 1,000-fold upon crossbridging CENP-A and its adjacent nucleosomal DNA. Disrupting the ‘arginine anchor’ on CENP-C for the nucleosomal acidic patch disrupts the CENP-A nucleosome structural transition and removes CENP-A nucleosomes from centromeres. CENP-A nucleosome retention at centromeres requires a core centromeric nucleosome complex where CENP-C clamps down a stable nucleosome conformation and CENP-N fastens CENP-A to the DNA.
- 9 June 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 8 (1) , 15775
Open AccessCentromeres are maintained by fastening CENP-A to DNA and directing an arginine anchor-dependent nucleosome transition
Maintaining centromere identity relies upon the persistence of the epigenetic mark provided by the histone H3 variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A), but the molecular mechanisms that underlie its remarkable stability remain unclear. Here, we define the contributions of each of the three candidate CENP-A nucleosome-binding domains (two on CENP-C and one on CENP-N) to CENP-A stability using gene replacement and rapid protein degradation. Surprisingly, the most conserved domain, the CENP-C motif, is dispensable. Instead, the stability is conferred by the unfolded central domain of CENP-C and the folded N-terminal domain of CENP-N that becomes rigidified 1,000-fold upon crossbridging CENP-A and its adjacent nucleosomal DNA. Disrupting the ‘arginine anchor’ on CENP-C for the nucleosomal acidic patch disrupts the CENP-A nucleosome structural transition and removes CENP-A nucleosomes from centromeres. CENP-A nucleosome retention at centromeres requires a core centromeric nucleosome complex where CENP-C clamps down a stable nucleosome conformation and CENP-N fastens CENP-A to the DNA.