JDJennine M. Dawicki-McKenna

Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna has a total of 116 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Functional profiling of STXBP1 missense variants using a novel dual‐readout fluorometric assay

    by Elisa A. Waxman, Jennine M. Dawicki‐McKenna, Ian McSalley, Anna J. Prentice, Torrey A. Chisari, Sarah M. Ruggiero, Jillian L. McKee, Alex J. Felix, Giulia Pavani, Benjamin L. Prosser, et al.

    Objective: STXBP1 ‐related disorders ( STXBP1 ‐RD) are among the most common genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, marked by early onset epilepsy, global developmental delay, and motor impairments. Many missense variants remain uncharacterized, limiting accurate variant interpretation and hindering development of precision therapies. Current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) variant curation frameworks provide limited discriminatory power for STXBP1 missense variants due to limited functional data and frequently incomplete parental testing, leaving a substantial proportion of variants classified as variants of uncertain significance. Methods: We developed a fluorometric assay that leverages split fluorescence complementation to simultaneously measure STXBP1 protein stability and its binding affinity to a primary interaction partner, syntaxin‐1A (STX1A), including genetically engineered closed and open STX1A conformations, which are essential for SNARE complex function. Using this platform, we evaluated five benign variants, six pathogenic variants, and four variants that result in an atypically mild clinical presentation. Results: Benign population variants showed minimal effects on stability or binding, whereas known pathogenic variants consistently demonstrated reduced protein stability and diminished binding to STX1A, with some exhibiting STX1A conformation‐specific binding deficits. Variants associated with atypically mild phenotypes displayed intermediate, variant‐specific profiles. To quantify discriminatory performance, we developed and trained an exploratory support vector machine classifier using stability and binding metrics. With the exception of a single STXBP1 variant in an individual with a mild clinical presentation, the model correctly classified benign and pathogenic variants using leave‐one‐out cross‐validation. For variants with available clinical data, classifier scores showed a statistically significant correlation with clinical severity. Significance: Together, these findings demonstrate that a scalable, quantitative assay capturing STXBP1 stability and syntaxin‐binding behavior can differentiate benign from pathogenic variants and provide functional insights into mechanisms of pathogenicity. This platform offers a path toward improved variant interpretation, supports refinement of ACMG/AMP criteria for synaptic disorders, and may inform future therapeutic targeting strategies for STXBP1 ‐RD.

  • Top Cited Papers

    Satellite DNA shapes dictate pericentromere packaging in female meiosis

    by Damian Dudka, Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna, Xueqi Sun, Keagan Beeravolu, Takashi Akera, Michael A. Lampson, Ben E. Black

    The abundance and sequence of satellite DNA at and around centromeres is evolving rapidly despite the highly conserved and essential process through which the centromere directs chromosome inheritance1,2,3. The impact of such rapid evolution is unclear. Here we find that sequence-dependent DNA shape dictates packaging of pericentromeric satellites in female meiosis through a conserved DNA-shape-recognizing chromatin architectural protein, high mobility group AT-hook 1 (HMGA1)4,5. Pericentromeric heterochromatin in two closely related mouse species, M. musculus and M. spretus, forms on divergent satellites that differ by both density of narrow DNA minor grooves and HMGA1 recruitment. HMGA1 binds preferentially to M. musculus satellites, and depletion in M. musculus oocytes causes massive stretching of pericentromeric satellites, disruption of kinetochore organization and delays in bipolar spindle assembly. In M. musculus × spretus hybrid oocytes, HMGA1 depletion disproportionately impairs M. musculus pericentromeres and microtubule attachment to their kinetochores. Thus, DNA shape affects both pericentromere packaging and the segregation machinery. We propose that rapid evolution of centromere and pericentromere DNA does not disrupt these essential processes when the satellites adopt DNA shapes recognized by conserved architectural proteins (such as HMGA1). By packaging these satellites, architectural proteins become part of the centromeric and pericentromeric chromatin, suggesting an evolutionary strategy that lowers the cost of megabase-scale satellite expansion.


  • Open Access

    Centromere innovations within a mouse species

    by Craig W. Gambogi, Nootan Pandey, Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna, Uma P. Arora, Mikhail A. Liskovykh, Jun Ma, Piero Lamelza, Vladimir Larionov, Michael A. Lampson, Glennis A. Logsdon, et al.

    Mammalian centromeres direct faithful genetic inheritance and are typically characterized by regions of highly repetitive and rapidly evolving DNA. We focused on a mouse species, Mus pahari, that we found has evolved to house centromere-specifying centromere protein-A (CENP-A) nucleosomes at the nexus of a satellite repeat that we identified and termed π-satellite (π-sat), a small number of recruitment sites for CENP-B, and short stretches of perfect telomere repeats. One M. pahari chromosome, however, houses a radically divergent centromere harboring ~6 mega–base pairs of a homogenized π-sat–related repeat, π-sat B , that contains >20,000 functional CENP-B boxes. There, CENP-B abundance promotes accumulation of microtubule-binding components of the kinetochore and a microtubule-destabilizing kinesin of the inner centromere. We propose that the balance of pro- and anti-microtubule binding by the new centromere is what permits it to segregate during cell division with high fidelity alongside the older ones whose sequence creates a markedly different molecular composition.


  • Open Access

    Mapping PTBP2 binding in human brain identifies SYNGAP1 as a target for therapeutic splice switching

    by Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna, Alex J. Felix, Elisa A. Waxman, Congsheng Cheng, Defne A. Amado, Paul T. Ranum, Alexey Bogush, Lea V. Dungan, Jean Ann Maguire, Alyssa L. Gagne, et al.

    Alternative splicing of neuronal genes is controlled partly by the coordinated action of polypyrimidine tract binding proteins (PTBPs). While PTBP1 is ubiquitously expressed, PTBP2 is predominantly neuronal. Here, we define the PTBP2 footprint in the human transcriptome using brain tissue and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons (iPSC-neurons). We map PTBP2 binding sites, characterize PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing events, and identify novel PTBP2 targets including SYNGAP1, a synaptic gene whose loss-of-function leads to a complex neurodevelopmental disorder. We find that PTBP2 binding to SYNGAP1 mRNA promotes alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated decay, and that antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) that disrupt PTBP binding redirect splicing and increase SYNGAP1 mRNA and protein expression. In SYNGAP1 haploinsufficient iPSC-neurons generated from two patients, we show that PTBP2-targeting ASOs partially restore SYNGAP1 expression. Our data comprehensively map PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing in human neurons and cerebral cortex, guiding development of novel therapeutic tools to benefit neurodevelopmental disorders.


  • Open Access

    Mapping PTBP splicing in human brain identifies targets for therapeutic splice switching including SYNGAP1

    by Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna, Alex J. Felix, Elisa A. Waxman, Congsheng Cheng, Defne A. Amado, Paul T. Ranum, Alexey Bogush, Lea V. Dungan, Elizabeth A. Heller, Deborah L. French, et al.

    Alternative splicing of neuronal genes is controlled in part by the coordinated action of the polypyrimidine tract binding proteins (PTBP1 and PTBP2). While PTBP1 is ubiquitously expressed, PTBP2 is predominantly neuronal, controlling the expression of such targets as DLG4 , which encodes PSD95, a protein important in synaptic function whose deficiency causes neurodevelopmental disorders. Here, we fully define the PTBP2 footprint in the human transcriptome using both human brain tissue and neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-neurons). We identify direct PTBP2 binding sites and define PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing events, finding novel targets such as STXBP1 and SYNGAP1 , which are synaptic genes also associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. The resultant PTBP2 binding and splicing maps were used to test if PTBP2 binding could be manipulated to increase gene expression in PTBP-targeted genes that cause disease when haploinsufficient. We find that PTBP2 binding to SYNGAP1 mRNA promotes alternative splicing and non-sense mediated decay. Antisense oligonucleotides that disrupt PTBP binding sites on SYNGAP1 redirect splicing and increase gene and protein expression. Collectively, our data provide a comprehensive view of PTBP2-dependent alternative splicing in human neurons and human cerebral cortex, guiding the development of novel therapeutic tools that may benefit a range of neurodevelopmental disorders.

  • Epigenetic, genetic and maternal effects enable stable centromere inheritance

    by Arunika Das, Aiko Iwata-Otsubo, Aspasia Destouni, Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna, Katelyn G. Boese, Ben E. Black, Michael A. Lampson

    Centromeres are defined epigenetically by the histone H3 variant CENP-A. The propagation cycle by which pre-existing CENP-A nucleosomes serve as templates for nascent assembly predicts the epigenetic memory of weakened centromeres. Using a mouse model with reduced levels of CENP-A nucleosomes, we find that an embryonic plastic phase precedes epigenetic memory through development. During this phase, nascent CENP-A nucleosome assembly depends on the maternal Cenpa genotype rather than the pre-existing template. Weakened centromeres are thus limited to a single generation, and parental epigenetic differences are eliminated by equal assembly on maternal and paternal centromeres. These differences persist, however, when the underlying DNA of parental centromeres differs in repeat abundance, as assembly during the plastic phase also depends on sufficient repetitive centromere DNA. With contributions of centromere DNA and the Cenpa maternal effect, we propose that centromere inheritance naturally minimizes fitness costs associated with weakened centromeres or epigenetic differences between parents.


  • Structure of the Human Core Centromeric Nucleosome Complex

    by Praveen Kumar Allu, Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna, Trevor Van Eeuwen, Moriya Slavin, Merav Braitbard, Chen Xu, Nir Kalisman, Kenji Murakami, Ben E. Black


  • Chromosomes: Keeping Centromeric Chromatin Tidy through S Phase

    by Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna, Ben E. Black


  • Expanded Satellite Repeats Amplify a Discrete CENP-A Nucleosome Assembly Site on Chromosomes that Drive in Female Meiosis

    by Aiko Iwata-Otsubo, Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna, Takashi Akera, Samantha J. Falk, Lukáš Chmátal, Karren Yang, Beth A. Sullivan, Richard M. Schultz, Michael A. Lampson, Ben E. Black


  • Open Access

    Centromeres are maintained by fastening CENP-A to DNA and directing an arginine anchor-dependent nucleosome transition

    by Lucie Y. Guo, Praveen Kumar Allu, Levani Zandarashvili, Kara L. McKinley, Nikolina Sekulic, Jennine M. Dawicki-McKenna, Daniele Fachinetti, Glennis A. Logsdon, Ryan M. Jamiolkowski, Don W. Cleveland, et al.

    Maintaining centromere identity relies upon the persistence of the epigenetic mark provided by the histone H3 variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A), but the molecular mechanisms that underlie its remarkable stability remain unclear. Here, we define the contributions of each of the three candidate CENP-A nucleosome-binding domains (two on CENP-C and one on CENP-N) to CENP-A stability using gene replacement and rapid protein degradation. Surprisingly, the most conserved domain, the CENP-C motif, is dispensable. Instead, the stability is conferred by the unfolded central domain of CENP-C and the folded N-terminal domain of CENP-N that becomes rigidified 1,000-fold upon crossbridging CENP-A and its adjacent nucleosomal DNA. Disrupting the ‘arginine anchor’ on CENP-C for the nucleosomal acidic patch disrupts the CENP-A nucleosome structural transition and removes CENP-A nucleosomes from centromeres. CENP-A nucleosome retention at centromeres requires a core centromeric nucleosome complex where CENP-C clamps down a stable nucleosome conformation and CENP-N fastens CENP-A to the DNA.