Stefano Cosma
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Stefano Cosma has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Daniela Pennetta
Marco Biagi Department of Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Jacopo Berengario, 51, 41121, Modena, MO, Italy
6 shared publications - Simona Cosma
Department of Management University of Bologna Bologna Italy
4 shared publications - Giuseppe Rimo
Department of Management University of Bologna Bologna Italy
3 shared publications Elisabetta Gualandri
Department of Economics “Marco Biagi”, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy & CEFIN, Centro Studi Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy
2 shared publicationsFrancesco Pattarin
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
2 shared publicationsAlessandro Giovanni Grasso
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 26 February 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Economics Letters
- Vol. 262
Who defaults during COVID-19? evidence from local lockdown restrictions
- 26 February 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Economics Letters
- Vol. 262
Open AccessWho defaults during COVID-19? evidence from local lockdown restrictions
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 2 March 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Economics Letters
- Vol. 249
Political elections and market reactions: The ‘Trump effect’ on green stocks
- 2 March 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Economics Letters
- Vol. 249
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessPolitical elections and market reactions: The ‘Trump effect’ on green stocks
- Open Access
- 17 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science & Medicine
- Vol. 366, 117639
Overcoming the “valleys of death” in advanced therapies: The role of finance
- 17 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science & Medicine
- Vol. 366, 117639
Open AccessOvercoming the “valleys of death” in advanced therapies: The role of finance
- 25 November 2024
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Venture Capital
- p. 1-23
Getting some fuel from incumbents: bank-FinTech relationships and effects on newcomers’ performance
- 25 November 2024
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Venture Capital
- p. 1-23
Getting some fuel from incumbents: bank-FinTech relationships and effects on newcomers’ performance
- 23 January 2024
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Bank Marketing
- Vol. 42 (5) , 947-980
Enhancing online visibility through strategic alliances: the case of bank-FinTech relationships
Purpose: This work aims to explore the effects of (equity and non-equity) strategic alliances between banks and FinTechs on FinTechs' online visibility. Design/methodology/approach: For a sample of 124 Italian FinTechs, the authors measured online visibility through their website ranking (Google PageRank) and website traffic (Google Trends). Consistent to the historical depth of these measures, the authors separately investigated the effect of equity and non-equity (contractual) agreements on online visibility by means of ordinal logistic regressions and diff-in-diff analysis. Findings: Strategic alliances with banks enhance FinTechs' online visibility. Although both equity and contractual agreements positively influence the popularity of FinTechs' website achieved through the activity of internal and external online content creators (websites ranking), only equity agreements are effective in attracting Internet users (website traffic). Practical implications: When deciding to interact with banks, FinTechs' managers should consider that equity agreements may be a powerful strategic choice for enlarging the customer base and boosting visibility of FinTechs. Social implications: Fostering strategic alliances between banks and FinTechs contributes to FinTechs' growth, generating virtuous mechanisms of innovation, financial inclusion and better allocative efficiency of the financial system. Originality/value: This work expands marketing knowledge and literature regarding online visibility determinants, by investigating the benefits of strategic alliances and cooperation in the market, while providing an empirical strategy replicable by future marketing studies.
- 23 January 2024
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Bank Marketing
- Vol. 42 (5) , 947-980
Enhancing online visibility through strategic alliances: the case of bank-FinTech relationships
Purpose: This work aims to explore the effects of (equity and non-equity) strategic alliances between banks and FinTechs on FinTechs' online visibility. Design/methodology/approach: For a sample of 124 Italian FinTechs, the authors measured online visibility through their website ranking (Google PageRank) and website traffic (Google Trends). Consistent to the historical depth of these measures, the authors separately investigated the effect of equity and non-equity (contractual) agreements on online visibility by means of ordinal logistic regressions and diff-in-diff analysis. Findings: Strategic alliances with banks enhance FinTechs' online visibility. Although both equity and contractual agreements positively influence the popularity of FinTechs' website achieved through the activity of internal and external online content creators (websites ranking), only equity agreements are effective in attracting Internet users (website traffic). Practical implications: When deciding to interact with banks, FinTechs' managers should consider that equity agreements may be a powerful strategic choice for enlarging the customer base and boosting visibility of FinTechs. Social implications: Fostering strategic alliances between banks and FinTechs contributes to FinTechs' growth, generating virtuous mechanisms of innovation, financial inclusion and better allocative efficiency of the financial system. Originality/value: This work expands marketing knowledge and literature regarding online visibility determinants, by investigating the benefits of strategic alliances and cooperation in the market, while providing an empirical strategy replicable by future marketing studies.
- Open Access
- 2 March 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 336, 117649
Conservation finance: What are we not doing? A review and research agenda
- 2 March 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 336, 117649
Open AccessConservation finance: What are we not doing? A review and research agenda
- 25 February 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 191-213
The Rise of Financial Services Ecosystems: Towards Open Banking Platforms
- 25 February 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 191-213
The Rise of Financial Services Ecosystems: Towards Open Banking Platforms
- 11 January 2021
- Published by Wiley in Economic Notes
- Vol. 50 (2)
How does the financial market evaluate business models? Evidence from European banks
This paper investigates the way in which the financial market defines and evaluates different business models, using a sample of listed European banking groups from 2006 to 2015. The main findings suggest that the financial market seems to associate a better risk‐return trade‐off to non‐banking fees than to banking ones and that the performance of different business models varies depending on context conditions. In particular, in the current economic context, characterised by the combination of slow economic growth with historically low levels of interest rates, the market‐oriented business model tends to over‐perform. These findings have strategic implications for bank managers, regulators, and supervisors, due to the impact of the crises on banking business, profitability and risk and the new challenges they entail.
- 11 January 2021
- Published by Wiley in Economic Notes
- Vol. 50 (2)
How does the financial market evaluate business models? Evidence from European banks
This paper investigates the way in which the financial market defines and evaluates different business models, using a sample of listed European banking groups from 2006 to 2015. The main findings suggest that the financial market seems to associate a better risk‐return trade‐off to non‐banking fees than to banking ones and that the performance of different business models varies depending on context conditions. In particular, in the current economic context, characterised by the combination of slow economic growth with historically low levels of interest rates, the market‐oriented business model tends to over‐perform. These findings have strategic implications for bank managers, regulators, and supervisors, due to the impact of the crises on banking business, profitability and risk and the new challenges they entail.
- 14 August 2020
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 191-213
Business Models in the Lending-Based Crowdfunding Industry
- 14 August 2020
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 191-213
Business Models in the Lending-Based Crowdfunding Industry
- 29 May 2019
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 73-95
Exploring Factors Influencing the Success of Equity Crowdfunding Campaigns: Findings from Italy
- 29 May 2019
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 73-95
Exploring Factors Influencing the Success of Equity Crowdfunding Campaigns: Findings from Italy