Isabelle Gross

Metal complexes have been used to treat cancer since the discovery of cisplatin and its interaction with DNA in the 1960’s. Facing the resistance mechanisms against platinum salts and their side effects, safer therapeutic approaches have been sought through other metals, including ruthenium. In the early 2000s, Michel Pfeffer and his collaborators started to investigate the biological activity of organo-ruthenium/osmium complexes, demonstrating their ability to interfere with the activity of purified redox enzymes. Then, they discovered that these organo-ruthenium/osmium complexes could act independently of DNA damage and bypass the requirement for the tumor suppressor gene TP53 to induce the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathway, which is an original cell death pathway. They showed that other types of ruthenium complexes—as well complexes with other metals (osmium, iron, platinum)—can induce this pathway as well. They also demonstrated that ruthenium complexes accumulate in the ER after entering the cell using passive and active mechanisms. These particular physico-chemical properties of the organometallic complexes designed by Dr. Pfeffer contribute to their ability to reduce tumor growth and angiogenesis. Taken together, the pioneering work of Dr. Michel Pfeffer over his career provides us with a legacy that we have yet to fully embrace.

Meta-analysis of transcripts in colon adenocarcinoma patient tissues led to the identification of a DNA damage responsive miR signature called DNA damage sensitive miRs (DDSMs). DDSMs were experimentally validated in the cancerous colon tissues obtained from an independent cohort of colon cancer patients and in multiple cellular systems with high levels of endogenous DNA damage. All the tested DDSMs were transcriptionally upregulated by a common intestine-specific transcription factor, CDX2. Reciprocally, DDSMs were repressed via the recruitment of HDAC1/2-containing complexes onto the CDX2 promoter. These miRs downregulated multiple key targets in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, namely BRCA1, ATM, Chk1 (also known as CHEK1) and RNF8. CDX2 directly regulated the DDSMs, which led to increased tumor volume and metastasis in multiple preclinical models. In colon cancer patient tissues, the DDSMs negatively correlated with BRCA1 levels, were associated with decreased probability of survival and thereby could be used as a prognostic biomarker. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Cadherins form a large and pleiotropic superfamily of membranous proteins sharing Ca²⁺-binding repeats. While the importance of classic cadherins such as E- or N-cadherin for tumorigenesis is acknowledged, there is much less information about other cadherins that are merely considered as tissue-specific adhesion molecules. Here, we focused on the atypical cadherin MUCDHL that stood out for its unusual features and unique function in the gut. Analyses of transcriptomic data sets (n > 250) established that MUCDHL mRNA levels are down-regulated in colorectal tumors. Importantly, the decrease of MUCDHL expression is more pronounced in the worst-prognosis subset of tumors and is associated with decreased survival. Molecular characterization of the tumors indicated a negative correlation with proliferation-related processes (e.g., nucleic acid metabolism, DNA replication). Functional genomic studies showed that the loss of MUCDHL enhanced tumor incidence and burden in intestinal tumor-prone mice. Extensive structure/function analyses revealed that the mode of action of MUCDHL goes beyond membrane sequestration of ß-catenin and targets through its extracellular domain key oncogenic signaling pathways (e.g., EGFR, AKT). Beyond MUCDHL, this study illustrates how the loss of a gene critical for the morphological and functional features of mature cells contributes to tumorigenesis by dysregulating oncogenic pathways.

Ruthenium and osmium complexes have been shown to bypass several resistance mechanisms of platinum anticancer drugs, suggesting that they might represent therapeutic alternatives. However, the resistance mechanisms that may alter the cytotoxicity of ruthenium and osmium complexes have not been identified yet. Here we investigated the mechanisms governing the variability in the cytotoxicity of two ruthenium cyclometalated compounds and their osmium equivalents. We characterized their anticancer properties in vitro and in vivo, and we developed a 4-step approach to identify genes involved in their sensibility/resistance by correlating their cytotoxicity measures with transcriptomic data of 60 cancer cell lines. As previously observed for ruthenium complexes, we showed that osmium compounds target the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway and that their activity was not hindered by mutation in the tumor suppressor gene TP53. Then, we identified multiple sensibility/resistance genes that correlated with the cytotoxicity of cyclometalated compounds. Docking and functional studies demonstrated that inhibition of some of these resistance mechanisms, namely ABCB1 export and EGFR expression, improved the activity of cyclometalated complexes. Interestingly, switching from ruthenium to osmium favored cytotoxicity while reducing sensibility to the ABCB1 export mechanism. In summary, this study represents the first comprehensive investigation of the resistance mechanisms that alter the biological activity of ruthenium or osmium complexes, and identifies some of the chemical determinants that are important for their activity.