Margarida Silvestre

Background/Objectives: Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), which include hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and related disorders), gestational diabetes, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, low birth weight, small-for-gestational-age newborn, placental abruption, and stillbirth, are health risks for pregnant women that can have fatal outcomes. This study’s aim is to investigate the usefulness of artificial intelligence (AI) in improving these outcomes and includes changes in the utilization of ultrasound, continuous monitoring, and an earlier prediction of complications, as well as being able to individualize processes and support clinical decision-making. This study evaluates the use of AI in improving at least one APO. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched and limited to the English language, humans, and between 2020 and 2024. This scoping review included peer-reviewed articles across any study design. However, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, unpublished studies, and grey literature sources (e.g., reports and conference abstracts) were excluded. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they described the use of AI in improving APOs and the associated ethical issues. Results: Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. Although this review initially aimed to evaluate AI’s role across a wide range of APOs, including placental abruption and stillbirth, the five selected studies focused primarily on preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and gestational diabetes. None of the included studies addressed placental abruption or stillbirth directly. The studies primarily utilized machine-learning models, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and random forest (RF), showing promising results in enhancing prenatal care and supporting clinical decision-making. Ethical considerations, including algorithmic bias, transparency, and the need for regulatory oversight, were highlighted as critical challenges. Conclusions: The application of these tools can improve prenatal care by predicting obstetric complications, but ethics and transparency are pivotal. Empathy and humanization in healthcare must remain fundamental, and flexible training mechanisms are needed to keep up with rapid innovation. AI offers an opportunity to support, not replace, the doctor–patient relationship and must be subject to strict legislation if it is to be used safely and fairly.

INPLASY202520065 Artificial Intelligence in Improving Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes – A Scoping Review and Ethical Issues Keywords: Artificial intelligence, perinatal care, pregnancy outcome, ethics. …

Background: Embryo implantation is a complex biological process which requires synchronized dialogue between the receptive endometrium and the blastocyst. The endometrium, however, is only receptive to embryo implantation for a very short period. Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is a major challenge in assisted reproductive techniques mainly due to impaired receptivity, but there is still a need for a reliable and valid clinical test to assess endometrial receptiveness, especially at embryo transfer time. The aim of this review is to investigate what is currently known about the contribution of endometrial fluid (EF) to endometrial receptivity by identifying its potential biomarkers. Methods: This study involved an extensive search of the electronic databases PubMed and Cochrane, covering the period from 2011 to 2022. A combination of Medical Subject Headings with the terms 'endometrial fluid' and ‘embryo implantation’ was used. Results: Several different proteins presented in the endometrial cavity fluid have been described but the most consistent as potential biomarkers were Proprotein Convertase 6 (PC6), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), PIGF (Placental growth factor), β3 integrin, Colony Stimulating Factor-3 (CSF-3), Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), glycodelin and extracellular vesicles (EVs). Conclusions: Strong indicators support the use of uterine fluid collection as a non-invasive tool for receptivity assessment. Therefore, it could improve outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques.

Information and communication Technologies are increasingly present in health care, as exemplified by the recourse to remote consultation. Such care delivery modality brings unquestionable benefits, such as helping to face the contemporary challenges plaguing health systems worldwide. But its ever-increasing use underlines the importance of safeguarding ethical issues related to autonomy, equity, privacy, and the quality of the user-professional relations. This paper reflects on the ethical challenges presented before, during, and after remote consultation as to optimize and shape its use.

Resumen Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación tienen una influencia cada vez mayor en el área de la salud, y esto lleva a un aumento significativo en el uso de la teleconsulta. Muchos son los beneficios de esta modalidad de prestación de servicios sanitarios, comenzando por el hecho de que ayudan a abordar los desafíos contemporáneos que afectan a los sistemas de salud en todo el mundo. Sin embargo, su uso creciente destaca la importancia de salvaguardar las cuestiones éticas relacionadas con la autonomía, la equidad, la privacidad y la calidad de la relación entre el paciente y el profesional de la salud. Este artículo pretende incitar a una reflexión sobre los desafíos éticos que surgen antes, durante y después del uso de la teleconsulta, con el fin de optimizarlo y modelarlo.

Resumo As tecnologias da informação e comunicação têm influência cada vez maior na área da saúde, sendo o aumento significativo do recurso à teleconsulta um reflexo disso. Os benefícios que essa modalidade de prestação de serviços de saúde ocasiona são inquestionáveis, a começar pelo facto de auxiliarem a enfrentar os desafios contemporâneos que assolam os sistemas de saúde em todo o mundo. Todavia, a sua crescente utilização vem sublinhar a importância de salvaguardar questões éticas relacionadas com a autonomia, equidade, privacidade e qualidade da relação entre o utente e o profissional de saúde. Este artigo pretende estimular uma reflexão acerca dos desafios éticos que se colocam antes, durante e após o uso da teleconsulta, com o intuito de otimizar e modelar a sua utilização.

Background: Compulsory treatments represent a legal means of imposing treatment on an individual, usually with a mental illness, who refuses therapeutic intervention and poses a risk of self-harm or harm to others. Compulsory outpatient treatment (COT) in psychiatry, also known as community treatment order, is a modality of involuntary treatment that broadens the therapeutic imposition beyond hospitalization and into the community. Despite its existence in over 75 jurisdictions worldwide, COT is currently one of the most controversial topics in psychiatry, and it presents significant ethical challenges. Nonetheless, the ethical debate regarding compulsory treatment almost always stops at a preclinical level, with the different ethical positions arguing for or against its use, and there is little guidance to support for the individual clinicians to act ethically when making the decision to implement COT. Main body: The current body of evidence is not clear about the efficacy of COT. Therefore, despite its application in several countries, evidence favouring the use of COT is controversial and mixed at best. In these unclear circumstances, ethical guidance becomes paramount. This paper provides an ethical analysis of use of COT, considering the principlist framework established by Ross Upshur in 2002 to justify public health interventions during the 2002–2004 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak. This paper thoroughly examines the pertinence of using the principles of harm, proportionality, reciprocity, and transparency when considering the initiation of COT. Conclusion: Ross Upshur’s principlist model provides a useful reflection tool for justifying the application of COT. This framework may help to inform sounder ethical decisions in clinical psychiatric practice.

Ethical standards in audiology have been continuously improved and discussed, leading to the elaboration of specific regulatory guidelines for the profession. However, in the field of auditory rehabilitation, audiologists are still faced with circumstances that question their ethical principles, usually associated with the support of the hearing aids industry. The study explores the decision-making process and ethical concerns in auditory rehabilitation as they relate to the practice of audiology in Portugal. An online questionnaire constructed by the authors was used and sent to the email addresses of a list of audiologists, registered with the Portuguese Association of Audiologists. The questionnaire was answered by 93 audiologists with clinical experience in auditory rehabilitation for more than one year. The collected data demonstrated that audiometric results and clinical experience are the most important factors for decision-making in auditory rehabilitation practice. Moreover, incentives from the employers or manufacturers were identified as the main cause of ethical dilemmas. This study highlights the ethical concerns regarding the clinical practice of auditory rehabilitation in Portugal, revealing that the decision-making process is complex and, specifically in this field, the current practice may not be adequate for effective compliance with professional ethical standards.

As Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação têm uma influência cada vez maior na área da saúde, sendo o aumento significativo do recurso à Teleconsulta um reflexo disso mesmo. Os benefícios que esta modalidade de prestação de serviços de saúde ocasiona são inquestionáveis, desde logo pelo facto de auxiliar a enfrentar os desafios contemporâneos que assolam os sistemas de saúde em todo o mundo. Todavia, a sua crescente utilização vem sublinhar a importância de salvaguardar questões éticas relacionadas com a autonomia, equidade, privacidade e qualidade da relação entre o utente e o profissional de saúde. O presente artigo pretende estimular uma reflexão acerca dos desafios éticos que se colocam antes, durante e após uso da teleconsulta, com o intuito de otimizar e modelar a sua utilização.