Nicole Jane Francis

Activation-induced deaminase (AID) drives antibody diversification through class-switch recombination and somatic hypermutation of the immunoglobulin (Ig) genes, but its off-target mutagenic activity contributes to B cell lymphoma^1,2,3,4,5. How AID selectively mutates Ig loci and a restricted set of other genes remains unknown. Transcription is required for AID activity, but most transcribed genes are not mutated^1,5,6,7, and AID occupies more loci than it mutates^7,8,9. Here we identify the super elongation complex histone readers MLLT1 and MLLT3 as determinants of selective AID activity. Combined loss of MLLT1 and MLLT3 abolishes all AID-dependent mutagenic processes, recapitulating AID deficiency. AID-mutated genomic regions in mouse and human B cells are precisely marked by high MLLT1 and MLLT3 occupancy (MLLT1/MLLT3^high). Transcriptional changes after deleting both readers are modest and cannot explain the AID activity loss. Mechanistically, MLLT1 and MLLT3 are dispensable for global AID chromatin tethering but locally enrich AID downstream from promoter regions. Both readers bind to AID and act redundantly, but MLLT1 has a dominant role in mice through its intrinsically disordered region, which promotes condensates that selectively concentrate AID. Fusing AID to MLLT1 or MLLT3 is sufficient to restore class-switch recombination and mutagenesis in Mllt1^−/−Mllt3^−/− cells. These findings reveal that local MLLT1/MLLT3^high-dependent enrichment licenses AID at a restricted subset of genomic regions by spatially confining and concentrating its activity, probably through condensate formation.

The Drosophila PRC1 complex regulates gene expression by modifying histone proteins and chromatin architecture. Two PRC1 subunits, PSC and Ph, are most implicated in chromatin architecture. In vitro, PRC1 compacts chromatin and inhibits transcription and nucleosome remodeling. The long disordered C-terminal region of PSC (PSC-CTR) is important for these activities, while Ph has little effect. In cells, Ph is important for condensate formation, long-range chromatin interactions, and gene regulation, and its polymerizing sterile alpha motif (SAM) is implicated in these activities. In vitro, truncated Ph containing the SAM and two other conserved domains (mini-Ph) undergoes phase separation with chromatin, suggesting a mechanism for SAM-dependent condensate formation in vivo. How the distinct activities of PSC and Ph on chromatin function together in PRC1 is not known. To address this question, we analyzed structures formed with large chromatin templates and PRC1 in vitro. PRC1 bridges chromatin into extensive fibrillar networks. Ph, its SAM, and SAM polymerization activity have little effect on these structures. Instead, the PSC-CTR controls their growth, and is sufficient for their formation. To understand how phase separation driven by Ph SAM intersects with the chromatin bridging activity of the PSC-CTR, we used mini-Ph to form condensates with chromatin and then challenged them with PRC1 lacking Ph (PRC1ΔPh). PRC1ΔPh converts mini-Ph chromatin condensates into clusters of small non-fusing condensates and bridged fibers. These condensates retain a high level of chromatin compaction and do not intermix. Thus, phase separation of chromatin by mini-Ph, followed by the action of the PSC-CTR, creates a unique chromatin organization with regions of high nucleosome density and extraordinary stability. We discuss how this coordinated sequential activity of two proteins found in the same complex may occur and the possible implications of stable chromatin architectures in maintaining transcription states.

The Drosophila PRC1 complex regulates gene expression by modifying histone proteins and chromatin architecture. Two PRC1 subunits, PSC and Ph, are most implicated in chromatin architecture. In vitro, PRC1 compacts chromatin and inhibits transcription and nucleosome remodeling. The long disordered C-terminal region of PSC (PSC-CTR) is important for these activities, while Ph has little effect. In cells, Ph is important for condensate formation, long range chromatin interactions, and gene regulation, and its polymerizing Sterile alpha motif (SAM) is implicated in these activities. In vitro, truncated Ph containing the SAM and two other conserved domains (mini-Ph) undergoes phase separation with chromatin, suggesting a mechanism for SAM-dependent condensate formation in vivo. How the distinct activities of PSC and Ph on chromatin function together in PRC1 is not known. To address this question, we analyzed structures formed with large chromatin templates and PRC1 in vitro. PRC1 bridges chromatin into extensive fibrillar networks. Ph, its SAM, and SAM polymerization activity have little effect on these structures. Instead, the PSC-CTR controls their growth, and is sufficient for their formation. To understand how phase separation driven by Ph SAM intersects with the chromatin bridging activity of the PSC-CTR, we used mini-Ph to form condensates with chromatin and then challenged them with PRC1 lacking Ph (PRC1ΔPh). PRC1ΔPh converts mini-Ph chromatin condensates into clusters of small non-fusing condensates and bridged fibers. These condensates retain a high level of chromatin compaction and do not intermix. Thus, phase separation of chromatin by mini-Ph, followed by the action of the PSC-CTR creates a unique chromatin organization with regions of high nucleosome density and extraordinary stability. We discuss how this coordinated sequential activity of two proteins found in the same complex may occur and the possible implications of stable chromatin architectures in maintaining transcription states.

Biomolecular condensates are increasingly appreciated for their function in organizing and regulating biochemical processes in cells, including chromatin function. Condensate formation and properties are encoded in protein sequence but the mechanisms linking sequence to macroscale properties are incompletely understood. Cross species comparisons can reveal mechanisms either because they identify conserved functions or because they point to important differences. Here we use in vitro reconstitution and molecular dynamics simulations to compare Drosophila and human sequences that regulate condensate formation driven by the sterile alpha motif (SAM) oligomerization domain in the Polyhomeotic (Ph) subunit of the chromatin regulatory complex PRC1. We discover evolutionarily diverged contacts between the conserved SAM and the disordered linker that connects it to the rest of Ph. Linker-SAM interactions increase oligomerization and regulate formation and properties of reconstituted condensates. Oligomerization affects condensate dynamics but, in most cases, has little effect on their formation. Linker-SAM interactions also affect condensate formation in Drosophila and human cells, and growth in Drosophila imaginal discs. Our data show how evolutionary sequence changes in linkers connecting conserved structured domains can alter condensate properties.

The Polycomb group (PcG) complex PRC1 localizes in the nucleus in condensed structures called Polycomb bodies. The PRC1 subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) contains an oligomerizing sterile alpha motif (SAM) that is implicated in both PcG body formation and chromatin organization in Drosophila and mammalian cells. A truncated version of Ph containing the SAM (mini-Ph) forms phase-separated condensates with DNA or chromatin in vitro, suggesting that PcG bodies may form through SAM-driven phase separation. In cells, Ph forms multiple small condensates, while mini-Ph typically forms a single large nuclear condensate. We therefore hypothesized that sequences outside of mini-Ph, which are predicted to be intrinsically disordered, are required for proper condensate formation. We identified three distinct low-complexity regions in Ph based on sequence composition. We systematically tested the role of each of these sequences in Ph condensates using live imaging of transfected Drosophila S2 cells. Each sequence uniquely affected Ph SAM-dependent condensate size, number, and morphology, but the most dramatic effects occurred when the central, glutamine-rich intrinsically disordered region (IDR) was removed, which resulted in large Ph condensates. Like mini-Ph condensates, condensates lacking the glutamine-rich IDR excluded chromatin. Chromatin fractionation experiments indicated that the removal of the glutamine-rich IDR reduced chromatin binding and that the removal of either of the other IDRs increased chromatin binding. Our data suggest that all three IDRs, and functional interactions among them, regulate Ph condensate size and number. Our results can be explained by a model in which tight chromatin binding by Ph IDRs antagonizes Ph SAM-driven phase separation. Our observations highlight the complexity of regulation of biological condensates housed in single proteins.

The Polycomb group (PcG) complex PRC1 localizes in the nucleus in the form of condensed structures called Polycomb bodies. The PRC1 subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) contains a polymerizing sterile alpha motif (SAM) that is implicated in both PcG body formation and chromatin organization in Drosophila and mammalian cells. A truncated version of Ph containing the SAM (mini-Ph), forms phase separated condensates with DNA or chromatin in vitro, suggesting PcG bodies may form by phase separation. In cells, Ph forms multiple condensates, while mini-Ph forms a single large nuclear condensate. We therefore hypothesize that sequences outside of mini-Ph are required for proper condensate formation. We identified three distinct Intrinsically Disordered Regions (IDRs) in Ph based on sequence composition and complexity. We tested the role of each IDR in Ph condensates using live imaging of transfected Drosophila S2 cells. We find that each IDR uniquely affects Ph SAM-dependent condensate size, number, and morphology.