Valentine Rech de Laval
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Valentine Rech de Laval has a total of 68 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Marc Robinson-Rechavi
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne , 1015 Lausanne
5 shared publications - Pascale Gaudet
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics and GO Central, 4 rue Michel-Servet, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
5 shared publications - Amos Bairoch
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
4 shared publications Pierre-André Michel
CALIPHO group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland
4 shared publicationsAnne Gleizes
Computer and Laboratory Investigation of Proteins of Human Origin Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva 4, Switzerland
3 shared publicationsDaniel Teixeira
CALIPHO group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, Switzerland
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 31 March 2026
- Published by Agence Bibliographique de l'Enseignement Supérieur
Analyse bioinformatique des protéines BCL-2 et développement de la base de connaissance dédiée, BCL2DB
Les protéines BCL-2 jouent un rôle essentiel dans la décision de vie ou de mort des cellules. Elles contrôlent l'induction de l'apoptose (mort cellulaire programmée) par la voie mitochondriale via des fonctions opposées de régulateurs anti- et pro-apoptotiques. Les protéines contenant un ou plusieurs domaines dits d'homologie à Bcl-2 (BHl- 4) sont systématiquement classées dans cette famille. Grâce à une analyse bioinformatique et phylogénétique, nous avons revisité les différents critères d'inclusion dans le groupe de protéines BCL-2 et proposé une nouvelle classification tenant compte des données structurales et évolutives. Cette nouvelle nomenclature distingue : un premier groupe de protéines homologues (dérivant d'un ancêtre commun), partageant une structure 3D semblable à celle de Bcl-2 et pouvant ne posséder aucun motif BH, et un conglomérat, en pleine expansion, regroupant des protéines sans lien phylogénétique apparent et partageant une courte région de similarité de séquence correspondant au motif BH3. Sur la base de ces résultats, nous avons construit un processus, basé sur des profils HMM, pour identifier les protéines appartenant au groupe de protéines BCL-2. Notre processus automatisé est utilisé pour i) récupérer les séquences nucléotidiques et protéiques mensuellement ii) les annoter et iii) les intégrer dans la base de connaissances BCL2DB (« The BCL-2 Database »). Celle-ci est accessible via une interface Web (http://bcl2db.ibcp.fr) qui permet aux chercheurs d'extraire des données et d'effectuer des analyses de séquence
- 31 March 2026
- Published by Agence Bibliographique de l'Enseignement Supérieur
Analyse bioinformatique des protéines BCL-2 et développement de la base de connaissance dédiée, BCL2DB
Les protéines BCL-2 jouent un rôle essentiel dans la décision de vie ou de mort des cellules. Elles contrôlent l'induction de l'apoptose (mort cellulaire programmée) par la voie mitochondriale via des fonctions opposées de régulateurs anti- et pro-apoptotiques. Les protéines contenant un ou plusieurs domaines dits d'homologie à Bcl-2 (BHl- 4) sont systématiquement classées dans cette famille. Grâce à une analyse bioinformatique et phylogénétique, nous avons revisité les différents critères d'inclusion dans le groupe de protéines BCL-2 et proposé une nouvelle classification tenant compte des données structurales et évolutives. Cette nouvelle nomenclature distingue : un premier groupe de protéines homologues (dérivant d'un ancêtre commun), partageant une structure 3D semblable à celle de Bcl-2 et pouvant ne posséder aucun motif BH, et un conglomérat, en pleine expansion, regroupant des protéines sans lien phylogénétique apparent et partageant une courte région de similarité de séquence correspondant au motif BH3. Sur la base de ces résultats, nous avons construit un processus, basé sur des profils HMM, pour identifier les protéines appartenant au groupe de protéines BCL-2. Notre processus automatisé est utilisé pour i) récupérer les séquences nucléotidiques et protéiques mensuellement ii) les annoter et iii) les intégrer dans la base de connaissances BCL2DB (« The BCL-2 Database »). Celle-ci est accessible via une interface Web (http://bcl2db.ibcp.fr) qui permet aux chercheurs d'extraire des données et d'effectuer des analyses de séquence
- Open Access
TaxonMatch: taxonomic integration and tree construction from heterogeneous biological databases
Integrating taxonomic data across heterogeneous biological databases remains a major challenge in biodiversity research due to non-standardized nomenclature, incomplete synonym annotation, and inconsistencies in taxonomic hierarchies. These issues limit interoperability between key resources such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), and citizen science platforms such as iNaturalist. Here, we present TaxonMatch, a scalable and reproducible framework for taxonomic reconciliation and cross-database integration. The workflow combines string-based candidate generation using TF–IDF vectorization, supervised machine learning for match classification, and lineage-aware synonym resolution to align taxonomic entities across multiple sources. By integrating both declared and implicit equivalences, TaxonMatch resolves typographical variation, synonymy, and structural inconsistencies in taxonomic data. The framework produces a unified taxonomic structure in which equivalent entities are reconciled while preserving source-specific identifiers, provenance information, and hierarchical relationships. We evaluate its robustness across multiple classifiers and demonstrate its effectiveness in resolving ambiguous taxonomic cases that are not handled by traditional matching approaches. We illustrate the applicability of TaxonMatch through three use cases: the construction of a unified arthropod taxonomy integrating GBIF, NCBI, and iNaturalist data; the identification of closest extant relatives of fossil taxa with molecular information; and the integration of genomic resources with conservation data from the IUCN Red List. These applications highlight the ability of the workflow to support the integration of ecological, genomic, and paleontological datasets. TaxonMatch provides a flexible and generalizable solution for taxonomic data integration, enabling the construction of coherent and interoperable biodiversity datasets for downstream analyses in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology.
Open AccessTaxonMatch: taxonomic integration and tree construction from heterogeneous biological databases
Integrating taxonomic data across heterogeneous biological databases remains a major challenge in biodiversity research due to non-standardized nomenclature, incomplete synonym annotation, and inconsistencies in taxonomic hierarchies. These issues limit interoperability between key resources such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), and citizen science platforms such as iNaturalist. Here, we present TaxonMatch, a scalable and reproducible framework for taxonomic reconciliation and cross-database integration. The workflow combines string-based candidate generation using TF–IDF vectorization, supervised machine learning for match classification, and lineage-aware synonym resolution to align taxonomic entities across multiple sources. By integrating both declared and implicit equivalences, TaxonMatch resolves typographical variation, synonymy, and structural inconsistencies in taxonomic data. The framework produces a unified taxonomic structure in which equivalent entities are reconciled while preserving source-specific identifiers, provenance information, and hierarchical relationships. We evaluate its robustness across multiple classifiers and demonstrate its effectiveness in resolving ambiguous taxonomic cases that are not handled by traditional matching approaches. We illustrate the applicability of TaxonMatch through three use cases: the construction of a unified arthropod taxonomy integrating GBIF, NCBI, and iNaturalist data; the identification of closest extant relatives of fossil taxa with molecular information; and the integration of genomic resources with conservation data from the IUCN Red List. These applications highlight the ability of the workflow to support the integration of ecological, genomic, and paleontological datasets. TaxonMatch provides a flexible and generalizable solution for taxonomic data integration, enabling the construction of coherent and interoperable biodiversity datasets for downstream analyses in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology.
- Open Access
- 29 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Bioinformatics
- Vol. 26 (1) , 198
The BeeBiome data portal provides easy access to bee microbiome information
Bees can be colonized by a large diversity of microbes, including beneficial gut symbionts and detrimental pathogens, with implications for bee health. Over the last few years, researchers around the world have collected a huge amount of genomic and transcriptomic data about the composition, genomic content, and gene expression of bee-associated microbial communities. While each of these datasets by itself has provided important insights, the integration of such datasets provides an unprecedented opportunity to obtain a global picture of the microbes associated with bees and their link to bee health. The challenge of such an approach is that datasets are difficult to find within large generalist repositories and are often not readily accessible, which hinders integrative analyses. Here we present a publicly-available online resource, the BeeBiome data portal (https://www.beebiome.org), which provides an overview of and easy access to currently available metagenomic datasets involving bee-associated microbes. Currently the data portal contains 33,678 Sequence Read Archive (SRA) experiments for 278 Apoidea hosts. We present the content and functionalities of this portal. By providing access to all bee microbiomes in a single place, with easy filtering on relevant criteria, BeeBiome will allow faster progress of applied and fundamental research on bee biology and health. It should be a useful tool for researchers, academics, funding agencies, and governments, with beneficial impacts for stakeholders.
- 29 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Bioinformatics
- Vol. 26 (1) , 198
Open AccessThe BeeBiome data portal provides easy access to bee microbiome information
Bees can be colonized by a large diversity of microbes, including beneficial gut symbionts and detrimental pathogens, with implications for bee health. Over the last few years, researchers around the world have collected a huge amount of genomic and transcriptomic data about the composition, genomic content, and gene expression of bee-associated microbial communities. While each of these datasets by itself has provided important insights, the integration of such datasets provides an unprecedented opportunity to obtain a global picture of the microbes associated with bees and their link to bee health. The challenge of such an approach is that datasets are difficult to find within large generalist repositories and are often not readily accessible, which hinders integrative analyses. Here we present a publicly-available online resource, the BeeBiome data portal (https://www.beebiome.org), which provides an overview of and easy access to currently available metagenomic datasets involving bee-associated microbes. Currently the data portal contains 33,678 Sequence Read Archive (SRA) experiments for 278 Apoidea hosts. We present the content and functionalities of this portal. By providing access to all bee microbiomes in a single place, with easy filtering on relevant criteria, BeeBiome will allow faster progress of applied and fundamental research on bee biology and health. It should be a useful tool for researchers, academics, funding agencies, and governments, with beneficial impacts for stakeholders.
- Open Access
Taxonbridge: an R package to create custom taxonomies based on the NCBI and GBIF taxonomies
Summary: Biological taxonomies establish conventions by which researchers can catalogue and systematically compare their work using nomenclature such as species binomial names and reference identifiers. The ideal taxonomy is unambiguous and exhaustive; however, no such single taxonomy exists, partly due to continuous changes and contributions made to existing taxonomies. The degree to which a taxonomy is useful furthermore depends on context provided by such variables as the taxonomic neighbourhood of a species (e.g., selecting arthropod or vertebrate species) or the geological time frame of the study (e.g., selecting extinct versus extant species). Collating the most relevant taxonomic information from multiple taxonomies is hampered by arbitrarily defined identifiers, ambiguity in scientific names, as well as duplicated and erroneous entries. The goal of taxonbridge is to provide tools for merging the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Backbone Taxonomy and the United States National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Taxonomy in order to create consistent, deduplicated and disambiguated custom taxonomies that reference both extant and extinct species. Availability: Taxonbridge is available as a package in the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) repository: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=taxonbridge . Contact: wernerpieter.veldsman@unil.ch
Open AccessTaxonbridge: an R package to create custom taxonomies based on the NCBI and GBIF taxonomies
Summary: Biological taxonomies establish conventions by which researchers can catalogue and systematically compare their work using nomenclature such as species binomial names and reference identifiers. The ideal taxonomy is unambiguous and exhaustive; however, no such single taxonomy exists, partly due to continuous changes and contributions made to existing taxonomies. The degree to which a taxonomy is useful furthermore depends on context provided by such variables as the taxonomic neighbourhood of a species (e.g., selecting arthropod or vertebrate species) or the geological time frame of the study (e.g., selecting extinct versus extant species). Collating the most relevant taxonomic information from multiple taxonomies is hampered by arbitrarily defined identifiers, ambiguity in scientific names, as well as duplicated and erroneous entries. The goal of taxonbridge is to provide tools for merging the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Backbone Taxonomy and the United States National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Taxonomy in order to create consistent, deduplicated and disambiguated custom taxonomies that reference both extant and extinct species. Availability: Taxonbridge is available as a package in the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) repository: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=taxonbridge . Contact: wernerpieter.veldsman@unil.ch
- Open Access
- 20 January 2022
- Published by The R Foundation
taxonbridge: Create Custom Taxonomies Based on the NCBI Taxonomy and GBIF Backbone Taxonomy
- 20 January 2022
- Published by The R Foundation
Open Accesstaxonbridge: Create Custom Taxonomies Based on the NCBI Taxonomy and GBIF Backbone Taxonomy
- Open Access
- 10 October 2020
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 49 (D1) , D831-D847
The Bgee suite: integrated curated expression atlas and comparative transcriptomics in animals
Bgee is a database to retrieve and compare gene expression patterns in multiple animal species, produced by integrating multiple data types (RNA-Seq, Affymetrix, in situ hybridization, and EST data). It is based exclusively on curated healthy wild-type expression data (e.g., no gene knock-out, no treatment, no disease), to provide a comparable reference of normal gene expression. Curation includes very large datasets such as GTEx (re-annotation of samples as ‘healthy’ or not) as well as many small ones. Data are integrated and made comparable between species thanks to consistent data annotation and processing, and to calls of presence/absence of expression, along with expression scores. As a result, Bgee is capable of detecting the conditions of expression of any single gene, accommodating any data type and species. Bgee provides several tools for analyses, allowing, e.g., automated comparisons of gene expression patterns within and between species, retrieval of the prefered conditions of expression of any gene, or enrichment analyses of conditions with expression of sets of genes. Bgee release 14.1 includes 29 animal species, and is available at https://bgee.org/ and through its Bioconductor R package BgeeDB.
- 10 October 2020
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 49 (D1) , D831-D847
Open AccessThe Bgee suite: integrated curated expression atlas and comparative transcriptomics in animals
Bgee is a database to retrieve and compare gene expression patterns in multiple animal species, produced by integrating multiple data types (RNA-Seq, Affymetrix, in situ hybridization, and EST data). It is based exclusively on curated healthy wild-type expression data (e.g., no gene knock-out, no treatment, no disease), to provide a comparable reference of normal gene expression. Curation includes very large datasets such as GTEx (re-annotation of samples as ‘healthy’ or not) as well as many small ones. Data are integrated and made comparable between species thanks to consistent data annotation and processing, and to calls of presence/absence of expression, along with expression scores. As a result, Bgee is capable of detecting the conditions of expression of any single gene, accommodating any data type and species. Bgee provides several tools for analyses, allowing, e.g., automated comparisons of gene expression patterns within and between species, retrieval of the prefered conditions of expression of any gene, or enrichment analyses of conditions with expression of sets of genes. Bgee release 14.1 includes 29 animal species, and is available at https://bgee.org/ and through its Bioconductor R package BgeeDB.
- Open Access
The Bgee suite: integrated curated expression atlas and comparative transcriptomics in animals
Bgee is a database to retrieve and compare gene expression patterns in multiple animal species, produced by integrating multiple data types (RNA-Seq, Affymetrix, in situ hybridization, and EST data). It is based exclusively on curated healthy wild-type expression data (e.g., no gene knock-out, no treatment, no disease), to provide a comparable reference of normal gene expression. Curation includes very large datasets such as GTEx (re-annotation of samples as “healthy” or not) as well as many small ones. Data are integrated and made comparable between species thanks to consistent data annotation and processing, and to calls of presence/absence of expression, along with expression scores. As a result, Bgee is capable of detecting the conditions of expression of any single gene, accommodating any data type and species. Bgee provides several tools for analyses, allowing, e.g., automated comparisons of gene expression patterns within and between species, retrieval of the prefered conditions of expression of any gene, or enrichment analyses of conditions with expression of sets of genes. Bgee release 14.1 includes 29 animal species, and is available at https://bgee.org/ and through its Bioconductor R package BgeeDB.
Open AccessThe Bgee suite: integrated curated expression atlas and comparative transcriptomics in animals
Bgee is a database to retrieve and compare gene expression patterns in multiple animal species, produced by integrating multiple data types (RNA-Seq, Affymetrix, in situ hybridization, and EST data). It is based exclusively on curated healthy wild-type expression data (e.g., no gene knock-out, no treatment, no disease), to provide a comparable reference of normal gene expression. Curation includes very large datasets such as GTEx (re-annotation of samples as “healthy” or not) as well as many small ones. Data are integrated and made comparable between species thanks to consistent data annotation and processing, and to calls of presence/absence of expression, along with expression scores. As a result, Bgee is capable of detecting the conditions of expression of any single gene, accommodating any data type and species. Bgee provides several tools for analyses, allowing, e.g., automated comparisons of gene expression patterns within and between species, retrieval of the prefered conditions of expression of any gene, or enrichment analyses of conditions with expression of sets of genes. Bgee release 14.1 includes 29 animal species, and is available at https://bgee.org/ and through its Bioconductor R package BgeeDB.
- Open Access
- 14 November 2019
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 48 (D1) , D328-D334
The neXtProt knowledgebase in 2020: data, tools and usability improvements
The neXtProt knowledgebase (https://www.nextprot.org) is an integrative resource providing both data on human protein and the tools to explore these. In order to provide comprehensive and up-to-date data, we evaluate and add new data sets. We describe the incorporation of three new data sets that provide expression, function, protein-protein binary interaction, post-translational modifications (PTM) and variant information. New SPARQL query examples illustrating uses of the new data were added. neXtProt has continued to develop tools for proteomics. We have improved the peptide uniqueness checker and have implemented a new protein digestion tool. Together, these tools make it possible to determine which proteases can be used to identify trypsin-resistant proteins by mass spectrometry. In terms of usability, we have finished revamping our web interface and completely rewritten our API. Our SPARQL endpoint now supports federated queries. All the neXtProt data are available via our user interface, API, SPARQL endpoint and FTP site, including the new PEFF 1.0 format files. Finally, the data on our FTP site is now CC BY 4.0 to promote its reuse.
- 14 November 2019
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 48 (D1) , D328-D334
Open AccessThe neXtProt knowledgebase in 2020: data, tools and usability improvements
The neXtProt knowledgebase (https://www.nextprot.org) is an integrative resource providing both data on human protein and the tools to explore these. In order to provide comprehensive and up-to-date data, we evaluate and add new data sets. We describe the incorporation of three new data sets that provide expression, function, protein-protein binary interaction, post-translational modifications (PTM) and variant information. New SPARQL query examples illustrating uses of the new data were added. neXtProt has continued to develop tools for proteomics. We have improved the peptide uniqueness checker and have implemented a new protein digestion tool. Together, these tools make it possible to determine which proteases can be used to identify trypsin-resistant proteins by mass spectrometry. In terms of usability, we have finished revamping our web interface and completely rewritten our API. Our SPARQL endpoint now supports federated queries. All the neXtProt data are available via our user interface, API, SPARQL endpoint and FTP site, including the new PEFF 1.0 format files. Finally, the data on our FTP site is now CC BY 4.0 to promote its reuse.
- Open Access
- 11 July 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Human Genomics
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1-11
A new bioinformatics tool to help assess the significance of BRCA1 variants
Germline pathogenic variants in the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility gene BRCA1 are associated with a 60% lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer. This overall risk estimate is for all BRCA1 variants; obviously, not all variants confer the same risk of developing a disease. In cancer patients, loss of BRCA1 function in tumor tissue has been associated with an increased sensitivity to platinum agents and to poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. For clinical management of both at-risk individuals and cancer patients, it would be important that each identified genetic variant be associated with clinical significance. Unfortunately for the vast majority of variants, the clinical impact is unknown. The availability of results from studies assessing the impact of variants on protein function may provide insight of crucial importance. We have collected, curated, and structured the molecular and cellular phenotypic impact of 3654 distinct BRCA1 variants. The data was modeled in triple format, using the variant as a subject, the studied function as the object, and a predicate describing the relation between the two. Each annotation is supported by a fully traceable evidence. The data was captured using standard ontologies to ensure consistency, and enhance searchability and interoperability. We have assessed the extent to which functional defects at the molecular and cellular levels correlate with the clinical interpretation of variants by ClinVar submitters. Approximately 30% of the ClinVar BRCA1 missense variants have some molecular or cellular assay available in the literature. Pathogenic variants (as assigned by ClinVar) have at least some significant functional defect in 94% of testable cases. For benign variants, 77% of ClinVar benign variants, for which neXtProt Cancer variant portal has data, shows either no or mild experimental functional defects. While this does not provide evidence for clinical interpretation of variants, it may provide some guidance for variants of unknown significance, in the absence of more reliable data. The neXtProt Cancer variant portal ( https://www.nextprot.org/portals/breast-cancer ) contains over 6300 observations at the molecular and/or cellular level for BRCA1 variants.
- 11 July 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Human Genomics
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1-11
Open AccessA new bioinformatics tool to help assess the significance of BRCA1 variants
Germline pathogenic variants in the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility gene BRCA1 are associated with a 60% lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer. This overall risk estimate is for all BRCA1 variants; obviously, not all variants confer the same risk of developing a disease. In cancer patients, loss of BRCA1 function in tumor tissue has been associated with an increased sensitivity to platinum agents and to poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. For clinical management of both at-risk individuals and cancer patients, it would be important that each identified genetic variant be associated with clinical significance. Unfortunately for the vast majority of variants, the clinical impact is unknown. The availability of results from studies assessing the impact of variants on protein function may provide insight of crucial importance. We have collected, curated, and structured the molecular and cellular phenotypic impact of 3654 distinct BRCA1 variants. The data was modeled in triple format, using the variant as a subject, the studied function as the object, and a predicate describing the relation between the two. Each annotation is supported by a fully traceable evidence. The data was captured using standard ontologies to ensure consistency, and enhance searchability and interoperability. We have assessed the extent to which functional defects at the molecular and cellular levels correlate with the clinical interpretation of variants by ClinVar submitters. Approximately 30% of the ClinVar BRCA1 missense variants have some molecular or cellular assay available in the literature. Pathogenic variants (as assigned by ClinVar) have at least some significant functional defect in 94% of testable cases. For benign variants, 77% of ClinVar benign variants, for which neXtProt Cancer variant portal has data, shows either no or mild experimental functional defects. While this does not provide evidence for clinical interpretation of variants, it may provide some guidance for variants of unknown significance, in the absence of more reliable data. The neXtProt Cancer variant portal ( https://www.nextprot.org/portals/breast-cancer ) contains over 6300 observations at the molecular and/or cellular level for BRCA1 variants.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2018
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation
- Vol. 2018
Accelerating annotation of articles via automated approaches: evaluation of the neXtA5 curation-support tool by neXtProt
The development of efficient text-mining tools promises to boost the curation workflow by significantly reducing the time needed to process the literature into biological databases. We have developed a curation support tool, neXtA5, that provides a search engine coupled with an annotation system directly integrated into a biocuration workflow. neXtA5 assists curation with modules optimized for the thevarious curation tasks: document triage, entity recognition and information extraction. Here, we describe the evaluation of neXtA5 by expert curators. We first assessed the annotations of two independent curators to provide a baseline for comparison. To evaluate the performance of neXtA5, we submitted requests and compared the neXtA5 results with the manual curation. The analysis focuses on the usability of neXtA5 to support the curation of two types of data: biological processes (BPs) and diseases (Ds). We evaluated the relevance of the papers proposed as well as the recall and precision of the suggested annotations. The evaluation of document triage by neXtA5 precision showed that both curators agree with neXtA5 for 67 (BP) and 63% (D) of abstracts, while curators agree on accepting or rejecting an abstract ~80% of the time. Hence, the precision of the triage system is satisfactory. For concept extraction, curators approved 35 (BP) and 25% (D) of the neXtA5 annotations. Conversely, neXtA5 successfully annotated up to 36 (BP) and 68% (D) of the terms identified by curators. The user feedback obtained in these tests highlighted the need for improvement in the ranking function of neXtA5 annotations. Therefore, we transformed the information extraction component into an annotation ranking system. This improvement results in a top precision (precision at first rank) of 59 (D) and 63% (BP). These results suggest that when considering only the first extracted entity, the current system achieves a precision comparable with expert biocurators.
- 1 January 2018
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation
- Vol. 2018
Open AccessAccelerating annotation of articles via automated approaches: evaluation of the neXtA5 curation-support tool by neXtProt
The development of efficient text-mining tools promises to boost the curation workflow by significantly reducing the time needed to process the literature into biological databases. We have developed a curation support tool, neXtA5, that provides a search engine coupled with an annotation system directly integrated into a biocuration workflow. neXtA5 assists curation with modules optimized for the thevarious curation tasks: document triage, entity recognition and information extraction. Here, we describe the evaluation of neXtA5 by expert curators. We first assessed the annotations of two independent curators to provide a baseline for comparison. To evaluate the performance of neXtA5, we submitted requests and compared the neXtA5 results with the manual curation. The analysis focuses on the usability of neXtA5 to support the curation of two types of data: biological processes (BPs) and diseases (Ds). We evaluated the relevance of the papers proposed as well as the recall and precision of the suggested annotations. The evaluation of document triage by neXtA5 precision showed that both curators agree with neXtA5 for 67 (BP) and 63% (D) of abstracts, while curators agree on accepting or rejecting an abstract ~80% of the time. Hence, the precision of the triage system is satisfactory. For concept extraction, curators approved 35 (BP) and 25% (D) of the neXtA5 annotations. Conversely, neXtA5 successfully annotated up to 36 (BP) and 68% (D) of the terms identified by curators. The user feedback obtained in these tests highlighted the need for improvement in the ranking function of neXtA5 annotations. Therefore, we transformed the information extraction component into an annotation ranking system. This improvement results in a top precision (precision at first rank) of 59 (D) and 63% (BP). These results suggest that when considering only the first extracted entity, the current system achieves a precision comparable with expert biocurators.