Katia Bravo-Jaimes

Background: Adults with congenital heart disease frequently experience gaps in lifelong adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) specialty care, leading to preventable complications, hospitalizations, and premature mortality. However, effective, scalable, accessible, and sustainable strategies to reduce these gaps are lacking. Digital health offers potential solutions but requires a rigorous scientific approach in its design to address the needs of the target population. Objective: This study aims to describe the development of a theory-based, community co-designed digital health intervention to improve lifelong ACHD care. Methods: We integrated theory-based behavioral frameworks, semistructured qualitative interviews with patients and clinicians, and a community-engaged approach to develop a digital health intervention for ACHD. The primary behavioral target was completing an ACHD specialist appointment. We conducted Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior (COM-B)–guided semistructured interviews with patients with ACHD and clinicians to identify barriers to specialized care amenable to a digital intervention, and patient-centered goals for the digital tool. The community partners helped develop key intervention objectives, create a theory-driven framework, and specify how each intervention component targets specific COM-B barriers. Results: We interviewed 54 participants (n=37 patients with ACHD, and n=17 clinicians) and engaged 21 community partners representing 4 advocacy organizations. Design objectives emphasized addressing patient loneliness, ensuring accessibility and credibility, and enabling scalability while centering patient perspectives. Participants identified 4 priorities: providing credible resources, uplifting patient voices, customizing to patient needs, and centering positivity and joy. The digital tool, named by community partners as Empower My Congenital Heart (EMCH), was designed within the web- and mobile-based, Apple- and Android-compatible, Eureka Digital Research platform (University of California, San Francisco). Key intervention components included educational modules, peer support, appointment planning nudges, and a digital medical passport. The EMCH’s theory-driven framework specifies how each intervention component targets specific COM-B barriers to specialized ACHD care. Conclusions: The theory-driven, community co-designed EMCH digital tool provides a scalable approach to promote lifelong ACHD specialist care. Ongoing process evaluation and a planned randomized controlled trial will assess acceptability, engagement, and effectiveness in reducing care gaps. If proven effective, EMCH has the potential to prevent complications, emergency hospitalizations, and mortality affecting the majority of adults with congenital heart disease.

Background: Specialised knowledge in adult congenital heart disease is crucial but often lacking, particularly in resource-limited settings. The Global Conversations in Adult Congenital Heart Disease webinar series was initiated to provide accessible, global education via virtual platforms. Objective: This study evaluates the attendance patterns, participant demographics, knowledge outcomes, and audience feedback of the Global Conversations in Adult Congenital Heart Disease webinar series , analysing 19 monthly sessions conducted from October 2023 to April 2025. Methods: Registration data, session viewership, and total series reach were recorded. Demographics were collected per session. Pre- and post-session quizzes were used to assess changes in knowledge; scores from these independent groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Post-webinar surveys collected improvement suggestions. Results: Out of 1,956 registrants from 89 countries, 54.6% attended the sessions, representing 1,068 participants from 64 nations: mainly Colombia (30.9%), Peru (18%), the USA (14.1%), and Mexico (9.9%). Median quiz scores improved from 50% pre-session ( n = 120) to 100% post-session ( n = 108), a statistically significant gain ( p = 0.035). Notably, 29% had no prior adult congenital heart disease education. Most post-webinar survey respondents rated case presentations and discussions as excellent (75.0%) or good (20.1%). Qualitative feedback suggested areas for improvement included audiovisual quality, audience engagement, content delivery, and language accessibility. Conclusion: The Global Conversations in Adult Congenital Heart Disease webinar series successfully engaged a diverse international audience and showed significant differences in quiz scores between pre- and post-session independent groups, demonstrating the potential benefit and feasibility of virtual education in bridging gaps in adult congenital heart disease training, particularly in resource-limited countries.

Background: An increasing number of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are pursuing pregnancy with the potential for cardiovascular complications. This study aimed to establish patient‐centered national research and care priorities to improve pregnancy‐related outcomes for individuals with CHD. Methods: This mixed‐methods study used a modified Stakeholder Engagement in Question Development methodology to systematically identify patient‐centered priorities. Key activities included consortium engagement (phase 1), patient and provider questionnaires (phase 2), and an in‐person facilitated meeting to explore survey results and follow‐up virtual focus groups (phase 3). Reflexive thematic analysis was used to synthesize short‐ and long‐term research priorities (phase 4). Results: Three overarching goals emerged: (1) improving access to specialized CHD, cardio‐obstetrics, and mental health care; (2) improving quality and consistency in clinical care; and (3) increasing patient and community engagement. These goals were then expanded into 5 central themes: (1) communication within the health care setting; (2) community engagement; (3) ancillary clinical support; (4) integration of patient‐reported outcomes; and (5) implementation, education, and knowledge mobilization. Short‐term (1–5‐year) goals included expanded telemedicine use, best practice recommendations for multidisciplinary care coordination, and targeted educational resources. Long‐term (5–10‐year) goals included expansion of adult CHD and cardio‐obstetrics programs, integration of mental health services, and advocacy to improve insurance coverage. Conclusions: The consortium provided a national, community‐driven prioritization that highlights actionable pathways to improve pregnancy outcomes for people with CHD. Sustained engagement with patients and community partners is essential to achieving durable improvements across cardio‐obstetric care, education, research, and mental health.

Background: There is a global mismatch between the number of adults with congenital heart disease and adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) cardiologists, potentially impacting patient outcomes. This survey explores factors influencing trainees and cardiologists' career choices in ACHD. Methods: An online, anonymous global survey on demographics, ACHD as a career choice, encouraging and deterring factors assessed via a 5‐point Likert scale and open‐ended questions on recommending ACHD was distributed through targeted emails and social media. Responses meeting a 75% completion criterion were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results: Among 811 included responses, most were from women (53.5%), aged 31 to 40 years (48.3%), White individuals (43.3%), non‐Hispanic individuals (85%), from outside the ACHD field (79.0%), and from North America (42.7%). Only 30.9% of non‐ACHD physicians considered specializing in ACHD despite 78.9% recommending it. Encouraging factors included awareness of ACHD significance, mentor influence, and clinical exposure. Key deterrents were inadequate financial incentives, limited job opportunities, and lengthy training. Regional variations showed that longer training duration and lack of compensation incentives were the main deterrents in North America. Suggested solutions included structured training programs, salary improvements, and early ACHD exposure during medical education. Conclusions: Less than a third of respondents considered ACHD as a career largely due to inadequate financial incentives, limited job opportunities, and long training duration. Addressing these barriers could enhance recruitment and help meet the growing demands of the ACHD population.