Keith David Bennett
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Keith David Bennett has a total of 199 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Katherine J. Willis
Department of Biology, University of Oxford, UK
15 shared publications - Laura Parducci
Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
9 shared publications - Cynthia A. Froyd
Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
5 shared publications - H. John B. Birks
University of Bergen
5 shared publications - Maarten Blaauw
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK
5 shared publications - Yoshihisa Suyama
Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Osaki, Japan
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 September 2018
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Vol. 58 (6) , 1111-1117
Measuring Biodiversity and Extinction—Present and Past
How biodiversity is changing in our time represents a major concern for all organismal biologists. Anthropogenic changes to our planet are decreasing species diversity through the negative effects of pollution, habitat destruction, direct extirpation of species, and climate change. But major biotic changes—including those that have both increased and decreased species diversity—have happened before in Earth’s history. Biodiversity dynamics in past eras provide important context to understand ecological responses to current environmental change. The work of assessing biodiversity is woven into ecology, environmental science, conservation, paleontology, phylogenetics, evolutionary and developmental biology, and many other disciplines; yet, the absolute foundation of how we measure species diversity depends on taxonomy and systematics. The aspiration of this symposium, and complementary contributed talks, was to promote better understanding of our common goals and encourage future interdisciplinary discussion of biodiversity dynamics. The contributions in this collection of papers bring together a diverse group of speakers to confront several important themes. How can biologists best respond to the urgent need to identify and conserve diversity? How can we better communicate the nature of species across scientific disciplines? Where are the major gaps in knowledge about the diversity of living animal and plant groups, and what are the implications for understanding potential diversity loss? How can we effectively use the fossil record of past diversity and extinction to understand current biodiversity loss?
- 18 September 2018
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Vol. 58 (6) , 1111-1117
Open AccessMeasuring Biodiversity and Extinction—Present and Past
How biodiversity is changing in our time represents a major concern for all organismal biologists. Anthropogenic changes to our planet are decreasing species diversity through the negative effects of pollution, habitat destruction, direct extirpation of species, and climate change. But major biotic changes—including those that have both increased and decreased species diversity—have happened before in Earth’s history. Biodiversity dynamics in past eras provide important context to understand ecological responses to current environmental change. The work of assessing biodiversity is woven into ecology, environmental science, conservation, paleontology, phylogenetics, evolutionary and developmental biology, and many other disciplines; yet, the absolute foundation of how we measure species diversity depends on taxonomy and systematics. The aspiration of this symposium, and complementary contributed talks, was to promote better understanding of our common goals and encourage future interdisciplinary discussion of biodiversity dynamics. The contributions in this collection of papers bring together a diverse group of speakers to confront several important themes. How can biologists best respond to the urgent need to identify and conserve diversity? How can we better communicate the nature of species across scientific disciplines? Where are the major gaps in knowledge about the diversity of living animal and plant groups, and what are the implications for understanding potential diversity loss? How can we effectively use the fossil record of past diversity and extinction to understand current biodiversity loss?
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 1 May 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Quaternary Science Reviews
- Vol. 188, 58-66
Double the dates and go for Bayes — Impacts of model choice, dating density and quality on chronologies
- 1 May 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Quaternary Science Reviews
- Vol. 188, 58-66
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessDouble the dates and go for Bayes — Impacts of model choice, dating density and quality on chronologies
- Open Access
- 14 October 2017
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Vol. 183 (2) , 237-252
How big is a genus? Towards a nomothetic systematics
A genus is a taxonomic unit that may contain one species (monotypic) or thousands. Yet counts of genera or families are used to quantify diversity where species-level data are not available. High frequencies of monotypic genera (~30% of animals) have previously been scrutinized as an artefact of human classification. To test whether Linnean taxonomy conflicts with phylogeny, we compared idealized phylogenetic systematics in silico with real-world data. We generated highly replicated, simulated phylogenies under a variety of fixed speciation/extinction rates, imposed three independent taxonomic sorting algorithms on these clades (2.65 × 108 simulated species) and compared the resulting genus size data with quality-controlled taxonomy of animal groups (2.8 × 105 species). ‘Perfect’ phylogenetic systematics arrives at similar distributions to real-world taxonomy, regardless of the taxonomic algorithm. Rapid radiations occasionally produce a large genus when speciation rates are favourable; however, small genera can arise in many different ways, from individual lineage persistence and/or extinctions creating subdivisions within a clade. The consistency of this skew distribution in simulation and real-world data, at sufficiently large samples, indicates that specific aspects of its mathematical behaviour could be developed into generalized or nomothetic principles of the global frequency distributions of higher taxa. Importantly, Linnean taxonomy is a better-than-expected reflection of underlying evolutionary patterns.
- 14 October 2017
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Vol. 183 (2) , 237-252
Open AccessHow big is a genus? Towards a nomothetic systematics
A genus is a taxonomic unit that may contain one species (monotypic) or thousands. Yet counts of genera or families are used to quantify diversity where species-level data are not available. High frequencies of monotypic genera (~30% of animals) have previously been scrutinized as an artefact of human classification. To test whether Linnean taxonomy conflicts with phylogeny, we compared idealized phylogenetic systematics in silico with real-world data. We generated highly replicated, simulated phylogenies under a variety of fixed speciation/extinction rates, imposed three independent taxonomic sorting algorithms on these clades (2.65 × 108 simulated species) and compared the resulting genus size data with quality-controlled taxonomy of animal groups (2.8 × 105 species). ‘Perfect’ phylogenetic systematics arrives at similar distributions to real-world taxonomy, regardless of the taxonomic algorithm. Rapid radiations occasionally produce a large genus when speciation rates are favourable; however, small genera can arise in many different ways, from individual lineage persistence and/or extinctions creating subdivisions within a clade. The consistency of this skew distribution in simulation and real-world data, at sufficiently large samples, indicates that specific aspects of its mathematical behaviour could be developed into generalized or nomothetic principles of the global frequency distributions of higher taxa. Importantly, Linnean taxonomy is a better-than-expected reflection of underlying evolutionary patterns.
- 6 June 2017
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Botany
- Vol. 104 (6) , 800-802
The real significance of ancient DNA
- 6 June 2017
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Botany
- Vol. 104 (6) , 800-802
The real significance of ancient DNA
- Top Cited Papers
- 3 April 2017
- Published by Wiley in New Phytologist
- Vol. 214 (3) , 924-942
Ancient plant DNA in lake sediments
Contents Summary 924 I. Introduction 925 II. Environmental and temporal limits for survival of aDNA 925 III. Lake sediments 927 IV. Perspective for plant aDNA research 929 V. Perspective for plant aDNA research 930 VI. Pollen DNA 930 VII. Sedimentary aDNA 931 VIII. Recent key findings and future methods using HTS techniques 933 IX. Challenges when studying aDNA from lake sediments 935 X. Bioinformatic processing 936 XI. Conclusions and directions for future research 938 Acknowledgements 938 References 938 Summary: Recent advances in sequencing technologies now permit the analyses of plant DNA from fossil samples (ancient plant DNA, plant aDNA), and thus enable the molecular reconstruction of palaeofloras. Hitherto, ancient frozen soils have proved excellent in preserving DNA molecules, and have thus been the most commonly used source of plant aDNA. However, DNA from soil mainly represents taxa growing a few metres from the sampling point. Lakes have larger catchment areas and recent studies have suggested that plant aDNA from lake sediments is a more powerful tool for palaeofloristic reconstruction. Furthermore, lakes can be found globally in nearly all environments, and are therefore not limited to perennially frozen areas. Here, we review the latest approaches and methods for the study of plant aDNA from lake sediments and discuss the progress made up to the present. We argue that aDNA analyses add new and additional perspectives for the study of ancient plant populations and, in time, will provide higher taxonomic resolution and more precise estimation of abundance. Despite this, key questions and challenges remain for such plant aDNA studies. Finally, we provide guidelines on technical issues, including lake selection, and we suggest directions for future research on plant aDNA studies in lake sediments.
- 3 April 2017
- Published by Wiley in New Phytologist
- Vol. 214 (3) , 924-942
Top Cited PapersAncient plant DNA in lake sediments
Contents Summary 924 I. Introduction 925 II. Environmental and temporal limits for survival of aDNA 925 III. Lake sediments 927 IV. Perspective for plant aDNA research 929 V. Perspective for plant aDNA research 930 VI. Pollen DNA 930 VII. Sedimentary aDNA 931 VIII. Recent key findings and future methods using HTS techniques 933 IX. Challenges when studying aDNA from lake sediments 935 X. Bioinformatic processing 936 XI. Conclusions and directions for future research 938 Acknowledgements 938 References 938 Summary: Recent advances in sequencing technologies now permit the analyses of plant DNA from fossil samples (ancient plant DNA, plant aDNA), and thus enable the molecular reconstruction of palaeofloras. Hitherto, ancient frozen soils have proved excellent in preserving DNA molecules, and have thus been the most commonly used source of plant aDNA. However, DNA from soil mainly represents taxa growing a few metres from the sampling point. Lakes have larger catchment areas and recent studies have suggested that plant aDNA from lake sediments is a more powerful tool for palaeofloristic reconstruction. Furthermore, lakes can be found globally in nearly all environments, and are therefore not limited to perennially frozen areas. Here, we review the latest approaches and methods for the study of plant aDNA from lake sediments and discuss the progress made up to the present. We argue that aDNA analyses add new and additional perspectives for the study of ancient plant populations and, in time, will provide higher taxonomic resolution and more precise estimation of abundance. Despite this, key questions and challenges remain for such plant aDNA studies. Finally, we provide guidelines on technical issues, including lake selection, and we suggest directions for future research on plant aDNA studies in lake sediments.
- 1 November 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Global and Planetary Change
- Vol. 134, 142-154
Holocene environmental changes in southern Kamchatka, Far Eastern Russia, inferred from a pollen and testate amoebae peat succession record
- 1 November 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Global and Planetary Change
- Vol. 134, 142-154
Holocene environmental changes in southern Kamchatka, Far Eastern Russia, inferred from a pollen and testate amoebae peat succession record
- Open Access
- 1 November 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Global and Planetary Change
- Vol. 134, 41-54
Holocene climate and environmental change in north-eastern Kamchatka (Russian Far East), inferred from a multi-proxy study of lake sediments
- 1 November 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Global and Planetary Change
- Vol. 134, 41-54
Open AccessHolocene climate and environmental change in north-eastern Kamchatka (Russian Far East), inferred from a multi-proxy study of lake sediments
- 17 July 2015
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 349 (6245) , 247
Comment on “Sedimentary DNA from a submerged site reveals wheat in the British Isles 8000 years ago”
Smith et al. (Reports, 27 February 2015, p. 998) identify wheat DNA from an 8000-calendar-years-before-the-present archaeological site in southern England and conclude that wheat was traded to Britain 2000 years before the arrival of agriculture. The DNA samples are not dated, either directly or from circumstantial evidence, so there is no chronological evidence to support the claim.
- 17 July 2015
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 349 (6245) , 247
Comment on “Sedimentary DNA from a submerged site reveals wheat in the British Isles 8000 years ago”
Smith et al. (Reports, 27 February 2015, p. 998) identify wheat DNA from an 8000-calendar-years-before-the-present archaeological site in southern England and conclude that wheat was traded to Britain 2000 years before the arrival of agriculture. The DNA samples are not dated, either directly or from circumstantial evidence, so there is no chronological evidence to support the claim.
- 9 December 2014
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Holocene
- Vol. 25 (1) , 3-16
John Birks: Pioneer in quantitative palaeoecology
We describe the career of John Birks as a pioneering scientist who has, over a career spanning five decades, transformed palaeoecology from a largely descriptive to a rigorous quantitative science relevant to contemporary questions in ecology and environmental change. We review his influence on students and colleagues not only at Cambridge and Bergen Universities, his places of primary employment, but also on individuals and research groups in Europe and North America. We also introduce the collection of papers that we have assembled in his honour. The papers are written by his former students and close colleagues and span many of the areas of palaeoecology to which John himself has made major contributions. These include the relationship between ecology and palaeoecology, late-glacial and Holocene palaeoecology, ecological succession, climate change and vegetation history, the role of palaeoecological techniques in reconstructing and understanding the impact of human activity on terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems and numerical analysis of multivariate palaeoecological data.
- 9 December 2014
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Holocene
- Vol. 25 (1) , 3-16
John Birks: Pioneer in quantitative palaeoecology
We describe the career of John Birks as a pioneering scientist who has, over a career spanning five decades, transformed palaeoecology from a largely descriptive to a rigorous quantitative science relevant to contemporary questions in ecology and environmental change. We review his influence on students and colleagues not only at Cambridge and Bergen Universities, his places of primary employment, but also on individuals and research groups in Europe and North America. We also introduce the collection of papers that we have assembled in his honour. The papers are written by his former students and close colleagues and span many of the areas of palaeoecology to which John himself has made major contributions. These include the relationship between ecology and palaeoecology, late-glacial and Holocene palaeoecology, ecological succession, climate change and vegetation history, the role of palaeoecological techniques in reconstructing and understanding the impact of human activity on terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems and numerical analysis of multivariate palaeoecological data.
- Open Access
- 27 May 2014
- Published by Wiley in New Phytologist
- Vol. 203 (3) , 735-742
Principles and methods for automated palynology
Summary: Pollen grains are microscopic so their identification and quantification has, for decades, depended upon human observers using light microscopes: a labour‐intensive approach. Modern improvements in computing and imaging hardware and software now bring automation of pollen analyses within reach. In this paper, we provide the first review in over 15 yr of progress towards automation of the part of palynology concerned with counting and classifying pollen, bringing together literature published from a wide spectrum of sources. We consider which attempts offer the most potential for an automated palynology system for universal application across all fields of research concerned with pollen classification and counting. We discuss what is required to make the datasets of these automated systems as acceptable as those produced by human palynologists, and present suggestions for how automation will generate novel approaches to counting and classifying pollen that have hitherto been unthinkable.
- 27 May 2014
- Published by Wiley in New Phytologist
- Vol. 203 (3) , 735-742
Open AccessPrinciples and methods for automated palynology
Summary: Pollen grains are microscopic so their identification and quantification has, for decades, depended upon human observers using light microscopes: a labour‐intensive approach. Modern improvements in computing and imaging hardware and software now bring automation of pollen analyses within reach. In this paper, we provide the first review in over 15 yr of progress towards automation of the part of palynology concerned with counting and classifying pollen, bringing together literature published from a wide spectrum of sources. We consider which attempts offer the most potential for an automated palynology system for universal application across all fields of research concerned with pollen classification and counting. We discuss what is required to make the datasets of these automated systems as acceptable as those produced by human palynologists, and present suggestions for how automation will generate novel approaches to counting and classifying pollen that have hitherto been unthinkable.