Mufareh Asiri
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Mufareh Asiri has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ahmed Altraigey
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt
2 shared publications - Mohamed Ibrahem Ellaithy
Obstetrics & Gynecology Department, Ain Shams Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
2 shared publications Abdulsamed Almdefa
King Saud Medical City
1 shared publicationAfaf Altweijiry
King Saud Medical City
1 shared publication- Ahmed Mohammed Abbas
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Assiut University Assiut Egypt
1 shared publication - Ahmed Rateb
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Faisal Military Hospital, Saudi Arabia; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ain Shams University, Abbassia Square, Cairo, Egypt
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 31 January 2024
- Published by Wiley
COVID-19 and pregnancy outcome: A multicenter study
Objective: Evaluation of COVID-19 during pregnancy and the pregnancy outcomes. Design: A prospective cohort study. Setting: Central First Health Care Cluster (multicentric), Riyadh. Population or Sample: Pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy diagnosed with COVID-19 . Methods: Parameters included: the age of the patient, gestational age at diagnosis, symptoms at presentation (cough, fever), presence of congenital anomalies, IUFD, mode of delivery, presence of PPH, admission to ICU, newborn Apgar s.core, cord PH, need for NICU admission, and the newborn becoming infected with COVID-19. Main Outcome Measures: COVID-19 positive women and adverse maternal and fetal outcome Results: One hundred pregnant, COVID-19-positive women met the inclusion criteria; the average age of participants was 31.2 years (SD ± 6.4). Asymptomatic patients represented 54% of participants. Most of the deliveries occurred at 36 weeks or less as preterm delivery. Cesarean sections represented 55% of our population. The average weight of the newborn was 2.86 ± 0.65SD); however, 23 (26.4 %) of the newborns delivered to a COVID-positive mother became COVID-19 positive. Conclusion: A high rate of preterm labor, miscarriage, cesarean section, and newborn testing positive for COVID-19 were observed among our population. No congenital anomalies related to COVID-19 were observed. Keywords: Pregnancy, COVID 19, Preterm labor, Miscarriage, Saudi Arabia
- 31 January 2024
- Published by Wiley
Open AccessCOVID-19 and pregnancy outcome: A multicenter study
Objective: Evaluation of COVID-19 during pregnancy and the pregnancy outcomes. Design: A prospective cohort study. Setting: Central First Health Care Cluster (multicentric), Riyadh. Population or Sample: Pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy diagnosed with COVID-19 . Methods: Parameters included: the age of the patient, gestational age at diagnosis, symptoms at presentation (cough, fever), presence of congenital anomalies, IUFD, mode of delivery, presence of PPH, admission to ICU, newborn Apgar s.core, cord PH, need for NICU admission, and the newborn becoming infected with COVID-19. Main Outcome Measures: COVID-19 positive women and adverse maternal and fetal outcome Results: One hundred pregnant, COVID-19-positive women met the inclusion criteria; the average age of participants was 31.2 years (SD ± 6.4). Asymptomatic patients represented 54% of participants. Most of the deliveries occurred at 36 weeks or less as preterm delivery. Cesarean sections represented 55% of our population. The average weight of the newborn was 2.86 ± 0.65SD); however, 23 (26.4 %) of the newborns delivered to a COVID-positive mother became COVID-19 positive. Conclusion: A high rate of preterm labor, miscarriage, cesarean section, and newborn testing positive for COVID-19 were observed among our population. No congenital anomalies related to COVID-19 were observed. Keywords: Pregnancy, COVID 19, Preterm labor, Miscarriage, Saudi Arabia
- Open Access
- 3 October 2022
- Published by Wiley
COVID-19 Vaccine During Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes
Initially, there was little data on the safety of immunization against COVID-19 infection in pregnant women. However, previous studies revealed no safety concerns for pregnant women or newborns who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on perinatal outcomes. Methods: This cross-sectional study. It started from January 2022 to June 2022. The questionnaire was developed and validated by experts. This study included all women admitted to the postpartum ward who were more than 18 years old and had received the COVID-19 vaccine. The study excluded women without proof of their vaccination status or who could not complete the questionnaire. The primary outcome was the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on gestational age and birth weight. Results: A total of 365 participants. The mean gestational age of the unvaccinated women was 38.83 ± 1.62 weeks (p < 0.001), higher than that of vaccinated women (37.69 ± 2.9 weeks). However, the average birth weight for the unvaccinated women was 2.96 ± 0.4 kg (p = 0.89) and for vaccinated women (2.97 ± 0.66 kg). Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of the type of vaccine received before, during, or after pregnancy, is not associated with any unfavorable perinatal outcomes.
- 3 October 2022
- Published by Wiley
Open AccessCOVID-19 Vaccine During Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes
Initially, there was little data on the safety of immunization against COVID-19 infection in pregnant women. However, previous studies revealed no safety concerns for pregnant women or newborns who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on perinatal outcomes. Methods: This cross-sectional study. It started from January 2022 to June 2022. The questionnaire was developed and validated by experts. This study included all women admitted to the postpartum ward who were more than 18 years old and had received the COVID-19 vaccine. The study excluded women without proof of their vaccination status or who could not complete the questionnaire. The primary outcome was the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on gestational age and birth weight. Results: A total of 365 participants. The mean gestational age of the unvaccinated women was 38.83 ± 1.62 weeks (p < 0.001), higher than that of vaccinated women (37.69 ± 2.9 weeks). However, the average birth weight for the unvaccinated women was 2.96 ± 0.4 kg (p = 0.89) and for vaccinated women (2.97 ± 0.66 kg). Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of the type of vaccine received before, during, or after pregnancy, is not associated with any unfavorable perinatal outcomes.
- Open Access
- 17 March 2021
- Published by MedCrave Group Kft. in Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal
- Vol. 12 (2) , 78-79
Dilemma of COVID19 vaccine during pregnancy
The 2019 Coronavirus caused by single stranded RNA virus. Morbidity and mortality are high among pregnant women. Covid 19 vaccine considered safe for adult and protective. Issues of safety raised toward pregnant women and vaccine. The authorization of Covid 19 vaccine for pregnant and nursery women need more studies and trials.
- 17 March 2021
- Published by MedCrave Group Kft. in Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal
- Vol. 12 (2) , 78-79
Open AccessDilemma of COVID19 vaccine during pregnancy
The 2019 Coronavirus caused by single stranded RNA virus. Morbidity and mortality are high among pregnant women. Covid 19 vaccine considered safe for adult and protective. Issues of safety raised toward pregnant women and vaccine. The authorization of Covid 19 vaccine for pregnant and nursery women need more studies and trials.
- 29 October 2018
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Vol. 33 (10) , 1670-1677
The effect of gum chewing on the return of bowel motility after planned cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
Objective: To endorse the impact of chewing gum on the intestinal functions’ restoration, hospital stay and gastrointestinal complications after planned cesarean delivery (CD). Methods: Women aged between 20 and 35 years scheduled for planned CD; either first or repeated, with term, singleton, viable and healthy pregnancy at obstetrics and gynaecology department, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushayt, Saudi Arabia were invited to participate and randomized if eligible into three groups. The first group chewed sugar-free gum 2 hours after recovery at least for half an hour and at 2-hour interval during daytime. The second group received oral fluids 6 hours postoperatively, while the third group was the control group. The primary outcome measure was the time to first passage of stool. The secondary outcomes included the time of the first passage of flatus, the first hearing of normal intestinal sounds, the duration of hospital stay the duration of parenteral therapy by intravenous fluids, the time of initiating breast-feeding and the cost of hospital stay. The study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02386748). Results: The study included 372 women randomized into three groups (124 women in each group). Chewing gum significantly improved intestinal recovery with faster onset of bowel movements, first audible intestinal sounds, passage of flatus and passage of stool (p = 0.0001). It was associated with significantly shorter duration of hospital stay and parenteral therapy duration (p = 0.0001). Abdominal distension, vomiting and ileus postoperatively were significantly higher in nonchewing gum groups. Neither paralytic ileus nor side effects were recorded with gum use. Conclusion: Chewing gum, within 2 hours postoperatively, is a simple, safe and well tolerated intervention that can boost rapid intestinal recovery and shorten hospital stay after planned cesarean deliveries.
- 29 October 2018
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Vol. 33 (10) , 1670-1677
The effect of gum chewing on the return of bowel motility after planned cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
Objective: To endorse the impact of chewing gum on the intestinal functions’ restoration, hospital stay and gastrointestinal complications after planned cesarean delivery (CD). Methods: Women aged between 20 and 35 years scheduled for planned CD; either first or repeated, with term, singleton, viable and healthy pregnancy at obstetrics and gynaecology department, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushayt, Saudi Arabia were invited to participate and randomized if eligible into three groups. The first group chewed sugar-free gum 2 hours after recovery at least for half an hour and at 2-hour interval during daytime. The second group received oral fluids 6 hours postoperatively, while the third group was the control group. The primary outcome measure was the time to first passage of stool. The secondary outcomes included the time of the first passage of flatus, the first hearing of normal intestinal sounds, the duration of hospital stay the duration of parenteral therapy by intravenous fluids, the time of initiating breast-feeding and the cost of hospital stay. The study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02386748). Results: The study included 372 women randomized into three groups (124 women in each group). Chewing gum significantly improved intestinal recovery with faster onset of bowel movements, first audible intestinal sounds, passage of flatus and passage of stool (p = 0.0001). It was associated with significantly shorter duration of hospital stay and parenteral therapy duration (p = 0.0001). Abdominal distension, vomiting and ileus postoperatively were significantly higher in nonchewing gum groups. Neither paralytic ileus nor side effects were recorded with gum use. Conclusion: Chewing gum, within 2 hours postoperatively, is a simple, safe and well tolerated intervention that can boost rapid intestinal recovery and shorten hospital stay after planned cesarean deliveries.
- 1 June 2018
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 225, 70-78
Prediction of recurrent ectopic pregnancy: A five-year follow-up cohort study
- 1 June 2018
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 225, 70-78
Prediction of recurrent ectopic pregnancy: A five-year follow-up cohort study