Carlo Gandi

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and the learning curve of an insourced, clinician-performed three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction workflow using Synapse3D™ software in a robotic urologic surgery setting. Methods: In this prospective single-centre case series, 20 consecutive patients scheduled for robotic kidney surgery were enrolled over a 30-day period. Three urology residents without prior experience in 3D reconstruction completed a structured two-day training programme including eight supervised practice reconstructions. Subsequently, each one reconstructed all 20 study cases independently. Reconstruction time was recorded for every reconstruction. After surgery, the two operating surgeons independently rated each model on a 5-point Likert scale for anatomical fidelity, defined as the correspondence between the model and the anatomy encountered intraoperatively. Results: All 60 reconstructions were completed successfully, with no failed reconstructions, no DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) import errors and no software crashes; assistance from the manufacturer was never required. Mean reconstruction time was 19 min (range 11–29 min). Reconstruction time decreased by 0.63 min per case (95% CI 0.51–0.74; p < 0.001). Median time fell from 23 min in the first ten cases to 15 min in the last ten (p < 0.001), and the reduction was significant for each operator analysed separately. Anatomical fidelity was rated 4 (IQR 1) by both surgeons. The two surgeons rated overall system usability 3/5 and 5/5. Conclusions: Insourced 3D reconstruction with Synapse3D™ is technically feasible and is learned rapidly and reproducibly by urology residents after limited training.

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) imposes a substantial global health burden, with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) established as the gold standard for localized disease. While da Vinci^® Xi maintains market dominance, Toumai^® MT-1000 offers a potentially cost-competitive alternative lacking prospective validation. Objective: To evaluate perioperative safety, oncologic quality (primary endpoint: positive surgical margins), early functional recovery (continence), and surgeon learning curve between Toumai^® MT-1000 (T-RARP) and da Vinci^® Xi RARP (DV-RARP) performed in high-volume European practice. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective single-center comparative study carried out at Policlinico Gemelli, Rome (May–November 2025), enrolling 80 patients with localized or locally advanced PCa, elected for radical prostatectomy and casually allocated to receive surgery with Toumai or the da Vinci robotic platform. The primary endpoint was the comparison of positive surgical margin (PSM) rates. Secondary endpoints included the comparison of operative time (skin-to-skin), estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, 45-day postop outcomes, specifically Clavien–Dindo complications, urinary continence recovery (0–1 pad/day), and IIEF-5 scores. Learning curve was evaluated through the cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis of operative times and linear regression of operative times (n = 80 cases). The analyses used STATA 19 with two-sided tests at p < 0.05 significance. Results: Baseline characteristics showed balance between cohorts (p > 0.05 for most covariates). Perioperative outcomes proved equivalent: median operative time (OT) was 192.5 min (IQR 165–230) for Toumai^® versus 183.5 min (IQR 147–225) for da Vinci^® Xi (p = 0.38); estimated blood loss (EBL) was 150 mL in both groups (p = 0.87); length of hospital stay (LOS) was 2 days in both groups (p = 0.92). PSM rates were identical at 17.5% (p = 0.79). Continence recovery reached 72.5% versus 80% (p = 0.43). Complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ II) occurred in 7.5% versus 12.5% of cases (p = 0.45). The CUSUM analysis demonstrated operative time proficiency after only four procedures; operative time regression showed no significant trend (p = 0.38). Conclusions: Toumai^® MT-1000 demonstrates similar performance to da Vinci^® Xi across different RARP quality metrics, with no detectable learning curve for surgeons previously experienced with da Vinci. These findings support a safe integration of cost-effective platforms into clinical practice, pending multicenter randomized confirmation.

Background and Objective: Liquid biopsy has transformed the management of advanced prostate cancer, yet its clinical role in non-metastatic disease remains uncertain. Conventional biomarkers such as PSA, imaging, and pathology have limited ability to capture minimal residual disease and biological aggressiveness. The objective of this review was to critically evaluate the current evidence on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in non-metastatic prostate cancer, focusing on feasibility, prognostic value, and potential clinical applications. Methods: A narrative review of PubMed-indexed original studies evaluating liquid biopsy in clinically localized or non-metastatic prostate cancer was performed. Eligible studies included patients treated with curative-intent local therapy or experiencing biochemical recurrence without radiologic metastases. Study designs were predominantly prospective or retrospective observational cohorts. Liquid biopsy analytes included CTCs and ctDNA assessed from peripheral blood plasma using EpCAM-based enrichment, targeted next-generation sequencing, whole-genome sequencing, or ultra-sensitive tumor-informed assays. Primary outcomes included detection rates, associations with clinicopathologic features, biochemical recurrence, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. Key Findings and Limitations: Across 11 studies, CTC detection using EpCAM-based platforms was infrequent in localized disease and biochemical recurrence and showed limited prognostic value (10–11% in preoperative settings). In contrast, ctDNA was detectable in a minority of patients but consistently identified biologically aggressive disease and a higher risk of recurrence when present, particularly using tumor-informed ultra-sensitive assays. Limitations include low detection rates, heterogeneous methodologies, small sample sizes, and predominantly exploratory study designs. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Currently, its most promising application is not broad screening, but as a selective, biology-driven tool for detecting minimal residual disease and refining risk assessment. CtDNA acts as a biological risk modifier, potentially guiding the escalation or de-escalation of adjuvant therapy. However, prospective biomarker-driven trials are required to validate these strategies before routine clinical implementation.

We present the Toumai Surgical System's first clinical use for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at a high-volume multiplatform academic institution. As new robotic platforms arise, their integration into existing surgical workflows necessitates an accurate assessment of feasibility, safety, and efficiency. This prospective single-case evaluation involved a patient with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent RARP with the Toumai system. The procedure was performed by a senior surgeon proficient across multiple robotic platforms, following a brief dry-lab simulation with the Toumai console. The Toumai system, characterized by 4 independent arm carts, immersive HD 3D vision, and wrist instruments akin to the Da Vinci system, facilitated a standardized operating room workflow. Procedural assessment used the validated Educational Working Group Metrics Initiative (ERUS/ORSI Academy), which standardizes RARP into 12 surgical steps and evaluates for critical and metric errors. The RARP was completed successfully without intraoperative complications. Interestingly, none of the 12 assessed steps showed any critical or metric errors. The estimated blood loss was less than 50 mL, the console time was 95 minutes, and the patient was discharged without complication on postoperative day 2. Setup and docking were straightforward, and instrument responsiveness was stable, with seamless transition from prior Da Vinci platform experience. This first clinical experience demonstrates the Toumai system's safety, reproducibility, and adequate reliability for RARP, showing its feasibility and effectiveness in the hands of an experienced robotic surgeon.

Technological advancements have revolutionized surgical methods, with laparoscopic and robotic surgeries offering significant benefits over traditional open procedures. These benefits include reduced intraoperative blood loss, shortened hospital stays, faster recovery, and improved cosmetic outcomes. However, the learning curve for laparoscopic surgery remains a challenge. Robotic systems, like the da Vinci Surgical System, address many limitations of laparoscopic surgery, including limited range of motion and tremors, and offer superior ergonomics. Despite concerns over cost and tactile feedback, innovations like telesurgery and augmented reality are enhancing robotic surgery’s potential. Moreover, robotic surgery generally results in less blood loss, fewer complications, and quicker recovery compared to open surgery. Robotic surgery tends also to be less physically demanding for surgeons, reducing fatigue and musculoskeletal strain. However, research also reveals that many surgeons still experience discomfort, particularly in the neck and shoulders, emphasizing the need for ergonomic training and improved workstation setups. The review also explores the impact of pre-procedure fatigue on surgical performance, noting that fatigue can impair performance on surgical simulators, particularly among residents. Despite this, studies showed that performing consecutive surgeries in a single day does not appear to adversely affect patient outcomes. Overall, ergonomic interventions are crucial in both laparoscopic and robotic surgeries to enhance surgeon efficiency and well-being, and further research is needed to optimize these surgical methods and understand the long-term impacts of fatigue on performance and patient outcomes.

Background/Objectives: A comprehensive comparison of intraoperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of RARP performed with different robotic surgical platforms is critically needed. Our aim is to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of RARP performed using the novel Hugo™ RAS system with those from the daVinci system, the reference standard, at a high-volume robotic center, with an extended follow-up period (one year). Methods: We analyzed the data of 400 patients undergoing RARP ± pelvic lymph node dissection between 2021 and 2023, using propensity score (PS) matching to correct for treatment selection bias. All procedures were performed by three surgeons with HugoTM RAS or daVinci. This analysis extends the follow-up period to 1 year, focusing on specific functional and oncological outcomes, building on our previous 3-month evaluation of perioperative outcomes. The primary outcome was the trifecta rate, defined as freedom from biochemical recurrence, continence, and erectile function recovery. Secondary outcomes included detailed assessments of oncological outcomes (PSA levels) and functional outcomes (continence and erectile function). Results: The propensity score-matched cohort included 99 matched pairs (198 patients), balanced for all covariates. No significant differences were found in trifecta rates between the two platforms at 1-year follow-up (Hugo: 25.25%, daVinci: 27.27%, p = 0.743). Both groups showed improved trifecta rates when considering only nerve-sparing procedures (Hugo: 36.84%, daVinci: 35.59%, p = 0.889). Continence rates were similar (Hugo: 87.9%, daVinci: 89.9%, p = 0.327), as were the undetectable PSA rates (Hugo: 92.9%, daVinci: 88.8%, p = 0.158). Also, the erectile function recovery rate did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions: This is the first study comparing 1-year functional and oncological outcomes of RARP performed with Hugo™ RAS and daVinci surgical robotic systems using PS matching. Functional and oncological outcomes of RARP were comparable between the two robotic platforms. These findings confirm that the transition to the Hugo™ platform does not compromise surgical proficiency or patient outcomes, even if further long-term studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Testicular hemangioma is a rare benign vascular neoplasm originating from the inner layer of the tunica albuginea, predominantly affecting the pediatric population and often associated with hemangiomas in other organs. Histopathologically can be categorized into four types, including capillary, cavernous, papillary endothelial hyperplasia, and epithelioid (histiocytoid). We report a case of a 24-year-old presenting with left inguinal pain, diagnosed with an epithelioid (histiocytoid) hemangioma of the testis. Diagnostic evaluation included scrotal doppler ultrasonography, which revealed a small, hypoechoic formation with evident vascularization. Serum tumor markers were within normal limits. Surgical excision via testis-sparing surgery (TSS) was performed based on frozen section analysis. A literature review underscores the rarity of testicular histiocytoid hemangiomas. Advancements in diagnostic technique have improved the accuracy of diagnosis and allowed for more conservative surgical approaches, preserving fertility and minimizing long-term adverse effects. In conclusion, while testicular hemangiomas may present characteristic features on ultrasound, frozen section examination remains crucial in guiding surgical decision-making. TSS offers significant advantages over traditional excisional surgery, including reduced morbidity and preservation of cancer control, making it an essential option in the management of testicular hemangiomas, particularly in young patients concerned about fertility preservation.

The world of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) encompasses a wide range of practices, treatments, and products that fall outside the realm of conventional (mainstream) medicine. The use of complementary and CAM has become increasingly popular in Western nations. People are turning to CAM for a variety of reasons, including managing chronic diseases, relieving symptoms of various conditions, and improving their overall health and well-being. There’s a growing trend of people using and showing interest in complementary and alternative medicine therapies, especially in Western countries. CAM encompasses a wide range of treatments, some offering complete alternatives to conventional medicine, while others aim to complement existing medical approaches. Urologists should stay informed about CAM to guide their patients effectively to treat patients in a modern and personalized way. The aim of review is to analyze the scenario of complimentary and alternative medicine with a specific focus in the urological field.

Background/Objectives: There is an urgent need for comparative analyses of the intraoperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of different surgical robotic platforms. We aimed to compare the outcomes of RARP performed at a tertiary referral robotic centre with the novel Hugo^TM RAS system with those performed with a daVinci surgical system, which is considered the reference standard. Methods: We analysed the data of 400 patients undergoing RARP ± pelvic lymph node dissection between 2021 and 2023, using propensity score (PS) matching to correct for treatment selection bias. All procedures were performed by three surgeons with Hugo^TM RAS or daVinci. Results: The PS-matched cohort included 198 patients with 99 matched pairs, balanced for all covariates. Positive surgical margins (PSMs) were found in 22.2% and 25.3% (p = 0.616) of patients, respectively, in the Hugo^TM RAS and daVinci groups. No significant differences were found for other important perioperative outcomes, including median (1st–3rd q) operative time (170 (147.5–195.5) vs. 166 (154–202.5) min; p = 0.540), median (1st–3rd q) estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 (100–150) vs. 100 (100–150) ml; p = 0.834), Clavien–Dindo (CD) ≥ 2 complications (3% vs. 4%; p = 0.498), and social continence at 3 months (73.7% vs. 74.7%; p = 0.353). In multiple analyses, no associations were found between surgical outcomes (PSM, length of PSM, operative time, EBL, length of catheterization, length of hospital stay, social continence at three months after surgery, and CD ≥ 2 complications) and the robotic platform. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that Hugo^TM RAS enables surgeons to safely and effectively transfer the level of proficiency they reached during their previous experience with the daVinci systems.

Background/Objectives: to assess surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed using the novel Hugo™ RAS system. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. Eligible papers included studies involving adult males undergoing RARP with the Hugo™ RAS platform, with at least ten patients analyzed. The pooled analysis was performed using a random-effect model. Results: Quantitative analysis was conducted on 12 studies including 579 patients. The pooled median docking time, console time, and operative time were 11 min (95% CI 7.95–14.50; I² = 98.4%, ten studies), 142 min (95% CI 119.74–164.68; I² = 96.5%, seven studies), and 176 min (95% CI 148.33–203.76; I² = 96.3%, seven studies), respectively. The pooled median estimated blood loss was 223 mL (95% CI 166.75–280.17; I² = 96.5%, eleven studies). The pooled median length of hospital stay and time to catheter removal were 2.8 days (95% CI 1.67–3.89; I² = 100%, ten studies) and 8.3 days (95% CI 5.53–11.09; I² = 100%, eight studies), respectively. The pooled rate of postoperative CD ≥ 2 complications was 4.1% (95% CI 1–8.5; I² = 63.6%, eleven studies). The pooled rate of positive surgical margins and undetectable postoperative PSA were 20% (95% CI 12.6–28.5; I² = 71.5%, nine studies) and 94.2% (95% CI 87.7–98.6; I² = 48.9%, three studies), respectively. At three months, a pooled rate of social continence of 81.9% (95% CI 73.8–88.9; I² = 66.7%, seven studies) was found. Erectile function at six months was 31% in one study. Conclusions: despite the preliminary nature of the evidence, this systematic review and pooled analysis underscores the feasibility, safety, and reproducibility of the Hugo™ RAS system in the context of RARP.