Daniel Jose García-Domínguez

The dysregulation of immune homeostasis and the persistence of chronic, low-grade inflammation represent core pathophysiological drivers governing the onset and progression of metabolic and cardiovascular disorders. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) comprise a highly heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells that are rapidly mobilized from the bone marrow in response to biological stressors, such as sustained tissue injury and chronic inflammatory signaling. Historically evaluated within oncology and infectious disease frameworks, accumulating evidence highlights the pivotal, context-dependent roles of MDSCs in cardiometabolic environments. In conditions of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D), MDSCs undergo substantial expansion and accumulation within peripheral tissues, including adipose tissue and the liver. Functionally, MDSCs act as dynamic immunoregulators that can either buffer metabolic inflammation, via the secretion of interleukin-10 (IL-10), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), and nitric oxide (NO) or, conversely, reflect and exacerbate disease progression depending on specific cellular subsets, glycemic control, and tissue localization. Within the vascular system, specific monocytic MDSC subsets demonstrate significant atheroprotective and cardioprotective capabilities by dampening Th1/Th17-mediated arterial wall inflammation, stabilizing atherosclerotic plaques, and preserving cardiac structural architecture during heart failure. However, phenotypic and functional heterogeneity poses a critical clinical challenge, as certain persistent or altered subsets correlate with heightened cardiovascular risk and adverse cerebrovascular outcomes. This review delivers a comprehensive synthesis of contemporary insights into MDSC biology at the intersection of obesity-associated diabetes and cardiovascular disease, characterizing their dualistic mechanisms, distinguishing preclinical causal mechanisms from human observational data. Moreover, we have established a comprehensive framework to reconcile the conflicting protective versus detrimental effects of MDSCs. And finally, we have also evaluated their potential clinical utility as candidate biomarkers, delineating the safety imperatives essential for translating MDSC-targeted therapeutic interventions into clinical practice.

Drug resistance is an ill-defined cause of dismal outcomes in cancer. Ewing sarcoma (EwS), a pediatric cancer characterized by high therapy failure rates, is driven by a single oncogenic event generating EWSR1::ETS gene fusions (primarily EWSR1::FLI1) in a silent genomic background. This provides a straightforward model to study the impact of gene fusions on drug responses. Here, we describe a novel mechanism of sensitivity to DNA topoisomerase 1 poisons in EwS. We discovered that EWS::FLI1 prevents the resolution of R-loops induced by these drugs via sequestering DHX9 helicase, ultimately resulting in R-loop accumulation, replication stress, and genome instability. In turn, excessive DHX9 or reduced EWS::FLI1 levels render EwS cells resistant to the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN-38) independent of proliferation and global transcription rates. This resistance helps explain how elevated DHX9 levels predict worse clinical outcomes. Overall, our research demonstrates the impact of a dominant mutation on cancer drug sensitivity, highlighting its significant clinical implications.

Cancer is a complex disease that, despite advances in treatment and the greater understanding of the tumor biology until today, continues to be a prevalent and lethal disease. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery are the conventional treatments, which have increased the survival for cancer patients. However, the complexity of this disease together with the persistent problems due to tumor progression and recurrence, drug resistance, or side effects of therapy make it necessary to explore new strategies that address the challenges to obtain a positive response. One important point is that tumor cells can interact with the microenvironment, promoting proliferation, dissemination, and immune evasion. Therefore, immunotherapy has emerged as a novel therapy based on the modulation of the immune system for combating cancer, as reflected in the promising results both in preclinical studies and clinical trials obtained. In order to enhance the immune response, the combination of immunotherapy with nanoparticles has been conducted, improving the access of immune cells to the tumor, antigen presentation, as well as the induction of persistent immune responses. Therefore, nanomedicine holds an enormous potential to enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Here, we review the most recent advances in specific molecular and cellular immunotherapy and in nano-immunotherapy against cancer in the light of the latest published preclinical studies and clinical trials.

Supplementary Data from Lenalidomide plus R-GDP (R2-GDP) in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the R2-GDP-GOTEL Trial and Immune Biomarker Subanalysis

Supplementary Data from Lenalidomide plus R-GDP (R2-GDP) in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the R2-GDP-GOTEL Trial and Immune Biomarker Subanalysis

Supplementary Table from Lenalidomide plus R-GDP (R2-GDP) in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the R2-GDP-GOTEL Trial and Immune Biomarker Subanalysis

Purpose:New therapeutic options are needed in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). Lenalidomide-based schedules can reverse rituximab refractoriness in lymphoma.Patients and Methods:In the phase II R2-GDP trial, 78 patients unsuitable for autologous stem cell transplant received treatment with the following schedule: lenalidomide 10 mg Days (D)1–14, rituximab 375 mg/m2 D1, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 D1, gemcitabine 750 mg/m2 D1 and D8, and dexamethasone 20 mg D1–3, up to 6 cycles (induction phase), followed by lenalidomide 10 mg (or last lenalidomide dose received) D1–21 every 28 days (maintenance phase). Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and monitorization of key circulating immune biomarkers (EU Clinical Trials Register number: EudraCT 2014-001620-29).Results:After a median follow-up of 37 months, ORR was 60.2% [37.1% complete responses (CR) and 23.1% partial responses (PR)]. Median OS was 12 months (47 vs. 6 months in CR vs. no CR); median PFS was 9 months (34 vs. 5 months in CR vs. no CR). In the primary refractory population, ORR was 45.5% (21.2% CR and 24.3% PR). Most common grade 3–4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (60.2%), neutropenia (60.2%), anemia (26.9%), infections (15.3%), and febrile neutropenia (14.1%). Complete responses were associated with a sharp decrease in circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells.Conclusions:R2-GDP schedule is feasible and highly active in R/R DLBCL, including the primary refractory population. Immune biomarkers showed differences in responders versus progressors.

Supplementary Table from Lenalidomide plus R-GDP (R2-GDP) in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the R2-GDP-GOTEL Trial and Immune Biomarker Subanalysis

Purpose:New therapeutic options are needed in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). Lenalidomide-based schedules can reverse rituximab refractoriness in lymphoma.Patients and Methods:In the phase II R2-GDP trial, 78 patients unsuitable for autologous stem cell transplant received treatment with the following schedule: lenalidomide 10 mg Days (D)1–14, rituximab 375 mg/m2 D1, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 D1, gemcitabine 750 mg/m2 D1 and D8, and dexamethasone 20 mg D1–3, up to 6 cycles (induction phase), followed by lenalidomide 10 mg (or last lenalidomide dose received) D1–21 every 28 days (maintenance phase). Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and monitorization of key circulating immune biomarkers (EU Clinical Trials Register number: EudraCT 2014-001620-29).Results:After a median follow-up of 37 months, ORR was 60.2% [37.1% complete responses (CR) and 23.1% partial responses (PR)]. Median OS was 12 months (47 vs. 6 months in CR vs. no CR); median PFS was 9 months (34 vs. 5 months in CR vs. no CR). In the primary refractory population, ORR was 45.5% (21.2% CR and 24.3% PR). Most common grade 3–4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (60.2%), neutropenia (60.2%), anemia (26.9%), infections (15.3%), and febrile neutropenia (14.1%). Complete responses were associated with a sharp decrease in circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells.Conclusions:R2-GDP schedule is feasible and highly active in R/R DLBCL, including the primary refractory population. Immune biomarkers showed differences in responders versus progressors.

Breast cancer (BC) continues to be the most diagnosed tumor in women and a very heterogeneous disease both inter- and intratumoral, mainly given by the variety of molecular profiles with different biological and clinical characteristics. Despite the advancements in early detection and therapeutic strategies, the survival rate is low in patients who develop metastatic disease. Therefore, it is mandatory to explore new approaches to achieve better responses. In this regard, immunotherapy arose as a promising alternative to conventional treatments due to its ability to modulate the immune system, which may play a dual role in this disease since the relationship between the immune system and BC cells depends on several factors: the tumor histology and size, as well as the involvement of lymph nodes, immune cells, and molecules that are part of the tumor microenvironment. Particularly, myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) expansion is one of the major immunosuppressive mechanisms used by breast tumors since it has been associated with worse clinical stage, metastatic burden, and poor efficacy of immunotherapies. This review focuses on the new immunotherapies in BC in the last five years. Additionally, the role of MDSC as a therapeutic target in breast cancer will be described.