Alyssa R. Palmer

Young children are overrepresented among people who lose housing in the United States, and the stressors of housing loss pose both direct and indirect threats to their development. Furthermore, children experiencing housing loss have often faced many other adversities, such as racism and exposure to neighborhood-level risks. At the same time, many go on to meet developmental milestones, including positive socioemotional adjustment. This study used a developmental resilience science lens to document psychosocial adjustment (measured via the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) of young children in an emergency shelter in a U.S. city and identify environmental factors associated with this positive outcome. Participants were 125 caregivers (M = 31.61 years old, SD = 8.12; 84.0% biological mothers) and their children (M = 5.29 years old, SD = 0.86; 61.6% Black, 20.8% bi/multiracial, 9.6% Native American, 4.8% White). In the shelter setting, caregivers completed surveys and structured interaction tasks with children. Hierarchical linear regression was used. Parenting quality and lower cumulative adversity were associated with better child psychosocial adjustment, but no interaction effect was observed between the two. Access to community resources (environmental safety and daycare/preschool enrollment) did not relate to psychosocial adjustment. These findings support growing evidence that parenting protects development amid housing loss and related risks and that housing instability can disrupt community-level resilience resources, increasing the relative importance of proximal protections like parenting. Strengthening caregivers' functioning while maintaining children's access to community resources can protect child well-being amid housing loss. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

COVID-19 disrupted early reading development, especially for under-resourced students. Few studies have evaluated early reading skill recovery after the return to in-person instruction. This study tracked reading achievement among 236,701 kindergarten through second-grade students from the academic year 2019–2020 to 2023–2024 (48.7% female; 69.8% Latine). Children had lower reading performance and less growth during remote instruction (2020–2021) compared with the pre-COVID cohort. Reading scores improved once in-person learning resumed. Kindergarten students who experienced remote instruction during COVID-19 demonstrated reading achievement recovery by the second grade. We also assessed if increased school-level (N = 467) support services were related to reading skill growth. Results demonstrated that early reading skill recovery is possible after mass disruptions.

Although the significance of teacher-student relationships for children's development has long been of interest to developmental scientists, few prior studies have used modeling approaches that explicitly document the intraindividual, dynamic processes that link teacher-student relationships with children's adjustment. The present study used bias-adjusted Student-Teacher Relationship Scale (Pianta, 2001) scores to document the within-person developmental processes that link teacher-student relationship quality with key developmental outcomes (including social competence, academic competence, and externalizing and internalizing symptoms) from kindergarten through Grade 6. Data were drawn from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (N = 1,041; 80.4% White, 12.9% Black, 6.1% Hispanic; 31.5% of mothers had a high school diploma or less). Within- and between-person bivariate associations were estimated using a series of latent curve models with structured residuals. Findings revealed consistent within-year associations with both school and home adjustment. Longitudinal findings suggested that within-person variations in teacher-student relationship quality are associated with subsequent academic functioning and externalizing symptoms. Furthermore, analyses suggested that social competence, academic competence, and externalizing symptoms are associated with subsequent teacher-student relationship quality. Results highlight the dynamic, bidirectional interactions between teacher-student relationships and children's social, academic, and behavioral trajectories over time. Future studies are needed to explore teacher-student relationships and adjustment at different timescales and to understand the extent to which teacher-student relationships are impactful for different students at various levels of developmental risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Research suggests there are differences in children's internalizing and externalizing symptoms as a function of age, race, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES). Males, Black children, and children experiencing lower SES have been rated as having more externalizing problems. Female and older children have been rated as having higher internalizing symptoms. The validity of these findings rests on the assumption that the measures mean the same thing across groups and developmental time (i.e., measurement invariance [MI]). Without assuring MI, results may represent differences in measurement and not true differences in the underlying construct. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used tool to measure internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Papers have evaluated MI of the SDQ in school-aged children. However, to our knowledge, no studies of young children have examined MI across Black and White families from diverse SES backgrounds. Data from the Family Life Project were used to evaluate MI of the SDQ across child age (35 to 90 months), race, sex, and SES. Using moderated nonlinear factor analysis (MNLFA), multiple SDQ items demonstrated measurement noninvariance as a function of child demographic variables. Results suggest that it is important to test and adjust for noninvariance with the SDQ when applied to early childhood populations comprising Black and White children from diverse SES backgrounds. An MNLFA approach improves our ability to validly measure and compare symptoms of psychopathology in diverse early childhood populations. This could have implications for our understanding of rates of mental health challenges and treatment in early childhood. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Research suggests there are differences in children’s internalizing and externalizing symptoms as a function of age, race, sex, and socio-economic status (SES). Males, Black children, and children experiencing lower SES have been rated as having more externalizing problems. Female and older children have been rated as having higher internalizing symptoms. The validity of these findings rests on the assumption that the measures mean the same thing across groups and developmental time (i.e., Measurement Invariance; MI). Without assuring MI, results may represent differences in measurement and not true differences in the underlying construct. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used tool to measure internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Papers have evaluated MI of the SDQ in school-aged children. However, to our knowledge, no studies of young children have examined MI across Black and White families from diverse SES backgrounds. Data from the Family Life Project were used to evaluate MI of the SDQ across child age (35 to 90 months), race, sex, and SES. Using moderated non-linear factor analysis (MNLFA), multiple SDQ items demonstrated measurement non-invariance as a function of child demographic variables. Results suggest that it is important to test and adjust for non-invariance with the SDQ when applied to early-childhood populations comprising Black and White children from diverse SES backgrounds. An MNLFA approach improves our ability to validly measure and compare symptoms of psychopathology in diverse early childhood populations. This could have implications for our understanding of rates of mental health challenges and treatment in early childhood.

Early childhood executive functioning (EF) predicts later adjustment and academic achievement. However, measuring EF consistently and efficiently across settings in early childhood can be challenging. Most researchers use task-based measures of EF, but these methods present practical challenges that impede implementation in some settings. The current study of 380 3-5-year-old children in the United States evaluated the psychometric properties of a new 14-item parent-reported measure of EF in a diverse urban school district. This questionnaire aimed to capture a normative range of EF skills in ecologically valid contexts. There was evidence for two specific subscales - one that measures children's EF challenges and another that measures children's EF skills. Results suggested that several items demonstrated differential item functioning by age and race. After adjusting for measurement differences across demographic groups and controlling for age at screening, the EF challenges subscale was more strongly related to task-based measures of EF than was the EF skills subscale. EF challenges predicted third-grade math achievement, controlling for demographic variables and a performance-based measure of children's early cognitive and academic skills. Results suggest that this parent report of EF could be a useful and effective early childhood screening tool.