DLDeborah E. Linares

Deborah E. Linares

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Deborah E. Linares has a total of 44 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    A Critical Review on the Complex Interplay between Social Determinants of Health and Maternal and Infant Mortality

    by Rada K. Dagher, Deborah E. Linares

    Background: U.S. maternal and infant mortality rates constitute an important public health problem, because these rates surpass those in developed countries and are characterized by stark disparities for racial/ethnic minorities, rural residents, and individuals with less privileged socioeconomic status due to social determinants of health (SDoH). Methods: A critical review of the maternal and infant mortality literature was performed to determine multilevel SDoH factors leading to mortality disparities with a life course lens. Results: Black mothers and infants fared the worst in terms of mortality rates, likely due to the accumulation of SDoH experienced as a result of structural racism across the life course. Upstream SDoH are important contributors to disparities in maternal and infant mortality. More research is needed on the effectiveness of continuous quality improvement initiatives for the maternal–infant dyad, and expanding programs such as paid maternity leave, quality, stable and affordable housing, and social safety-nets (Medicaid, CHIP, WIC), in reducing maternal and infant mortality. Finally, it is important to address research gaps in individual, interpersonal, community, and societal factors, because they affect maternal and infant mortality and related disparities. Conclusion: Key SDoH at multiple levels affect maternal and infant health. These SDoH shape and perpetuate disparities across the lifespan and are implicated in maternal and infant mortality disparities.


  • Lifecourse factors associated with flourishing among US children aged 1–5 years

    by Deborah E. Linares, Veni Kandasamy, Catherine J. Vladutiu

    Aim: This study aimed to examine the association between lifecourse factors and flourishing among children ages 1–5 years.Study design: Using data from the combined 2016 and 2017 National Survey of Children's Health (N = 18 007 children aged 1–5 years), flourishing was defined as parent‐reported child's affection, resilience, curiosity about learning, and affect. Multivariable logistic regression modelled the associations between lifecourse factors and flourishing. These factors were identified according to the lifecourse health development model.Results: Approximately 63% of children aged 1–5 years were flourishing. Children who were female (vs. male, adjusted prevalence ratio [APR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00–1.11), White, non‐Hispanic (vs. Black, non‐Hispanic, APR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01–1.26), not having a special health care need (vs. special health care need, APR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03–1.26), not having an emotional, developmental or behavioural disorder (EBD) (vs. EBD, APR: 1.66, 95% CI:1.23–2.10), spoke English at home (vs. other language, APR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06–1.54), parents received emotional social support (vs. no emotional social support, APR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01–1.21) and who lived in a supportive neighbourhood (vs. not in supportive neighbourhood, APR: 1.12, 95% CI:1.05–1.18) were more likely to flourish. Children from households within 0%–99% of the federal poverty level (APR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79–0.98) were less likely to be flourishing compared with their counterparts from households within 400% of the federal poverty level.Conclusions: Findings indicate that several lifecourse factors are associated with young children's flourishing, including being female, White, non‐Hispanic, not having a special health care need or EBD, English as a primary language, parents receiving emotional social support, having neighbourhood support and a lower household income. Our findings promote the continuation of programmes supporting diverse and low‐income children's families and communities such as home visiting and Head Start, which provide avenues for bolstering children's health and development across the lifespan.


  • Open Access

    Disrupted Care Continuity: Testing Associations between Social Networks and Transition Success for Children with Autism

    by Elizabeth McGhee Hassrick, Wendy Shih, Heather J. Nuske, Sarah F. Vejnoska, Samantha Hochheimer, Deborah E. Linares, Jonas Ventimiglia, Kathleen M. Carley, Aubyn C. Stahmer, Tristram Smith, et al.

    Children with autism situated in lower income families often receive intensive educational interventions as their primary form of treatment, due to financial barriers for community interventions. However, the continuity of care can be disrupted by school transitions. The quality of social relationships during the transition to a new school among parents, school staff and community providers, called the team-around-the-child (TAC), can potentially buffer a child with autism from the adverse effects caused by care disruptions. Qualities of social relationships, including trust and collaborative problem solving, can be measured using social network analysis. This study investigates if two different types of TAC relationships, defined as (1) the level of trust among team members and (2) the degree of collaborative problem solving among team members, are associated with perceived successful transitions for children with autism from lower income families. Findings suggested that TAC trust is significantly associated with the outcome of transition success for children with autism immediately post-transition.


  • Open Access

    The Interwoven Nature of Medical and Social Complexity in US Children

    by Jay G. Berry, Debbi Harris, Ryan J. Coller, Paul J. Chung, Jonathan Rodean, Michelle Macy, Deborah E. Linares

    This cross-sectional study uses data from the 2017 National Survey of Children’s Health to assess whether social challenges increase with higher medical conditi


  • Social Determinants of Health Associated with Mental Health Among U.S. Mothers with Children Aged 0–5 Years

    by Deborah E. Linares, Romuladus E. Azuine, Gopal K. Singh

    Background: Maternal mental illness is a significant public health problem during the perinatal period and beyond. Little is known about how social determinants of health (SDOH) affect maternal mental health. Materials and Methods: We used cross-sectional data from the 2016 to 2017 National Survey of Children's Health with 19,127 mothers of a nationally representative sample of U.S. children aged 0–5. We estimated the prevalence of poor reported mental health (reported as “fair”/“poor”) among mothers with children aged 0–5 by SDOH. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with poor maternal mental health. Results: Approximately 4.5% of mothers with children aged 0–5 reported having poor mental health in 2016–2017. Postadjustment and mothers' poor mental health were significantly associated with age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 18–20 years: 2.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35–5.67; 21–24 years AOR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.22–3.73, and 30–34 years AOR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.13–3.43), U.S.-born status (AOR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.48–3.63), poor physical health (AOR: 8.69, 95% CI: 5.81–13.02), having a child with a special health care need (AOR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.03–2.64), experiencing food insecurity (afford enough food, yet, unhealthy [AOR: 2.74, 95% CI: 1.59–4.70] and sometimes/often not afford enough food [AOR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.76–5.84]), and low social capital (AOR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.04–3.73). Conclusion: Mothers with children aged 0–5 who had poor physical health and experienced food insecurity were at the greatest risk for poor mental health. Integrated perinatal and behavioral health models, screening, and referrals may help identify and treat mothers experiencing these issues.


  • Maternal and Child Health Bureau’s Autism Research Program

    by Jessica N. DiBari, Romuladus E. Azuine, Deborah E. Linares, Imelda Rocha, Hae Young Park, Lauren Raskin Ramos, Michael D. Kogan, Laura Kavanagh

    OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview and quantitatively demonstrate the reach of the Health Resources and Services Administration’s Maternal and Child Health Bureau autism research program. METHODS: We reviewed program reports and internal data from 59 autism research grantees. The US federal Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee’s strategic plan questions were used as a framework to highlight the contributions of the autism research program in advancing the field. RESULTS: The autism research program grantees advance research in several ways. Grantees have strengthened the evidence for autism interventions by conducting 89 studies at 79 distinct research sites. A total of 212 708 participants have enrolled in autism research program studies and 361 researchers have contributed to furthering autism research. The program addresses topics that align with the majority of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee’s priority topic areas, including advancements in treatments and interventions, services and supports, and identifying risk factors. Grantee products include 387 peer-reviewed publications, 19 tools, and 13 practice guidelines for improving care and intervention practices. CONCLUSIONS: The autism research program has contributed to medical advances in research, leveraged innovative training platforms to provide specialized training, and provided access to health services through research-based screening and diagnostic procedures. Autism research program studies have contributed to the development of evidence-based practice guidelines, informed policy guidelines, and quality improvement efforts to bolster advancements in the field. Although disparities still exist, the Health Resources and Services Administration’s Maternal and Child Health Bureau can reduce gaps in screening and diagnosis by targeting interventions to underserved populations including minority and rural communities.


  • Variation in Hospitalization Rates Following Emergency Department Visits in Children with Medical Complexity

    by Ryan J. Coller, Jonathan Rodean, Deborah E. Linares, Paul J. Chung, Christian Pulcini, Matt Hall, Elizabeth Alpern, Ricardo Mosquera, Elizabeth Casto, Jay G. Berry


  • Using a Mixed-Methods RE-AIM Framework to Evaluate Community Health Programs for Older Latinas

    by Andiara Schwingel, Patricia Gálvez, Deborah Linares, Emerson Sebastião

    Objective: This study used the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework to evaluate a promotora -led community health program designed for Latinas ages 50 and older that sought to improve physical activity, nutrition, and stress management. Method: A mixed-methods evaluation approach was administered at participant and organizational levels with a focus on the efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance components of the RE-AIM theoretical model. Results: The program was shown to be effective at improving participants’ eating behaviors, increasing their physical activity levels, and lowering their depressive symptoms. Promotoras felt motivated and sufficiently prepared to deliver the program. Some implementation challenges were reported. More child care opportunities and an increased focus on mental well-being were suggested. Discussion: The promotora delivery model has promise for program sustainability with both promotoras and participants alike expressing interest in leading future programs.


  • Developing a Culturally Sensitive Lifestyle Behavior Change Program for Older Latinas

    by Andiara Schwingel, Deborah E. Linares, Patricia Gálvez, Brynn Adamson, Liliana Aguayo, Julie Bobitt, Yvette Castañeda, Emerson Sebastião, David X. Marquez

    Despite the burgeoning U.S. Latino population and their increased risk of chronic disease, little emphasis had been placed on developing culturally sensitive lifestyle interventions in this area. This article examines older Latinas’ sociocultural context relative to health with the goal of developing a culturally sensitive health behavior intervention. Photo-elicitation indicated two emerging themes that influenced lifestyle choices: family caregiving and religion. Researchers partnered with a faith-based organization to develop and implement a 6-month lifestyle intervention for Latinas ages 50 and older: Abuelas en Acción (AEA). At completion, interviews were conducted to understand women’s experiences and the influence AEA had on their lifestyles and health. Findings suggest that religious content empowered and deeply affected women; however, the intergenerational content presented significant challenges for instruction, retention, and implementation. We discuss findings in relation to the health intervention literature and provide suggestions for future interventions drawing on religion, family, and health behavior change.