Elena Tenti

Objective: Mitral valve repair failure encompasses heterogeneous anatomical patterns requiring redo surgery, yet the factors determining why repaired valves fail through different mechanisms remain poorly understood. We investigated the association of patient characteristics and index repair features with the anatomical mechanisms of failure among patients requiring redo surgery after degenerative mitral valve repair. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients undergoing redo mitral valve surgery after previous degenerative mitral valve repair between January 2010 and June 2026. To minimize misclassification bias, only patients with complete operative documentation of the index repair and detailed intraoperative information regarding the mechanism of repair failure were included. Operative reports were reviewed to identify the reconstructive techniques used during the initial repair and the anatomical mechanism of failure at reoperation. To account for mutually exclusive clinical outcomes (prolapse recurrence and mitral stenosis), a competing-risks framework was employed. Results: A total of 121 patients constituted the study cohort. Recurrent leaflet prolapse was the most frequent mechanism of repair failure (71.6%) among patients with mitral regurgitation; mitral stenosis was present in 27.3% overall. Leaflet preservation versus resection, implantation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) neochordae, edge-to-edge repair, and annuloplasty ring size were not significantly associated with the anatomical mechanism of repair failure. In multivariable analysis, older age at the index operation was independently associated with recurrent prolapse, whereas younger age and female sex independently predicted the development of mitral stenosis. Within this redo cohort, no statistically significant association was observed between the recorded index repair features and the predominant anatomical mechanisms of failure after adjustment for patient characteristics. Conclusions: Among patients requiring redo surgery after degenerative mitral valve repair, the anatomical mechanisms of failure were associated with selected patient characteristics, whereas no significant association was observed with the recorded index repair features. These findings should be interpreted within the context of a selected redo population and do not support conclusions regarding the comparative durability of different repair strategies.

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is characterized by marked heterogeneity in microbiological etiology, clinical presentation, valvular involvement, and patient complexity, which complicates risk stratification. Unsupervised machine learning has been proposed to identify latent clinical phenotypes in complex diseases; however, whether IE exhibits a natural cluster structure remains unclear. Methods: In a cohort of 739 patients undergoing surgery for IE, unsupervised clustering was performed using K-medoids based on Gower distance to account for mixed-type variables, which is a common scenario in clinical settings. The optimal number of clusters was selected by maximizing the average silhouette width and the gap statistic. Density and semi-parametric algorithms (K-prototypes, KAMILA, hierarchical clustering, and HDBSCAN) were applied as a sensitivity analysis. Differences in postoperative outcomes across clusters were explored using logistic regression. Results: K-medoids clustering identified three patient groups; however, the average silhouette width was low (0.129), indicating very weak separation between clusters. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the absence of a natural cluster structure. Despite this, a descriptive comparison of forced clusters revealed a gradient of clinical severity, with one group characterized by older age, higher comorbidity burden, complex infection features, and worse postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: Unsupervised clustering did not identify natural clinical phenotypes in surgically treated IE, likely reflecting the extreme intrinsic heterogeneity of the disease. Although forced clustering highlighted clinically interpretable gradients of risk, these groups should not be considered true latent phenotypes. Alternative approaches, such as continuous risk modeling, may be more appropriate for patient stratification in IE.

Background: Reintervention after mitral valve repair represents a relevant clinical challenge, yet the mechanisms and timing of repair failure remain incompletely defined. Understanding how the interval between index repair and reoperation affects failure mechanisms and the feasibility of repeat repair may help refine surgical strategies. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 194 patients undergoing repeat mitral valve surgery between 2010 and 2025 after prior repair. Median age was 70 years and 61.3% were male. Patients were stratified by time to reoperation: 0–5 years (n = 91), 6–10 years (n = 42), and >10 years (n = 61). Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 58%, atrial fibrillation prevalence 32.5%, minimally invasive approach 21.6%, and EuroSCORE II 4.8%. Results: Baseline characteristics and operative risk were comparable across groups. However, mechanisms of repair failure differed significantly. Early failures were more commonly due to recurrent leaflet prolapse (47.8%), whereas late failures showed a higher incidence of mitral stenosis (63.9%). The rate of repeat mitral repair decreased over time, being higher in early failures compared with intermediate and late failures (17.6% vs. 14.3% vs. 8.2%). Conclusions: Timing of mitral repair failure is associated with distinct mechanisms and influences surgical management. Early failures are more frequently related to prolapse recurrence and are more amenable to re-repair, whereas late failures are characterized by structural degeneration and more often require valve replacement.

Background: The minimally invasive approach is increasingly recognized as the standard for surgical management of mitral valve disease. Advances in endoscopic visualization and surgical instrumentation have enhanced precision while minimizing trauma, improving both functional and esthetic outcomes. This study presents a single-center experience with total endoscopic mitral valve repair (MVR) performed using two- or three-dimensional video-assisted technology. Methods: Between October 2022 and September 2025, 239 patients underwent total endoscopic MVR at our institution. Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Results: Median age was 63 years, with 64.4% male. Median logistic EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II were 2.53 and 0.83, respectively. Most patients were NYHA class II (54.4%), and 47.7% had pulmonary hypertension. Mitral annuloplasty was performed in 99.2% of cases; 78.6% received Gore-Tex chordae, 6.3% underwent posterior leaflet resection, and 11.7% edge-to-edge repair. Conversion to sternotomy occurred in 0.4%. In-hospital mortality was 1.3%; stroke occurred in 0.4%. Postoperative atrial fibrillation developed in 26.8%, while major complications such as sepsis (2.1%) and renal failure requiring dialysis (1.3%) were infrequent. Median ventilation time was 5 h, ICU stay was 2 days, and hospital stay was 7 days. Pre-discharge echocardiography showed ≤mild regurgitation in 99.2%. Conclusions: Total endoscopic MVR using two- or three-dimensional video assistance is safe, feasible, and yields excellent clinical, functional, and cosmetic results, with low morbidity and rapid recovery.

Background and Objectives: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains a life-threatening condition requiring prompt surgical management. Over the last decades, improvements in diagnosis, surgical techniques, and perioperative care have influenced patient characteristics and outcomes. This study analyzes temporal trends in the clinical profiles and results of patients surgically treated for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) in a Northern Italian region over a fifteen-year period. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing emergency surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection or acute intramural hematoma (IMH) between January 2010 and December 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with chronic penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer or traumatic etiology were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative variables were analyzed to assess temporal changes. Trends were evaluated using linear regression and Cochran–Armitage tests for trend. Results: A total of 427 patients underwent surgery for AAD during the study period. The proportion of patients presenting with preoperative intubation significantly decreased over time (p for trend < 0.05), as did the incidence of preoperative shock (p for trend < 0.001). Conversely, the mean EuroSCORE showed a non-significant increase over the years. No significant differences were observed in age or other baseline parameters. A non-significant but progressive increase in female representation was observed over time (p = 0.064). Given this observation, a sex-based subanalysis was performed: women were significantly older (p < 0.001) and presented with higher EuroSCORE values (p < 0.001) compared to men, yet postoperative mortality was similar between sexes. This finding contrasts with recent reports suggesting worse outcomes among female patients. Conclusions: Over fifteen years, patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection have shown decreasing rates of preoperative critical conditions, reflecting earlier diagnosis and improved management. Despite higher operative risk scores, women demonstrated comparable short-term survival to men within our regional program. Multivariable analysis showed that sex was dependently associated with in-hospital mortality.

The evolution of decentralized clinical trials, driven by advanced digital technologies, is transforming traditional clinical research. It introduces innovative methods for informed consent, remote patient monitoring, and data analysis, enhancing study efficiency, validity, and participation while reducing patient burden. Some clinical procedures can be conducted remotely, increasing trial accessibility and reducing population selection biases, particularly for cardiovascular patients. However, this also presents complex regulatory and ethical challenges. The article explores how digital platforms and emerging technologies like block chain, AI, and advanced cryptography can promote traceability, security, and transparency throughout the trial process, ensuring participant identification and documentation of each procedural step. Clear, legally compliant informed consent, often managed through electronic systems, both for research participation and data management in line with GDPR, is essential. Ethical considerations include ensuring participants understand trial information, with adaptations such as simplified language, visual aids, and multilingual support. The transnational nature of decentralized trials highlights the need for coordinated regulatory standards to overcome jurisdictional barriers and reinforce accountability. This framework promotes trust, shared responsibility, and the protection of participants rights while upholding high ethical standards in scientific research.

Background: Right anterior mini-thoracotomy has gained increasing popularity as a preferred approach for mitral valve surgery due to its numerous advantages. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique in elderly patients. Methods: Between January 2010 and November 2024, a total of 4092 adult patients underwent mitral valve repair or replacement at our institution. Of these, 1687 patients were treated using a minimally invasive approach. This analysis focuses on elderly patients aged 75 years and older (n = 402), further subdivided into two groups: 75–79 years (n = 253) and 80 years and older (n = 149). Results: The study population comprised 49.8% male patients. A small percentage (1.7%) had a history of endocarditis, and 6.5% had undergone prior cardiac surgery. The median logistic EuroSCORE was 7.68 (IQR 5.83–11.00), and the median EuroSCORE II was 2.75 (1.71, 4.40). Alternative cannulation strategies, guided by AngioCT scans, can expand the applicability of this technique to patients unsuitable for femoral cannulation. Median durations for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamping were 99.5 and 80.0 min, respectively. Median ventilation time was 7 h, and the median ICU stay was 2 days. Atrial fibrillation was the most common postoperative complication (20.9%). A significant proportion of patients (47.8%) required blood transfusions, and 3.0% needed re-exploration for bleeding. The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.7%, with 7 (1.7%) patients requiring postoperative dialysis and 5 (1.2%) experiencing sepsis and multiple organ failure. Patients aged 80 years and older exhibited worse renal function and higher EuroSCOREs compared to the younger group (p < 0.001). However, they had shorter CPB (p = 0.004) and cross-clamp times (p = 0.001) and underwent a higher proportion of valve replacements (p = 0.003). Rates of major complications and in-hospital mortality were comparable between the two age groups. Logistic regression analysis identified the logistic EuroSCORE as the only significant preoperative risk factor (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Right anterior minithoracotomy is a safe and reproducible surgical approach, even in elderly patients, promoting faster recovery with a lower risk of complications. Among patients aged >80 years, despite higher comorbidities and elevated EuroSCORE II, in-hospital outcomes are comparable to those aged 75–79 years.

Background: This study examines the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on outcomes after mitral valve surgery via right minithoracotomy, an approach that may reduce wound complications in obese patients. Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2024, 1773 adult patients underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery at our institution. They were categorized into three groups: normal weight (BMI < 25, n = 942), overweight (BMI 25–30, n = 661), and obese (BMI > 30, n = 170). Results: The three groups exhibited significant differences, with a higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes (p < 0.001) in overweight and obese patients. Further-more, they had a greater incidence of preoperative atrial fibrillation (p < 0.001), prior stroke (p = 0.023), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.002), and elevated preoperative creatinine levels (p < 0.001). and their euroscore II was significantly higher (p = 0.040). In-hospital mortality and major complications were similar across groups, except for drainage output in the first 24 h (p = 0.002) and ICU stay (p = 0.022), both resulting higher in the overweight and obese patients. We employed inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to create three well-matched groups. Following IPTW, postoperative outcomes remained comparable across groups. However, obese patients exhibited a higher incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (p = 0.037) and required pacemaker implantation more frequently (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that obesity does not increase the risk of mortality or major adverse events after minimally in-vasive mitral valve surgery. This approach may offer a less invasive alternative for obese patients, potentially reducing the risk of wound complications associated with conventional surgery.

Background: This study evaluates the outcomes of isolated mitral valve surgery for infective endocarditis performed via conventional full sternotomy or minimally invasive right minithoracotomy. While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is well-established for elective mitral procedures, its role in infective endocarditis remains less explored due to the complexity of the disease. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 134 patients who underwent isolated mitral valve surgery for infective endocarditis between January 2010 and March 2024 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: full sternotomy (n = 94) and MIS via right minithoracotomy (n = 40). Variables analyzed included preoperative characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes, such as mortality, complications, and hospital stay duration. Given significant baseline differences, inverse probability weighting was applied for comparability. Results: Mitral valve replacement was performed in 77% of cases. After adjustment, the MIS group demonstrated shorter intensive care unit stays (p = 0.018), with no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (p = 0.145) or total hospitalization length (p = 0.151). Conclusions: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is a safe and effective alternative to sternotomy in infective endocarditis, offering comparable outcomes with shorter ICU stays. Further research is needed to refine patient selection and validate these findings.

Background: The minimally invasive approach, performed via ministernotomy, is now often preferred for isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, its benefits in patients with prior cardiac surgery remain unclear. This article compares traditional and minimally invasive surgery for isolated aortic valve replacement in reoperative cases. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 382 patients who underwent reoperative AVR between January 2010 and June 2024 divided them into two groups: 309 patients (80.1%) had a traditional full sternotomy, while 73 patients (19.1%) had minimally invasive AVR via upper ministernotomy. Results: Significant differences were noted between the groups. The full sternotomy group had a higher logistic EuroSCORE (SMD = 0.203), more patients with active endocarditis (SMD = 0.312), and a higher pacemaker rate. To minimize bias, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used. The minimally invasive group had shorter aortic cross-clamp (50 vs. 65 min, p < 0.001) and cardiopulmonary bypass times (62 vs. 85 min, p < 0.001), shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stays (p < 0.001), lower rates of acute renal failure (p = 0.001), and less blood loss (p < 0.001), but similar transfusion needs. Early mortality was higher in the full sternotomy group (4.5% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.025). Conclusions: Minimally invasive aortic valve reoperation via upper “J” sternotomy is as safe as full sternotomy. Patients experienced lower rates of acute renal failure and less postoperative bleeding, contributing to a safer recovery with decreased hospital mortality.