Sandra Giovanna Salamanca-Pinzón
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Sandra Giovanna Salamanca-Pinzón has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Frederick Peter Guengerich
Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine
3 shared publications - Jesús Javier Espinosa-Aguirre
Institute of Biomedical Research, Third Exterior Circuit, National Autonomous University of Mexico. , University City, Mexico City, Mexico
2 shared publications - Rafael Camacho-Carranza
Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
2 shared publications S. L. Hernandez-Ojeda
Departamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70228, México, D.F. 04510, México
2 shared publicationsZhongmei Tang
2 shared publicationsB. A. Frontana-Uribe
Centro Conjunto de Investigación en Química Sustentable, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Kilómetro 14.5 carretera Toluca-Atlacomulco, Sn. Cayetano, 50200 Toluca Edo. de México, México
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 October 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Protein Expression and Purification
- Vol. 79 (2) , 231-236
A tricistronic human adrenodoxin reductase-adrenodoxin–cytochrome P450 27A1 vector system for substrate hydroxylation in Escherichia coli
- 1 October 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Protein Expression and Purification
- Vol. 79 (2) , 231-236
A tricistronic human adrenodoxin reductase-adrenodoxin–cytochrome P450 27A1 vector system for substrate hydroxylation in Escherichia coli
- 1 January 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics
- Vol. 1814 (1) , 139-145
Approaches to deorphanization of human and microbial cytochrome P450 enzymes
- 1 January 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics
- Vol. 1814 (1) , 139-145
Approaches to deorphanization of human and microbial cytochrome P450 enzymes
- 1 February 2010
- Published by Elsevier in Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
- Vol. 494 (1) , 86-93
Human cytochrome P450 4F11: Heterologous expression in bacteria, purification, and characterization of catalytic function
- 1 February 2010
- Published by Elsevier in Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
- Vol. 494 (1) , 86-93
Human cytochrome P450 4F11: Heterologous expression in bacteria, purification, and characterization of catalytic function
- Open Access
- 29 January 2010
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Mutagenesis
- Vol. 25 (3) , 249-255
Correlation of the genotoxic activation and kinetic properties of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium nitroreductases SnrA and cnr with the redox potentials of nitroaromatic compounds and quinones
Bacterial nitroreductases (NRs) catalyse the oxygen-insensitive reduction of several nitro-substituted compounds and quinones. SnrA and cnr NRs have been previously identified in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium; they reduce several environmental nitro compounds that display mutagenic activity in the Ames test. Although some of their biochemical properties have been reported, the substrate specificity of each protein over mutagenic nitro compounds is unknown; even more, the possible relationship between their capacity to activate nitro compounds into mutagens and the redox properties of putative substrates has been poorly investigated. We have purified SnrA and cnr and investigated their capacity to activate several mutagens in the Ames test as well as their kinetic parameters Km and Vmax. Our results show that SnrA and cnr are able to activate 2,7-dinitrofluorene with the same efficiency and a similar mutagenic potency in the YG7132 tester strain; 1-nitropyrene and 1,3-dinitropyrene were efficiently activated by cnr, whereas 1,8-dinitropyrene, 1,6-dinitropyrene and 2-nitrofluorene were scarcely activated by either NR. The mutagenic potency of nitro compounds obtained in the presence of either enzyme correlates with their redox potential reported in the literature. On the other hand, a good correlation was obtained between the catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km) of the purified cnr with the redox potential of eight molecules including nitro-substituted compounds and quinones. No correlation between redox potential and catalytic efficiency by SnrA was observed, suggesting that factors other than redox potential such as the structure of the compounds are involved in the catalytic efficiency of SnrA.
- 29 January 2010
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Mutagenesis
- Vol. 25 (3) , 249-255
Open AccessCorrelation of the genotoxic activation and kinetic properties of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium nitroreductases SnrA and cnr with the redox potentials of nitroaromatic compounds and quinones
Bacterial nitroreductases (NRs) catalyse the oxygen-insensitive reduction of several nitro-substituted compounds and quinones. SnrA and cnr NRs have been previously identified in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium; they reduce several environmental nitro compounds that display mutagenic activity in the Ames test. Although some of their biochemical properties have been reported, the substrate specificity of each protein over mutagenic nitro compounds is unknown; even more, the possible relationship between their capacity to activate nitro compounds into mutagens and the redox properties of putative substrates has been poorly investigated. We have purified SnrA and cnr and investigated their capacity to activate several mutagens in the Ames test as well as their kinetic parameters Km and Vmax. Our results show that SnrA and cnr are able to activate 2,7-dinitrofluorene with the same efficiency and a similar mutagenic potency in the YG7132 tester strain; 1-nitropyrene and 1,3-dinitropyrene were efficiently activated by cnr, whereas 1,8-dinitropyrene, 1,6-dinitropyrene and 2-nitrofluorene were scarcely activated by either NR. The mutagenic potency of nitro compounds obtained in the presence of either enzyme correlates with their redox potential reported in the literature. On the other hand, a good correlation was obtained between the catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km) of the purified cnr with the redox potential of eight molecules including nitro-substituted compounds and quinones. No correlation between redox potential and catalytic efficiency by SnrA was observed, suggesting that factors other than redox potential such as the structure of the compounds are involved in the catalytic efficiency of SnrA.
- 23 September 2006
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Mutagenesis
- Vol. 21 (6) , 369-374
Nitrocompound activation by cell-free extracts of nitroreductase-proficient Salmonella typhimurium strains
A characterization of nitrocompounds activation by cell-free extracts (CFE) of wild-type (AB+), SnrA deficient (B+), Cnr deficient (A+) and SnrA/Cnr deficient (AB−) Salmonella typhimurium strains has been done. The Ames mutagenicity test (S. typhimurium his+ reversion assay) was used, as well as nitroreductase (NR) activity determinations where the decrease in absorbance generated by nitrofurantoin (NFN) reduction and NADP(H) oxidation in the presence of NFN, nitrofurazone (NFZ), metronidazole (MTZ) and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO) were followed. Different aromatic and heterocyclic compounds were tested for mutagenic activation: 2-nitrofluorene (2-NF); 2,7-dinitrofluorene (2,7-DNF); 1-nitropyrene (1-NP), 1,3-dinitropyrene (1,3-DNP); 1,6-dinitropyrene (1,6-DNP); and 1,8-dinitropyrene (1,8-DNP). Differential mutagenicity was found with individual cell free extracts, being higher when the wild type or Cnr containing extract was used; nevertheless, depending on the nitrocompound, activation was found when either NR, SnrA or Cnr, were present. In addition, all nitrocompounds were more mutagenic after metabolic activation by CFE of NR proficient strains, although AB− extract still showed activation capacity. On the other hand, NR activity was predominantly catalyzed by wild type CFE followed by A+, B+ and AB− extracts in that order. We can conclude that results from the Ames test indicate that Cnr is the major NR, while NFN and NFZ reductions were predominantly catalyzed by SnrA. The characterization of the residual NR activity detected by the mutagenicity assay and the biochemical determinations in the AB− CFE needs further investigation.
- 23 September 2006
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Mutagenesis
- Vol. 21 (6) , 369-374
Nitrocompound activation by cell-free extracts of nitroreductase-proficient Salmonella typhimurium strains
A characterization of nitrocompounds activation by cell-free extracts (CFE) of wild-type (AB+), SnrA deficient (B+), Cnr deficient (A+) and SnrA/Cnr deficient (AB−) Salmonella typhimurium strains has been done. The Ames mutagenicity test (S. typhimurium his+ reversion assay) was used, as well as nitroreductase (NR) activity determinations where the decrease in absorbance generated by nitrofurantoin (NFN) reduction and NADP(H) oxidation in the presence of NFN, nitrofurazone (NFZ), metronidazole (MTZ) and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO) were followed. Different aromatic and heterocyclic compounds were tested for mutagenic activation: 2-nitrofluorene (2-NF); 2,7-dinitrofluorene (2,7-DNF); 1-nitropyrene (1-NP), 1,3-dinitropyrene (1,3-DNP); 1,6-dinitropyrene (1,6-DNP); and 1,8-dinitropyrene (1,8-DNP). Differential mutagenicity was found with individual cell free extracts, being higher when the wild type or Cnr containing extract was used; nevertheless, depending on the nitrocompound, activation was found when either NR, SnrA or Cnr, were present. In addition, all nitrocompounds were more mutagenic after metabolic activation by CFE of NR proficient strains, although AB− extract still showed activation capacity. On the other hand, NR activity was predominantly catalyzed by wild type CFE followed by A+, B+ and AB− extracts in that order. We can conclude that results from the Ames test indicate that Cnr is the major NR, while NFN and NFZ reductions were predominantly catalyzed by SnrA. The characterization of the residual NR activity detected by the mutagenicity assay and the biochemical determinations in the AB− CFE needs further investigation.