Luis Fernando de Oliveira Gorla

Luis Fernando de Oliveira Gorla

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Luis Fernando de Oliveira Gorla has a total of 87 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Simultaneous Paranasal Augmentation and Le Fort I Osteotomy Using a Patient-Specific Implant Designed to Share the Fixation Space: Two-Year Clinical Outcomes

    by Renato Marano, Luis Fernando de Oliveira Gorla, Diogo Vasconcelos Macedo

    Background: Residual paranasal concavity may persist after Le Fort I osteotomy despite adequate maxillary repositioning, limiting the aesthetic impact of orthognathic surgery. Simultaneous paranasal implant placement is rarely reported due to spatial conflict with rigid internal fixation systems and concerns regarding infraorbital nerve safety. Methods: Two patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy combined with simultaneous placement of patient-specific paranasal implants designed through 3-dimensional virtual surgical planning (VSP) to intentionally share the anatomical space occupied by Le Fort I fixation plates. Implants were fabricated from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) using CAD/CAM patient-specific molds. Clinical and photographic outcomes were assessed at minimum 24-month follow-up. Results: Both patients achieved satisfactory midface projection with no postoperative complications at 24-month follow-up. No implant displacement, infraorbital nerve deficit, wound dehiscence, or plate removal was required in either case. Conclusion: A patient-specific paranasal implant designed to coexist with Le Fort I fixation hardware enables safe, effective, and stable single-stage midface augmentation during orthognathic surgery, eliminating secondary procedures over a minimum 2-year follow-up.

  • Open Access

    Multicentre retrospective study on plate osteosynthesis for non-condylar mandibular fractures in paediatric patients with deciduous, mixed, and permanent dentition: A World Oral Maxillofacial Trauma (WORMAT) project

    by Federica Sobrero, Fabio Roccia, Valfrido Antonio Pereira-Filho, Luis Fernando de Oliveira Gorla, Anamaria Sivrić, Mario Kordić, Sajjad Abdur Rahman, Tabishur Rahman, Timothy Aladelusi, Karpal Singh Sohal, et al.

  • Open Access

    Management of Mandibular Condyle Fractures in Pediatric Patients: A Multicentric Retrospective Study with 180 Children and Adolescents

    by Gian Battista Bottini, Wolfgang Hitzl, Maximilian Götzinger, Constantinus Politis, Kathia Dubron, Mario Kordić, Anamaria Sivrić, Petia Pechalova, Angel Sapundzhiev, Valfrido Antonio Pereira-Filho, et al.

    Background: Mandibular condyle fractures in pediatric patients can lead to crippling sequelae such as ankylosis, pain and facial deformity if not managed properly. However, there is no consensus on the best approach for treating these fractures in children. Objective: This study aimed to describe the management of mandibular condyle fractures in growing patients across 14 maxillofacial departments worldwide. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on children and adolescents aged 0 to 16 who had at least one mandibular condyle fracture. This study included patients who underwent expectant, closed, or open management and were treated over an 11-year period. Results: 180 patients had at least one mandibular condyle fracture, and 37 had a second condylar fracture. One hundred sixteen patients (65%) were males, and 64 (35%) were females (ratio 1.8:1). An expectant strategy was chosen in 51 (28%) patients, a closed treatment—stand-alone maxillomandibular fixation (MMF)—in 47 (26%), and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was performed in 82 (46%) patients. The management varied significantly between the different departments (p < 0.0001). Significant differences were also identified between the fracture type (non-displaced, displaced or comminuted) and the management of the 180 patients with a single condylar fracture. Out of 50 non-displaced fractures, only 3 (6%) had ORIF, 25 (50%) had expectant management, and 22 (44%) had MMF. Out of 129 displaced fractures, 79 (62%) had ORIF, 25 (19%) had a soft diet, and 25 (19%) had MMF. Conclusions: Expectative management, MMF, and ORIF were all effective in treating pediatric mandibular condyle fractures, with a low incidence of complications and asymmetry.


  • Guided versus non-guided chin repositioning: a retrospective study on accuracy

    by Luis Fernando de Oliveira Gorla, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli, José Cleveilton Dos Santos, Muzzammil Nusrath, Nicholas J. Lee


  • In vitro mechanical test of grid plates for mandibular angle fractures

    by Valfrido Antonio Pereira-Filho, Luís Fernando de Oliveira Gorla, José Cleveilton Dos Santos, Marcelo Silva Monnazzi, José Maurício dos Santos Nunes Reis, Márcio de Moraes, Mário F R Gabrielli


  • Open Access

    A multicentric, prospective study on oral and maxillofacial trauma in the female population around the world

    by Irene Romeo, Federica Sobrero, Fabio Roccia, Sean Dolan, Sean Laverick, Kirsten Carlaw, Peter Aquilina, Alessandro Bojino, Guglielmo Ramieri, Francesc Duran‐Valles, et al.

    Background/Aims: Approximately 20% of patients with maxillofacial trauma are women, but few articles have analysed this. The aim of this multicentric, prospective, epidemiological study was to analyse the characteristics of maxillofacial fractures in the female population managed in 14 maxillofacial surgery departments on five continents over a 1‐year period.Methods: The following data were collected: age (0–18, 19–64, or ≥65 years), cause and mechanism of the maxillofacial fracture, alcohol and/or drug abuse at the time of trauma, fracture site, Facial Injury Severity Scale score, associated injury, day of trauma, timing and type of treatment, and length of hospitalization.Results: Between 30 September 2019 and 4 October 2020, 562 of 2387 patients hospitalized with maxillofacial trauma were females (24%; M: F ratio, 3.2:1) aged between 1 and 96 years (median age, 37 years). Most fractures occurred in patients aged 20–39 years. The main causes were falls (43% [median age, 60.5 years]), which were more common in Australian, European and American units (p < .001). They were followed by road traffic accidents (35% [median age, 29.5 years]). Assaults (15% [median age, 31.5 years]) were statistically associated with alcohol and/or drug abuse (p < .001). Of all patients, 39% underwent open reduction and internal fixation, 36% did not receive surgical treatment, and 25% underwent closed reduction.Conclusion: Falls were the main cause of maxillofacial injury in the female population in countries with ageing populations, while road traffic accidents were the main cause in African and some Asian centres, especially in patients ≤65 years. Assaults remain a significant cause of trauma, primarily in patients aged 19–64 years, and they are related to alcohol use.


  • Endoscopic Removal of Displaced Sagittal Intracapsular Condylar Fracture

    by Guilherme dos Santos Trento, Luis Fernando de Oliveira Gorla, Marcos Marques Rodrigues, Valfrido Antônio Pereira-Filho

    Fractures involving the mandibular condyle are among the most common fractures of facial bones and still generate great discussion concerning therapeutic issues. Several factors have influence on the decision of treatment management of these fractures. In some patients, even when there is displacement of fractured fragments, the choice for conservative treatment is made. However, the removal of the condyle fragment may be required. In the oral surgery scope, endoscopy is a procedure used in many areas, and can be helpful to improve the visualization of surgical sites with difficult access. The endoscopic surgery brings benefits to patient such as no scar or minimal scar, lower risk to nerve damage, and decreased of surgical trauma and bleeding. In addition, according to surgeon experience, the surgery may become more dynamic. The aim of this study is to present an endoscopic technique associated with a transoral approach to remove a displaced sagittal intracapsular condyle fragment. Furthermore, to expose the advantages and benefits of this technique as well as the satisfactory results achieved.


  • Maxillary Sinus Elevation Surgery with ChronOS and Autogenous Bone Graft: Immunohistochemical Assessment of RUNX2, VEGF, TRAP, and Osteocalcin

    by Rodrigo dos Santos Pereira, Fernanda Boos, Luis Gorla, Idelmo Garcia, Roberta Okamoto, Eduardo Hochuli-Vieira

    Rodrigo dos Santos Pereira, DDS, MSc, PhD/Fernanda Brasil Jorge Daura Boos, DDS, MSc, PhD/Luis Fernado Gorla, DDS/Idelmo Rangel Garcia Jr, DDS, MSc, PhD/Roberta Okamoto, DDS, MSc, PhD/Eduardo Hochuli-Vieira, DDS, MSc, PhD: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a composite graft of ChronOS, a betatricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), mixed 1:1 with an autogenous bone graft in human maxillary sinus augmentation. A total of 12 maxillary sinuses were grafted with an autogenous bone graft (control group), and 9 maxillary sinuses were grafted with ChronOS mixed 1:1 with an autogenous bone graft (test group). After 6 months, biopsy samples were obtained concurrent to the placement of dental implants and were subjected to histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses for Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, and osteocalcin. Histologic analysis of samples obtained from the test group revealed the presence of immature bone, while samples from the control group indicated lamellar bone formation. However, both types of bone grafts were well vascularized. The new bone formation averaged 25.4% ? 6.4% in the test group and 38.6% ? 10.5% in the control group (P = .001). Immunostaining of samples in the test group showed high cellular turnover. The outcomes of this study demonstrate a delay in bone formation but intense cellular differentiation after 6 months of bone graft healing in the test group. The amount of immature bone and the immunostaining for RUNX2 and VEGF provide evidence of an osteogenic pathway that can improve the bone formation rate.


  • Off-Label Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 in the Reconstructions of Mandibular Continuity Defects

    by Marina Reis Oliveira, Luíz Fernando de Oliveira Gorla, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli, Valfrido Antonio Pereira-Filho

    This paper describes 3 patients of off-label use of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in the reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. In the first patient, rhBMP-2 was associated with iliac crest bone graft for late mandibular reconstruction after resection of osteosarcoma. In the 2 other patients, rhBMP-2 was used alone. In 1 patient the mandibular continuity defect was due to resection for treatment of osteomyelitis and in the other patient a continuity defect was created by unsuccessful osteogenic distraction for correction of mandibular hypoplasia. Despite the good results in those patients, the off-label use of rhBMP-2 is associated with increased rate of complications, so more studies are needed to assess the predictability of the use of rhBMP-2 in mandibular continuity defects. Therefore, at the moment the off-label use of rhBMP-2 should be restricted to complicated bone defects in which the conventional alternatives of reconstruction were unsuccessful.