Christine Browne-Nuñez
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Christine Browne-Nuñez has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Jerry J. Vaske
Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Colorado State University Ft. Collins CO 80523 USA
1 shared publicationSandra A. Jonker
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife , Vancouver, Washington, USA
1 shared publication- Susan K. Jacobson
University of Florida
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 15 June 2013
- Published by Wiley in Wildlife Society Bulletin
- Vol. 37 (3) , 639-648
Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions for allowing elephants in group ranches around amboseli national park, Kenya
Wildlife authorities and conservationists are working to improve attitudes toward elephants ( Loxodonta africana ) among residents of the Greater Amboseli Ecosystem in southern Kenya; yet information on existing attitudes and their antecedents is lacking. In 2005, we conducted a survey of 569 randomly selected residents of group ranches—communally held lands around Amboseli National Park—to 1) identify intentions to allow elephants in group ranches, 2) examine attitudes toward this behavior, 3) explore underlying beliefs that influence attitudes, and 4) identify socio‐demographic predictors of residents for and against elephants in group ranches. A slight majority (53%) supported elephants in the group ranches and 47% were opposed. Residents who favored elephants in group ranches were more likely to believe that allowing elephants would increase opportunities to see elephants and attract more tourists to visit group ranches. Those opposed believed that it would cause conflict between people, increase dangerous human–elephant interactions, and increase costs to local people. Both groups believed allowing elephants in the group ranches would cause elephants to increase in number, but those in favor gave this outcome a positive evaluation, whereas those opposed felt this was a negative outcome. Women were less positive than men toward allowing elephants outside the park. Information on beliefs and evaluations of outcomes associated with allowing elephants in group ranches can assist stakeholder groups in addressing concerns of local people and developing interventions to facilitate the continued coexistence of people and elephants. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.
- 15 June 2013
- Published by Wiley in Wildlife Society Bulletin
- Vol. 37 (3) , 639-648
Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions for allowing elephants in group ranches around amboseli national park, Kenya
Wildlife authorities and conservationists are working to improve attitudes toward elephants ( Loxodonta africana ) among residents of the Greater Amboseli Ecosystem in southern Kenya; yet information on existing attitudes and their antecedents is lacking. In 2005, we conducted a survey of 569 randomly selected residents of group ranches—communally held lands around Amboseli National Park—to 1) identify intentions to allow elephants in group ranches, 2) examine attitudes toward this behavior, 3) explore underlying beliefs that influence attitudes, and 4) identify socio‐demographic predictors of residents for and against elephants in group ranches. A slight majority (53%) supported elephants in the group ranches and 47% were opposed. Residents who favored elephants in group ranches were more likely to believe that allowing elephants would increase opportunities to see elephants and attract more tourists to visit group ranches. Those opposed believed that it would cause conflict between people, increase dangerous human–elephant interactions, and increase costs to local people. Both groups believed allowing elephants in the group ranches would cause elephants to increase in number, but those in favor gave this outcome a positive evaluation, whereas those opposed felt this was a negative outcome. Women were less positive than men toward allowing elephants outside the park. Information on beliefs and evaluations of outcomes associated with allowing elephants in group ranches can assist stakeholder groups in addressing concerns of local people and developing interventions to facilitate the continued coexistence of people and elephants. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.
- 21 January 2008
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Human Dimensions of Wildlife
- Vol. 13 (1) , 47-70
Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Conservation Across Africa: A Review of Survey Research
Human–wildlife conflict is increasing across Africa and enlisting the support of local people is critical to conflict mitigation and conservation efforts. Information from attitude surveys can inform management and policy decisions particularly in situations of human–wildlife conflict. Our review of survey research in Africa revealed a wide range of methods. We discuss the challenges in obtaining valid, reliable, and generalizable data and consider the feasibility of transferring Western-based methods and theory to African settings. We examine how the reviewed studies address methodological issues as they relate to the basic tenets of scientific inquiry and make recommendations for a framework of standards of best practice. Using social science research tools, it is important to build upon this growing body of human dimensions research in Africa. Researchers need to recognize cultural variation while implementing consistent methodological and theoretical frameworks to ensure valid and reliable information is informing decision-making processes.
- 21 January 2008
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Human Dimensions of Wildlife
- Vol. 13 (1) , 47-70
Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Conservation Across Africa: A Review of Survey Research
Human–wildlife conflict is increasing across Africa and enlisting the support of local people is critical to conflict mitigation and conservation efforts. Information from attitude surveys can inform management and policy decisions particularly in situations of human–wildlife conflict. Our review of survey research in Africa revealed a wide range of methods. We discuss the challenges in obtaining valid, reliable, and generalizable data and consider the feasibility of transferring Western-based methods and theory to African settings. We examine how the reviewed studies address methodological issues as they relate to the basic tenets of scientific inquiry and make recommendations for a framework of standards of best practice. Using social science research tools, it is important to build upon this growing body of human dimensions research in Africa. Researchers need to recognize cultural variation while implementing consistent methodological and theoretical frameworks to ensure valid and reliable information is informing decision-making processes.