BFBradley Ford

Bradley Ford

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Bradley Ford has a total of 349 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Temporal Increase in Antibiotic Resistance in Chronically Treated Non-Healing Ulcers

    by Sinisa Grozdanic, Milan Joksimovic, Jarred Childs, Djordje Racic, Tatjana Lazic, Bradley Ford

    The goal of study was to identify bacterial species isolated from canine non-healing ulcers and evaluate temporal changes in resistance patterns. Corneal microbiology samples were collected from 228 non-healing ulcers of 221 dogs between January 2019 and February 2023. Samples were cultured aerobically and isolates were identified using MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion according to current CLSI guidelines. Acquired resistance patterns were compared between 2019–2020 and 2021–2023, and multidrug-resistant (MDR) and possible extensively drug-resistant (XDR) isolates were characterized. Bacterial growth was observed in 71% (163/228) of samples, yielding 170 isolates. The most frequently isolated species were Staphylococcus epidermidis (21%), Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (18%), Staphylococcus capitis (15%), and other coagulase-negative staphylococci (14%). Overall susceptibility was highest to combinations involving neomycin-polymyxin-bacitracin (neopolybac). A statistically significant increase in overall bacterial resistance (P = 0.000008) and acquired resistance (P = 0.000504) was observed from 2019–2020 to 2021–2023. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. comprised 61% of staphylococcal isolates, with an increase from 47% (2019–2020) to 70% (2021–2023). Over half the isolates (53%) were multidrug-resistant. Topical antibiotic regimens containing neomycin-polymyxin-bacitracin provided the broadest coverage. Increasing resistance, particularly methicillin resistance in staphylococci, highlights the concern about the development of highly resistant bacteria which can potentially increase crossover infections between humans and dogs.

  • Open Access

    Helicobacter pylori Exposure in Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy Increases Risk of Preterm Delivery

    by Amr H. Masaadeh, Patrick C. Mathias, Bradley A. Ford, Dustin E. Bosch

    Background. Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP), is a leading indication for hospitalization in the first trimester. NVP and HG are associated with Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection in non-United States cohorts. How HP exposure and NVP interact to affect metabolic disturbance and pregnancy outcomes is not known. Materials and Methods. We designed a retrospective cohort study relating HP and NVP to serum electrolyte laboratory results, preterm delivery, and infant birth weight. Single academic institution discovery and independent multi-institutional validation cohorts included pregnant subjects with an HP test result. Associations of HP, NVP, and pregnancy outcomes were assessed with odds ratio calculations, Student’s -tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Results. Among subjects with positive HP test results, the prevalence of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) was 0.025 (66 of 2671) and NVP was 0.27 (710 of 2671). Subjects with negative HP had prevalence of HG 0.015 (165 of 10,960) and NVP 0.22 (2392 of 10,960). History of HP exposure increased risk of NVP, including HG (odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.4). Patients with HP exposure had lower serum potassium (mean difference 0.1 mEq/L) and bicarbonate (mean difference 0.3 mEq/L) during pregnancy than HP-negative patients ( ). Serum potassium was lowest in subjects with both NVP and HP exposure (mean 3.5 mEq/L [3.4-3.6], ). HP exposure alone carried increased risk for preterm delivery (OR 1.3 [1.1-1.4]). NVP alone increased risk of preterm delivery (OR 2.8 [2.5-3.1]) including second trimester delivery (OR 2.2 [1.7-2.8]). In multivariate analysis, HP exposure in the setting of NVP further increased risk of preterm delivery (adjusted OR 1.4 [1.0-1.9], ). Conclusions. H. pylori exposure and diagnosis of NVP are individually associated with metabolic disturbances and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm labor and delivery, and their combination further increases risk in US populations.


  • Open Access

    Antibiotic Recommendations for Treatment of Canine Stromal Corneal Ulcers

    by Milan Joksimovic, Bradley A. Ford, Tatjana Lazic, Ivan Soldatovic, Sergey Luzetsky, Sinisa Grozdanic

    The aim of the study was to identify the aerobic bacterial isolates and determine corresponding antibiotic susceptibility profiles in vitro in canine clinical specimens with stromal corneal ulcers, with the goal of providing recommendations for first-line treatment with antibiotics. A total of 198 canine corneal stromal ulcer samples were studied between 2018 and 2021. A corneal swab was collected and cultured under aerobic conditions. Bacterial organisms were identified at the species level by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Antibiotic susceptibility testing for commonly used topical and systemic antibiotics was performed by disk diffusion. Bacterial growth was obtained from 80% of samples. A variety of bacterial species were identified wherein the most common specimens were represented by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (22%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (12%), Staphylococcus capitis (11%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10%). Based on the overall antibiotic susceptibility data, neopolybac alone (96%) or a combination of neopolybac with either ofloxacin or amikacin (each 99%) showed the best coverage for commonly isolated bacterial organisms from canine corneal stromal ulcers. Results of this study support the use of the combined antibiotics as the first-line response for the treatment of canine corneal stromal ulcers. A statically significant increase in acquired bacterial resistance was detected during the longitudinal data observation.


  • Open Access

    Impact on time to active antimicrobial therapy with 24-hour pharmacist review of Accelerate Pheno BC Kit results

    by Patrick M. Kinn, Bradley Ford, Kelly M. Percival, Lukasz Weiner, Dilek Ince

    The Accelerate Pheno platform provides rapid identification and susceptibility data. We demonstrate successful incorporation of 24-hour pharmacist review of Accelerate Pheno results that reduced the number of patients going >3 hours from result without an order for active antimicrobial therapy from 29 (2.8%) of 1,043 to 9 (0.85%) of 1,053 (P < .001).


  • Staphylococcus aureus detection from CF respiratory samples is improved using alternative media

    by Christian F. Zirbes, Nicholas J. Pitcher, Joseph C. Davis, Alyssa R. Bartels, Justin D. Krogh, Mary Teresi, Tyler Farber, Francesca Milavetz, Anthony J. Pamatmat, Alexis L. Rozen, et al.


  • Open Access

    Meningitis Caused by the Live Varicella Vaccine Virus: Metagenomic Next Generation Sequencing, Immunology Exome Sequencing and Cytokine Multiplex Profiling

    by Prashanth S. Ramachandran, Michael R. Wilson, Gaud Catho, Geraldine Blanchard-Rohner, Nicoline Schiess, Randall J. Cohrs, David Boutolleau, Sonia Burrel, Tetsushi Yoshikawa, Anne Wapniarski, et al.

    Varicella vaccine meningitis is an uncommon delayed adverse event of vaccination. Varicella vaccine meningitis has been diagnosed in 12 children, of whom 3 were immunocompromised. We now report two additional cases of vaccine meningitis in twice-immunized immunocompetent children and we perform further testing on a prior third case. We used three methods to diagnose or investigate cases of varicella vaccine meningitis, none of which have been used previously on this disease. These include metagenomic next-generation sequencing and cytokine multiplex profiling of cerebrospinal fluid and immunology exome analysis of white blood cells. In one new case, the diagnosis was confirmed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid. Both varicella vaccine virus and human herpesvirus 7 DNA were detected. We performed cytokine multiplex profiling on the cerebrospinal fluid of two cases and found ten elevated biomarkers: interferon gamma, interleukins IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17F, chemokines CXCL-9, CXCL-10, CCL-2, and G-CSF. In a second new case, we performed immunology exome sequencing on a panel of 356 genes, but no errors were found. After a review of all 14 cases, we concluded that (i) there is no common explanation for this adverse event, but (ii) ingestion of an oral corticosteroid burst 3–4 weeks before onset of vaccine meningitis may be a risk factor in some cases.


  • Open Access

    COVID-19 Conversion after Exposure in a Semiprivate Room at a Tertiary Care Center in Iowa, July–December 2020

    by Alexandra Trannel, Takaaki Kobayashi, Oluchi Abosi, Kyle Jenn, Holly Meacham, Lorinda Sheeler, William Etienne, Angie Dains, Mary Kukla, Mohammed Alsuhaibani, et al.

    Background: Hospital semiprivate rooms may lead to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patient exposures. We investigated the risk of COVID-19 patient-to-patient exposure in semiprivate rooms and the subsequent risk of acquiring COVID-19. Methods: The University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics is an 811-bed tertiary care center. Overall, 16% of patient days are spent in semiprivate rooms. Most patients do not wear masks while in semiprivate rooms. Active COVID-19 surveillance included admission and every 5 days nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. We identified inpatients with COVID-19 who were in semiprivate rooms during their infectious periods during July–December 2020. Testing was repeated 24 hours after the first positive test. Cycle threshold (Ct) values of the two tests (average Ct <30), SARS-CoV-2 serology results, clinical assessment, and COVID-19 history were used to determine patient infectiousness. Roommates were considered exposed if in the same semiprivate room with an infectious patient. Exposed patients were notified, quarantined (private room), and follow-up testing was arranged (median seven days). Conversion was defined as having a negative test followed by a subsequent positive within 14 days after exposure. We calculated the risk of exposure: number of infectious patients in semiprivate rooms/number of semiprivate patient-days (hospitalization days in semiprivate rooms). Results: There were 16,427 semiprivate patient days during July–December 2020. We identified 43 COVID-19 inpatients who roommates during their infectious periods. Most infectious patients (77%) were male; the median age was 67 years; and 22 (51%) were symptomatic. Most were detected during active surveillance: admission testing (51%) and serial testing (28%). There were 57 exposed roommates. The risk of exposure was 3 of 1,000 semiprivate patient days. In total, 16 roommates (28%) did not complete follow-up testing. Of 41 exposed patients with follow-up data, 8 (20%) converted following their exposure. Median time to conversion was 5 days. The risk of exposure and subsequent conversion was 0.7 of 1,000 semiprivate patient days. Median Ct value of the source patient was 20 for those who converted and 23 for those who did not convert. Median exposure time was 45 hours (range, 3–73) for those who converted and 12 hours (range, 1–75) for those who did not convert. Conclusions: The overall risk of exposure in semiprivate rooms was low. The conversion rate was comparable to that reported for household exposures. Lower Ct values and lengthier exposures may be associated with conversion. Active COVID-19 surveillance helps early detection and decreases exposure time. Funding: No Disclosures: None

  • Open Access

    Suspected COVID-19 Reinfections at a Tertiary Care Center, Iowa 2020

    by Takaaki Kobayashi, Mohammed Alsuhaibani, Miguel Ortiz, Katherine Imborek, Stephanie Holley, Alexandra Trannel, Alexandre Marra, William Etienne, Kyle Jenn, Oluchi Abosi, et al.

    Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be detected by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for several weeks after infection. Discerning persistent RT-PCR positivity versus reinfection is challenging and the frequency of COVID-19 reinfections is unknown. We aimed to determine the frequency of clinically suspected reinfection in our center and confirm reinfection using viral whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Methods: The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) is an 811-bed academic medical center. Patients with respiratory complaints undergo COVID-19 RT-PCR using nasopharyngeal swabs. The RT-PCR (TaqPath COVID-19 Combo kit) uses 3 targets (ORF1ab, S gene, and N gene). We identified patients with previous laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who sought care for new respiratory complaints and underwent a repeated SARS-CoV-2 test at least 45 days from their first positive test. We then identified patients with median RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values. Results: During the study period, 13,603 patients had a SARS-CoV-2– positive RT-PCR. Of these, 296 (2.2%) had a clinical visit for new onset of symptoms and a repeated RT-PCR assay >45 days from the first test. Moreover, 29 patients (9.8%) had a positive RT-PCR assay in the repeated testing. Ct values were available for samples from 25 patients; 7 (28%) had Ct values. Conclusions: In patients with a recent history of COVID-19 infection, repeated testing for respiratory symptoms was infrequent. Some had a SARS-CoV-2–positive RT-PCR assay on repeated testing, but only 1 in 4 had Ct values suggestive of a reinfection. We confirmed 1 case of reinfection using WGS. Funding: No Disclosures: None

  • Open Access

    Molecular Epidemiology of Large COVID-19 Clusters at an Academic Medical Center, March–October 2020

    by Takaaki Kobayashi, Miguel Ortiz, Stephanie Holley, William Etienne, Kyle Jenn, Oluchi Abosi, Holly Meacham, Lorinda Sheeler, Angie Dains, Mary Kukla, et al.

    Background: COVID-19 in hospitalized patients may be the result of community acquisition or in-hospital transmission. Molecular epidemiology can help confirm hospital COVID-19 transmission and outbreaks. We describe large COVID-19 clusters identified in our hospital and apply molecular epidemiology to confirm outbreaks. Methods: The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics is an 811-bed academic medical center. We identified large clusters involving patients with hospital onset COVID-19 detected during March–October 2020. Large clusters included ≥10 individuals (patients, visitors, or HCWs) with a laboratory confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis (RT-PCR) and an epidemiologic link. Epidemiologic links were defined as hospitalization, work, or visiting in the same unit during the incubation or infectious period for the index case. Hospital onset was defined as a COVID-19 diagnosis ≥14 days from admission date. Admission screening has been conducted since May 2020 and serial testing (every 5 days) since July 2020. Nasopharyngeal swab specimens were retrieved for viral whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Cluster patients with a pairwise difference in ≤5 mutations were considered part of an outbreak. WGS was performed using Oxford Nanopore Technology and protocols from the ARTIC network. Results: We identified 2 large clusters involving patients with hospital-onset COVID-19. Cluster 1: 2 hospital-onset cases were identified in a medical-surgical unit in June 2020. Source and contact tracing revealed 4 additional patients, 1 visitor, and 13 employees with COVID-19. Median age for patients was 62 (range, 38–79), and all were male. In total, 17 samples (6 patients, 1 visitor, and 10 HCWs) were available for WGS. Cluster 2: A hospital-onset case was identified via serial testing in a non–COVID-19 intensive care unit in September 2020. Source investigation, contact tracing, and serial testing revealed 3 additional patients, and 8 HCWs. One HCW also had a community exposure. Patient median age was 60 years (range, 48–68) and all were male. In total, 11 samples (4 patients and 7 HCWs) were sequenced. Using WGS, cluster 1 was confirmed to be an outbreak: WGS showed 0–5 mutations in between samples. Cluster 2 was also an outbreak: WGS showed less diversity (0–3 mutations) and ruled out the HCW with a community exposure (20 mutations of difference). Conclusion: Whole-genome sequencing confirmed the outbreaks identified using classic epidemiologic methods. Serial testing allowed for early outbreak detection. Early outbreak detection and implementation of control measures may decrease outbreak size and genetic diversity. Funding: No Disclosures: None Figure 1.

  • Open Access

    Suspected COVID-19 Reinfections at a Tertiary Care Center, Iowa, 2020

    by Takaaki Kobayashi, Miguel E Ortiz, Katherine L Imborek, Mohammed Alsuhaibani, Stephanie A Holley, Alexandra Trannel, Alexandre R Marra, William Etienne, Kyle E Jenn, Oluchi J Abosi, et al.

    Takaaki Kobayashi, Miguel E Ortiz, Katherine L Imborek, Mohammed Alsuhaibani, Stephanie A Holley, Alexandra Trannel, Alexandre R Marra, William Etienne, Kyle E