Olivier Casasnovas

The phase 2 ALYCANTE trial aimed to evaluate the investigator-assessed complete metabolic response at 3 months from the axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) infusion as a primary end point in patients with high-risk relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This study showed a significant improvement in complete metabolic response rate at 3 months based on historical controls. This study reports the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results as a secondary end point. HRQoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) cancer-specific questionnaire, the Quality of Life Questionnaire high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma 29 (QLQ-NHL-HG29) , and the EuroQol Quality of Life Scale-5 dimensions-5 levels of severity (EQ-5D-5L) generic questionnaire at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after axi-cel infusion. Among the 62 patients included, 60 (97%) completed a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline HRQoL assessment. At 1 month infusion, adjusted mean change in HRQoL scores from baseline showed a clinically significant deterioration (greater than the clinical threshold) in physical, role, social functioning, and fatigue. However, all HRQoL dimensions recovered by 3 months after infusion and remained stable or continued to improve by 12 months. In an exploratory analysis, adjusted mean change in HRQoL score from baseline in ALYCANTE was similar to or better than in ASCT-eligible patients who received axi-cel in the phase 3 ZUMA-7 trial. Finally, the global health status and fatigue scores of the ALYCANTE population improved to levels comparable to the general French population of similar age by 3 months after infusion. These findings indicate that axi-cel improves HRQoL regardless of transplant eligibility, supporting its use across a broad patient population. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04531046.

Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients failing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy exhibit poor prognosis. Most progressions/relapses occur within 3 months from infusion whereas only a few events occur thereafter (late failure, [LF]). We analyze features, treatments, and outcomes of patients with LF from DESCAR-T, a nationwide registry collecting real-life data for patients treated with approved CAR T-cell therapy in France. Between July 2018 and March 2024, 298 (39.9%) LBCL LF patients (median age, 62 years [range, 18-79]; male, 61.7%) were collected from DESCAR-T. Most patients had diffuse LBCL (n = 205 [68.8%]), advanced stage disease (84.6%), and age-adjusted International Prognostic Index of 2 to 3 (59.3%) at CAR T-cell eligibility. After failure, 76.5% of patients received a systemic therapy and overall response rate was 22.6% (complete response, 18%). At a median follow-up since first LF event of 13.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.1-15.4), the median overall survival and progression-free survival 2 (PFS-2) were 4.4 (95% CI, 3.8-5.8) and 13.2 (95% CI, 9.6-18) months, respectively. Compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.350; 95% CI, 0.193-0.633) and with pooled other treatment groups (HR, 0.483; 95% CI, 0.290-0.805), salvage treatment with bispecific antibodies (bsAb) after CAR T-cell failure showed better PFS-2. Radiotherapy obtained prolonged responses in some patients with 12-month PFS-2 of 41.5% (95% CI, 22.5-59.5). This work is, to our knowledge, the first study describing LBCL patients with LF after CAR T-cells. bsAb seem to be more effective compared with other strategies in the LF setting and this should be considered in the design of new clinical trials.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) poses a challenge in hematology given its varied symptoms, and the complex interplay between disease and treatment effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The phase 3 POLARIX study demonstrated superior progression-free survival and a similar safety profile with polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) vs R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in patients with previously untreated DLBCL. Here, we evaluate HRQoL through patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to fully characterize the patient experience in the POLARIX study. Changes from baseline in HRQoL, lymphoma symptoms, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were assessed, as well as incidence and severity of common symptoms by PROs vs clinician-reported adverse events (AEs). Baseline characteristics of PRO-evaluable patients (N = 874) were consistent. Comparison between PROs and clinician-reported AEs revealed a notable discordance; patients generally reported a higher incidence of symptoms than clinicians, emphasizing the need for patient-centric tools to accurately capture the patient experience. Both treatments exhibited rapid and sustained improvements in HRQoL and lymphoma symptoms, with the most substantial improvements seen in global health status/QoL, lymphoma symptoms, fatigue, role, emotional, and social functioning. GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, and vomiting) were generally similar between treatment arms and returned to baseline levels after treatment completion. These HRQoL data underscore the complementarity of PROs, as an adjunct to clinician-reported AEs, in evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of new treatments, including Pola-R-CHP, which may represent a new benchmark for patient-reported HRQoL in previously untreated DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03274492.

Outcomes in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have steadily improved; however, additional therapies are needed for patients who relapse or do not respond to novel agents. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of camidanlumab tesirine (Cami), an anti-CD25 antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with relapsed/refractory cHL after brentuximab vedotin/programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor therapies from the phase 2 ADCT-301-201 study. Eligible patients were adults with cHL who had received ≥3 previous lines of systemic therapy (or ≥2 if ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant). Patients received 45 μg/kg Cami (IV, once every 3 weeks) in cycles 1 to 2, followed by 30 μg/kg IV once every 3 weeks for ≤1 year. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) per 2014 Lugano classification. Secondary end points included complete response rate (CRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). In total, 117 patients were enrolled with a median age of 37.0 years (range, 19-87). The ORR was 70.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.9-78.2), with a CRR of 33.3% (95% CI, 24.9-42.6). The median PFS was 9.13 months (95% CI, 5.3-15.0); median OS was not reached. Thirty-three (28.2%) patients discontinued treatment because of treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common reasons were skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (n = 10 [8.5%] patients), infections and infestations (n = 5 [4.3%]), and nervous systems disorders (n = 5 [4.3%]). Guillain-Barré–type or polyradiculopathy-type events occurred in 8 (6.8%) patients. Cami was efficacious in this heavily pretreated population; however, the efficacy was overshadowed by substantial issues with the safety profile. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04052997.

In mantle cell lymphoma, early progression of disease has been associated with short overall survival. The impact of clinical, pathological, and treatment strategies on the risk of early relapse has not been assessed in a large cohort of patients. We performed a pooled analysis of patients recruited in France from six randomized first-line MCL trials. Among 1386 treated MCL patients, 1280 were evaluable for POD24 status: 299 (23.4%) with a POD24 event and 981 (76.6%) without. Patients with a POD24 event had a median OS of 9.3 months (95% CI 8.4–11.8) versus not reached (95% CI 97.8–NR) for those without POD24 events. The median post-relapse OS of patients with a late relapse was also significantly longer at 49.4 months (HR = 0.39; 95% CI 0.31–0.48; P < 0.001) as compared to POD24 patients. Baseline variables (age, performance status, B symptoms, LDH/ULN, leukocytes, blastoid variant, and Ki-67 > 30%) were significantly associated with the risk of POD24, independent of ASCT. Among responding patients at end-of-induction (n = 1105) who had received ASCT, anti-CD20 maintenance was associated with a decreased risk of POD24 (OR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.1–1.0). Using this large data set of patients in clinical trials, we confirm that POD24 status is strongly associated with subsequent OS in MCL. Rituximab maintenance provided significant protection against the risk of POD24, independent of ASCT. Progression within 2 years should be considered as a primary endpoint in future studies.

Objectives The Robust and Optimized Biomarker Identifier (ROBI) feature selection pipeline is introduced to improve the identification of informative biomarkers coding information not already captured by existing features. It aims to accurately maximize the number of discoveries while minimizing and estimating the number of false positives (FP) with an adjustable selection stringency. Methods 500 synthetic datasets and retrospective data of 378 Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) patients were used for validation. On the DLBCL data, two established radiomic biomarkers, TMTV and Dmax, were measured from the 18F-FDG PET/CT scans, and 10,000 random ones were generated. Selection was performed and verified on each dataset. The efficacy of ROBI has been compared to methods controlling for multiple testing and a Cox model with Elasticnet penalty. Results On synthetic datasets, ROBI selected significantly more true positives (TP) than FP (p < 0.001), and for 99.3% of datasets, the number of FP was within the estimated 95% confidence interval. ROBI significantly increased the number of TP compared to usual feature selection methods (p < 0.001). On retrospective data, ROBI selected the two established biomarkers and one random biomarker and estimated 95% chance of selecting 0 or 1 FP and a probability of 0.0014 of selecting only FP. Bonferroni correction selected no feature, and Elasticnet selected 101 spurious features and discarded TMTV. Conclusion ROBI selected relevant biomarkers while effectively controlling for FPs, outperforming conventional selection methods. This underscores its potential as a valuable asset for biomarker discovery. Highlights ROBI is a feature selection tool capable of screening thousands of features. It enables systematic evaluation of numerous radiomic features while minimizing false discoveries. ROBI was validated on synthetic and real datasets, outperforming other selection techniques.

Progression or relapse in the central nervous system (CNS) remains a rare but mostly fatal event for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In a retrospective analysis of 5189 patients treated within 19 prospective German and French phase 2/3 trials, we identified 159 patients experiencing a CNS event (relapse: 62%, progression: 38%). Intracerebral, meningeal, intraspinal, or combined involvement was reported in 44%, 31%, 3%, and 22% of patients, respectively. 62 of 155 evaluable patients (40%) showed concurrent systemic progression/ relapse. 82% of all CNS events occurred within two years after study inclusion or randomization. 87% of patients showed extranodal involvement outside the CNS. Patients generally had poor outcomes with a median overall survival (OS) of 3.4 months (95% CI 2.9–4.2) and a 2-year OS of 15% (10–22%). Outcomes did not differ depending on the site or time point of CNS events. Patients with isolated CNS events demonstrated significantly better OS (p = 0.023). Twenty-five patients were consolidated with autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation and achieved a 3-year OS of 36% (20–66%). This large study including more than 5000 DLBCL patients highlights the unmet medical need to improve the outcome of DLBCL patients suffering from CNS relapse.

Purpose: Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of exportine-1 (XPO1) with efficacy as a single agent in heavily pretreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We conducted a study investigating the combination of selinexor with rituximab and platinum-based chemotherapy in B-cell lymphoma. Patients and methods: We conducted a phase 1b, dose-escalation, and expansion trial, which enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients received oral selinexor according to a 3 + 3 design in combination with rituximab and dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, oxaliplatine (DHAOX) or gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) chemotherapy. Results: A total of 39 patients were enrolled, 27 during the escalation phase and 12 during the expansion phase. Most patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 77%). Group R-DHAOX was prematurely closed to inclusion due to a recommendation from the French drug agency, independent of this trial. A recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of selinexor in association with R-GPD was established at 40 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. In a population of 18 patients treated at this dose of selinexor, the most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events were hematological. With this regimen, seven obtained a complete metabolic response and five a partial response. The median PFS was 5.8 months. Conclusions: Among the patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma, selinexor at a weekly dose of 40 mg with R-GDP is feasible for outpatients, with a generally acceptable safety profile.

Purpose of review: In this review, we analyzed the different therapy options in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Recent findings: The treatment of advanced HL has greatly evolved during the last decade even still based on polychemotherapy. Mature data established that the better strategies require Positron emission tomography (PET)-driven treatments which allow to optimize the balance between disease control and both immediate and late treatment adverse effects, leading to cure most patients while minimizing the risk of toxicity. Indeed, PET-driven deescalated strategies offer the better treatment option. The recent incorporation of targeted therapies, anti-CD30 or anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) in combination with chemotherapy should quickly change the game and be a step forward to still decrease the risk of treatment toxicity and improve the cure rate. Summary: The standard of care for advanced HL remains currently PET-driven chemotherapy and should rapidly evolve with the addition of targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy.