Janet Carter Anand
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Janet Carter Anand has a total of 39 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bagga Bjerge
Aarhus Univeristy
3 shared publications Alisoun Milne
School of Sociology, Social Policy & Social Research, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, UK
2 shared publications- Chaitali Das
Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences
2 shared publications - Hadi Farahani
University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Finland
2 shared publications Natalie Joubert
2 shared publications- Natalie Joubert
Department of Social Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 6 October 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 293-307
Global Mindedness in Social Work for Anti-oppressive Solidarity
- 6 October 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 293-307
Global Mindedness in Social Work for Anti-oppressive Solidarity
- 11 September 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 205-222
Chapter 10: Rethinking Transnational Social Work Pedagogy for Climate Change, Migration, and Crisis Preparedness
- 11 September 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 205-222
Chapter 10: Rethinking Transnational Social Work Pedagogy for Climate Change, Migration, and Crisis Preparedness
- Open Access
- 6 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Children and Youth Services Review
- Vol. 164
Educational and employment outcomes for young adults with a history of immigration and out of home care in Finland
- 6 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Children and Youth Services Review
- Vol. 164
Open AccessEducational and employment outcomes for young adults with a history of immigration and out of home care in Finland
- Open Access
- 7 February 2024
- Published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Social Work
- Vol. 27 (6) , 1152-1165
Admission of an older person into a care home in Europe: exploring the dimensions of a ‘Healthy Transition’ and the potential role of social work
- 7 February 2024
- Published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Social Work
- Vol. 27 (6) , 1152-1165
Open AccessAdmission of an older person into a care home in Europe: exploring the dimensions of a ‘Healthy Transition’ and the potential role of social work
- 20 June 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-15
Global Mindedness in Social Work for Anti-oppressive Solidarity
- 20 June 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-15
Global Mindedness in Social Work for Anti-oppressive Solidarity
- 5 December 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Nordic Social Work Research
- Vol. 12 (5) , 611
Editorial
The 5th issue of NSWR for 2022 heralds a change in the length and content of future journal issues. At a quick glance, you will notice the increased number of pages and articles! This change reflec...
- 5 December 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Nordic Social Work Research
- Vol. 12 (5) , 611
Editorial
The 5th issue of NSWR for 2022 heralds a change in the length and content of future journal issues. At a quick glance, you will notice the increased number of pages and articles! This change reflec...
- 2 October 2021
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Social Work
- Vol. 74 (4) , III-IV
Critical Multicultural Practice in Social Work. New Perspectives and Practices
(2020). Critical Multicultural Practice in Social Work. New Perspectives and Practices. Australian Social Work. Ahead of Print.
- 2 October 2021
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Social Work
- Vol. 74 (4) , III-IV
Critical Multicultural Practice in Social Work. New Perspectives and Practices
(2020). Critical Multicultural Practice in Social Work. New Perspectives and Practices. Australian Social Work. Ahead of Print.
- Open Access
- 7 September 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Social Sciences
- Vol. 10 (9) , 334
A Systematic Review of the Protective and Risk Factors Influencing the Mental Health of Forced Migrants: Implications for Sustainable Intercultural Mental Health Practice
This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The primary aim of this research was to identify risks and protective factors for the mental health of forced migrants. The secondary aim was to suggest an alternative, more comprehensive approach in social work that surpasses usual diagnoses and intrinsically contradicts the medicalization of mental health issues of forced migrants. The search was conducted between January 2015 and January 2021. As a result, 29 studies met inclusion criteria. Medicalizing mental health issues by relying solely on the effectiveness of medicine was a controversial risk factor that negatively affected daily life activities of refugees and reduced their willingness for seeking professional mental health services. Empowering vulnerable minorities by giving them back their power and agency to be able to speak for themselves and raise voices of trauma and recovery was the missing protective factor for a sustainable mental health practice. The benefits of group-based interventions were highlighted in which communities and individuals address mental health issues as well as isolation through building collective identities and support networks. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) can add more strength to any kind of mental health interventions. Finally, the benefits of applying an ecological perspective for the study of the mental health of refugees, and its implications for a sustainable intercultural practice, were discussed. Social workers in this model are the representatives of at-risk groups, and thus require more agency and creativity in reflecting client’s concrete needs.
- 7 September 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Social Sciences
- Vol. 10 (9) , 334
Open AccessA Systematic Review of the Protective and Risk Factors Influencing the Mental Health of Forced Migrants: Implications for Sustainable Intercultural Mental Health Practice
This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The primary aim of this research was to identify risks and protective factors for the mental health of forced migrants. The secondary aim was to suggest an alternative, more comprehensive approach in social work that surpasses usual diagnoses and intrinsically contradicts the medicalization of mental health issues of forced migrants. The search was conducted between January 2015 and January 2021. As a result, 29 studies met inclusion criteria. Medicalizing mental health issues by relying solely on the effectiveness of medicine was a controversial risk factor that negatively affected daily life activities of refugees and reduced their willingness for seeking professional mental health services. Empowering vulnerable minorities by giving them back their power and agency to be able to speak for themselves and raise voices of trauma and recovery was the missing protective factor for a sustainable mental health practice. The benefits of group-based interventions were highlighted in which communities and individuals address mental health issues as well as isolation through building collective identities and support networks. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) can add more strength to any kind of mental health interventions. Finally, the benefits of applying an ecological perspective for the study of the mental health of refugees, and its implications for a sustainable intercultural practice, were discussed. Social workers in this model are the representatives of at-risk groups, and thus require more agency and creativity in reflecting client’s concrete needs.
- Open Access
- 12 August 2021
- Published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Social Work
- Vol. 25 (5) , 804-815
The covid-19 pandemic and care homes for older people in Europe - deaths, damage and violations of human rights
Throughout Europe the most damaging consequences of the coronavirus have fallen disproportionately on older people who live in care homes. This study involves the analysis of secondary data sources relating to deaths, and related harms, in European care homes from seven countries between March and December 2020. The findings are reviewed using the framework of the European Convention on Human Rights to identify examples of human rights violations - namely the right to life, liberty and security, respect for private and family life, and prohibition of torture, and general prohibition of discrimination. A significant contributing factor to the scale and nature of deaths and harms is the abject disregard of older people’s human rights. Based on the findings, the authors, a group of social work academics, call for an urgent re-examination of the role of social work in relationship to care homes and the importance of re-engaging with human rights issues for care home residents.
- 12 August 2021
- Published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Social Work
- Vol. 25 (5) , 804-815
Open AccessThe covid-19 pandemic and care homes for older people in Europe - deaths, damage and violations of human rights
Throughout Europe the most damaging consequences of the coronavirus have fallen disproportionately on older people who live in care homes. This study involves the analysis of secondary data sources relating to deaths, and related harms, in European care homes from seven countries between March and December 2020. The findings are reviewed using the framework of the European Convention on Human Rights to identify examples of human rights violations - namely the right to life, liberty and security, respect for private and family life, and prohibition of torture, and general prohibition of discrimination. A significant contributing factor to the scale and nature of deaths and harms is the abject disregard of older people’s human rights. Based on the findings, the authors, a group of social work academics, call for an urgent re-examination of the role of social work in relationship to care homes and the importance of re-engaging with human rights issues for care home residents.
- Open Access
- 27 April 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
A Systematic Review of the Protective and Risk Factors Influencing the Mental Health of Forced Migrants: Implications for Sustainable Intercultural Mental Health Practice
This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement to synthesizes the existing literature with a goal to review current conceptual frameworks of mental health of forced migrants for further practice research priorities in social work. The search was done between January 2015 to January 2021. As a result, 29 studies met inclusion criteria. Medicalizing mental health issues by relying solely on the effectiveness of medicine was a controversial risk factor that negatively affected the daily life activities of refugees and reduced their willingness for seeking professional mental health services. Empowering vulnerable minorities by giving them back their power and agency to be able to speak for themselves and raise voices of trauma and recovery was the missing protective factor for sustainable mental health practice. The benefits of group-based interventions are highlighted in which communities and individuals address mental health issues as well as isolation through building collective identities and support networks. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) can add more strength to any kind of mental health intervention. Finally, the benefits of applying ecological perspective for the mental health of refugees, and its implications for a sustainable intercultural practice are discussed. Social workers in this model are the representatives of at-risk groups, thus need more agency and creativity in reflecting client’s concrete needs.
- 27 April 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessA Systematic Review of the Protective and Risk Factors Influencing the Mental Health of Forced Migrants: Implications for Sustainable Intercultural Mental Health Practice
This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement to synthesizes the existing literature with a goal to review current conceptual frameworks of mental health of forced migrants for further practice research priorities in social work. The search was done between January 2015 to January 2021. As a result, 29 studies met inclusion criteria. Medicalizing mental health issues by relying solely on the effectiveness of medicine was a controversial risk factor that negatively affected the daily life activities of refugees and reduced their willingness for seeking professional mental health services. Empowering vulnerable minorities by giving them back their power and agency to be able to speak for themselves and raise voices of trauma and recovery was the missing protective factor for sustainable mental health practice. The benefits of group-based interventions are highlighted in which communities and individuals address mental health issues as well as isolation through building collective identities and support networks. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) can add more strength to any kind of mental health intervention. Finally, the benefits of applying ecological perspective for the mental health of refugees, and its implications for a sustainable intercultural practice are discussed. Social workers in this model are the representatives of at-risk groups, thus need more agency and creativity in reflecting client’s concrete needs.