Zhiyong Liao

A fluctuating resource supply makes some of the most problematic invasive plants more successful against native plants. However, the evidence so far comes from simplified pot experiments in the greenhouse or garden, and it remains an open question whether these mechanisms are also relevant in natural conditions. Here, we present an experiment that tested the effects of nutrient fluctuations on plant invasion in the field. In eight sites in South-West Germany invaded by Asian knotweed (Reynoutria x bohemica) or Canadian goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), we manipulated the temporal patterns of nutrient availability by applying liquid fertilizer at weekly intervals over a 10-week period. There were three treatments: (1) constant nutrient supply, with equal amounts at every application, (2) variable nutrients supply, with double amount of nutrient as in the constant treatment but added at every second application, totaling the same total amount for the entire experiment, and (3) control with water only. We found that the invaders did not benefit from the additional nutrients when they were supplied in a constant manner but became more dominant after several months of variable nutrient supply. To our knowledge, this is the first field evidence that resource fluctuations can promote invasive plants in natural communities and shows that fluctuating resources can alter invasion success even within a single growing season. The key questions are now how general these effects are across other invasive plants and possibly also strong native ruderals, and what the longer-term effects of the fluctuating resources are on community composition and diversity.

While successful plant invasions often occur in novel environments, invasive species usually occupy broad niches within their native and introduced ranges. A better understanding of the process of invasion therefore requires a wide sampling of ranges, and a good knowledge of introduction history. We tested for differentiation in herbivore resistance among 128 introduced (European, North American) and native (Chinese, Japanese) populations of the invasive Japanese knotweed Reynoutria japonica in two common gardens in the native range: one in Shanghai and the other in Yunnan. In both common gardens, we found that herbivore resistance of plants from introduced populations differed from that from native populations in China but not from native populations in Japan, the putative source of introduction. Compared to native Chinese populations, plants from native Japanese populations and introduced European and North American populations had thicker leaves in both common gardens, and a lower C:N ratio but higher flavonoids content in the Shanghai garden. Variation in herbivore resistance was more strongly associated with climate of collecting sites for populations from the native range than for those from introduced ranges. Our results support the hypothesis that introduction of particularly resistant plants from Japan may have played a key role in driving biogeographic variation in herbivore resistance. Our study highlights the importance of understanding introduction history to interpret the biogeographic divergence of global plant invaders.

Summary: Many widespread invasive plant species express high phenotypic variation across novel environments, providing a unique opportunity to examine ecological and evolutionary dynamics under global change. However, studies often lack information about the origin of introduced populations, limiting our understanding of post‐introduction evolution. We assessed the responses of Reynoutria japonica from 128 populations spanning latitudinal transects in the native (China and Japan), and introduced (North America and Europe) ranges when grown in two common gardens. Plants from introduced populations differed in almost all traits from those from Chinese populations, but were similar to plants from the putative origin in Japan. Compared to Chinese populations, North American, European and Japanese populations expressed lower trait values and plasticity in most traits. However, plants from both introduced and Japanese populations expressed higher clonality and plasticity in clonality than plants from Chinese populations. Further, introduced populations expressed higher plasticity in clonality but lower plasticity in basal diameter compared to Japanese populations. Our findings emphasize the potential role of clonality and plasticity in clonality for invasion success. In addition, our study highlights the importance of comparisons to source populations within the native range to identify evolutionary responses of introduced plants to novel environments.

Aim: Plant invasions are a global problem that requires studying plants and their environmental associations across native and introduced ranges.Location: 2000 km transects in China, Europe and North America.Time Period: June 2019–July 2020.Major Taxa Studied: Japanese knotweed (Reynoutria japonica).Methods: We surveyed 150 populations of Japanese knotweed, a noxious invader of the temperate zone, along 2000 km transects in native China and the introduced ranges of Europe and North America.Results: We found that larger plants and denser populations in the introduced ranges were associated with shifts in leaf economy and chemical defences. Introduced knotweed populations had higher SLA but reduced leaf chlorophyll, lignin, C:N ratio and leaf toughness along with altered leaf tannins, flavonoids and alkaloids. We found three distinct multivariate knotweed phenotypes primarily in the introduced ranges, and two multivariate knotweed phenotypes mainly in native populations.Main Conclusions: Decreased herbivore and pathogen impacts in introduced populations and changes in environmental associations indicate that enemy release and novel habitat conditions might have driven the emergence of novel ecological strategies in this global plant invader.

Biological invasions pose a global challenge, affecting ecosystems worldwide and human societies. Knowledge of the evolutionary history of invasive species is critical to understanding their current invasion success and projecting their future spread. However, to date, few studies have addressed the evolutionary history and potential future spread of invaders simultaneously. In this study, we explored both evolutionary history and spatiotemporal dynamic patterns of the distribution of Reynoutria japonica, known as one of the world's worst plant invaders. We analysed 265 R. japonica samples from its current geographical ranges across three continents, using seven chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) markers to establish the phylogenetic relationships among extant populations. We combined these with ecological niche modelling to infer historical and more recent migration patterns and predict potential future distribution changes under climate change. Our results indicate that climate fluctuations and sea level changes likely facilitated the expansion of R. japonica from southern Japan to continental East Asia in the Pliocene, followed by a contraction in East Asian populations. In the recent Holocene, human activities have then enabled a linage of this species to spread from Japan to Europe and North America, resulting in three major global clades. Future climate scenarios suggest a northward expansion of R. japonica in Europe and North America, but shrinking habitat in China. Our study, thus, demonstrates the complex influences of historical climate‐driven migrations, human activities and future climate changes on the global distribution of an invasive species.

Many widespread invasive plant species express high phenotypic variation across novel environments, providing a unique opportunity to examine ecological and evolutionary dynamics under global change. However, biogeographical studies often lack information about the origin of introduced populations, limiting our understanding of post-introduction evolution of introduced species in the new range. Here, we assessed the responses of Reynoutria japonica from 128 populations spanning three latitudinal transects in the native ranges of China and Japan, and the introduced ranges of North America and Europe. When grown in two common gardens in the native range, plants from introduced populations in North America and Europe differed in almost all traits from those from native Chinese populations, but were similar to plants from native Japanese populations. Compared to Chinese populations, North American, European and Japanese populations expressed lower trait values and plasticity in most traits. However, plants from both introduced ranges and from Japanese populations expressed higher clonality and plasticity in clonality than plants from Chinese populations. In addition, introduced populations expressed higher plasticity in clonality but lower plasticity in basal diameter compared to Japanese populations. Our study showed heritable differences in phenotypes between plants from the native ranges of Japan and China, and those from the introduced ranges were similar to the putative source of origin in Japan. However, we found that introduced populations may have evolved higher plasticity in clonal growth. Our findings emphasize the critical role of clonality and plasticity in invasion success, demonstrating the importance of discriminating between source and non-source native populations to identify ecological and evolutionary responses of invasive plants to novel environments.

Invasive plant species pose significant ecological and economic threats due to their establishment and dominance in non-native ranges. Previous studies have yielded mixed results regarding the plants' adaptive mechanisms for thriving in new environments, and particularly, little is known about how the phenotypic plasticity of growth and defense-related traits may facilitate plant invasion. This study addressed these uncertainties by employing the aggressive weed Reynoutria japonica as a study model. We examined the differences in growth, defense-related traits, and biomass allocation between R. japonica populations from native and introduced ranges grown in two common gardens with distinct climate conditions. Our results demonstrated that while the introduced populations did not exhibit increases in height and total dry mass, nor reductions in leaf defense levels, their investment in leaf production was significantly higher compared to the native populations. Additionally, introduced populations displayed greater phenotypic plasticity in clonal ramet but less phenotypic plasticity in biomass production than native populations across varying environments. These findings highlight the roles of phenotypic plasticity and specific trait adaptations, such as clonality, in the successful invasion of R. japonica. This study has important implications for managing invasive plant species under changing environmental conditions.

Successful plant invasions are often explained by adaptation to novel environments. However, invasive species usually occupy broad niches within their native and introduced ranges. A true understanding of microevolution during invasion therefore requires a wide sampling of ranges, ideally with a knowledge of introduction history. We tested for genetic differentiation in herbivore resistance among 128 introduced (European, North American) and native (Chinese, Japanese) populations of the invasive Japanese knotweed ( Reynoutria japonica ) in two common gardens in the native range. In both common gardens, we found that the resistance traits of the introduced populations differed from most Chinese native populations but not from native populations in Japan, which are the two putative sources of introduction. Compared to Chinese populations, introduced European populations had thicker leaves in both common gardens with a lower C: N ratio but higher flavonoids content in the Shanghai garden. In the native range, variation in herbivore resistance was much more strongly associated with climate of origin than in introduced populations. Our results support that introducing particular resistance phenotypes from Japan played a key role in the invasion of knotweed into Europe and North America. Our study demonstrates how knowledge of introduction history can avoid misinterpretations of observed biogeographic divergence.

Successful plant invasions are often explained with adaptation to novel environments. However, invasive species often occupy broad niches within their native and introduced ranges, and a true understanding of microevolution during invasion therefore requires broad sampling of ranges, ideally with a knowledge of introduction history. We tested for genetic differentiation in herbivore resistance among 128 introduced (Europe, North America) and native (China, Japan) populations of the invasive Japanese knotweed (Reynoutria japonica) in two common gardens in the native range. In both common gardens we found that resistance traits of introduced populations differed from most Chinese native populations, but not from populations in Japan, the putative sources of introduction. Compared to Chinese populations, introduced European populations had thicker leaves with a lower C:N ratio but higher flavonoids contents. In the native range, variation in herbivore resistance was much more strongly associated with climate of origin than in introduced populations. Our results support the idea that founder effects played a key role in the invasion of knotweed into Europe and North America, with introduction of particular resistance phenotypes from Japan. Our study also demonstrates how knowledge of introduction history can avoid drawing wrong conclusions from observed biogeographic divergence.